Radley Balko | January 30, 2009
Over the weekend, I'll put up a more thorough review of the last few days in the trial of Ryan Frederick, the Chesapeake, Virginia man charged with capital murder for shooting a police officer during a botched drug raid.
But here's one item of note: Earlier this week, we heard the unlikely testimony of Steven Wright, the police informant in the case. Wright gave damning statements about buying marijuana from Frederick dozens of times over about a six month period, and state that Frederick threatened to kill both him in his family. Wright also admitted to both illegally breaking into Frederick's home three days before the raid (to collect probable cause for the search warrant), and to lying to the police about said break-in for months. His testimony was not only harmful to Frederick, it helped assuage allegations that Chesapeake police officers were sending informants to break into private homes in order to look for evidence for search warrants.
Wright has been in jail since last October on several charges stemming from his theft and use of credit cards, including a charge of grand larceny. He was supposed to appear in court last December on those charges, but that appearance was delayed, rather conveniently, until two days after his testimony in Frederick's trial.
Yesterday, Wright was released on bond. He still hasn't been charged for breaking in to Frederick's home, nor has he been charged for obstructing the investigation of Frederick and the raid by allegedly lying to police about the break-in for months.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I don't care about no 'evidence' to show his 'innocence'. The dude was a pothead and he killed a cop, he deserves life in prison, period, end of discussion.
You're right, Juanita. People should not be allowed to defend
themselves or their homes from intruders when it is LATER learned
that the intruder collects a government paycheck.
If I have trouble sleeping at night, I'll just count Juanitas.
Relax. It's just a regular poster posing as Juanita. Though we should really get J sub D to check himself. He's in love with her and claims he can tell the difference between spoofers and the "real" Juanita.
Did Ryan's lawyer make it clear for the jury on
cross-examination that Wright was never charged with burglary or
obstruction?
This seems like one of the few issues in the case that might
actually change the mind of the the type of person who might
otherwise be inclined to convict. To put it another way, this lack
of charges seem to bug some people who aren't that bothered by the
rest of what happened.
No Dave, he merely grilled him about his consumption of HFCS. That tactic sort of confused me, I'll admit.
I forget - when you say he lied to police about the breakin for months, what do you mean? He obviously told them that he broke in, right? Because the day they got Frederick they told him they knew that someone had broken into his house.
You're right, Juanita. People should not be allowed to
defend themselves or their homes from intruders when it is LATER
learned that the intruder collects a government
paycheck.
While the no knock tactics are meant to suprise and confuse the
criminal, the police do announce that they are police.
Did he actually admit being on HFCS, or did the label say: HFCS and/or sugar? That is usually the loophole they use on the stand.
Who needs witness tampering when you've got the indictment of Damocles hanging over their heads?
Dave, amazingly enough he brazenly claimed to avoid all HFCS, and I think the jury bought it. Frederick is screwed if they believe that.
I forget - when you say he lied to police about the breakin
for months, what do you mean? He obviously told them that he broke
in, right? Because the day they got Frederick they told him they
knew that someone had broken into his house.
Wright told them that someone had broken into the house, but
repeatedly denied it was him.
Oddly, the police apparently found nothing amiss in that.
OK, so he told them that someone ELSE broke into Frederick's house, and then proceeded to tell them what he...er.. I mean the other person found there? I'm getting confused..
"While the no knock tactics are meant to suprise and confuse the
criminal, the police do announce that they are police."
Yes, the one announcement of "POLICE" through a closed door and
then breaking down the door while I'm asleep makes perfect sense. I
always act completely coherent in the middle of the night when I'm
dreaming about Rainbow Puppy Island.
Perhaps NOT surprising the SUSPECT would mean Shivers would still
be alive. Frederick could have been picked up on his way to his
mail box in broad daylight and served the warrant then. That would
have been much safer and smarter (less likely to be packing on his
way to see if Landscapers Quarterly has arrived) for everyone
involved.
"The dude was a pothead"
Juanita, you must be one of those people who can justify casting
the first stone.
Nick, Juanita is a regularly reoccurring sockpuppet. Don't waste your energy, just enjoy the performance.
Nick,
Or write love poetry to her. Juanita seems like the type that just
needs lovin'.
It's just a regular poster posing as Juanita. Though we
should really get J sub D to check himself. He's in love with her
and claims he can tell the difference between spoofers and the
"real" Juanita.
Nay, nay NS. 'Tis indeed the anti-drug siren who has won my
heart.
E-mail me, my love.
Nah - Juanita's too conservative to experience "lovin'" She'd only accept intercourse after marriage, and only for the purpose of creating a baby.
"""While the no knock tactics are meant to suprise and confuse
the criminal, the police do announce that they are police""
It's reasonable to conclude a surprised and confused person can't
comprehend the annoucement because he's surprised and confused.
Confused and surprised cops kill innocent people every now and then
and they usually escape punishment.
PROTECT THE KING'S MEN!!!!
Frederick took the stand yesterday and corroborated Wright's
testomony about plants stolen. Frederick told the jury that he knew
Wright broke into his garage and stole some of his plants and then
he decided to destroy the remaining plants. How many plants? We
won't know since Wright interfered with the police raid by stealing
would be evidence. But Frederick's own words make Wright look more
believable. Not good for Frederick.
The real issue is the murder charge. While I still believe
Frederick didn't intend to kill a cop, and he was concerned by a
recent and close by home invasion, the idea that Fredrick thought
the person breaking in when he shot the cop was related to his
garage break in is out the window, becuase he knew who broke in.
Did he think he was shooting at Wright?
To add to Reinmoose's comment, The break in was only three days
prior to the raid. Therefore Wright had to have told the cops
within 72 hours of his breaking in.
All evidence presented about Frederick wanting to kill a cop is BS,
nothing I've seen presented would make me believe that. The cops
did the least they could to make Frederick know it was them. But
his actions were still wrong under VA law. My understanding is the
castle doctrine in VA requires you to retreat. They have to be in
your house for you to shoot them. Therefore it boils down to
whether or not the jury can consider less charges. Anyone know
anything about that? If the jury can only consider the charge,
Federick may get a hung jury on the murder charge. If lesser
charges are available, he will probably be found guilty on one of
those.
We all know that this trial is going to end poorly for
Frederick. Appeals, and hopefully a USDOJ lawsuit or criminal
investigation, are the only way this is going to be resolved in
anything resembling a satisfactory manner.
Radley should keep reporting on the outrageousness of this all, of
course.
I really get the sense that in this, and similar cases, that the
police and prosecutors are really going all out. If anyone anywhere
gets acquitted, the whole house of cards will start to fall.
Regardless of whether the 12:48 comment is from the "real" Juanita,
there are many people in our society who do feel just that way.
This is the root of the problem. Fear. Unthinking trust of the
government. Complete lack of understanding of even the most
fundamental concepts of our legals system. It's going to be a long,
hard slog to reclaim our rights.
Frederick took the stand?! Why? With a decent cross-examination of the witnesses who already testified, the prosecution's whole case seems like it could be destroyed, at least for one juror. Why give the prosecution a chance to cross examine Frederick? I'm beginning to question the intelligence of the defense attorney.
Nick, my take is that it has become a game of credibility with respects to the murder charge. Frederick did appear credible. The issue of the snitches is being looked at today. If the defense can show that the prosecutor is deceiving about Fredrick knowing killing an officer then the prosecution loses credibility over the central issue. That's why I expect a hung jury on the murder charge.
Nick,
I think it was to show the jury that he's not some sort of feral
madman drug kingpin who asassinates police and kicks puppies.
It's come down to preventing a guy from doing a life
sentence.
Not really sure why the defense is doing what they are, but the
above makes some sense.
It will be curious how today turns out. Radley's lagging, ;-) so I've been going to Tabor's blog and the VA Pilot online site regularly.
Man, I hope the jury sees it that way. If he's got 12 Juanitas on his jury, he's so screwed. Their minds would already be made up.
i disagree with balko's characterization that wright's testimony was harmful to frederick or that it assuaged allegations of police misconduct at all. he admitted breaking into the house three days before **to collect probable cause for the search warrant**(!) juror brucie goes "lol wut!"
If someone threatened to kill me, the first thing I would do would be to break into his house, where he could do it legally.
Bruce, that's incorrect, Wright was not sent there to collect
probable cause, he was sent to verify it still existed prior to the
raid. Which makes it all the more funny that Wright did take some
of the plants. Wrights actions made sure the plants WERE NOT there
at the time of the raid. I would think the cops would be pissed
about that. But since Ryan shot the cop, my guess is that the cops
are not that concerned about the pot charges.
Dogzilla, two things, 1. The threat allegedly occured after the
break in. 2. Wright didn't break into the house, only the
deattached garage. The threat might have been made but since the
prosecutor has enlisted false testomony about Ryan boasting and
such, I believe Wright's claim is also coached.
Professional witness Skeeter swatted like a fly.
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/01/frederick-informant-also-offered-information-vick-case
Here's a link to the pilot online's article about Frederick's
testimony.
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/01/defendant-frederick-testifies-he-didnt-intend-kill-officer
I know Ryan; he's a really tiny guy, and about the least threatening person I ever met. I refuse to believe he would ever threaten to kill anyone's family, especially after what happened to his mom. I hope he gets out of this OK.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245