Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
David Horowitz: "Ron Paul...is a Disgrace"
A sign, if of nothing else, of some of the trouble Ron Paul can expect as a GOP primary candidate in 2008's presidential cycle: Right-wing fighter against campus lefties David Horowitz (author, in a previous ideological life, of a huge book excoriating U.S. cold war foreign policy from a leftist perspective, The Free World Colossus ) says in a Frontpagemag interview:
Some of my best friends are libertarians and the greatest intellectual influence on me was Hayek. However, in practical political matters, libertarians tend to live in alternate universe, without regard for the real world consequences of their actions. Ron Paul – the only Libertarian in Congress – is a disgrace. He has waged a war against America’s war on terror, in lockstep with the left, and against the state of Israel, the frontline democracy in this war.
|3.5.07 @ 2:31PM|#
Ron Paul - the only Libertarian in Congress - is a
disgrace.
David Horowitz
That has to be the best endorsement he's gotten since he announced
his candidacy.
|3.5.07 @ 2:34PM|#
He has waged a war against America's war on terror, in
lockstep with the left, and against the state of Israel, the
frontline democracy in this war.
My memory must be getting poor, have I forgotten seeing footing of
Ron Paul in fatigues in the West Bank? Unless Horowitz is using the
"Nay vote of something I endorse, even when it passes anyway" as
his standard for "waging a war".
|3.5.07 @ 2:34PM|#
As if I needed another reason to vote for Dr. Paul! See its not just the shrieking Irish (Hannity, O'Reilly) talking heads who are cowards. The former campus radicals once bravely striding the ramparts turned out to be cringing chickeshits too!
Grotius|3.5.07 @ 2:38PM|#
What have been the "real world" consequences of the war in Iraq
again?
Taking our eye off the situation Afghanistan has got to be one of
them.
|3.5.07 @ 2:40PM|#
Anybody who ever thought any government could effectively fight
a War on Terror is a disgrace.
War?
What is it good far?
"cringing crikeshit" I love that.
|3.5.07 @ 2:40PM|#
Before this thread degenerates into the usual Iraq fest, one question; what if anything has Ron Paul ever said about Israel that would cause Horowitz to say that? I really don't know what Paul has to say about Israel and wonder if anyone else does?
|3.5.07 @ 2:44PM|#
what if anything has Ron Paul ever said about Israel that
would cause Horowitz to say that?
If you're
not with HR921, you're against us.
megs|3.5.07 @ 2:45PM|#
Another example of how those vaguely libertarian are dismissed
by people on the right or left - by calling them close to the left
or the right.
Maybe it's because they know that criticizing Paul for not actually
doing anything will make him more appealing to the average voter?
Most of us don't want a president to actually do all that much,
hence the love of opposing parties controlling the branches.
Bi-partisan stuff stinks.
The comment about real world consequences is hilarious in context
with being against the war on terror.
|3.5.07 @ 2:49PM|#
"But I also object to the unreasonable accusations that the
Government of Lebanon has not done enough, when we realize that
Israel occupied southern Lebanon for 18 years and was not able to
neutralize Hezbollah."
Hezbollah indescriminately bombing civilians and Ron Paul has a
problem with it. Fuck him and the horse he road in on. It is too
bad that the Libertarian Party can't do better for itself.
Thanks for the link MP.
Thomas Paine\'s Goiter|3.5.07 @ 2:50PM|#
So right wing jewish guy freaks out that someone doesn't want to
spend money on farce of a war or defense of Israel.
In other news: sun comes up.
|3.5.07 @ 2:52PM|#
John,
You realize that Paul is a Republican, right? Besides, his point is
that it's unfair for Israel to expect the Lebanese Government to be
able to neutralize Hezbollah when they were unable to do so while
they controlled the region.
|3.5.07 @ 2:55PM|#
waiv,
That one is more of a rant against foreign aide than anything
against Israel. The money quote seems to be
"The interventionist approach that has dominated American foreign
policy since World War I has produced an unmitigated series of
disasters. From Korea to Vietnam to Kosovo to the Middle East,
American military and economic meddling has made numerous conflicts
worse, not better."
That is just typical know nothing Pat Buchanan type bullshit. Oh
yeah, Korea was a real disaster. Things would be so much better if
we had let the North Koreans overrun the South and turn into a
prison state rather than the free and highly productive South Korea
we have today.
|3.5.07 @ 2:55PM|#
John,
Here's his opening lines from his weekly column from Jan 22
Former President Carter's new book about the ongoing conflict
between Israel and Palestine has raised the ire of Americans on two
sides of the debate. I say "two sides" rather than "both sides,"
because there is another perspective that is never discussed in
American politics. That perspective is the perspective of our
founding fathers, namely that America should not intervene in the
internal affairs of other nations.
So according to Horowitz, not supporting Israel is the same as,
waging war against Israel.
|3.5.07 @ 2:57PM|#
But it is bullshit for Ron Paul to object to Israel defending
itself. If you can't control the people within your borders and
those people attack another country, that country has a right to
self defense. Paul seems to be denying that for Israel. In Ron Paul
world, Israel is suppose to just sit around and take it because the
Lebonese are trying. That is what I object to.
I know Ron Paul is a Republican, but that doesn't mean I have to
like the guy. Trent Lott is a Republican two and I wouldn't give
you a bucket a piss for him.
|3.5.07 @ 2:59PM|#
Warren,
I would have to see that paragraph in conext. Frankly, I am not
sure what the views of the founders have to do with Jimmy Carter
lying about Israel in his book.
|3.5.07 @ 3:00PM|#
John, as my father used to say "You went off half-cocked"
Reread that paragraph in question. Paul is saying its unfair to
criticize Lebanon for failing to contain Hezbollah
when Israel couldnt do it after 18 years.
There is no critique of Israel in that statement, but perhaps you
want to subscribe to Frontpage anyway.
|3.5.07 @ 3:00PM|#
Is John the biggest tard in blog comment history?
He just wrote, "It is too bad that the Libertarian Party can't do
better for itself." Eight minutes later, he writes, "I know Ron
Paul is a Republican..."
And I believe waiv cited the antiwar.com article as a rebuttal to
John's claim that Paul is anti-Israel. That, too, went over John's
head.
|3.5.07 @ 3:01PM|#
But it is bullshit for Ron Paul to object to Israel
defending itself.
Nowhere has Ron Paul ever objected to Israel defending itself.
That's just bullshit. There's a difference between failing to
support, and actively opposing.
|3.5.07 @ 3:03PM|#
There's a difference between failing to support, and
actively opposing.
Not for David Horowitz, there isn't.
|3.5.07 @ 3:07PM|#
However, in practical political matters, libertarians tend
to live in alternate universe, without regard for the real world
consequences of their actions.
Unlike the neocons, who are sober realists...
|3.5.07 @ 3:07PM|#
Here's the whole thing:
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst012207.htm
Basically it says "The US Defense Forces should only be used to
defend to defend the US. Trying to mold the world to our liking is
folly and a bad idea to begin with". That's the kind of rhetoric a
libertarian longs to hear. If you can't get behind that, then fuck
you and your horse.
|3.5.07 @ 3:11PM|#
Anon,
Your goig too try two corretc John's spellig?
Gud luk! Its an uphil battel.
Philly Dave|3.5.07 @ 3:11PM|#
Uh Oh ! Either Horowitz fortgot hiomself or the warmongers are
switching gears and no longer are going to ignore Paul but will
attack him.
This is a good thing.
|3.5.07 @ 3:15PM|#
That perspective is the perspective of our founding fathers,
namely that America should not intervene in the internal affairs of
other nations.
Out of curiosity, where does this perspective come from? Who is it
attributed to?
|3.5.07 @ 3:16PM|#
Trent Lott is a Republican two
I think he's rated a little higher than that. I'd say he's a
Republican three. He was somewhat important to the party for a
while.
|3.5.07 @ 3:18PM|#
Place yer bets... place yer bets... How long until Single Issue
Voter swoops down to again proclaim it's statism in America is
entirely the fault of "progressives" and continue to imply that
libertarians should continue to bend over and support fucks like
Horowitz, Coulter, Romney, et al.
(Of course, despite his stand on the war, I'm not voting for Paul
because he's got it in his head that fetus-fetishism and nativism
are libertarian positions.)
Sorry, I'd rather vote for the CP-USA than for any Republican or
"conservative" right now.
|3.5.07 @ 3:18PM|#
He has waged a war against America's war on
terror...
So it seems that Paul is waging a War on Error...I think most of
America can get down wit dat Mr Horrorwitz!
T|3.5.07 @ 3:21PM|#
No, Lott's the Minority Whip this go round, which makes him Republican two after Mitch McConnell's Rebublican one.
VM|3.5.07 @ 3:25PM|#
High:
Yooo da man!
Between the NASCAR and this thread, it looks like you win at teh
Intertubez today!
|3.5.07 @ 3:31PM|#
Out of curiosity, where does this perspective come from? Who
is it attributed to?
George Washington
|3.5.07 @ 3:41PM|#
"what if anything has Ron Paul ever said about Israel that would
cause Horowitz to say that?"
Ron Paul believes we should be neutral in regards to Israel. He was
only one of three Republicans in the House that voted against the
vote of support for Israel in Israel's recent war last summer
against the Hezbollah
|3.5.07 @ 3:43PM|#
Wow, VM. Thanks!
My life is complete. I am going to write 666 on my shaved head,
proclaim myself the Antichrist, then hang myself.
K-Fed, come back.
|3.5.07 @ 3:43PM|#
I like Paul more and more.
Still can't figure out what John is complaining about.
VM|3.5.07 @ 3:45PM|#
High#:
nah- it's been done. Most recently by Mr. Crane. "What A" Dienstag
blogged about it. :)
(Kfed was on Q101 this morning. It sounded like a bad parody)
rdkraus - if you figure it out, please tell! Maybe he's actually
supporting Dr. Paul; it's just that his spelling is so bad that it
looks like he's complaining?
|3.5.07 @ 3:52PM|#
The former campus radicals once bravely striding the
ramparts turned out to be cringing chickeshits too!
At least, the ones who turned traitor.
clone12|3.5.07 @ 3:59PM|#
The phrase "some of my best friends are..." is a sure sign that the speaker is about to rip into some of his/her "best friends"
|3.5.07 @ 4:10PM|#
Does this mean that it's time for me to rehabilitate the
prolifically violent and wildly successful terrorist group
Jews for Ron Paul? Cuz I'll do it. And this time,
I'm declaring myself President-For-Life and doubling the proportion
of ninjas on staff.
Seriously, all Jews should support Ron Paul. It should be a
requirement for becoming Bar Mitzvah and furthermore large pictures
of Ron Paul should preside solemnly over every bris. As
President-for-Life, I have decreed it thus.
|3.5.07 @ 4:10PM|#
I'm confused, is this the same John, because it's a different
email.
What gives? Does the Army not like you to shill for AIPAC on their
dime or what?
|3.5.07 @ 4:19PM|#
Can I be Vice President, HHIC? At least one of the ninjas. Can
there be Jewish ninjas?
Oh yeah. I'm a Jewish libertarian, and Horowitz is an idiot. Not
like the latter part isn't obvious or anything.
chucklehead|3.5.07 @ 4:27PM|#
John | March 5, 2007, 2:57pm | #
But it is bullshit for Ron Paul to object to Israel defending
itself. If you can't control the people within your borders and
those people attack another country, that country has a right to
self defense. Paul seems to be denying that for Israel. In
Ron Paul world, Israel is suppose to just sit around and
take it because the Lebonese are trying. That is what I object
to.
Wow, in just 5 posts, he goes from knowing very little about Paul's
position to actually reading his mind!
LarryA|3.5.07 @ 4:41PM|#
However, in practical political matters, libertarians tend
to live in alternate universe, without regard for the real world
consequences of their actions.
As opposed to Republicans and Democrats, who completely disregard
the real-world consequences of their actions, and the laws they
pass?
Pot-->Kettle-->Black
|3.5.07 @ 5:35PM|#
henry,
Israeli detectives are always on the TV
Cos killers in the Levant work seven days a week (except
Shabbos)
|3.5.07 @ 5:47PM|#
Just listen to Micah Jones' song about the IDF's performance in Lebanon, Train in Vain.
|3.5.07 @ 5:55PM|#
But it is bullshit for Ron Paul to object to Israel
defending itself. If you can't control the people within your
borders and those people attack another country, that country has a
right to self defense. Paul seems to be denying that for Israel. In
Ron Paul world, Israel is suppose to just sit around and take it
because the Lebonese are trying. That is what I object
to.
For the record (not that you care about facts, John), Hezbollah
attacked Israeli soldiers and Israel responded by bombing Lebanese
civilians. So, John, fuck you and the horse you rode on.
|3.5.07 @ 6:13PM|#
Herb - that's a plus for Dr Paul in my book. What does Israel do for us? I understand that they are fairly democratic, and I've got no problems with the "man on the street" in Israel, but I often have a lot of problems with the attitude and actions of the Israeli government at times.
|3.5.07 @ 6:27PM|#
Horowitz thinks Paul is a Libertarian. Talk about "distortion"!
(although I wouldn't call it "character assassination").
Paul used to be a Libertarian, in the same sense that Horowitz used
to be commie pinko scum (with the difference that many Libertarian
principles are wonderful, and commie pinko scum are bad).
|3.5.07 @ 6:29PM|#
(with the further difference that Dr. Paul has kept his principles while pragmatically working throught the Republican Party)
Cesar|3.5.07 @ 6:29PM|#
Lowdog-
I too get sick of the attitude among many Israeli politicians
(especially Benjamin Netanyahu et. al) that the United States
somehow owes them something.
For the record, I feel the same way about other wealthy
industrialized countries (South Korea, Japan, Germany) that still
want us to pick up the tab for their defense budgets.
|3.5.07 @ 7:39PM|#
You know what? People who howled for the Iraq War to begin, like
Horowitz did, don't get to accuse people who called bullshit, like
Ron Paul did, of not paying due regard to the consequences of their
actions.
Hey, Horowitz, who was it that urged Israel to launch that war
against Hizbollah - was that Ron Paul, or was that you?
|3.5.07 @ 7:51PM|#
"highnumber | March 5, 2007, 3:16pm | #
Trent Lott is a Republican two
I think he's rated a little higher than that. I'd say he's a
Republican three."
OK, here we have a guy called "highnumber," who tells us that being
rated three is higher than two.
Now consider this: thanks to John, that is not even in the top five
dumbest comments on the thread.
|3.5.07 @ 7:55PM|#
Hey, I was rating the man on a scale of 1-10. Overall, as a
Republican, I'd say he's about a three.
joe,
As a liberal, I'd say you are about 6. ;)
|3.5.07 @ 10:15PM|#
Basically it says "The US Defense Forces should only be used to defend to defend the US. Trying to mold the world to our liking is folly and a bad idea to begin with". That's the kind of rhetoric a libertarian longs to hear.
I do long to hear it, but it's wrong. To believe that the need
for defense stops at your border is unjustified by history, and to
act on that belief is suicide.
If you can't get behind that, then fuck you and your horse.
My horse, ironically, likes it doggy style.
Asharak|3.5.07 @ 10:54PM|#
I think Paul has some nutty views, but where does a statist and
total fraud like Horowitz get off lecturing to libertarians, let
alone about the "real world?"
And Max, you're absolutely right about Horowitz's commie pinko
past, but he still hasn't stopped thinking like a commie pinko.
Asharak|3.5.07 @ 11:19PM|#
And regardless of how one feels about Paul's opinions about Middle East policy, Horowitz certainly has no right to be making his usual accusations of anti-Semitism and terrorist sympathizing when he associates with the likes of Paul "Christ was crucified by the Jews" Weyrich and gives FPM column space to Stephen Scwhartz, who supports the al Qaeda-connected KLA.
|3.5.07 @ 11:22PM|#
Heh. Anyone who pisses David Horowitz off can't be all that
bad.
Horowitz--"drink-sodden ex-Trotskyite popinjay"
And you know what? Even when he turns himself around totally 180
degrees, he's still a silly statist.
Asharak|3.5.07 @ 11:48PM|#
I think "drink-sodden ex-Trotskyite popinjay" was used to describe Christopher Hitchens, actually, but you're right about everything else.
goldhorder|3.6.07 @ 2:32AM|#
I didn't realize there were Israeli shills who claimed to be libertarian. You should be kinder to Ron Paul John. He didn't bother bringing up that Hezzbolah didn't even exist before Israel's invasion of Lebanon to flush out the PLO. The Shite population was happy to be rid of the poor PLO beggars in the refugee camps at first...until they got the checkpoint, curfew, untermenschen treatment fromt the IDF. Screw Israel. Some of the worst bunch of beggars leaching off US taxpayers that exist. Ron Paul and myself are in favor of not giving them another dime and having them fend for themselves. Let them solve their own conflicts.
Goldhorder|3.6.07 @ 2:41AM|#
Yes...just look at what happened to Switzerland. Over 200 years
of peace even being smack in the middle of two world wars...but
seriously...who is a parasatic military industrial complex supposed
to operate in an environment like that?
"To believe that the need for defense stops at your border is
unjustified by history, and to act on that belief is suicide."
|3.6.07 @ 4:05AM|#
Hey goldhorder, tell us how you really feel. Please share the
sad stories of "untermenschen treatment" that grip your
sensitivities. Illuminate us with your brilliant insight into how
the nasty IDF went after the "poor PLO beggars" with no
justification. How did those conniving Israelis force Hizbollah to
stupidly attack even after the UN got all of Lebanon's land
reclaimed?
"Fend for themselves"? "Let them solve their own conflicts"? Do you
realize how silly you sound? Ever Google any story of US soldiers
defending Israel from assaults by its vastly larger neighbors? BTW,
ever see any UN troops defending this legitimate nation state under
illegal attack from other UN members? Fail to recall how the Arab
armies were supported by Soviet Union arms during the Cold War?
Ever consider that the war on terror is actually necessary because
the Islamist enemy is a real enemy and it is not just some
propaganda or flippant conspiracy theory? Their own conflicts?
Hardly.
The biggest problem with your "solution" is that Israel's enemies
and America's enemies are the same people (going back to the
Barbary Coast). Most Americans understand this basic survival
equation at a core level and therefore the inability of the pro-PLO
/ anti-Israel lobby to make a dent in the overwhelming American
public opinion that supports Israel and does not trust the PLO.
Until the Islamist's stop rejoicing in ritual human sacrifice,
Israel will continue to be seen as the only beacon of humanity in a
sea of repression - even the Israeli Arabs don't want to be a part
of any potential PLO state. Your rants, twists, and manipulations
may fool some of the people all of the time…
|3.6.07 @ 4:15AM|#
"I do long to hear it, but it's wrong. To believe that the need
for defense stops at your border is unjustified by history, and to
act on that belief is suicide."
Sweden has committed suicide? Why doesn't anyone tell me these
things?
But seriously, not only is this stance obviously not suicidal, it
is actually beneficial to the countries who practice it. Of course,
there are other alternatives as well between the highly
interventionistic policy we have now and the Sweden/Swiss
model.
American soldiers, as well as advisors, could join, or contract out
to, foreign legions whose causes they support. American defense
contractors could sell weapons of mass destruction to friendly
liberal democracies. Along with that American technical experts
could work for those liberal democracies. Just for starters.
Asharak|3.6.07 @ 2:08PM|#
I was thinking that someone should also explain to Horowitz that
are libertarians (including a couple of Reason columnists)
who did support the war in Iraq, but I guess he wouldn't like them
either because they also don't want to jail all the "traitors" who
disagree with them.
And aside from Paul and a few paleo-libs, I haven't seen any real
anti-Israel hostility coming from most libertarians, big-L,
small-l, or otherwise. Perhaps it's the libertarian opposition to
public foreign aid that rubs Horowitz the wrong way.
|3.14.07 @ 12:24AM|#
Stop implying that Americans who put America above Israel are
"anti-semitic." It's soooo cliche. Ron Paul condemned the attacks
personally, but he consistently explains that's it not within the
scope of Congress to be writing silly "resolutions" and making
lofty speeches when the whole world clearly knows that the U.S.
won't be supporting Hezbollah anytime soon. That's like Congress
declaring "WE OPPOSE OSAMA!" and wasting time and money to stage a
ceremony. He does not want to see the U.S. bogged down in another
conflict the way it is now...
As far as being weak on terror, I bet his border policies and some
cracking down on the corrupt FBI would probably do more for the war
on terror than meddling in international affairs (I can't imagine
Giuliani, McCain, Gingrich doing much better than Bush...)
Americans are strong, and need not depend on Israel to take on
radical Islam. To say otherwise insults me as an American!
Ron Paul, a disgrace? He's the only true American patriot running
in 2008, I think..
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245