Reregulation Fantasy

Another critic of airline deregulation misses the mark.

(Page 2 of 2)

Ultimately, the proof of McGee’s safety allegations should show up in airline accident records. While he never provides such data, I dug into the National Transportation Safety Board’s accident database and retrieved airline safety data going back to 1947, tracking fatal accidents in absolute numbers, per million miles flown, and per million aircraft departures. (Since fatal accidents were rather rare events even in the early post−World War II years, trends are more easily seen by using 10-year averages.) Both before and after deregulation, fatalities per mile and per flight have steadily declined. (See chart.) Aviation safety was improving prior to deregulation and has continued to improve since then. 

Some advocates of reregulation argue that the fatal accident rate per million passenger miles disguises what’s happening with regional airlines, since the major airlines fly the vast majority of all miles. That’s why I included the rate based on aircraft departures, since regional carriers make a bit more than 50 percent of all departures. And during the most recent decade, when the growth of regional airlines reached its highest rate ever, safety continued improving. 

Since McGee’s lament about the decimation of airline employment due to outsourcing is equally data-free, I obtained numbers from the airline trade group Airlines for America on total U.S. airline employment from 1971 to the present. From 1971 to 1978, airline employment grew slowly, from 284,000 to 313,000. And then it took off, reaching 406,000 by 1988 and an all-time peak of 547,000 in 2000, 74 percent higher than in the year of deregulation. Since then, however, the twin shocks of 9/11 and much higher fuel prices have led to airline cost cutting and outsourcing, resulting in 386,000 employees as of 2011. So McGee is right about recent job shrinkage, but today’s number is still 23 percent higher than when airlines were deregulated in 1978.

McGee was a guest recently on NPR’s Diane Rehm Show, along with “Ask the Pilot” columnist John Cox and Air Line Pilots Association President Lee Moak. Cox and Moak dismissed McGee’s safety scaremongering as groundless. As Cox put it, “Those of us that are involved in airline safety, we’re looking at this data for trends all the time, and the safety has gotten better.” Washington Post transportation reporter Ashley Halsey III added, “Lee’s pilots would be complaining, loudly and very publicly, if they felt that they were being given substandard equipment.”

Unleashing competition on an industry that had been in a regulatory straitjacket for four decades was bound to lead to “creative destruction.” Tools such as outsourcing, automation, and creative pricing are all part of the discovery process as airlines seek viable business models for a sector that was badly in need of fundamental change. More evolution is likely (and necessary) in coming years, but so far three decades of deregulation have served airline customers well.  

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    He says “much” of this [outsourced maintenance] work is done “outside the United States in developing countries, in El Salvador, in Mexico, China, Singapore.

    Yeah, cos poor foreigners have no incentive or ability to do a good job. Oh, and fun fact: Singapore has the highest GDP per capita in the world.

    So, sloppy, inaccurate, and racist.

  • AnonoBot||

    I thought this too! Seems that whenever someone complains about "outsourcing" to other countries, there's an implication that the people to whom the task was outsourced are necessarily incompetent and incapable of doing the work completely or satisfactorily. Now, I'm not one to throw around the "racist!" label wantonly, but is there not at least a smidge of latent bigotry to be found in such complaints? And the kicker is, the people doing the complaining are often the same ones who hear those racist dog whistles.

  • ||

    a large (unspecified) number are in Europe

    Yes, one of those places would be good ole' UKR, manufacturers of the world's largest cargo airplane. UKR has quite the thriving aerospace industry. So, not only is this twat a sloppy knobknocker as pointed out by IFH, but a lazy bljad' as well.

  • ||

    you probably don't read perfume guides, so this is offered for your amusement:

    No. 22 is above all an exercise in heavy lifting. Aldehydes are said to give "lift" to a fragrance, meaning they offset the sweetness and heaviness of whatever else is in there. Like its Antonov namesake, Chanel's 22 goes for the maximum-payload record as follows: (1) Determine the largest dose of aldehydes a human can stand without fainting. (2) Load it up with as much sweetness as the aldehydes can bear. (3) Round it off with a note of iris to make it look easy. (4) Stand back and watch the whole thing lumber off into the sky after a three-mile takeoff roll
  • ||

    That's hilarious!

    Actually, IFH, I do read them. Russian perfumers are amoungst the finest in the world, and many of them have shoppes in the major cities here, Donets'k included. It's an integral part of understanding the culture, as men are expected to know the scents that women most enjoy.

    When the Queen Mum goes tits up and Charles gets crowned (in more ways than one), I'll know what perfume to I might select along with that wager ticket. -)))

  • Ted S.||

    Donets'k included.

    Ukrainians put a funny letter in between the ц and к of Донецк?

  • ||

    In OO-krah-nee-an, they do, Theodore. -D AKA, mjakij znak. Which you already know, smartypants. -))

  • Ted S.||

    Ukrainian spelling always throws me for a loop because it looks so wrong to me. I majored in Russian in college, so I can recognize a lot of words in most of the other Slavic languages in print, but they all look wrong to a greater or lesser degree.

  • ||

    Also, how did you get that Cyrillic past the squirrels????

  • Ted S.||

    Luck.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    If you haven't already, check out www.basenotes.net. And just what scents do Russian women most enjoy? My fall/winter scent is Bay Rum, and while my wife likes it, I find Thai women like citrus and chyper scents on men. Most of the compliments I get on Bay Rum have been from Middle Eastern women (and some men.)

  • ||

    And just what scents do Russian women most enjoy?

    Lilac and lilly scents are pretty popular, as are these. The most important thing is A)Ask, so you can display cursory knowledge of perfumes; and B) Take the woman to a perfumery, usually as part of a courtship engagement.

    I, myself, don't were cologne, and opt for the simple refreshing scent of a clean, tidy, au natural Groovus.

  • Ted S.||

    Dealing with the Russian language on a daily basis has made your English spelling terrible.

  • Generic Stranger||

    Yes, one of those places would be good ole' UKR, manufacturers of the world's largest cargo airplane.

    As a side note, the largest by wingspan is the Spruce Goose, which is not too far from me. The AN-225 has something like 20m in length and 200,000kg (unloaded) in weight on it, but the Goose's wingspan is not quite 10m longer.

    Here's a picture of a B-17 Flying Fortress underneath it's tail.

  • ||

    A nice comparison graphic.

  • ||

    Also of note, I saw not reference one about the effect of the unions and those contract obligations the airlines, that are currently in bankruptcy, are holding/held.

    (Pilot's Union, in particular, I'm looking at you.)

  • Almanian.||

    Another no-data scaremongering book, and just in time for Christmas!

    I will note that I found travel by air to be increasingly uncomfortable, and have managed to avoid it entirely - even for bidness - the last couple years. Frankly, for me, the majority of this is the POST911WORLLDZOMFUCKINGODTERRORISTS!!!!111! TSA bullshit at the airports that's more than tripled the amount of time I have to spend in the terminal before and after a flight.

    The flight itself - meh. I never liked being packed into a sardine can and shot through the air, but can't argue with the price (lower) or conveneince (hard to bitch about getting to Europe in 6 hours for less than a grand round trip).

    So...whatever.

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Flying was so much nicer before they let all those smelly poor people on the planes.

  • ||

    Do you realize people can actually afford to take children on planes now? So uncouth!

  • LTC(ret) John||

    Exactly. Men wore jackets and ties, women their Sunday best - and you could smoke, and you could try to pick up stewardesses!

    Ah, walking up the stairs onto the 707, clutching my paper ticket that cost more than a mortgage payment, just to get to New York from Chicago - those were the days!

    Now it might as well be a Greyhound bus in the sky. Sniff!

  • ||

    I only fly business class, Brooksie. I don't have to worry myself with such pedestrian concerns. -D

    (adjusts monocle)

    But seriously, some people really do push the boundaries of good taste and attire whence flying on the aeroplane.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    If you are flying more than, say, 5 hours, business class is a must. After being spoiled by Cathay-Pacific, I just can't fly in America any more.

  • Generic Stranger||

    I won't fly in America either, but not because of the quality of the airlines.

    *cough*TSA*cough*

  • Fladnag the Yarg||

    Wait a minute, my name isn't BenDover.

  • waaminn||

    Once Government gets involved, its all screwed up man!

    www.Tru-Anon.tk

  • ||

    amen, anonbot

  • C. S. P. Schofield||

    "It always turns out that what the author is really lamenting is the loss of monopoly wages and benefits for the employees of a formerly cartelized industry"

    I've read a few of these and, personally, I thought they smacked of nostalgia for a time when the writer (who was accustomed to flying on an expense account) didn't have to rub elbows with the Little People. Since airline deregulation, the airlines have taken a lot of business that used to belong to Greyhound, and I think that the self-styled Elite REALLY resent that.

  • DRM||

    When the price of a one-way ticket can be earned, *after* taxes, by a teenager working just two days in the summer at a minimum-wage job, it's hard to take pride in being in the jet set.

  • ||

    Bingo! "Our luxury has been commoditized! We live in NYC to care about the poor, not to live like them!"

  • xavier2012||

    Also need to be concerned about flight safety

  • AnonoBot||

    If you're an anon-bot, you're doing it wrong. You got the short, vague, possibly on-topic-but usually-not comment down ok, but you then need to follow up with your anon link, which is your whole reason for posting in the first place. More training for you. Next!

  • ||

    Hover over his username. Seems they've developed the art of subtlety. The singularity is near...

  • Tablet pc||

    I hate Reregulation , and fight is always has danger

  • jdgalt||

    Flying used to be safer than driving. But since the Totally Silly Assholes made it an even bigger pain than it already was, I won't do it anymore, and neither will a lot of Americans.

    The TSA now kills more people EACH MONTH than died on 9/11.

    They must be abolished. Now. No lesser "reform" will help.

  • cinsel chat||

    good thanks sohbet
    cinsel sohbet

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement