Nick Gillespie | January 9, 2007
Over at Stop the Drug War, Scott Morgan blogs about one victory in the generally luckless (and damnably destructive) War on Drugs: the near-eradication of the American asparagus industry. Some details, via a Seattle Times story:
The [U.S. asparagus] industry has been decimated by a U.S. drug policy designed to encourage Peruvian coca-leaf growers to switch to asparagus. Passed in 1990 and since renewed, the Andean Trade Preferences and Drugs Eradication Act permits certain products from Peru and Colombia, including asparagus, to be imported to the United States tariff-free....
Meanwhile, the Washington [state] industry is a shadow of its former self. Acreage has been cut by 71 percent to just 9,000 acres.
Scott Morgan adds:
Notwithstanding divergent views on free trade among our readership, I'm sure we can all agree that tariffs shouldn't be arbitrarily lifted in support of a failed drug war policy in Peru. Any success achieved in South America (there hasn't been any, but bear with me) must be measured against the sacrifices American farmers are forced against their will to make. Factoring this against ONDCP's otherwise already pathetic claims of progress leaves a worse taste in one's mouth than that of canned asparagus.
The readership at Hit & Run is, of course, far more favorable to free trade than STDW's may be. And it's always a good thing to slip free of a tariff. But the main point of Morgan's post--the law of unintended consequences is particularly strong when it comes to prohibition--is tough to miss. As is the truth of his insistence that the folks calling the shots in the drug war are idiots.
Headline explanation here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"Meanwhile, the Washington [state] industry is a shadow of its
former self. Acreage has been cut by 71 percent to just 9,000
acres."
Please feel free to apply whatever herbicide you choose to those
9,000 acres in Washington state as well.
Asparagus! Gaahh! Hate the stuff.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could just put US farmers out of business via free trade without the drugwar being involved or other strings attached? And is this freetrade? Are the Peruvian asparagus farmers being subsidized to grow it rather than the sacred coca plant?
Mr Morgan has it precisely backwards.
All tariffs are harmful, and any excuse to lift one, even the BS
Drug War, is sufficient.
The tariffs were benefitting a few asparagus farmers in the U.S. at
the expense of consumers of asparagus who happened to be living in
the U.S.
The harm they are sufferring is the same harm one of those
polygamist cult leaders suffers when the young girls in the clan
are no longer prevented from looking for husbands outside the
clan.
Let us rejoice! There are many harmful effects of the drug war, but
at least we can enjoy cheap asparagus!
I'm no fan of asparagus, but cutting a tariff is hardly something to bemoan.
"The harm they are sufferring is the same harm one of those
polygamist cult leaders suffers when the young girls in the clan
are no longer prevented from looking for husbands outside the
clan."
I'm betting you watched the last episode of Numb3rs, didn't you?
'fess up.
I was wondering why asparagus was all from Peru all of a
sudden.
Asparagus, like most things, suffers from boiling. Roast those
badboys with some butter and parmesian and they're quite ok.
Speaking of things that give you pleasure and joy: I'm surprised that you libertarians here didn't bother to comment on the fact that Bangor, ME has banned smoking in private cars yesterday.
Are there any Peruvians here?
Well of course their requests for subsidies was not Peruvian in and
of it is as it were the United States government would never have
if the president, our president, had not and as far as I know
that's the way it will always be. Is that clear?
This blog post doesn't make much sense - if lifting a tariff is
a good thing, then you have a positive "unforeseen consequence" of
the drug war, correct?
Remember, people being put out of business is a good thing if the
market does it.
Boy, it took some pretty remarkable gymnastics, but you did it, you spun this into a bad outcome of the drug war. Really, the story here should be "Unintended GOOD outcome of the hated war on drugs!!" I mean, free trade is either good or bad. It doesn't matter what the motivation is. But hey, we can't let REASON get in the way of our hatred of the drug war.
I grow asparagus. It's easy. You stick it in the ground and then once it matures, you harvest it a couple of times a year, pretty much for ever. I have a hard time seing how removing the tarrif would give an unfair advantage to Peruvian farmers, who's techniques are no different. Please explain.
Even a goat rope as as insane as the war on drugs is bound to cause an occasional "good thing." I think Nick's slouched-in-a-leather-jacket-Devil-may-care point is that these infrequent "good things" are complete and total accidents... sort of like, the herd of elephants that just destroyed my house also managed to kick out that old stump in the backyard.
Any market-oriented measure (e.g. freer trade in vegetables) that reduces the importance of a black market in the Andes is A Good Thing.
I'm with Aresen. I'll pass on the green spears. Yuck, blech,
ptui! I'd rather they be outlawed than the drugs. But, seriously,
if a tariff falls, I say "yea!"
Kevin
Even a goat rope as as insane as the war on drugs is bound
to cause an occasional "good thing." I think Nick's
slouched-in-a-leather-jacket-Devil-may-care point is that these
infrequent "good things" are complete and total accidents... sort
of like, the herd of elephants that just destroyed my house also
managed to kick out that old stump in the backyard.
The war on drugs keeps people from using drugs to at least some
degree, which is a good thing.
Whether it's worth the cost is another story, but it's difficult to
prove either way.
The post doesn't make clear if Peruvian farmers are being
subsidized to grow asparagus? (which is yummy fresh and uncooked on
salads)
Why would they just switch from Coca which I'd presume is more
profitable unless bribed/threatened into it?
Asparagus! Gaahh! Hate the stuff.
I'm no fan of asparagus
Why no love for asparagus?
Like the man says: "My greatest pleasure was the asparagus, bathed
in ultramarine and pink and whose spears, delicately brushed in
mauve and azure, fade imperceptibly to the base of the stalk -
still soiled with the earth of their bed - through iridescences
that are not of this world. It seemed to me that these celestial
nuances betrayed the delicious creatures that had amused themselves
by becoming vegetables and which, through the disguise of their
firm, edible flesh, gave a glimpse in these dawn-born colors, these
rainbow sketches, this extinction of blue evenings, of the precious
essence that I would still recognize when, all night following a
dinner where I had eaten them, they played in their crude, poetic
farces, like one of Shakespeare's fairies, at changing my
chamberpot into a bottle of perfume."
Why would they just switch from Coca which I'd presume is
more profitable unless bribed/threatened into it?
Less risk? Better to have a lower but safe income than a higher
income that could be disrupted by the law at any time?
And the fall of a trade barrier raises the value of the asparagus
crop.
Farmer Hank:
I would suspect we tend to think of these kinds of market
adjustments in terms of industries and winners & losers, when
it's more subtle than that. I doubt there are thousands of
asparagus farmers sitting on roadsides in Washington trying to get
pennies on the dollar for their previously valuable produce.
Instead, very subtle differences in costs made the asparagus
slightly less profitable, and led them to convert acreage to
marginally more profitable crop. The drop in acreage of 70% seems
harsh, but for each individual producer, the change was probably a
decision that reacted to very small changes in context, and had
relatively small effects on the farmers. There are probably some
major effects on suppliers who specifically supported asparagus
farming in some way, but for the producers, changes in profit
margins of just a few percent could have made dozens of alternative
crops preferable to asparagus.
"The war on drugs keeps people from using drugs to at least some
degree, which is a good thing."
Why? Some people are able to use drugs in moderation and function
normally, work, pay taxes, walk the dog, etc. I simply don't buy
that drug usage is a de facto evil and that any deterrence is
therefore good.
Great, now when drug smugglers have to take urine tests their piss will smell awful. Serves the drug testing drones right.
You have to wonder how US bureaucrats choose US asparagus
farmers to drive out of business.
I can imagine the DEA meeting with all the big farm lobbyists and
noticed no from from Big Asparagus was in the room.
There is a reason it wasn't cotton.
"Why no love for asparagus?"
Mainly because I am among the portion of the population [can't
remember the percentage] who becomes violently ill when exposed to
aspargame [sp?], the chemical in asparagus which makes one's pee
smell.
Washington state's minumum wage, which is higher than the
Federal government's minumum, is also partly responsible for our
farmers ripping the plants out of the ground. There is no
mechanized way to harvest asparagus and it's not woth paying
someone $7.93 an hour to pick it.
I know joe doesn't think raising the minimum wage curtails the
number of jobs, but in this case it was only some migrant Mexican
farmworkers who lost their jobs. As for the farmers, eh, let them
grow cake. (wheat prices are going up.)
Spur,
John Ashcroft helped make that decision. Asparagus is much too
phallic looking to be a good American vegetable.
StopTheDrugWar.org takes no position on matters such as free trade, and I hope my post remained sufficiently agnostic on that issue. For what it's worth, our office is practically wall-papered with old copies of Reason.
In the mid 90's I was having lunch in Lima, Peru with an economist friend of mine. After a number of pisco sours and over some really unbelievable ceviche he told me that his big venture had become asparagus and that he had planted lots of acreage... Now this fellow was not coca grower. He was a Stanford Ph.D. who knew a good bet when he saw one.
I'll support free trade when we have free movement of people. Until then the only reason it's cheaper to grow asparagus in Peru is because Peruvians are artificially restricted to Peru.
This is the only chance I'll ever get to share my one good
asparagus recipe:
Trim the ends off of one bunch of asparagus, either Peruvian or
American.
Heat oven to 400 degrees.
Place a casserole or baking dish on the stovetop on low heat. Add
the following:
2 tlbsp vegetable oil
1 tsp dark sesame oil
One clove garlic, finely chopped
1 tsp fresh ginger, grated (less if you're not a ginger fan. Just
enough for some heat)
Pinch salt
Red pepper flakes
1 tsp honey (I usually just take the squeeze bottle and draw two
cursive lower case l's, about an inch tall. I know that's not
precise, but it doesn't mess up a spoon, either.)
1/4 cup tamari soy sauce
Mix the sauce ingredients in the casserole dish until the honey
melts. Add the asparagus, and
1/3 cup sesame seeds.
Put the casserole dish in the oven, turn off the burner, and roast
for about 15 minutes or until browned.
Oh, shoot. I hit "submit" instead of "preview."
Important note in the recipe, toss the asparagus in the sauce so
that all stalks are thoroughly coated with sauce and sesame seeds,
then put in the oven.
My favorite:
Steam stalks. Arrange flat in a shallow dish. Sprinkle with
balsamic vinagar and shredded parmegian cheese.
Easy, simple, and yummy. And remember: the funny pee smell is a
feature, not a bug!
Karen, mmmmmmm, that sounds excellent.
I like asparagus with a good Hollandaise sauce, you know, one that
will still a beating heart, mid beat.
There is a reason it wasn't cotton.
Cotton is one of the most water intensive crops ever devised.
That's why they grow it in Bakersfield.
Ending an agricultural tariff/subsidy/allotment
without long advance warning and a taxpayer funded "buyout" would
constitute an unconstitutional "taking" of property.Even with a
costly reform and bailout the result would be an economically
devastating loss in property value and a consequent loss in
property tax collection.
One of the primary functions of government is to protect existing
business models and concentrations of wealth. Next you godless
communists will propose even more disruptive public policy such as
ending insurance subsidies for residential coastal property.
Imagine what THAT would do to our local and state tax collection
much less the solvency of banks.
There was a paraquat scare in the late 70's, when the herbacide
was first being used on marajuana crops. This prompted many devious
dope-fiends to place classified ads in local periodicals that
offered free paraquat testing for anyone who would send them a
sample of their stash.
I happen to like asparagus, but given its short shelf-life, I won't
be setting up a test lab.
Jozef,
Apparently tobacco restrictions are not that important. The next
gathering is in 'tobacco free bar' DC, rather than right next door
in tobacco friendly Virginia.
Yeah, yeah, free trade, tariffs, whatever. As "Bhh" stated
though, please, for the love of all you hold sacred, don't judge
asparagus based on the heartless bastards who boil the love out of
it.
I don't like boiled steak or boiled cookies either...
"don't like boiled steak or boiled cookies either..."
there goes your gastronomical adventure trip through England,
then...
I don't like boiled steak or boiled cookies
either...
What's wrong with beef stew?
TWC, Mmmmm, Hollandaise sauce . . . . .
A good Hollandaise, and any good one would come with a warning from
the American Society of Cardiologists, could make sawdust and lawn
clippings palatable. Unfortuneately, although I have mastered
souffles, cheesecakes, Bechamel, and beef bourganogne, I cannot for
the life of me make Hollandaise. I end up with a lumpy goo,
suitable for use as an industrial adhesive but not edible. I think
I'm going to add this as a New Year's Resolution. Next Christmas
dinner, asparagus with Hollandaise!!
Thousands of poor, northwestern farmers have lost their jobs. And all you people can think about is saving a nickel on asparagus.
That is a bold face lie, ALittleLiberal. We are also thinking about the best ways to serve our cheap asparagus.
Karen,
I got my recipe from the Frugal Gourmet and am very successful with
it. Unfortunately I don't have it with me, it involves eggs (4, I
think, they HAVE to be at room temperature), lime juice, tabasco,
powdered mustard, salt and a stick of melted butter. The trick is
to have everything in the blender and melt the butter just prior to
it starting to burn (I wonder if clarified butter would work?),
then when everything else is in the blender you pour the melted
butter, it should thicken almost immediately.
dead_elvis has the correct asparagus recipe, though I'd throw in
some black pepper, too. And grated white truffles.
Okay, just kidding about the truffles.
Ooh, thanks, Karen; that sounds yummy.
1 tsp honey (I usually just take the squeeze bottle and draw
two cursive lower case l's, about an inch tall. I know that's not
precise, but it doesn't mess up a spoon, either.)
If you use the teaspoon after measuring the sesame oil, it won't
stick.
eggs (4, I think, they HAVE to be at room
temperature)
Dairy and especially eggs almost always work better at room
temp.
Just consider it a manditory maximum on aspargus production. To
help curd the manditory minimums in place for drug offenders.
After all if the Aspargus farmers aren't willing to do their part
to get rid of drugs why should anyone else.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245