Briefly Noted: The Creation of ‘Closure’

There was a time when Americans didn’t assume that every tragedy requires “closure.” The Drake University sociologist Nancy Berns explores how that changed in Closure (Temple), a book about a word whose meaning is fluid: At different times, it can suggest either remembering or forgetting, either vengeance or forgiveness. Sometimes it is invoked in ways that have less to do with helping the bereaved than with stigmatizing people whose bereavement is making their acquaintances uncomfortable. Often the word carries a commercial or political agenda.

Berns attributes the rise of “closure” to several social forces, from the victims’ rights movement to changes in the funeral industry. She understands that some people have found the concept useful in coming to terms with grief, and she doesn’t dismiss their experiences. But it’s wrong, she argues persuasively, to expect everyone else to follow a formulaic “healing process” aimed at “moving on.” As Berns reminds us, “You do not need to ‘close’ pain in order to live life again.” —Jesse Walker

Find this and hundreds of other interesting books at the Reason Shop, powered by Amazon.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    Thank goodness, someone actually wrote my thoughts about this word "Closure". This word is at the top of my list of "Words I Do Not Care for At All."


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties