A Hopeful Ratio
Members of Congress seem less willing to sponsor costly bills
Once upon a time, sponsoring bills to increase spending was more popular than backing cuts. That seems to be changing.
Since 1991, the ratio of spending-increase bills to spending-cut bills has dropped from 12-to-1 to 5-to-4, according to data from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. In 1992, over 1,000 bills were proposed that would raise spending by more than $1 million; in 1995, there were fewer than 300.
Only around 10 percent of proposed bills ever make it to a full vote, so this trend doesn't necessarily mean Congress will end up spending less. "But that ratio does get reflected in the amending process and in a general pressure to see bills passed," says NTUF Executive Director Paul Hewitt. Hewitt hopes that publicizing the data will have "a shaping effect on the institutional fiscal culture in Congress, making them more reluctant to sponsor spending bills and more willing to sponsor bills that cut spending."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
cyhjh