Brickbat: St. Romanus, Building Code Enforcement Agent

Wikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsOfficials in Yavapai County, Arizona, have ordered David Smith to remove a 9-foot-tall statue of a gargoyle from his yard or cover the statue's genitalia. They say neighbors have complained about the statue's anatomy.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Feelings of inadequacy abound in Arizona.

  • Radioactive||

    hey if you ever saw a giant gargoyle dick looming over the horizon, you'd be feeling inaedequate too...just saying

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    I have, and I wasn't.

  • Rich||

    giant gargoyle dick looming over the horizon

    Wasn't that a Loudon Wainwright song?

  • Live Free or Diet||

    "Gargoyle?" Is that what the kids are calling it these days?

  • Ted S.||

    "Cover up" the genitals by putting another gargoyle next to it such that it looks like the second one is giving the first one a blowjob. Since you can't see the genitals any more, it can't be obscene. :-)

  • Rich||

    County officials say the statue's genitalia can be offensive.

    And the statue's *ears* are *definitely* offensive.

  • Agammamon||

    "can be offensive"

    Yes, but is it *illegal* - that's the question that's really important.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties