Bob Barr Looks Back

An exit interview with the 2008 Libertarian candidate for president

(Page 2 of 3)

reason: Throughout that period, though, and really up to the Republican convention, the big mainstream media story about Libertarians was what Ron Paul would do. Michael Badnarik, the party's 2004 nominee, told me in May that he was still waiting to see if Paul could win the Republican nomination before he supported the LP again. What was the effect of all this?

Barr: It was a not-insignificant frustration, let's say. It was somewhat difficult to convince people of the fact that we had a real timeline here. Certain things had to start being done in order to have the chance for the impact I knew we could have. Every day that went by with people sitting around for something to happen, which common sense told you was not going to happen, was a day lost. It was very frustrating.

reason: You were polling well through the summer, but you took a hit after John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. What was the impact of that on your campaign?

Barr: I don't think that Palin really mattered that much. Initially, perhaps, when her name was first announced and there was all of this unbridled excitement over Sarah Palin, I think there was some concern that it would stanch the flow of Republicans ditching the ticket because of McCain's liberal credentials. But by the time all the dust settled on election day, I think a lot of them realized that she was not the great savoir for the conservative movement that she was put forward as nationally, but I don't think that really mattered all that much. What killed us in the end is that the election came down to a referendum on Barack Obama, period. Nothing else seemed to matter to people.

reason: What did matter? Campaign funds? At the convention, Russ Verney told me that he hoped to raise $30 million, and the campaign eventually raised about $1.2 million.

Barr: If certain things had happened that we expected to happen early on, like gaining access to certain lists very quickly, I think we could have gotten there. But those lists turned out to be not available, unfortunately, and that prevented us early to turn over and over again into significant fundraising. We didn't get that seed money early on that we anticipated. We realistically anticipated it. We didn't sit around say ‘it would be nice to have all that money.'"

reason: Was one of these Ron Paul's fundraising list?

Barr: All I can say is that it appeared very realistic that we would have a list that let us raise a large amount of seed money that we could build on. And that didn't happen.

reason: What effect did your own running mate, Wayne Allyn Root, have on the ticket?

Barr: I enjoyed having Wayne on the ticket very much. I enjoy him personally very much. I mean, he's a very gregarious person. I enjoy his family as well. I think he brought a lot of energy to the campaign, a new dimension to the campaign, and a business perspective that got him booked on Fox Business and CNBC with sufficient regularity to have a little breakthrough there.

reason: Did you expect Root to be more of a fundraising asset?

Barr: Everything in a campaign doesn't always work out like you hoped. What can I say?

reason: You and Root both spoke frequently about bringing conservatives into the Libertarian Party from the GOP. Are you still focused on that?

Barr: First things first. I'm not going to bring anybody into an organization unless that organization is ready for it, has the groundwork laid for it, has a degree of receptivity to make it productive to bring them in. There's a lot of work that has to be done to move the party down the road it started on under [former executive director] Shane Cory into a truly professional viable political entity. There are still those in the Libertarian Party that do not want to go down that road, and there are some in the party that will have to make an important decision about that: whether they want to build themselves into a professional viable political party, or whether they don't.

If so, we've got a tremendous opportunity to increase the size, power, influence of the party. The Republican Party is in absolute disarray. And I think it'll get worse for them. I don't even think they've even reached bottom yet. If the Libertarian Party were at the point I'd like to see it at, we could shine in this atmosphere. We'd be on the news, media would seek us out, to provide the counterbalance that no one else is capable of doing.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • miche||

    I think a lot of them realized that she was not the great savoir for the conservative movement that she...

    Confusing french lessons and catechism Weigel?

    I wonder if Bob Barr would have left his congressional seat to run as veep on the LP ticket for Ron Paul.

  • ||

    "reason: What mistakes were made this year that the LP has to avoid making again?

    Barr: We have to not look backwards. If we are serious about being a real political party we have to set political goals, educate people, have a consistent message, organize at all levels, and look for opportunities. You don't wait for opportunities to be handed to you. Where's the Libertarian Party in these debates about the incoming administration? It needs to be there. But what I do know?"

    (bold added)

    I'm guessing that "But what I do know?" is a misprint, with one of two likely possibilities.

    1) "But what I do [not] know?"

    This seems unlikely considering the question mark, which leads to what I think is the most likely possibility--transposition.

    2) "But what [do I] know?"

    ...which is the perfect end to the interview.


    Articles about ron paul or bob "looks like a cheap bar mitzvah magaician" barr are so fucking over. Over! Who cares? is it not possible with all the shit going on in the world there's something more relevant in politics other than gossip about or the ruminations of a few political honable-mentioners?

  • ||

    That BobBarr is a fine fella I here.

  • Eric Dondero||

    Well, that was fair and balanced, unlike Doherty's piece last week.

    512,000 votes is not that bad. Not great. But it is 140,000 more votes than last time. Libertarians of all stripes should be encouraged by that number.

    Bottom line: Bob Barr ran the 2nd most successful Libertarian Presidential Campaign of all time. He and Wayne Root (and their staffs and family), should be heartily congratulated for that.

    Thank you Bob. Thanks Wayne.

  • Pac||

    Oh yeah I'm so encouraged

    I knew i should have just written Ron PAul's name in that would have been a better way to waste my vote.

  • ||

    Barr lost because he didn't worship at the Altar of Paul! (at least that's what a few people have told me)

  • ||

    Most of this interview could be summed up in a different blog post: So, Bob, Why Did You Suck?

  • ||

    Fucking douche bag asshat son of a bitch. If I never hear the name Bob Barr again, it will be too soon.

  • Xeones||

    *shakes fist*

  • The Angry Optimist||

    So productive, Warren. And insightful! The man gives an even-handed, fair interview where he admits mistakes...and still...

    "OHNOES BOB BARR taksesss our precious party!"

    Get off the cross.

  • Ravac||

    So, does Weigel interview Bobarr every week?

    Note: I haven't read any of these interview pieces because I really don't care about Bobarr. But it seems like this headline pops up every coupla days.

  • ||

    Dave is contractually obligated to interview Bob Barr 16 times.

  • creech||

    "We have to not look backwards."
    No, those who don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Just spin wheels and try to plow forward? No, the LP has to examine everything that has worked (?) and not worked for 35 years, and decide if its strategies and tactics are moving toward its goal or not.

  • The Angry Optimist||

    There are two ways of "looking backwards":

    1. Creech's way, which involves the objective evaluation of goals and the methods to reach those goals and

    2. The LP way, which involves purges, hairshirts, circular firing squads, mindreading and character assassination.

  • ||

    Quick, someone get me a Dramamine, all that spin made me nauseous!

    OK, better now.

    If Dondero likes it then it was a bunch of crap.

    The non-answers bear that out. He admits (without saying it in typical politician fashion) that A) He relied too much on the Paul lists, B) Despite Dondero's ravings to the contrary, Palin was not a factor on Barr, C) Root's fundraising was all hype, D) he wants to make the LP GOP-lite, E) he exalts Cory, proving he doesn't understand the LP, F) Wiggle totally avoids directly addressing Snubgate (which caused A. to fail).

    And yes, Barr, you are a Trojan Horse whether you protest too much to the contrary or not. Some of us saw it in 2006 and gave you the benefit of the doubt. No more.

  • The Angry Optimist||

    raise your tiny fists of rage, Seebeck. go take back your precioussss....

  • ||

    Well said, Seebeck.

    For those of you who think this is about taking something back, or sour grapes, or whatever else, wise up. This is about libertarianism. Some people are libertarians, and some aren't. Bob Barr isn't. There was an opportunity for the Liberty movement to really catch fire this election cycle, so comparing the Barr campaign to campaigns of the past do not hold water. There has never been so much libertarian buzz leading into the general election as there was this past year, and, yes, we can thank Paul for that. Barr dropped the ball.

  • The Angry Optimist||

    Bob Barr isn't.

    Please elucidate the issues that makes one "100% libertarian".

    Then, for kicks, grade Barr against it.

    Finally, tell me what grade constitutes passing.

    Or, you can engage in mindreading.

  • ||

    Whining about him not being taken as "100% libertarian" by the group he's trying to champion misses the point. Every group has cutoffs, and libertarians are no exception. George Bush is no libertarian, nor are John McCain, Sarah Palin, or Eric DONDEROOOOOOOOOOO. Some people think Barr falls outside of what they consider libertarian. Such a person can't lead libertarians?

    Unfair? Well, it's politics.

  • ||

    One question mark too many, above: Such a person can't lead libertarians.

  • Thane Eichenauer||

    I'm with The Angry Optimist.

    I have yet to see a complaint lodged against Bob Barr that wasn't based on a belief that Mr. Barr wasn't libertarian in his heart where it counts.

    I think most complaints about Barr and his campaign are from libertarians who are projecting their own lack of accomplishment onto a convenient scapegoat.

    Nothing kept any non-LP Presidential nominee from running for office but how many did? Ruwart? Jingozian? Kubby?

    At least Phillies ran for President and I'll bet he connected with more people than the average "Barr isn't a Libertarian" claimant.

    Thane Eichenauer
    2008 Libertarian Party candidate for Arizona's 1st congressional district

  • قبلة الوداع||

    thank u


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.