Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Migration Headaches

Restrictions on immigration move forward cautiously.

Rick Henderson | From the December 1995 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On September 21, the House Judiciary Committee narrowly approved the employer telephone verification system in HR 2202, the immigration bill championed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.). The system would go into effect by October 1, 1999. After that, every employer would have to telephone a division of the Department of Justice and verify the Social Security number or alien identification number of each new hire.

Calling the verification system "a sweeping new assertion of federal power," and "1-800-BIG-BROTHER," freshman Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) introduced the unsuccessful amendment to remove the system from the bill. "It is absolutely unprecedented to say that the government must grant affirmative permission every time any employee is hired," he said.

Smith assured wavering members that the registry would not lead to a national identity card. But just after the registry passed the committee, Rep. Bill McCollum (R-Fla.) said it "will not work without a hardened card that would verify an individual's identity." He has drafted an amendment to create a new Social Security card including a photograph, hologram, and perhaps such "biometric" identifiers as fingerprints and retina scans. (See "Bringing the Border War Home," October.) McCollum may offer the amendment when the bill reaches the floor of the House. Chabot promises to try to strip the registry from the bill then.

A floor vote may not happen until next year, however. Congress took its October recess before the committee could finish work on the bill's most controversial proposal: a 32 percent reduction in overall legal immigration. And House Majority Leader Dick Armey (Tex.) opposes both the verification system and cuts in legal immigration, so the Republican leadership may not let the House vote on the bill this fall. Meanwhile, Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) wants to add limits on legal immigration to his own bill, S 269, which already includes a "biometric" identity card.

Says one top Senate aide, "There are members pretty high up on the food chain" who will block any effort to cut legal immigration. As for the prospects of a worker registry or ID card passing the Senate, the aide says, "That won't happen."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Going Against the Flow

Rick Henderson
PolicyImmigration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (1)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. nfl jerseys   15 years ago

    vjvb nhj

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Trump Wants $25 Million To Settle His Meritless 60 Minutes Lawsuit

Joe Lancaster | 5.30.2025 1:45 PM

Two Courts Have Ruled Against Trump's Tariffs—but Not for the Same Reasons

Jack Nicastro | 5.30.2025 1:30 PM

Civil Rights Groups Say Immigrants Are Being Denied Legal Access at Detention Centers

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.30.2025 1:16 PM

Congress Must Vote on Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.30.2025 12:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!