Jacob Sullum | April 10, 2008
The Office of National Drug Control Policy has a new, mildly amusing anti-pot website featuring a faux documentary called Stoners in the Mist (parts of which, I assume, will also be featured in anti-drug PSAs). Although the jokes are mostly ripped off from Cheech & Chong and such pothead-depicting movies as Fast Times at Ridgemont High, I suppose I prefer this soft-sell approach to the ads accusing pot smokers of funding terrorism or initimating that it's only a matter of time before they accidentally run over a little girl or blow a friend's head off. Then again, people might be more receptive to subtler lies in an entertaining package, in which case the better propaganda is actually worse.
The mockumentary and the material accompanying it include many misrepresentations (see if you can spot them all!), but the most fundamental one is the conflation of pot smokers with stoners, which is rather like treating all drinkers as drunks. No doubt people who spend most of their lives stoned do have difficulty accomplishing things, relating to others, carrying on conversations, and catching basketballs. This is the grain of truth at the center of the pothead humor from which Stoners in the Mist borrows so shamelessly. But the traditional portrayals are usually gentle, even affectionate, and are especially popular among people who like to smoke pot, who recognize both the realistic aspects and the comic exaggeration. I doubt there are many people who decide to stop smoking weed (or never to try it) after watching Dude, Where's My Car? or Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle. By contrast, although Stoners in the Mist resembles a sketch from a weak episode of Chapelle's Show, the ONDCP's intended message is that all pot smokers are losers. In a country where about half the population admits to trying marijuana before graduating high school, and a substantial majority surely knows at least a few pot smokers pretty well by then, who is going to believe this message? Probably only the teenagers who were not inclined to smoke pot in the first place.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Why don't they ever do a PSA about the real danger of heavy
marijuana use?
Jam Bands
New ONDCP Message: Don't Smoke Pot Too Much
No, you should smoke just enough.
I don't think being anti-stoner is any worse than being anti-drunk;
it's common sense that overindulgence in anything tends to have
consequences.
I think having commercial marijuana producers doing "Smoke
Responsibly" ads a la the beer companies would be a much more
sensible and effective message.
New ONDCP Message: Don't Smoke Pot Too Much
Like the MTV "Rock Against Drugs" ads when I was a lad:
Shot of Jon Bon Jovi backstage at a concert. "Look around, you
don't see any drugs. Drugs are not everyday fun."
Ummm...ok. So, Catholic holidays, or what?
Stop with your suggestions please, if we create ads that
actually reduce pot smoking then where would I get my new crop of
workers for my expaning prison labor programs? Also what would
happen to drug prices if we really reduced drug use in the country?
prices would crash!
This would be horrible for the funding mechanisms of many
critically important CIA operations. If you are in favor of the
great American project of freedom spreading then you will stop
being so unpatriotic towards our drug war policies.
At some point, they have to throw in the towel. When they start citing 'lack of ambition' as a reason to keep a drug illegal, the game is up.
If someone would just sneak some pot brownies into the ONDCP's offices, this could all be over once they are laughing uncontrollably and remarking on how big their hands are.
Pot-smoking is for gay men... Not that there's anything wrong
with that!!
Now where did I put my bong...??
So, in the great debate over marijuana, the ONDCP has been
reduced to ad hominem.
Prediction: The next ONDCP ad campaign compares pot smokers to
Hitler.
In a country where about half the population admits to
trying marijuana before graduating high school, and a substantial
majority surely knows at least a few pot smokers pretty well by
then, who is going to believe this message? Probably only the
teenagers who were not inclined to smoke pot in the first
place.
Well observed, Mr. Sullum
At some point, they have to throw in the towel. When they start
citing 'lack of ambition' as a reason to keep a drug illegal, the
game is up.
I thought the game was up when they started teaching that it was a
"gateway" drug. It's basically admitting that there's nothing
actually wrong with smoking a doobie except for that they think
it'll make you more likely to do harder drugs.
At some point, they have to throw in the towel. When they
start citing 'lack of ambition' as a reason to keep a drug illegal,
the game is up.
How I wish I could believe that. What it's going to take, is a
legal market anywhere in the free world. Not decriminalized, legal,
where contracts can be enforced. One hamlet anywhere in Europe or
North America does that, and the game is up.
who is going to believe this message? Probably only the
teenagers who were not inclined to smoke pot in the first
place.
Due to my somewhat fruitless attempts to keep tabs on the younger
familial generation, I have a strange collection of high school age
myspace friends. Some of them are very adamantly against drugs, and
sound like ONDCP propaganda on the pages. I don't know all of them
personally, so some of them may be yanking my chain. However, some
appear to be serious. I conclude the agitprop is working on some of
them.
Shot of Jon Bon Jovi backstage at a concert. "Look around,
you don't see any drugs. Drugs are not everyday fun."
Ummm...ok. So, Catholic holidays, or what?
Holy days of obligation, if you include Sundays, works for
me.
the ONDCP's intended message is that all pot smokers are losers.
In a country where about half the population admits to trying
marijuana before graduating high school, and a substantial majority
surely knows at least a few pot smokers pretty well by then, who is
going to believe this message?
I believe it. Now, why would anyone believe being a "loser" is a
bad thing? O, yeah, spend all your time working so you can buy crap
instead of dope
Why does every ONDCP ad depicting "stoners" always include a guy with a knitted cap?
which is rather like treating all drinkers as
drunks.
ARE YOU IMPLYING THAT THEY ARE NOT? ALL WHO WORSHIP AT THE ALTAR OF
ALCOHOL ARE DEGENERATES WHO MUST BE STRIPPED OF ALL FORMS OF
TRANSPORTATION.
Taktix®,
That's the one part of the ad I don't actually have a problem with.
It's really quite accurate.
Up there with the most ridiculous attempt to justify the most ridiculous law ever.
@ pinette
No, it is illegal in both places. IIRC, it is not really enforced
in the Netherlands, Spain and Denmark, but Sweden in fact is just
as anti-pot (perhaps more so) as the U.S. and France.
The only way I'd be willing to legalize drugs is if we can get a
global water/salt or CO2 tax put in place. Until then I will
continue to make sure that all the CFR candidates we allow in the
game will be firmly against drug legalization.
There is no better way for me to gain control over my peasants and
your stupid children than the current drug war.
You silly little people with your appeals to logic and justice.
Just make sure you vote for one of the two wonderful candidates I
give you, it is your duty....aaaahhhhhhaaaaahhhaa
With the corporations government bootlicker's who
require peeing for a job, what's the problem?
Why does every ONDCP ad depicting "stoners" always include a
guy with a knitted cap?
Is it a cunning cap?
Some of them are very adamantly against drugs, and sound like
ONDCP propaganda on the pages. I don't know all of them personally,
so some of them may be yanking my chain. However, some appear to be
serious. I conclude the agitprop is working on some of them.
I think a lot of people just get really put off by what they see in
people who drink and smoke pot heavily. I don't drink or smoke pot
largely because I hate the way I've seen my parents and friends act
when they've been intoxicated.
I think a lot of people just get really put off by what they
see in people who drink and smoke pot heavily. I don't drink or
smoke pot largely because I hate the way I've seen my parents and
friends act when they've been intoxicated.
Yeah, I try to do my part to keep the kids off drugs by being a
horrible example. It seems to be working on my niece who lives with
us. However, some of these kids come from conservative bible
thumpin' homes, so I don't know that they've seen a lot of
alcohol/drug use.
Nothing wrong with pointing out that "stoners" and "drunks" are
losers. FWIW, the gateway drug thing, is true enough. I don't know
anyone who started with heroin...or PCP.
They are.
That doesn't justify the WOD, by any means, however.
Neu Mejican*
*former professional dope smoker...I got over it.
They (stoners & Drunks) are losers, for the most part, that
is...
Just to stir the pot around here... those losers should be provided
treatment for their addiction rather than jail time, if'n they want
it, that is...
The two stoners in the videos are totally bombed, yet their eyes
are not bloodshot. I smell a rat!
And one more observation: the bit about throwing stuff at stoners
who can't catch is flat out wrong. Smoking up can give one
miraculous powers to catch objects. Seriously. Perhaps because pot
makes coherent thinking so difficult, the stoner can make catches
that are impossible for the sober man. I have observed this
phenomenon over and over, because the stoned person is usually so
bad at throwing the object. Like a frog catching a fly, I've seen
keys hurled through the air snatched up while the stoner never
broke eye contact with the thrower. While reaction time is
certainly impaired in most instances, improbable catches are
actually increased. Anybody else notice this?
"While reaction time is certainly impaired in most instances,
improbable catches are actually increased. Anybody else notice
this?"
Yes.
"Why does every ONDCP ad depicting "stoners" always include a guy
with a knitted cap?"
*slides knitted cap under chair*
That has got to be one the goddam stupidest pieces of shit I
have ever seen. It has all the wit and wisdom of a christian
comedian. You can smell the flop sweat oozing from the
screen.
When Lord? When will this madness end? Free us from the grip of
these idiots!
Why have I never met anyone vehemently anti pot? Sure I get a
few who are somewhat against doing it. They break so easily after 5
minutes of facts
(not to do it just to legalize it) Do anti pot people ever leave
their house?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245