Jacob Sullum | May 7, 2009
In a recent Zogby poll, 52 percent of voters said they supported marijuana legalization. As far as I know, this is the first time a national survey has found majority support for repealing cannabis prohibition, as opposed to merely decriminalizing possession for personal use. A couple of caveats:
1. According to a press release from the Marijuana Policy Project, the survey, commissioned by The O'Leary Report, used "a sample of 3,937 voters weighted to match the 2008 presidential outcome—54 percent Obama voters and 46 percent McCain supporters." This sample may be skewed in a pro-reform direction if, as seems plausible, left-leaning Americans were especially motivated to vote in the last presidential election, while conservatives were dispirited. I'm not sure what the exit polls showed on that score.
2. The wording of the question seems slanted:
Scarce law enforcement and prison resources, a desire to neutralize drug cartels and the need for new sources of revenue have resurrected the topic of legalizing marijuana. Proponents say it makes sense to tax and regulate the drug while opponents say that legalization would lead marijuana users to use other illegal drugs. Would you favor or oppose the government's effort to legalize marijuana?
Respondents were presented with three arguments in favor of legalization and only one against, and it was pretty lame. Why would legalizing pot make people more likely to use heroin? Because pot would lose its "forbidden fruit" cachet? That sounds like an antiprohibitionist argument. Also, the phrase "the government's effort to legalize marijuana" makes it sound as if this is something that's already happening, which makes the idea seem more realistic and credible.
Still, this sounds like good news, and it's in line with building support for marijuana legalization in other surveys, as well as recent comments by sitting public officials who say they'e open to discussing the idea.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I want it legalized just to piss off my co-workers who think it will ruin America if its legal. They deserve the discomfort for being so stupid.
Has anyone examined the opposite of the gateway drug argument? If marijuana were legal, how many users of other illegal drugs would settle for marijuana, like so many people settle for alcohol because marijuana comes with a greater risk at present?
Respondents were presented with three arguments in favor of
legalization and only one against, and it was pretty
lame.
I agree with what you are saying Jacob. But it's redundant to call
an argument in favor of prohibition "pretty lame".
I'm interested to see, if it is legalized, whether the influx of
revenue makes the government so giddy with cash that they decide to
legalize everything. Legalizing MJ would be an insane boon to the
economy. Hundreds of now-legal businesses catering to boutique MJ
customers would spring up overnight. Think of all the products that
could now be produced and marketed to MJ users, from bongs to
vaporizers to MJ cigs to pot brownies...the list is endless.
So they'd start thinking "wow, if we now legalized coke..."
Besides, now they could do it openly too, instead of behind closed
doors off of page's asses.
like so many people settle for alcohol because marijuana
comes with a greater risk at present
I had actually never thought of it that way, even though I
(usually) fall into that category. I'll have to test that one next
time it comes up at work.
I think that people overestimate the usage of these types of polls, remember it is not only the numbers that matter, but the zeal that people have for a particular issue that matters as well. For example I may favor marijuana legalization or prohibition, but I may be much more interested in capital gains tax issues.
The big deal here would be the commercial applications of marijuana/hemp when the laws are finally changed. Fuel, oil, paint, cloth, paper -- God does not make mistakes, and industrial hemp will be a BIG deal!
I think the ability to tax drugs is the strongest argument for
legalization when dealing with politicians. It's in their
wheelhouse, so to speak. It's the worst reason, but I repeat
myself.
The issue that arises is the private growing by individuals. How do
they tax that? Has homebrewing come under fire because it removes a
revenue stream?
Has homebrewing come under fire because it removes a revenue
stream?
Not really. The federal limits before taxes kick in are 100 gallons
annually for an individual, 200 gallons for a household. Ive never
gone over it. I know plenty of brewers who blow past it - so are
brewing illegally.
IIRC, the only state I know of that tries to get money off of
homebrewers is NJ. Technically, you have to be "licensed" to
homebrew. I think its something like $10 a year though. I dont
think many bother to get it.
Nick - while there will definitely be people who are down to
grow their own, I think most people would be put off at the idea of
dedicating all the space, time, power and ability required.
Certainly in urban areas, perhaps not as much in rural areas, but I
just don't see that many people homegrowing when they can go to
7-11.
When I was brewing my own beer, I still went out and bought beer
also. How about the potential for the American equivalent of an
Amsterdam cafe? There's a convenience/physical presence aspect to
it too. I don't see the legalization of marijuana and a prohibition
on growing it. Heavily taxed legal weed will still be much cheaper
than illegal black market weed, and homegrowing might not be
appealing except for a niche group of hobbyists.
OK, I'll be 50 years old when pot is legal (or there about), so
that was some fun fantasy.
Yeah, it's a loaded question, but that's a good thing. Many
people are unthinking boobs who are more than willing to change
their opinion just to be in the majority. If those people (~10%)
are convinced that supporting legalized reefer makes them on the
"winning team" maybe some politicians, no paragons of consistency
or integrity themselves, will change their stance on the issue so
they can be on the same "winning team".
IOW, rigging the poll can affect the political landscape. I
DON'T CARE THAT IT'S DISHONEST! Since ONDCP, MADD, DARE,
etc are all dishonest fucks promulgating outright lies,
misinformation, fabrications and blatant falsehoods, shading a poll
question seems almost virtuous in comparison.
You can also grow tobacco and brew your own beer but most people prefer to buy it. Same goes for tomatoes, corn and any other product people buy at the store. Most people who smoke will buy it and not grow it themselves simply because Americans prefer convenience.
If you think about it, marijuana is referenced more than once in the bible. And if marijuana was legalized and even if they put a tax on it, I bet you the government wouldn't be in such a deep recession, and crime rates would go down. And wouldn't it just piss them off if they found a cure for a life threatening disease from marijuana? Marijuana has absolutely no negative effects on people. I haven't seen ANYONE die from marijuana!!
If I recall, prohibition was repealed because the federal
government needed the tax dollars. Alcohol taxes were a significant
part of the federal budget prior prohibition.
I have always thought that the tax angle would be the lever to move
marijauna into the legal category -- just like state lotteries and
tax revenues on dog/horse tracks brought gambling into the legal
category.
I also tell people that it will take less than a generation for
Iowa farmers to grow marijuana so efficiently that no one can make
money on it -- so bring on the federal subsidies baby!
What we should do is have another prohibition. Take ALL the liquor out of stores, and see how the Congressmen feel about not having their Jim Beam after a hard and stressful day at the office, and see how it feels not having something to calm them down.
If you think about it, marijuana is referenced more than
once in the bible.
God does not make mistakes, and industrial hemp will be a BIG
deal!
With supporters like these, who needs opponents?
To all Californians who want marijuana legalized, regulated, and
taxed like alcohol:
We can make it happen. We can get Assembly Bill 390 passed and
legalize recreational marijuana for adults in California.
The majority must stop being afraid and speak out. We need to get
organized. Let's flood the state Assembly and Senate with
e-mail.
It's easy to send your representatives e-mail supporting A.B. 390.
Visit yes390.org
Then spread the word. Get all your friends to visit yes390.org
Post yes390.org on
Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter. Hand it out on business cards at
concerts and on street corners.
Californians, stand up for what you believe in.
Does that home garden ban that was floating around the last couple months have any legs? Is that being paired with a move to legalize MJ so they can be sure to tax every last leaf and seed?
THANK YOU!! Do you really want to hear something f**** up? My mom recently got busted for under or equal to 2grams of marijuana. She had a court date yesteday, and she has probation for 1 year, $530 in fines, and a suspended license for 6 months.
Growing your own will be a hobbyist thing. Also unless Cannabis sativa can grow on old cheese in the refrigerator, most bachelors will be forced to purchase it.
In the last 5000 years of recorded medical history, not one person has died from smoking marijuana. Before the 1920's, marijuana was not illegal in the United States. It has been used by other cultures for thousands of years for medicine, clothing, and tons of other uses. how can you argue with facts like that?
Hey Jacob, lets not get to much into "Slanted" questions on pot polls. CBS had a Poll that both the Anti-Marijuana activists and CBS themselves used in statements and articles to point out Non-majority support. Here is how they worded their poll as advertised, "Poll: Americans Oppose Legalizing Marijuana, Lowering Drinking Age". That poll my friend is way slanted. Take a look for yourselves, compared to that CBS Poll this one is Way to Fair in my opinion. Here is the link...http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/19/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4877495.shtml. It's time and we do have the Majority. NO MORE SMOKERS SHOULD BE ARRESTED.
Growing your own will be a hobbyist thing. Also unless Cannabis
sativa can grow on old cheese in the refrigerator, most bachelors
will be forced to purchase it.
___________________________________
I take offense to that, but i also can cook very well. lol
Prohibition is inherently unconstitutional. It baffles the mind that this is even a debate. The War on Drugs™ is a historic and massive failure. It serves as an example of law enforcement bureaucracy run amok. It is immoral and draconian that a plant, be it hemp or potent cannabis, is rendered illegal in the most free society in the world. If it allows people to make horrible mistakes with regard to their choice to use drugs, so be it. Give us back our right to choose between good and bad for ourselves.
"a sample of 3,937 voters weighted to match the 2008
presidential outcome-54 percent Obama voters and 46 percent McCain
supporters."
I could have sworn there were a handful of voters out there who
didn't vote for either major party candidate, or who didn't vote at
all because they didn't much care for anyone on the ballot.
So the assumption of this poll is that only people who voted for a
major party presidential candidate should be counted in assessing
public opinion on this issue? Think that might skew the
results?
Probably get my Libertarian card yanked for this but here it
goes:
I do believe marijuana is a gateway drug and it does open the door
to harder drugs (based on anecdotal experience with *friends*). And
while I would like to see it legalized, where do we draw the
line?
So let's say Marijuana is made legal for personal use, is heroin
next for legalization? Are we going to be able to go into a 7-11
and score a ball of coke for a Tuesday night?
Will our nation of road ragists get further out of control when
everyone has access to crystal meth (I know Ovation manufactures it
but that is a prescribed *medicine*)?
In other words, once the government says "Yes you cannabis", where
do we draw the line?
Regards
And that's why we shouldn't allow mixed-race marriages. If we do that, we open the door to GAY MARRIAGE!!!
Sturmbannfuhrer,
It's a good point.
A true libertarian response is: let natural selection occur, and
also let people segregate themselves as they see fit. That includes
by sexual orientation, class, race, ethnicity and degree of
antisocial tendency -- it's that last category you mention.
Of course, it's taboo to say that people would ever be allowed to
do such things. A community limited to upper middle class straight
Christian whites? Why, that sounds like privilege! Yet this is what
libertarianism is about: letting each us define our destiny, no
matter how much it appalls others.
I think you'll find that many of us will opt to be in communities
where recreational substances are not easy to get. Just like many
of us will opt to be in communities where 4 wheelers, big pickup
trucks, and hip-hop are illegal. That's the power of human choice
right there.
Of course, others will be forced to confront the paradox of
"freedom" as brought up by this little example: freedom means the
ability to make all sorts of decisions, including hurtful and
possibly destructive ones. Do we let nature sort it out, and hope
our domination of technology has not obliterated natural selection?
Do we blithely assume that tolerating bad behavior around us does
not result in crippling consequences for the whole of society,
including debilitating socialized cost and revolution?
Well, those are the big questions, aren't they ;)
My biggest gripe with these discussions of legalization is all
the talk of tax benefits. OMG the gov't will generate SOOOOO much
revenue!! Well, remember supply and demand. If it's suddenly legal,
supply will skyrocket, while demand might slightly uptick. Prices
will plummet.
$40 an ounce doesn't seem ludicrous when you can pick it up at
walmart. Granted, quality ganja will go for a premium, but nowhere
close to current prices.
Any business plan built on the premise of legalized bud will have
to assume rock bottom pricing. The only way the government could
still make lots of revenue would be monopolizing the sales and
keeping pricing at the same level. A black market would likely
still remain, well under those prices.
So let's say Marijuana is made legal for personal use, is
heroin next for legalization? Are we going to be able to go into a
7-11 and score a ball of coke for a Tuesday night?
You bet.
Will our nation of road ragists get further out of control when
everyone has access to crystal meth (I know Ovation manufactures it
but that is a prescribed *medicine*)?
Not relevant, just scare mongering. There basic rule is you don't
get to hurt other people. Being stoned is not a defense.
In other words, once the government says "Yes you cannabis",
where do we draw the line?
We erase the line.
However, I am willing to move it one yard at a time until we cross
the opponents goal line. Then we can push our way out into the
parking lot.
It's an appropriate time to legalize hemp, since the newspaper
industry is dying. Now we can use the correct fiber for paper,
rope, fabric and so much more, and have a great time doing
it!
Rot in pieces, William Randolph Hearst.
I think most people would be put off at the idea of
dedicating all the space, time, power and ability
required.
It's a weed, isn't it? It doesn't take that much effort, unless
you're trying to hide it and have very limited space to grow it
in.
-jcr
Saying pot is a gateway drug and we should ban it or be wary of it, is like saying we shouldn't trust doors, or just ban them outright, since they're just gateways to other rooms or the outside. Pot is no more a gateway drug than alcohol is, and that's perfectly legal. In fact I'd say you are more likely to stupidly try whatever anyone hands you when your drunk, than high. Does smoking pot mean you will end up addicted to heroin? No, of course not. Does it mean you will be around heroin? Not at all. It could happen, but just because you went and bought a 20 sack, doesn't mean it will, statistics are on the side of it not happening. Will *some* of the people who smoke pot move on to harder substances? Of course. But by the same token, will *some* people who drink move on to try harder stuff? Most assuredly. The gateway drug argument is also slanted as it puts the pot smoker into the arena of black market drugs, where most of what is sold is far more dangerous. Yes kids are more exposed to the hard drugs, but it's because you won't let them get their pack of Marlboro Marijuanna Filter Kings, regular or menthol, hard pack or soft down at their local 7-11. Lets say, for comparison, that you have 10 ravenous wolves in a zoo, would you pass a law saying that all kids had to walk to school through the wolf habitat? No, but we will pass laws saying that people who want to use a mostly harmless plant which there is a UTTERLY MASSIVE precedent for use of, and who's usage isn't decreasing in the slightest, and shows no signs of doing so, must go and get that plant from the wolves. Then we're going to complain that it's the plants fault for bad things happening.
So let's say Marijuana is made legal for personal use, is
heroin next for legalization? Are we going to be able to go into a
7-11 and score a ball of coke for a Tuesday night?
I certainly hope so. Take a look at Portugal's results from
legalization of all drugs.
-jcr
My biggest gripe with these discussions of legalization is
all the talk of tax benefits.
I agree with you on that. I'm rather offended at the idea that
government is entitled to some kind of tribute for finally fucking
off and leaving people alone.
-jcr
Hopefully the feds will quash this nonsense about 'legalizing'
pot. It sends a bad message to America's children that drug abuse
is OK. Arresting users sends the right message to the children that
drug use is illegal, unhealthy and wrong. Drug use is immoral,
according to any law abiding citizen.
What next, a debate on legalizing rape or murder because it costs
too much to enforce? I fail to see the difference, because drug
abuse is not a victimless crime because almost all violent and
property crimes are drug related. Drugs cause lots of deleterious
downstream effects on society.
Taking the pot is not good for us, the government has a right and
in fact an obligation to ban anything that isn't good for us. Any
substance that make it's users feel good can be subject to abuse
and is immoral and must be banned, except Alcohol because it has a
long history of safe use in western society. Any law that helps the
cops to keep us safe and sober is inherently a good thing, I'm all
for it.
I don't care about the constitution, it is only a piece of paper,
it was a different time when it was written, they didn't have a war
on drugs that needed to be fought. We need laws to make it illegal
to even discuss the repeal of drug laws. Surveys like this that
advocate the breaking of laws should be illegal, it sends a bad
message to Americas children.
All the drug dealers who now traffic in pot will happily settle for incomes a fraction of what they are now. And the people who fail the natural selection test won't cost taxpayers any money because there will be no pressure whatsoever to provide them with benefits and services. And oh yeah, ethanol from corn is an ecological disaster but hemp will, like totally replace oil. Whatever, dudes.
Has homebrewing come under fire because it removes a revenue
stream?
It was illegal until the late 70s. Now it is no more that 200
gallons/year.
Strunbannfuhrer:
Alcohol and tobacco are also gateway drugs. You will hardly find a
soul who has used cocaine that did not use alcohol or tobacco
first. According to the statistics, people who use alcohol and
tobacco are several times more likely to have tried cocaine than
those who have not used these other substances. Is there something
about tobacco and alcohol that makes people want to use cocaine? Or
does the fact that people use these substances just indicate that
they are the types who gravitate toward intoxicants? Is it
causation or just correlation?
There is no proof that there is something special about marijuana
that makes people want to use harder drugs. People who use harder
drugs usually did use alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana first. People
with those tendencies, the ones who will try everything or nearly
everything, will try the first drugs that come along and probably
those perceived as safest first. Alcohol, tobacco and marijuana
aren't perceived as being just horribly dangerous and they are
commonly used drugs that people are in most cases going to
encounter before they run across the really hard stuff. Of course
people who end up using drugs like cocaine or meth are going in
most cases going to use alcohol, tobacco and marijuana first.
The fact that marijuana is illegal makes it more of a gateway drug
than it should be. The same people that sell pot are often going to
sell other more dangerous drugs. It's all coming through the same
channels. If we were to sell marijuana from shops sort of like
liquor stores where clerks check to see that people are of age then
marijuana smokers would be far less likely to be offered all these
other drugs. How often does a clerk at a liquor store offer to sell
you cocaine or ecstacy? Adults will be less likely to be offered
these other substances and teens would be less likely to encounter
them as well because those who get pot will get it the same way
teens get beer today. They don't buy their beer from drug dealers.
They use fake identification to buy it or they have an older friend
or relative buy it for them.
As for legalizing other drugs, I don't see drugs like cocaine or
meth or heroin ever being made legal. Support for legalizing
marijuana is at close to a majority now. What percentage of voters
want to legalize meth? I doubt it's as high as 10%. We might very
well change the laws such that we treat drug abuse and addiction
more as a health issue than a criminal issue, but I seriously doubt
we'll ever legalize drugs like cocaine, meth and heroin. The
overwhelming majority of voters are dead set against doing that. I
bet most of the drug legalization activism we see today evaporates
when we legalize marijuana because so few people actually want to
legalize the rest of the stuff. I bet marijuana will be legalized,
and I bet we draw the line there.
Huh - I guess since I always check "Libertarian" on the Zogby
polls I take, I never saw one with this question on it. (Not to
mention "Pastafarian" until they added the "Atheist" button).
I have had polls on car brand names and silverware designs,
though.
It's a weed, isn't it? It doesn't take that much effort,
unless you're trying to hide it and have very limited space to grow
it in.
Which is why I stated that for rural consumers it wouldn't be as
much of a problem as for urban consumers.
Of course there's always the risk that your crops might yield shit,
that the potency isn't as strong as you like it, pests destroying
the crops or theft, off the top of my head. Sure you could throw
some seeds in the backyard and grow some weed. Will it be any good?
Are you going to have the patience to grow it, harvest it, cure it
and store it? Or are you going to buy a $50 ounce of chronic and be
back on your porch smoking a fat blunt in 20 minutes?
I do believe marijuana is a gateway drug and it does open
the door to harder drugs (based on anecdotal experience with
*friends*).
If marijuana is a gateway drug, its because its a gateway to the
black market suppliers of harder drugs.
In addition, during alcohol prohibition, beer drinking was replaced
by harder liquor for a lot of people, because of the black market
in alcohol.
But, regardless, even if prohibition hasn't caused to be a gateway
drug, it has obviously failed from keeping to from being a gateway
to harder drugs, no?
Sturmbannfuhrer,
It's my experience that prohibition of marijuana encourages the
"gateway effect".
Many reasonable people, especially in the age of internet research,
deem that marijuana is less harmful than alcohol and worth
trying.
But due to prohibition, procurement and use of marijuana forces the
users in to the black market which also contains the more dangerous
drugs. Further, the marijuana users experience that the government
is really full of bs with its marijauna "education", and is perhaps
also full of bs with regards to its information on harder drugs. It
is a tragedy for our country's youth who get burnt out and addicted
to hard drugs since they quite reasonably assumed that the
government must be lieing about all drugs like they lie about
marijuana.
If marijuana were regulated like alcohol and taken out of the black
market, there would be a clear separation between the soft drug
marijuana and the hard drugs.
(Libertarian note: yes, no drugs should be illegal, but it is
hugely practical to focus only on marijuana law. There is a giant
swath of voters out there who strongly think our marijuana policy
is ridiculous but who also think heroin would destroy the country
if it were legal.)
Growing cheap easy weed is..well, cheap and easy. But most
people won't enjoy it, and it won't get you high.
Gestation, sex identification, proper amounts of light, water and
nutrients...in order to grow the higher quality brands, all this is
necessary before you even begin the budding process. Outdoor limits
growing season, but indoor costs are high with the price of
electricity and the stronger, more powerful lights used.
No, it'll spark new businesses in commercial growing, but home
grown will be a niche thing to show off to your friends (much like
homebrewing).
That said, for idiots of the "gateway" persuasion, it has more to
do with tendency. I know a number of casual to daily smokers who
have never tried anything harder (and some who don't drink). On the
flip side, I know coke and meth addicts who started by smoking
dope. And knowing all of the, it wasn't as if you couldn't see it
coming. It's all down to whether or not you believe in personal
choice, freedom, and the natural consequences of those choices.
Obviously some of you don't.
Forgive the run on's, but my preview button doesn't work.
I checked on California's AB390. Here is what the state
legislative website
(http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/ab_390_bill_20090401_status.html)
had to say about the bill's status:
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 03/31/2009
LAST HIST. ACTION : In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing
canceled at
the request of author.
COMM. LOCATION : ASM PUBLIC SAFETY
There is no indication of why the first hearing was "canceled at
the request of author," or why there hasn't been any further action
since the end of March. Does anyone out there know?
The legalization of marijuana would create enermous tax revenue for the government along with making those who chose to smoke avoid having to deal with "dealers". It would create more job opportunities and allow the dea to focus on real drugs...if one smokes pot the illgealization of it is not going to prevent them from smoking, only make it more dangerous and difficult for them to get it. why not make tax money off something that the united states people obviously want?
Steve D said:
"All the drug dealers who now traffic in pot will happily settle
for incomes a fraction of what they are now."
Most people involved are just making a little money or getting free
pot. This is not unlike what we saw during alcohol prohibition.
There were probably millions of Americans involved in the supply
side of the black market for alcohol to one degree or another. My
grandfather and his brother had a still in the woods and they
cooked up a little hooch to so they'd have booze and so they could
sell a little to supplement their income from their carpentry
business. When prohibition was over they got into building homes
and later whole subdivisions. They didn't continue with a "life of
crime." Most of the people involved did not continue in criminal
enterprises. Gangsters like Al Capone stayed with a life of crime,
but most people involved with the supply side of the black market
for alcohol did not.
Our government now estimates that Mexican organized crime make more
than 60% of their income from marijuana sales. Some estimates put
that percentage even higher. These organizations supply most all
the cocaine, meth and heroin consumed here. They are already
involved heavily in other illegal activities. When they lose
marijuana they are not going to be able to replace the many
billions of dollars they make each year from it. It is also going
to hurt them to lose the countless marijuana sellers who sell their
marijuana and also help them move their far more dangerous drugs.
With so many marijuana sellers they always have plenty of people to
tap to sell the cocaine they smuggle in, the meth they produce.
This is one of their best resources. They'll lose that and the
lion's share of their income. They will shrink. There just won't be
the money there to attract the steady stream of recruits they
attract today. They won't have the money have so many in law
enforcement and the government in the take. They won't have so much
money to hire all the mercenaries they use now. They will be
smaller, less powerful and easier to contain. The black market for
drugs, which really is mostly a black market for marijuana, will be
much smaller and easier to contain.
As for people who "fail the natural selection test," I seriously
doubt there are that many of them who want to smoke pot who aren't
already smoking it. We aren't keeping that many from smoking pot
with our laws, and the few we do keep from doing it have shown that
they are law abiding people with some self control or they'd be
smoking it. The real screw ups are definitely not the types
deterred by the slight chance that they could get caught and get a
slap on the wrist. I truly don't think there are many people out
there who really want to smoke pot but won't just because it is
illegal. If people don't smoke pot, it's because there are so many
good reasons not to smoke it, not because they are worried about
the very slim likelihood of getting caught and having to pay a
fine.
Finally, on the point about hemp, it's not going to replace oil or
save the world or any of this nonsense some people think it will
do. It is a useful plant though and it's a shame we don't have a
hemp industry. Most industrialized nations now permit hemp growing.
We import all our hemp. If we legalized marijuana, companies like
Monsanto would develop marijuana stains with reasonable potency
that also have good fiber characteristics, high THC hemp. We'd end
up with a hemp industry that would create jobs and benefit us in
other ways. It's not some wonderplant that's going to save the
world, but it is a useful plant our farmers should be able to
grow.
The illegality of cannabis turns it into a gateway drug for alcohol addiction. Cannabis users may turn to alcohol as a substitute when it is unavailable due to illegality, or when they chose to come into compliance with the law. While both intoxicants are in their own way deleterious, the legal substance, ethanol, is toxic to the point of being deadly, and is physically addictive. While abstinance from all intoxicants is certainly the preferable path, cannabis could offer a legal alternative to deadly ethyl alcohol.
I want marijuana legalized because its prohibition doesn't
benefit this country in any way whatsoever.
The costs of the prohibition include, but are not limited to,
800,000 arrests every year, 6,000 brutal deaths last year alone at
the hands of the Mexican cartels, $40 billion in direct enforcement
costs and lost taxes, and distrust among our young people towards
law enforcement and the government.
The benefits of the prohibition are none, the costs enormous. We
need to legalize the production and sale of marijuana to adults,
NOW!
Here's ALL you need to know about marijuana: I smoked my usual
two 'wake and bake' jays and went for the taping of that well-known
game show where you actually have to know a bunch of stuff as well
as be able to strategize.
Of course I won. Twice. And led the third game until the final
question (which everybody in my family missed!)
I never drink 'cause it makes me stoopid.
Grow up, America, and legalize it. The amount of hypocrisy around
weed denial in public is staggering.
Good points and good discussion everyone with a minimal of
invective (which I shall endeavor to not lose sleep over..wish me
luck in my struggle).
I really think most of us are all in the same boat about
legalization based on freedom of choice with the potential benefits
far outweighing the potential negatives as a not-insignificant
complementary incentive.
Will it be legalized and offered in convenience stores? I doubt in
my lifetime it will but should it indeed happen, I'll be @
7-11.
So let's say Marijuana is made legal for personal use, is
heroin next for legalization? Are we going to be able to go into a
7-11 and score a ball of coke for a Tuesday night?
I would have started with heroin instead of pot (not using, I mean
legalizing, have no interest in using either).
So, ummm, I dont have a line to draw.
I do believe marijuana is a gateway drug and it does open
the door to harder drugs (based on anecdotal experience with
*friends*).
In chronilogical order, I at least sampled the following drugs
-
Caffiene
Alcohol
Nicotine
Marijuana
Cocaine
PCP
Barbituates
LSD
Amphetamines
Heroin
Psilocybin
Going by the gateway hypothesis, if we outlaw caffiene, drug
experimentation will cease.
And while I would like to see it legalized, where do we draw
the line?
We don't.
Of course there's always the risk that your crops might
yield shit
One of my early homebrew attempts was nicknamed "O'Doul's" for its
lack of potency. It was tasty, but people were slamming it and not
getting a buzz.
I swear it was about 4.5% abv, but maybe I screwed something up in
my measurements. :)
For my lovely Juanita -
Evil hearted you.
You kept,
Kidding me along,
With your phoney smile,
And with,
Your siren song smiling, beguiling,
You lead me on 'til all hope's gone,
Persuading, degrading,
On my knees I try to please.
But I love you,
Just the same,
And I want you,
To remain,
By my side,
And you'll see,
Just how much you,
Mean to me.
Peru legalized/decrim'd about 5 years ago... at that time Peru was one of the top country's with major drug issues such as heroin and cocain... guess what happened. Drug use is lower than ever in Peru... They just legalized it all... meth users are down, cocain and heroin users are dwindling, even aids is on the lowest its been in years... by legalizing the substances people no longer saw the pleasures of use... and this comes from a society known for its drugs and usage. If this has worked more than once, why wouldn't it work for us... yes granted, legalizing just MJ would NOT resolve our issues, other than making mass amts of money for our gov't. I may be a MJ user myself, but am against unnatural supplements. However, statistics clearly show those harder drugs are being used less and less... what do you thing US?
It likes like Obama is behind the times. But don't worry, he still has the admiration of liberaltarians everywhere.
I'll get right on supporting this as soon as I find that Cheeto
I dropped in the couch. God so hungry. Do you want to see the self
filling water cooled 4 foot bong I built out of tin foil, an egg,
and a hair brush? Have you seen my Cheeto?
What are we going to do with all the AR15s and APCs the police
departments have if we legalize weed? Come on guys the swat and ERT
guys can't just play paintball on the weekend. They need some real
action!! You can't take that from them.
As far as I know, this is the first time a national survey
has found majority support for repealing cannabis
prohibition
I was already to beef you about this line, recalling that around
the time of Carter it was polling about 2:1 in favor, then I
read
as opposed to merely decriminalizing possession for personal
use
and I recall that the issue in the late '70s was de-crim, not full
legalization.
I've said before that I didn't believe that pot would be
decriminalized (much less legalized) in my lifetime, having been
disappointed so many times in the past. The current groundswell
looks different than the past, however. Maybe I should start
getting my hopes up again.
.. Hobbit
I don't care about the constitution, it is only a piece of
paper
So's the bible, Juanita.
.. Hobbit
@ Juanita | May 7, 2009, 2:56pm | #
Hopefully the feds will quash this nonsense about 'legalizing' pot.
It sends a bad message to America's children that drug abuse is
OK.
I don't care about the constitution, it is only a piece of
paper
Wow, Juanita, that is weapons grade stupidity that you possess.
Constitution?? Written on hemp paper btw.
Go back to the century you came from. The future is here and we
don't want you.
I know responsible cannabis users who started using tobacco and
alcohol before moving on to cannabis.
Tobacco and alcohol = the gateways to the gateway drug
Milk is a gateway substance.
Research has shown that 99% of all heroin and cocaine users started
with milk as their white substance of choice.
I voted for McCain. Ive done every drug known to man. Havent bothered with any of them for 10 years. I think all drugs including heroin, cocaine, and anabolic steroids should be legal. I think in two years half of the people who voted for Obama will say, "Fuck that tent revival con man."
Marijuana should be legalized it could boost the economy People already make about anywhere from 50$-250$ and thats on a bad day. Medically its pretty much a mild pain reliever gets rid of head aches and slight muscle discomfort. Its safer than alcohol people can't die from an over dose from Pot Maybe some driving restrictions for the use of marijuana. I really don't see the huge hissy bitch fit that people place upon something that was here before man. Weed Good. Man Bad.
It would be a boon for transportation, the environment, history lessons, and my self-esttem, because hippies wouldn't have to feel so ostrosized by society they don't bother cleaning up. And when I give young hitchiking hippies a ride, and tell them stories of the way it was 50 years ago when I was like them, I don't have to realize I probably smelled just as bad when I was wearing all my freak flags.
If marijuana were legalized the "gateway" theory would be smashed. This theory is the belief that the use of marijuana increases ones chances of using more dangerous drugs such as cocaine or heroine. But, here's how legalization would overcome this theory. The drug users more than likely moved on to the harder drugs because of their continued contact with drug dealers. They already know where to get the harder drugs, and have most likely been offered them. If marijuana was legalized then pot smokers would not come into contact with drug dealers. This would eliminate any exposure to the more dangerous drugs and therefore would finally bury this "theory" that all of these ignorant anti-pot supporters always rant about.
I'm a 61 year old conservative Republican. I enjoy smoking a doobie. Legalize it. I'm not going to eat YOUR Fritos.
I wonder why 7-11 never gets behind these bills. They stand to make a lot of money off illegal drugs, since they will all someday be available at your local one.
And I'm so sick of the pot is a gateway drug thing. Alcohol is
the ultimate gateway drug. Most people's first buzz is from their
first beer. If they like the buzz, they want more.
All my friends that smoke (and are successful adults) never got
into any hard drugs.
Just legalize it. Sure it will be exciting for the first 6 months,
but then you'll find things will be the same. The same smokers will
smoke probably the same amount, and the folks that dont'
smoke....won't. Life will move on.
Why spend money to put people in jail for marijuana, rather not make money off of it and let us sell it.
Has homebrewing come under fire because it removes a revenue
stream?
Just like homebrewing, growing marijuana means the average American
user would probably have to read a book or something to master the
intricacies. And how many Americans are actually going to do
that?
It would work out just like booze. A lot of people would try to
grow their own, only to abandon it down the line because they can
never grow better bud cheaper than the government can sell it to
us. I am so ready to be able to buy a pack of Marlboro Greens.
The gateway drug "belief" is a bunch of bull!! You can't get
addicted to marijuana like you can tobacco. You guys should really
check out that movie "Super High Me". It gives a bunch of really
good points.
Marijuana isn't life threatening. Look at tobacco and alcohol: you
can get cancer from both. The most marijuana can do is shorten your
lung capacity and make you feel like your floating on a cloud
:)
"It would work out just like booze. A lot of people would try to
grow their own, only to abandon it down the line because they can
never grow better bud cheaper than the government can sell it to
us. I am so ready to be able to buy a pack of Marlboro
Greens."
It's not hard, it's actually very fun, plus I save hundreds of
dollars a month (and have more friends then I use to).
And yet, Obama still chuckles at them before moving on to the next question.
An important question is whether we continue a system in which
all of the money flows to criminal drug cartels, or do we legalize
and tax marijuana so the money can flow to the public treasury and
the rebuilding of America?
The gang violence and destruction of public lands caused by
criminals operating outside of the prohibition laws would end if
individuals could legally grow a few plants of their own at
home.
One approach: support a personal use and cultivation permit, for
example $100 for twelve plants, with the revenue split between the
Federal and State governments.
Let's let ordinary Americans grow a little marijuana in their own
backyards and put the criminal cartels out of business.
LEGALIZE IT FOR GODS SAKE !NOT ONE HUMAN BEING SHOULD DIE FOR THE SAKE OF A PLANT!!! JESUS WAS ANNOINTED IN HEMP JUICE !! GEORGE WASHINGTON AND THOMAS JEFFERSON GREW IT!! ..... MAKE ILLEAGAL . DRUGS THAT KILL!!!METH , HEROIN, BUT COKE LEAVES SHOULD BE OK !....UNPROCESSED COKE LEAVES LIKE THE ONES YOU SUCK ON IN PERU ,,ARE GREAT FOR STRENUOUS HIGH ALTITUDE CLIMBING ...ETC... USD TO BE IN YOUR SOFTDRINK!!!! AMERICA ,,, WAKE-UP ....PROHIBITION IS OVER AND THE FREEKS HAVE LEFT THE BLDNG>>>>>>
This is not a free country, to claim we have "freedom" is a lie. Being incarcerated and abused for life because you enjoy raising and eating your favorite species of plant is far from freedom. When gardening can carry a life sentence, you unquestionably live in a highly oppressive country. You live in a country that needs to be liberated. Prohibition is unacceptable in a free society, it doesn't matter if it has majority or minority support. We don't poll to find out the support level for slavery, we just know that depriving people of life and liberty without justification is wrong. It doesn't matter if there is majority support, prohibition is an atrocity, and the U.S. should recognize that if as a government they are in the atrocity business, they have failed and need to be removed from power.
Legalize it and treat it like alcohol - plain and simple.
After 6 months of being legal, the same people who smoke, will
smoke. The people who don't won't.
Not much will change.
And I'm so sick of the Gateway Drug Argument. Alcohol is the
ultimate gateway drug. It's most people's first buzz. And if they
like it, they want more. All of my successful friends that smoke
never got into coke or crack.
PLZ LEGALIZE IT!! we are tired of going to jail for some weed it just dosent make sence
Legalize Marijuana i went to High School and College and now i
am the same as i always was marijuana did not make me burnt like
people say it does. It can not kill you.. why is it illegal?
Also Hemp Oil IS THE CURE FOR CANCER!! So what is the problem with
legalizing? It will also help out the economy and fix what the
presidents
before screwed up!
Mary Jane should be legal cuz i don't want to get in trouble for smokin it n i dont wanna see my friends get in trouble...
I believe we should legalize it as soon as possible. Think about all those people who are suffering now, that could be helped by its legalization. We have proven it helps them. Think about the families that have to sit and watch their loved one suffer because the one think that could help is wrongfully illegal. After you think about that, think about all the good the taxation would do to our currently suffering economy. Were suffering, and marijuana could help. It would hurt nothing, and yet we still won't do it? I want to know why!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245