Jacob Sullum | July 1, 2009
Yesterday an FDA advisory panel recommended that Vicodin, Percocet, and other painkillers combining opioids with acetaminophen be taken off the market. Most of the 400 deaths and 42,000 hospitalizations related to acetaminophen overdoses each year involve such combination products. The risk is of special concern to people who take prescription medications like Vicodin (hydrocodone plus acetaminophen) and Percocet (oxycodone plus acetaminophen) for chronic pain. Contrary to popular perceptions, it's the over-the-counter ingredient in such prescription painkillers, as opposed to the narcotics, that poses the main health danger for people taking them over extended periods of time. Such patients develop tolerance to the opiods and have to raise their doses, which can be done safely and indefinitely, except that it also increases the danger of liver damage from the acetaminophen. Doctors who reflexively prescribe opioid-and-acetominophen combinations probably should be more cautious and consider alternative formulations, especially when their patients may be taking these drugs for a long time, and patients should be more aware of the acetaminophen risk. But that does not mean such drugs are never appropriate for anyone in any situation, so a ban seems hard to justify even on paternalistic grounds.
A second recommendation from the advisory panel is based on even shakier reasoning. It said the maximum dose for over-the-counter acetaminophen products such as Tylenol should be reduced from 500 milligrams to 325 milligrams per pill. This proposal does not seem to be based on new data indicating that the current recommended dose is unsafe:
Linda A. Suydam, president of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, said the committee had ignored studies showing that doses sold by her members—two pills of 500 milligrams, up to four times a day—were safe. "I think this is a very effective dose and one needed for individuals who experience chronic pain," she said.
Instead of adjusting what's considered safe and effective based on new evidence, the dose reduction seems to be aimed at lowering the risk to people who exceed the current guidelines. The change therefore would sacrifice the interests of consumers who follow instructions for the sake of consumers who don't. And if people find that two tablets don't do the trick anymore, won't they be more inclined to take a third or even a fourth, thereby equaling or exceeding the current recommended maximum dose? Alternatively, they may switch to other over-the-counter pain relievers, such as aspirin and ibuprofen, which have their own overdose risks. As one panel member told The New York Times, "If you keep track of what you're taking, none of this is an issue for you."
Reason coverage of the conflict between drug control and pain control here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Does anyone know why specifically they add the acetaminophen to Vicodin & Percocet? DEA, FDA, or did the drug companies themselves just realize that MDs would be more willing to prescribe the opiates when combined with acetaminophen?
What's truly infuriating about this, especially as someone who
suffers from chronic injury-related pain, is that I see nothing
about what they might replace these with. Will they come out with
Tylenol-free hydrocodone, for instance, like oxycontin is for
oxycodone?
I swear, the people in government are sadists. It's like they
want people to be in pain.
Also note that if they ban these common painkillers that are given
out after every wisdom tooth removal or broken bone, the black
market in them will go through the roof.
Does anyone know why specifically they add the acetaminophen
to Vicodin & Percocet?
It is specifically to curb abuse, though they make noises about a
(non-existent) synergistic effect. However, curbing abuse with
lethality is so twisted it boggles the mind.
It is specifically to curb abuse
OK. I was wondering if the feds mandated this, or if the drug
companies did it voluntarily.
Although, thinking about it now, "voluntary" can be a flexible
concept where the feds are concerned.
Cold water
extraction, wingnutx, and you have your (mostly) acetaminophen
free opiates.
Which just goes to show how additionally idiotic adding the Tylenol
is, and then attempting to ban it.
However, curbing abuse with lethality is so twisted it
boggles the mind.
I wish i was surprised that pureaucrats would be willing to destroy
people in order to save them, but i am not. Not even a little
bit.
Every time a doctor says "Try Tylenol, it's very effective for pain," I think about junkpunching them until I pop one of their crunchberries and seeing if they reach for APAP or something, you know, effective. I don't have that reaction with women doctors, but I do believe that the proper term of address should be "Doctoress."
But NutraSweet, try some tramadol! Just because it fucks up your
sleep (amongst other things) is no reason to not prescribe it over
Vicodin!
It's the DEA that should be punched in the junk, as they have the
doctors scared shitless.
Well, I can only really imagine the junk in the room, not some
hypothetical DEA junk.
Tramadol? I had it under the name Ultram and I wasn't
impressed.
I guess I know why you take it:
Off-label and investigational uses
* diabetic neuropathy[7][8]
* postherpetic neuralgia[9][10]
* fibromyalgia[11]
* restless legs syndrome[12]
* opiate withdrawal management[13][14]
* migraine headache[15]
* obsessive-compulsive disorder[16]
* premature ejaculation[17]
"Will they come out with Tylenol-free hydrocodone, for instance,
like oxycontin is for oxycodone?"
They already exist. Hydrocodone is combined with aspirin and
ibuprofen and marketed under different names. Don't know the exact
name brands off the top of my head, Lortab maybe??
The change therefore would sacrifice the interests of
consumers who follow instructions for the sake of consumers who
don't.
Can we just incorporate this in the Great Seal of the United
States, and be done with it?
Stuff like this article makes me wanna share my chronic pain. So the do-gooders can feel some empathy for folks with severe chronic pain.
Tramadol? I had it under the name Ultram and I wasn't
impressed.
Because it sucks. Though, if you take 4 at once before going to see
Watchmen in Boston and then drink a Dogfish Head 90 Minute
IPA just before the movie, you get pretty wasted.
And for the record, I take tramadol to ease the pain of reading
your tortured prose.
Our dear Mayor is correct, but as to the larger question, there is no current product like oxycontin for hydro. This concerns me as I have a hypersensitivity reaction to oxy. I gets me good and high and gobbles up pain like Pacman on meth, but it also depresses my respiration, an effect that almost killed me when I was three.
And for the record, I take tramadol to ease the pain of
reading your tortured prose.
Fair enough.
Seems like people in chronic pain are overrepresented even more than people from the Bluegrass State here on H&R.
HoneyBunny,
I don't have chronic pain, thank goodness. That'd be a nightmare.
I'd just like pain meds when I'm in pain.
I completely tore a tendon lose in my shoulder and they sent me
home with fucking Advil.
Aw, man. Karl Malden is dead too. This has been a rough few weeks on celebrities.
Does anyone know why specifically they add the acetaminophen
to Vicodin & Percocet?
To highly discourage self-injection.IIRC,if you step on the junk
with tylenol it is schedule III. Just the good stuff with a little
insoluble binder and filler and it is schedule II
Can't we just let the dumb mother-fuckers die?
Is that too difficult? Just kinda thin the herd a bit?
Ultram is more useless than my pecker. As are all the designer non
narcotic "pain relievers" the companies are cooking up today.
I hope these dumb cunts aren't having kids. I hate the thought of
hyperventilating shitbags beeing breeders.
I completely tore a tendon lose in my shoulder
Ahh, the fateful ice-lifting incident. Not as glamorous as being
shot in the nards.
Back in my pharm tech days, the people with chronic pain (one with
horror-movie migraines) were no joke. And on top of everything
else, if the pharmacist didn't personally know them, they were also
subjected to the skeptical third-degree before getting their
meds.
They saw themselves as the ever-vigilant last line of defense
against... someone getting high, I guess.
Being pretty much immune to pain and injury, I have never had a strong painkiller prescribed to me by a doctor. But being curious I tried hydrocodone last week to see if I was one of these opiate sensitive types. Honestly don't see what the big deal is, no euphoria, just a slight dizziness ( and I took 4 pills = 40mg). Anyone here take opiates not for the pain relieve but to get high?
"If you keep track of what you're taking, none of this is an
issue for you."
People can't be trusted with that! We need another new csar/tard to
keep track of what you're taking, via centralized medical records,
already in the pipeline!
3 words.... cold water extraction. basically break up the pills. grind to a pwder, place powder in a glass of ICECOLD water, stir, filter with a coffe filter, and violia apap removed. it has to do with the soulubiltiy of acetaminophen in cold water, which is near nill. and the fact that the opiates are souluble in cold water. if done right it will take about 90% out and make large doses safe.
Haven't had any close-calls with overdosing on weed yet. Think I'll stick to that.
I"m sorry but if you kill yourself by overdosing on Tylenol you're too stupid to live and deserve you're Darwin Award.
If they are really serious about protecting the retarded from themselves, they should take the Obama voters out into the street.
My wife sees jaundiced junkies in the ER all the time. Dead livers. I'm sure this isn't about folks taking this with a prescription who could otherwise get a different preparation, but rather people getting pills on the black market to get high. Apparently it's really easy to OD on the Tylenol trying to get off on the narcotic. It doesn't make much sense to have Tylenol in there to begin with. It's like gluing a marshmallow to your dash to help out the airbag.
"...if they reach for APAP or something, you know,
effective..."
SugarFree, APAP is Tylenol. It's also called paracetamol or
acetaminophen. As Wikipedia states,"in some contexts, it is simply
abbreviated as APAP, for N-Acetyl-Para-AminoPhenol."
Those contexts are usually on the label of some generic for Vicodin
or Percocet. As a chronic pain patient for over a decade, I know my
stuff. I will not take any drug, OTC or prescription, with that
liver killing shit in it. Only straight synthetic opioids for me,
thankyouverymuch.
thanks a lot to the assholes who don't know what cold water
extraction is.
it is going to get a lot harder to get pain treated. there is the
possibility that vicodin, percocet, tylenol with codeine, ultracet,
and darvocet might just get a black box warning. if they actually
take them off the market that means they are going to have to write
a schedule II script or treat the patient with an inadequate
analgesic like tramadol or codeine.
fuck the FDA and the DEA.
Dylboz,
I think you misunderstood my comment. I was lampooning the notion
that APAP is an effective pain killer for any source of major pain.
It is a separate issue from the adulteration of opiates with APAP,
which I, of course, oppose.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245