The Unsavory Alliance of Big Government and Big Pig

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is a state agency “responsible for the stewardship of Michigan's natural resources and for the provision of outdoor recreational opportunities.” As part of that responsibility, the agency recently issued new guidelines regulating the types of pigs that are permitted within the Wolverine State so as to “stop the spread of feral swine and the disease risk they pose to humans, domestic pigs, and wildlife.”

That doesn't sound so bad, right? Wrong. As Jennifer Fry of the Pacific Legal Foundation reports, the agency's ruling is “so broad that any pig could qualify for destruction, including domestic farm animals.” As Fry writes:

Whether a pig is prohibited or not depends on eight physical characteristics, including the coloration of its bristles, coat coloration, underfur coloration, skeletal appearance, ear structure and “other characteristics not currently known to the [Department] that are identified by the scientific community.”  Rather than clarify the scope of this order, the Department has told individual farmers to bring in pictures of their pigs so the Department can decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether a pig must be destroyed.  And any farmer found to possess a prohibited pig is subject to a felony conviction, two years in jail, and $20,000 in fines.

Mark Baker, an air force veteran and the owner of Bakers Green Acres Farm, filed a lawsuit challenging the Department’s order.  Baker raises specific heritage breeds of hogs which he has chosen because they can withstand Michigan’s cold winters and because they are prized for their reddish-meat and high fat content by chefs and other gourmet food consumers.  Now, because those breeds exhibit characteristics on the Department’s list, his entire operation is likely illegal under Michigan law; he expects the Department to show up at his farm any moment to destroy his animals and his livelihood.  Unsurprisingly, the Michigan Pork Producers Association—an organization whose members do not grow heritage pigs—supports the Department, which has allegedly assured the Association that its members’ operations will be exempt.  It must be nice for large-scale producers who command enough political clout to simply outlaw their competition.  Meanwhile, Mark Baker and other smaller-scale farmers must wait to see where the bureaucratic winds will blow.

Read the full story here. For Reason's coverage of food politics, go here.

Update: Katherine Mangu-Ward writes about the proposed slaughter of Michigan's "fancy pigs" here.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Invisible Finger||

    I thought KMW blogged this weeks ago.

  • o3||

    this didnt deserve a bump. what is it w libtoidz and food anyway?!11!!...

  • Flex Nasty B.I.G.||

  • Old Mexican||

    Rather than clarify the scope of this order, the Department has told individual farmers to bring in pictures of their pigs so the Department can decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether a pig must be destroyed.

    Only government bureaucrats could come up with stupid shit like that.

    "Ok, Porky, say 'cheese!' Otherwise Michigan could consider you too much of a rebel to live."

    Unsurprisingly, the Michigan Pork Producers Association [...] supports the Department[.]

    Of course they do. Since when are regulation meant to protect us, the public?

    Only the gullible, Tony-esque masses are stupid enough to believe they do.

  • Auric Demonocles||

    Such a softball for alt text and you didn't even swing.

  • Rich||

    Testing for validity of comment.

  • Rich||

    Screw it.

  • Invisible Finger||

    Wastin' Pigs is still radical.

  • 0x90||

    alt text:

    "Copyright © 2012, Bok"

  • Death Rock and Skull||

    Fuck the conservation police.

  • Geoff Nathan||

    I want you all to know that this stupid law was passed to protect us from wild boars running around and hurting people.
    I kid you not. That was the excuse given when it was passed.
    I keep pointing out to my pro-regulation friends that the purpose of regulations is to protect existing industries that have political clout against threats of competition from those who have less clout (or haven't established themselves yet to have any clout). They continue to believe that the purpose of regulations (such as, say, net neutrality) is to protect us from unicorn blight or rainbow pox.

  • billp||

    according to 'Natural News' last evening; the above mentioned farmer had to slaughter (shoot with rifles) all of his pigs, including twenty baby pigs weighing 15-20 pounds...

  • Eduard van Haalen||

    I hope he cremated the exactly the right temperature, of course. And I hope he had plenty of barbecue sauce to assist in the mourning process.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties