California Voters Overwhelmingly Approve Saner Sentences

Yesterday Proposition 36, which reforms California's draconian "three strikes" law, won by a margin of more than 2 to 1: 69 percent for, 31 percent against. By contrast, a previous attempt at reform, Proposition 66, fell three points short of a majority in 2004. The huge turnaround seems to vindicate the strategy pursued by Proposition 36's backers, who narrowed the measure's focus, added safeguards aimed at reassuring wary voters, emphasized the taxpayer savings resulting from shorter sentences, and lined up endorsements from prominent law enforcement officials such as Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck and Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley. But the shift may reflect other factors as well, including California's fiscal crisis, a prison overcrowding problem so severe that the federal courts have deemed it a violation of the Eighth Amendment, and a growing realization, among conservatives as well as progressives and moderates, that the impulse to crack down ever harder on crime consumes scarce resources without improving public safety. That understanding has led to sentencing reform even in states, such as Texas and South Carolina, that are not known for coddling criminals.

About a third of the 9,000 or so prisoners serving life sentences under California's three-strikes statute will be eligible for resentencing thanks to Proposition 36, which requires that all three strikes, not just the first two, be "serious or violent" crimes. Until now the third strike could be any felony, including "wobbler" offenses that are often charged as misdemeanors. The upshot was that someone who had already served time for two different burglaries could go to prison for the rest of his life after being caught with stolen property or even a bag of marijuana. "There's a shocking number of people whose third strike is simple possession," says Stanford law professor Michael Romano, who co-authored the initiative. 

Looking forward, there is a strong case for further reform, including reclassification of burglaries that do not involve a risk of violence, which probably stands a better chance of passing than it did eight years ago. Frugality may accomplish what compassion could not.

Reason TV on Proposition 36:

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    I'm still hoping they'll bring back the electric chair for death sentences.

  • Brandybuck||

    Doesn't matter what they bring back, because it won't get used.

  • ||

    Yeah, but if they do it in Texas, say, it will.

  • np||

    I guess this balances out CA's sex-offender-expanding Prop 35 a bit

  • ||

    Invariably some asshole who gets out because of this will go kill someone...someone who has never been in jail will also kill someone but we will not mention that nor the hundreds who get out because of this who will not kill or hurt anyone.

    Anyway my point is that this could only really happen as an initiative because politicians would never take that risk of reforming sentences because there is always that one asshole would not only kill someone but in that act also would kill that politician's career.

    One reason why initiatives are good.

  • Ken Shultz||

    As a Californian who voted for this, I can tell you I think it's had a lot to do with all the court ordered releases we've had over the past few years.

    Our jails are so overcrowded, they were letting violent offenders out--and having to keep relatively non-violent people behind bars because they were on their third strike.

    That was stupid policy.

  • tagtann||

    The Kangaroo Court System is a complete joke.

    www.post-anon.tk

  • BarryD||

    What is a non-serious felony? And why in fuck is it a FELONY if it's not serious?

    THAT is the fundamental problem.

    3 strikes wouldn't be an egregious problem, if felonies were actually FELONIES, rather than, oh, I don't know, putting dry ice in a plastic bottle with some water, and closing the lid (AFAIK that teenage goof-off activity is a felony in CA).

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement