Radley Balko | April 24, 2007
The Montreal man who killed a police officer who broke into his house during a 5am drug raid has been granted bail. It's believed to be the first time in Canadian history that someone accused of murdering a police officer has been granted bail. It's a notable ruling, and indicates that Parasiris, who claims he thought the invading officers were criminals, has a strong case.
The judge also ruled that police weren't justified in using a battering ram to enter Parasiris' home, and that the warrant didn't give them permission to enter at night.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
wait, what's this? Is that...fairness...in a trial that
involves a cop? Like, presumption of innocence and
everything?
There's something un-American going on up in Canada...
Indeed, g. Indeed.
Related link for the day:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkPb4s0-QcI
First Rush, now this. Like, one more thing, and it's enough reason to emigrate.
The last offence to carry the death penalty in Canada was the
murder of a police officer.
Given Canadians' general deference to authority the reluctance to
grant bail is not surprising.
it's enough reason to emigrate
I was proud to hear the news on the CBC this morning and hoping
that Mr. Balko would get to it today.
Montana is currently struggling with a revised self-defense law
(I have no real grasp of the details); the cops are fighting it,
and my suspicion is that they are afraid that a Corey Maye or
Parasiris would successfully be able to claim self-defense in one
of these situations.
As well they should.
Um, battering ram? Greek fire is the appropriate response to police using battering rams.
First Rush, now this. Like, one more thing, and it's enough
reason to emigrate.
Ah ah ah! Bilingualism, people! That should be:
"First Rush, now this. Like, one more thing, and it's enough reason
to emigrate.
Première Précipitation, maintenant ceci. Comme, une plus de chose,
et lui est assez de raison d'émigrer."
-lunchstealer/voleur des déjeuners
He is only getting off so easy because it was a drug raid. If the SWAT team had raided his house because they suspected him of speaking English, the government of Quebec would have had him drawn and quartered without trial.
With the judge's ruling on the warrant and entry, is there a possibility of charges against the police?
With the judge's ruling on the warrant and entry, is there a possibility of charges against the police?
It's possible, but unless the police officers knew, or were
reckless, that the warrant did not authorize their actions, it's
unlikely that the Crown could secure a conviction against the
police. If the police thought their actions were justified by the
warrant they would not be criminally liable.
So based on what we know now, there probably isn't enough evidence
to bring charges against any of the police officers.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245