March 8, 2011
On Monday, March 7, Associate Editor Peter Suderman appeared on Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano to talk about the recent spike in oil prices as well as the effect that the Federal Reserve's Quantitative Easing policy has had on the economy. Approximately 8 minutes.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|3.8.11 @ 3:10PM|#
Look, I'm not a Suderman hater like so many here. I have nothing against the man. But I hope that he was high on something powerful the first time Da Judge cut to him, because he looked hella goofy.
|3.8.11 @ 3:16PM|#
I've caught the show more than a few times and I while I appreciate the Judge's efforts, I swear that the liberal guests are chosen for their fuckheaded insufferableness.
Concerned Citizen|3.8.11 @ 3:17PM|#
True that.
Old Mexican|3.8.11 @ 4:12PM|#
Re: JW,
You're being too kind with liberals - you could throw darts at them and not avoid hitting one like you describe.
CatoTheElder|3.8.11 @ 3:20PM|#
The blond babe is a bit disingenuous. In the first half of the segment she expresses concern about escalation in the price of gasoline. In the second half she says "the only other thing we should look at is inflation and that is not an issue now."
So, when prices go up under a progressive regime, it's not inflation?
Old Mexican|3.8.11 @ 3:26PM|#
Re: CatoTheElder,
Who, the blond bimbo slash college professor? Nooooo!
She's as clueless as she is shifty - she quickly changes the focus of the discussion when she gets in the most trivial of troubles.
|3.8.11 @ 3:37PM|#
If she was capable at expressing emotion, she'd cry at such an accusation.
CatoTheElder|3.8.11 @ 3:26PM|#
Caroline Heldman is a political science professor. That explains it.
Ice Nine|3.8.11 @ 3:42PM|#
OT: Help please. How do you get the italics I see here using this seemingly primitive editor?
The Gobbler|3.8.11 @ 3:56PM|#
Look here:
http://www.web-source.net/html_codes_chart.htm
Ice Nine|3.8.11 @ 4:08PM|#
Thank you
rather|3.8.11 @ 3:47PM|#
pigfest today-you're boring me
Old Mexican|3.8.11 @ 4:02PM|#
Re: rather,
No, no boring. THIS is boring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3hLBR3m4qA
|3.8.11 @ 4:08PM|#
Really, OM? Isn't the best way to show rather boring is to force her to read her own posts? There has never been a more boring troll. Even Max had occasional flashes of wit.
Old Mexican|3.8.11 @ 4:14PM|#
What? I am showing her what boring (for wells) really is.
*chuckle chuckle*
Ok, ok, I will try harder.
The Gobbler|3.8.11 @ 3:57PM|#
^^Tree holes, no waiting^^
The Gobbler|3.8.11 @ 3:57PM|#
BTW, tree = 3.
|3.8.11 @ 4:06PM|#
Whew. Thanks for the clarification. We're, umm, openminded here at H & R, but trees? I was a little worried.