You're Against Prostitution...Aren't You??

Brian Doherty | October 15, 2009

The Brennan Center for Justice files a FOIA suit to try to get the government to acknowledge that even its own Office of Legal Counsel knew that one of its absurd demands is unconstitutional: the demand that any organization receiving federal funds related to AIDS work pledge that it has "a policy explictly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking."

Details from a press release I was emailed, but can't find online yet:

Today, the Brennan Center for Justice is filing a federal lawsuit to compel release of a long-suppressed Bush-era legal opinion; the opinion in question purportedly acknowledges that a federal law -- which requires organizations receiving federal grants for HIV/AIDS work to pledge opposition to  prostitution -- may be unconstitutional.  

The opinion was drafted in 2004 by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) housed within the Department of Justice (DOJ)....The nonprofit community opposes the law because it hampers their HIV/AIDS prevention work with prostitutes and others vulnerable to the pandemic.... 

The opinion sought in today's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was issued in February 2004 but was not publically disclosed. It purportedly states that the Constitution bars federal agencies from enforcing the pledge requirement against U.S. organizations.  In September 2004, OLC withdrew that opinion in a letter that said "reasonable arguments" support the statute's constitutionality.  The impetus for the FOIA request was a lawsuit, Alliance for Open Society International v. USAID, that challenged the statute. The Judge in that case enjoined enforcement against most U.S. organizations pending a final ruling in the case.

Lots of people find these sorts of "he who pays the piper calls the tune" arguments persuasive, which is all the more reason it's important to make sure the government is paying fewer pipers.

In August 2005, Kerry Howley wrote for Reason Online about entrepreneur Phil Harvey's fight against this absurd government demand.

Comments

|10.15.09 @ 7:54PM|#

Nothing like peace enforcement. Through USAID--in their own words this week they've become more of a contract-letting agency than a human support and development agency--the US Administration policy-du-jour can be enforced on those dirty little third world nations.

I love America, leading by righteous example with majestic heavenly force. Can you smell the freedom?

Fist of Etiquette|10.15.09 @ 8:10PM|#

Are you now or have you ever been paying for it?

|10.15.09 @ 8:41PM|#

I pimp my brain. Why can't I pimp my penis?

Suki|10.15.09 @ 8:46PM|#

Oh, it started under Bush so Obama inherited it.

|10.15.09 @ 8:56PM|#

Not that it matters, but is there any federal grant that requires a pledge of allegiance the the US?

Suki|10.15.09 @ 9:00PM|#

Do enlistment (and other military) bonuses count?

Diesel jeans|10.15.09 @ 8:57PM|#

Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

cheap jordan shoes|10.15.09 @ 8:57PM|#

Interesting content it realy help me.

Suki|10.15.09 @ 9:02PM|#

OMG, the invasion of the bots. BTW, every dam thing you are advertising sucks and Diesel jeans have never graced my smooth, beige ass. Nor will they ever.

|10.15.09 @ 11:29PM|#

I think it's time for a Captcha requirement before posting. Maybe it would take care of privacy bot as well.

|10.16.09 @ 12:04AM|#

If I say I support prostitutes, will you hold them against me?

Robert|10.16.09 @ 1:21AM|#

"The nonprofit community opposes the law because it hampers their HIV/AIDS prevention work with prostitutes and others vulnerable to the pandemic."

I don't get it. Why can't they just say, "I oppose your business, Ms. Prostitute. Now, what can we do for you in terms of AIDS prevention?"?

Chrispy|10.16.09 @ 1:55AM|#

"...one of its absurd demands is unconstitutional: the demand that any organization receiving federal funds..."

What's the constitutional basis for any organization receiving federal funds in the first place?

|10.16.09 @ 7:32AM|#

AIDS is not a communicable disease anyway.
http://www.aidsmythexposed.com/

Some Guy|10.16.09 @ 8:03AM|#

"may be unconstitutional"

How about they just man up and say, "Yes, it was blatantly unconstitutional to force groups to echo a political opinion." And then fix it.

|10.16.09 @ 9:12AM|#

You know AIDS and HIV - assuming there really is such an animal - has been a God send for blue nose, hypocritical, sex haters. It justifies their puritanical hysteria over anything sexual.

|10.16.09 @ 10:04AM|#

Why can't they just say, "I oppose your business, Ms. Prostitute. Now, what can we do for you in terms of AIDS prevention?"?

Since this is a government requirement we are talking about, the burden of persuasion is on those proposing/imposing it. So, a better questions "Why should they have to say, "I oppose your business, Ms. Prostitute. Now, what can we do for you in terms of AIDS prevention?"?

|10.19.09 @ 9:54AM|#

http://www.brennancenter.org/c.....j_opinion/

the press release is online, the case isn't yet....