ObamaCare's Medicaid Expansion Is Also a Problem

When it comes to ObamaCare, the law's health insurance mandate is the bigger political and legal story. But the Medicaid expansion, which accounts for roughly half of the law's increase in insurance coverage, is arguably the bigger policy story. Medicaid, however, is a deeply troubled program. Like many state-run health programs, it suffers from numerous cost problems. Yet its health benefits remain unclear. On an array of specific maladies, multiple studies report that beneficiaries with diseases such as colon cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma actually fare slightly worse on average than those with no insurance at all. A high-quality study of Medicaid recipients in Oregon found that self-reported health status rose after individuals were enrolled in Medicaid, but that two thirds of the effect occurred before the enrollees has received any medical care. 

The news about Medicaid is not getting any better. A new study by researchers at the University of Colorado, meanwhile, indicates that Medicaid enrollees face greater barriers to care, and confirms that they use emergency care at far higher rates than other patients. Another recent study conducted by the Center for Studying Health System Change also indicates that the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), a Medicaid spinoff program focused on kids, does significantly not improve physician access. "Coverage expansions," reports author Chapin White," even if they substantially reduce patient cost sharing, do not necessarily increase physician utilization." What does improve access? Paying doctors more: "Increases in physician fees," the study notes, "are associated with broad-based improvements in indicators of access." That's not likely to be comforting to the 16 million Americans who will end up on the program as a result of ObamaCare: Medicaid boasts the lowest provider reimbursement rates of any health program. 

The states challenging the health law's mandate are also challenging the Medicaid expansion. Most observers believe the constitutional case against the Medicaid portion of the law isn't as strong as the one against the mandate. But for the millions of Americans shuffled into a failing program because of the law, the Medicaid expansion will likely have a bigger impact. 

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    "does significantly not improve physician access"

    Huh? Remove comment when fixed.

  • ||

    I'm beginning to wonder if a ruling striking down the Medicaid expansion on federalism grounds might not be the way SCOTUS gets out of this without having to deal directly with the mandate issue.

    (1) Medicaid expansion violates principles of federalism - at some point, the states have become so dependent on federal money that federal mandates on the states are not excused by stating that "Well, the state can always drop out of the program."

    (2) No severability. You drafted it that way, Congress, so suck it.

    (3) Oh, I guess no severability means the whole thing goes, including the individual mandate.

    I haven't studied the federalism cases the way I have the commerce clause cases, but I have a vague recollection that SCOTUS left itself an out on the whole state mandate tied to funding issue.

  • Declaration of Obamacare||

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men persons are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator Government with certain unalienable Rights Mandates, that among these are healthier life, liberty to pursue happiness and to be free of the constraints that the lack of healthcare might provide. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iZ6lFKfF1Q

  • Auric Demonocles||

    Dick Durbin apparently decided he's got nothing more important to do than investigate NFL bounties.

  • Barack Obama||

    self-reported health status rose after individuals were enrolled in Medicaid, but that two thirds of the effect occurred before the enrollees has received any medical care

    Let me be clear.

    This is one of the benefits of PPACA that is yet to be seen.

  • shrike||

    All power to the Soviets

  • NRO||

    Is the Romney campaign like an Etch A Sketch?

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement