Data
Building Crisis
That housing prices have held up in the midst of the stock market downturn is considered a blessing by many economists -- and by the nearly seven in 10 families that own their homes. But it's a cause of concern for local pols and academics who worry for a living -- and seek federal subsidies as a solution for every problem.
In May, the U.S. Conference of Mayors descended upon Washington, D.C., in an effort to call attention to a purported housing crisis. From 1991 to 2001, the mayors fretted, household income increased by 45 percent while the price of homes jumped 52 percent. "We have to be able to answer the question, where are our children going to be able to live?" Nicolas Retsinas, head of Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies, told USA Today.
If the mayors get their way, those kids will be living in federally subsidized housing. Yet no crisis exists. Over the same decade that housing allegedly became less affordable, homeownership rates increased in every region of the country.
[Ran with graph, "A Home of One's Own," showing the percentage of households owning a home, 4th quarter of each year from 1992-2001]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
mcyujf