Legal blogger and FantasySCOTUS proprietor Josh Blackman does the math and creates a nice post explaining which Supreme Court justice is most likely to author the majority opinion this month in the eagerly anticipated gun rights case McDonald v. Chicago. Spoiler alert: It's not John Paul Stevens.
For more on the Chicago gun case, see here.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|6.15.10 @ 5:27PM|#
Fantasy Scotus. What an Idea.
Can I pack the bench with cartoon characters? Daffy and Bugs, Jerry (but not Tom), Quick Draw McGraw, The Pink Panther, Frylock, Big Gay Al, Huey Freeman, and Mentok The Mindtaker.
|6.15.10 @ 5:35PM|#
That's too depressing a game to play, I'm afraid.
I'd like to pick a fantasy SCOTUS, populated by my idea of good jurists.
¢|6.15.10 @ 5:37PM|#
Spoiler alert:
Ginsburg.
Old Mexican|6.15.10 @ 5:38PM|#
In my fantasy SCOTUS, they would all be doing something else.
Warty|6.15.10 @ 5:39PM|#
Court-related metal
Sonia Sotomayor |6.15.10 @ 5:46PM|#
Cool! I'm so gonna listen to that and get pumped up for the next case.