Jacob Sullum | June 11, 2007
In the U.S., smoking
bans that apply to just about every other workplace commonly exempt
tobacconists, on the theory that the consumption of tobacco
products is the raison de'tre of such businesses, many of which
provide lounge areas where customers can enjoy their
purchases. In the Netherlands, by
contrast, a smoking ban that takes effect
in July 2008 will apply to cannabis-selling
coffee shops, where on-site consumption is an even bigger part of
the business. Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende
explains:
Coffee shops will be treated in the same manner as other catering businesses. They will be smoke-free. It would have been wrong to move towards a smoke-free catering industry and then make an exception for coffee shops. People would not have understood that.
Will people who come to Amsterdam precisely to smoke really good pot in bohemian cafes understand it when they're told this tourist attraction is now illegal? Fortunately, there's a loophole: Coffee shop customers will be permitted to smoke in partitioned areas that employees do not have to enter. Depending on the ventilation requirements, such segregation could require a substantial investment. Presumably customers will still be allowed to eat cannabis-containing baked goods wherever they like. But what about customers who use vaporizers, which heat marijuana to release cannabinoids without burning it and therefore do not generate the combustion products associated with smoking?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Why would you want to ventilate the partitioned smoking
area?
(I can just imagine the kids hanging around that ventilation
fan)
It would have been wrong to move towards a smoke-free
catering industry
If the PM had just stopped right there . . .
and then make an exception for coffee shops. People would not
have understood that.
Yes, the little people. Too stupid to understand the difference
between a smokeshop and a deli. Thank God they have towering
intellects such as Prime Minister Balkenende to lead them by the
hand through their lives.
Coffee shop customers will be permitted to smoke in
partitioned areas that employees do not have to enter.
Employees? That chose to work in a FUCKING POT CAFE. Can they sign
a fucking waiver or something?
jesus-potatoes with mayonnaise and sesame sauce, "customers will be
permitted"... this rolls of the tounge so easy, yet is so fucking
wrong. We pay people for goods, then we are told what (not) to do
with it. Thanks! We'd all be happier if Gov "permitted" business
and consumers to make up their own goddam minds. There are
smokeshope where you can only consumer 'upstairs'... if this is a
consumer/employee protection, cant they choose to protect
themselves?
good god, I think RC Dean and I are probably 100% in accordance on something.
This result is a no-brainer. In America, the smoking ban
movement has closed the window of opportunity to marijuana
legalization.
The banners have been successful at two things:
1) convincing people that any smoke is imminently and permanently
dangerous; and
2) Public policy should be predicated upon the health of others,
not the freedom of others.
With those two, why on earth would the average American vote to
legalize marijuana?
It's over.
Ha ha! It's only a matter of time until the government tells us what to smoke, eat, say, read, and live!! Where is our freedom going?
Kwoodk,
I can't stand bars with Country music playing, and I don't think I
should be forced to work in a place where I'm forced to listen to
Country.
We should ban all Country music from bars. It's offensive and,
well, unhealthy. I mean, look at the tooth decay with some of those
people.
P.S. Sorry I directed that toward you Kwoodk, that last statement was intended for everybody...
"Pot will get you through times of no law better than laws will
get you through times of no pot."
Further affiant sayeth not.
We should ban all Country music from bars.
You are seriously straining my commitment to my libertarian
principals.
Pretty soon there will be no drinking in bars and no sex in
whorehouses.
Hey, it's for the children, which now includes every human being in
the Netherlands. Coming to a country near you!
Pretty soon there will be no drinking in bars...
Didn't they already try to stop that in Texas a few months ago?
Pretty soon there will be no drinking in bars...
No, alcohol will still be allowed, but the legal drinking age will
be raised to 35.
Actually, you will still be allowed to purchase the alcohol, but if you drink it you will be subject to fine or arrest.
In the Netherlands, by contrast, a smoking ban that takes
effect in July 2008 will apply to cannabis-selling coffee shops,
where on-site consumption is an even bigger part of the
business.
Thank you, now we will return to our regularly scheduled war on
drugs.
I've been living in the Netherlands for a few years now, mostly
in Amsterdam and now outside of Groningen. I can safely say that I
do not fear for the Amsterdam coffee-shops, smoking law or no. One
thing that must be understood about the Dutch is that they have a
habit of passing laws which are then ritually ignored by the
populace at large. Whilst Balkenende ("Harry Potter" as he is known
locally) represents a much more conservative government than has
been seen here in many years, the Dutch are a terribly practical
people, and will not allow millions of tourist euros to be pissed
away because of the moral pretentions of an unpopular government.
Many tourists are not aware that the purchase of more than about
ten grammes or so of weed is very much illegal in Holland, and yet
the coffeeshops obviously buy theirs in greater quantities... There
is the occasional "bust", a small fine is paid, and life goes
on.
Beyond the recent rightward trend in local elections, there is a
great deal of external pressure on the Dutch government to deal
with the "problem" of an open drug culture. The Danes have also
been cracking down on the more egregious instances in Copenhagen,
for much the same reason. The French and German governments,
inter alia, are terrified of the "Dutch Experiment", but
have been unable to use their leverage in the EU to force anything
more than paper compromises. The Dutch are a stubborn people, thank
the Sativa gods...
D.
the moral pretentions of an unpopular government.
They're a democracy, right? How'd this unpopular government get
there? And no, I'm not being facetious.
"Not to worry, Gilmore. Even joe and I agree on something about
once a week."
Sometimes, even a blind squirrel finds an acorn.
CB
There is misunderstanding in this report.
Cannabis smoking is not banned indoors in Holland. That will still
be permitted.
However, unlike North America pot smokers who smoke cannabis
without additives, 90% of Europeans mix tobacco with hashish in
order to smoke it. (This has lead to tens of thousands of
cannaphiles becoming inadvertently addicted to tobacco, which is
hazardous).
So now these smokers cannot mix tobacco into their cannabis. They
will be required to smoke cannabis straight without tobacco or go
into the special room for tobacco/cannabis smokers.
All smoking bylaws around Canada and Europe involve tobacco smoke
only. At our facility in Vancouver, smoking tobacco is strictly
forbidden indoors but no law restricts the presence of cannabis
smoke in our building. Federal prohibition makes possession of
cannabis a crime but that is not enforced in Vancouver, Canada.
Marc, are you sure the Dutch ban only applies to tobacco? I
haven't read the ban in its entirety, but my understanding is that
it does not just apply to tobacco.
Even if it does, that's pretty much everyone in a coffee shop,
spare the token american rolling his own...
@Marc Scott Emery:
This is soo funny!
I was just going to tell the reasonoids my story of being thrown
out of a Vancouver pot cafe for lightning up a cigarette (figured,
the air is so blue anyways, we were doing our semi-touristy
checking out of the city, being naive outsiders, when the guy at a
table two meters away started jumping up and down and shouting,
pointing at me: "This guy, this guy! He smokes a CIGARETTE!!!
Waitress, do something about it!!!" :) ) -- when I started reading
your posting, then looked at who posted it, then arrived at "our
facility in Vancover" part... :)
How are you legal troubles? Good luck, man! Seriously, you can set
up whatever rules you like in your place, and no, it did not take
any police force for me to learn that I was making others
uncomfortable and move to the porch area... But still makes a good
story to tell in less enlightened parts of the world! :)
Paul
They're a democracy, right? How'd this unpopular government
get there? And no, I'm not being facetious.
Well, they obviously weren't unpopular when they were elected. They
campaign as moderates, and then when elected become rather less so.
This should probably sound familiar to many people around the
world, and so I find your disbelief somewhat odd. Don't other
places have governments that become unpopular over time?
D.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245