Meet Esther George, the Fed's Lone Dissenter

Last month, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to continue its bond-buying spree. The lone dissenting vote was the committee's newest member, Esther George.

George, the president of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, voted against policies which included the continued monthly purchases of $40 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities, $45 billion worth of long-term Treasury bonds, keeping their target for the federal funds rate between 0 and .25 percent so long as the unemployment rate is above 6.5 percent.

George says her nay vote was due to concerns that

the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.

Her worries are not new. In fact, her predecessor Thomas Hoeing was known for voting against similar actions all eight times in 2010. George joined the Bank in 1982 and was promoted to first vice president of the Bank in 2009, shortly before her appointment as president in 2011. George and Hoeing worked together through the Savings and Loan crisis in the 1980s:

It’s hard for me to say I think about it very differently [from Hoeing], because Tom and I had some of the very same experiences coming through the ’80s and saw what caused banks to get into trouble.

I started [as a bank examiner] at a little bank in a strip mall in Oklahoma City called Penn Square Bank. That was my education.

I align pretty closely with Tom in thinking about how these risks can play out. We have watched for many years the funding advantage that has come from growing consolidation in the industry, so I wouldn’t paint myself very differently in terms of how I see those issues and the concerns.

While she doesn't believe that unemployment serves as the right target—she prefers to focus on inflationGeorge doesn't ignore its importance entirely:

Like others, I am concerned about the high rate of unemployment, but I recognize that monetary policy, by contributing to financial imbalances and instability, can just as easily aggravate unemployment as heal it.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • R C Dean||

    Shorter George. Also in English:

    "Monetization of debt has never ended well. There is no reason to expect it will be different this time."

  • XTSee||

    They killed Lady Sybil!
    Those bastards!

  • The Late P Brooks||

    the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.

    Well, you can always blame Standard and Poor's.

  • ||

    Yeah. Do they really think suing one of the institutions that rates their credit is a good idea?

  • db||

    I'm glad to see there is at least one sane person at the Fed.

  • Alan||

    Yup. Kudos to Esther George.

  • cthorm||

    Reason - please, just let Suderman write the Fed pieces. Or better yet, carry Scott Sumner's articles.

  • waaminn||

    I really like where that is leading, makes a lot of sense dude.

    www.Im-Anon.tk

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement