The Way of WWASP
But as the Martin Lee Anderson case makes clear, tough love
continued to thrive. Indeed, the New York Times business section
reported on tough teen programs as an investment opportunity last
year, saying the number of teenagers attending residential programs
to deal with drug and behavior problems had quadrupled since 1995.
Exposés of programs like Straight or Florida’s government-run boot
camps almost always include positive anecdotes along with the
accounts of abuse. As a result, for parents terrified of drugs,
these stories seem to portray the programs as the only ones tough
enough to “do what works.” Since the media play positive anecdote
against negative anecdote, often without citing the negative
research data, exposés can actually serve as advertisements. The
suggestion that the programs work serves to justify any abuse. In
2004, for example, Time quoted a father who said a tough-love
program “improved his [son’s] attitude and sense of
responsibility,” even as it reported that the family removed the
child after finding some of the program’s disciplinary measures too
harsh.
One of the largest chains of currently operating tough love schools is known as the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs (WWASP), sometimes called the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools. Like Straight, it took tactics from Synanon; its ideology, the language it uses, and its methods for discrediting teens’ complaints are eerily similar.
Variously claiming to hold 1,200 to 2,500 teenagers and reporting 2003 revenues of $80 million, the group currently has at least eight affiliates, in Jamaica (Tranquility Bay), South Carolina (Carolina Springs Academy), Nevada (Horizon Academy), Utah (Cross Creek Programs, Majestic Ranch Academy), Georgia (Darrington Academy), Mississippi (Respect Camp), and Iowa (Midwest Academy). WWASP is a series of limited liability corporations that frequently switch corporate officers and names. This strategy is often used to limit losses from lawsuits by disgruntled customers, and until very recently, WWASP has been successful in deterring major law firms from pursuing such cases against it.
Through its public relations representative, James Wall of Freeman Wall Aiello, WWASP denies charges of abuse. But nine of its affiliates have closed following abuse allegations and government investigations. Mexico has shut down three programs since the late ’90s; at one, police shot video of teenagers held in outdoor dog cages. (That program currently faces a civil suit by a boy who claims he not only was kept in a dog cage but was sexually assaulted and forced to eat vomit.) In 1998 the U.S. State Department found “credible allegations of physical abuse” at WWASP’s facility in Samoa, citing “beatings, isolation, food and water deprivation, choke-holds, kicking, punching, bondage, spraying with chemical agents, forced medication, [and] verbal abuse.” It called for an investigation by the local government, which resulted in the program’s closure. The man who ran that program, who once admitted to 48 Hours that teens had been bound with duct tape at the Samoa site, now operates the WWASP facility in Iowa.
In 2003 Costa Rican child welfare authorities raided WWASP’s Dundee Ranch Academy. They found staff “unqualified to attend to needs of children,” “inadequate food and meal portions,” and “some punishments [that] qualify as physical and psychological abuse.” The owner of the facility was arrested for human rights violations, and a source in the Costa Rican government says a prosecution is imminent. Yet Pillars of Hope Academy, an affiliated program for young adults run by Dundee Ranch’s owner, operates in the same building; it is not subject to Costa Rica’s regulations for programs aimed at minors.
Last year one WWASP program in upstate New York, the Academy at Ivy Ridge, was forced by the state attorney general to return nearly $2 million for fraudulently claiming to offer New York high school diplomas. It says it is no longer affiliated with WWASP, but it has changed neither its staff nor its treatment methods. (It is currently facing a $100 million class action suit for educational fraud.) Another WWASP affiliate, Spring Creek Lodge in Montana, likewise claims to be independent now, although it has the same staff and still gets referrals through the WWASP phone line and websites. In July a press release announced a new website, troubledteenprograms.org, linking all of the WWASP-associated programs under the name “Teen Revitalization.”
WWASP seems to have learned Straight’s P.R. lessons well: Deny abuse; smear kids who report problems as drug addicts, liars, and manipulators; insist that the media “balance” negative stories with positive anecdotes; and when the charges begin to stick and the press and regulators have thoroughly discredited a program, simply change its name and reopen, changing location only if necessary.
In an email message, James Wall, the WWASP publicist, says: “Clearly you can speculate about similarities between Straight and WWASPS. However, the two are completely separate organizations with no links whatsoever. You should also note that WWASPS and associated organizations continue to thrive (in terms of growth) despite continued attacks from individuals (online, etc.) and the media.”
WWASP seems to have learned from Straight’s political and regulatory strategies as well. Since the 2002 election, founder Robert Lichfield, his family members (some of whom run WWASP programs), and their various business entities have donated more than $1 million to the Republican Party and its candidates. Together the Lichfields and their businesses are the third largest Republican donor in WWASP’s home state of Utah, according to the Deseret News. WWASP has moved to block or water down state legislation aimed at reigning in tough love programs in at least two states, Utah and Montana.
In 2004 Marty Stephens, speaker of the Utah House of Representatives, used a procedural maneuver to block a vote on legislation, which backers say had more than enough support to pass, imposing stricter controls on a WWASP facility near Randolph, Utah. Six days later, he received a check from Robert Lichfield for his gubernatorial campaign. Lichfield insisted to the Salt Lake Tribune that “that check had nothing to do with” the bill’s blockage. He added: “I’d like to use my means and resources to bless people’s lives. Does that also imply influencing policy makers to make good policies that support good family values, quality education, and the things I believe in? Definitely.”
Prior to 2005, Montana didn’t require teen programs to let the state know they existed, let alone impose regulation. But local and national exposés led to calls for greater oversight. In the 2005 legislative session, Spring Creek Lodge registered five lobbyists and spent at least $50,000 to block a bill that would have imposed strict state rules, according to the Missoula Independent. The legislation died in the state House of Representatives. An alternative bill, sponsored by Spring Creek’s competitors, passed. It created a governor-appointed board with five members—three of whom represent the industry. One of the members is the “principal” of Spring Creek Lodge.
The Tide Turns?
Thanks to the potent combination of political influence, industry
and government fear-mongering, and media malpractice, tough love
has so far survived its detractors. But Martin Lee Anderson’s death
may have marked a turning point.
The case has revealed the politics of tough love in one of its home states, and has turned a new spotlight on the data. In a departure from the usual journalistic pattern, the early coverage of the case consistently cited the research finding boot camps to be no more effective than juvenile prison, and editorials mainly called for their closure.
The movement toward “evidence-based” social policy has been growing since the early ’90s, as insurers, patient advocates, and government agencies alike demanded proof that expensive policies produce demonstrable results. It also seems to have spurred at least some journalists to view scientific data as superior to anecdotes when assessing the performance of tough love programs. This has reduced the false balance in prior coverage that simply played success stories against abuse accounts. Some Florida papers even noted how the research and prior abuse scandals had led other states to shut down their government-run boot camps. They cited a Maryland scandal in which the Baltimore Sun photographed guards at a state-run boot camp openly beating inmates, which led that state to drop such programs. They also mentioned a similar scandal that prompted a federal investigation of Georgia’s public boot camp programs, leading to their closure. Some coverage of the Anderson case noted the 1999 death of 14-year-old Gina Score at a South Dakota boot camp following forced exercise similar to that endured by Anderson, an incident that led that state to shutter its programs.
As the Florida case unfolded, political missteps dogged boot camp supporters. First, the state refused to release the videotape of the boy’s beating to the media, leading to an outcry and greater media attention. Guy Tunnell, who had founded and staffed the sheriff’s boot camp in which Anderson died, had gone on to head the Florida Department of Law Enforcement; as a result, he was initially in charge of investigating the death. Email messages from Tunnell—who serves on the board of the Drug Free America Foundation—showed that he supported the boot camp he was supposed to be objectively investigating, and that he had adamantly resisted releasing the video. The revelations prompted the appointment of a special prosecutor, generating yet more media attention. No criminal charges have been filed so far, but Anderson’s family has filed a $40 million lawsuit against the state.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|10.4.09 @ 3:00PM|#
I think parents now consider on how well they can control their troubled teens by learning & training their selves with the tools that are necessary for effective parenting of today's teens. Limits and rules are critical in the development of safety, growth, and fulfillment of individuals or groups. If you are dealing with a troubled or defiant teen you are already familiar with the need for more defined structure. When setting rules for troubled teens you need to create several layers of preventative rules to assist your teen. For example: It probably would not work to have a rule of "Don't Use Drugs" but then allow your teen to associate with drug using friends or hang out at the wrong places. You should set some very clear preventative rules with your teens concerning "WHO" they may associate with, "WHAT" types of activities they are allowed to attend and/or participate, "WHERE" they are allowed to go, and "WHEN" they may go, as well as expected to return.
http://www.helpfortroubledteen.....tions.html , these suggestions might be very helpful for parents of troubled teens.
Pingback| 10.9.09 @ 10:32AM
The Trouble with Troubled Teen Programs - Reason Magazine | Finally! Be free from sm links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Jacob W|10.12.09 @ 1:07PM|#
Anderson's death never should have happened. The biggest problem with these types of programs is the lack of staff training. If the staff think a kid is faking they should treat the kid just as if they were having a serious problem. Most deaths occur within the first few days of being admitted. The first days are very challenging for the teens and the staff. The problems with many of these kids are deeper than the outward signs they are displaying. There needs to be better oversight on these programs and better training dealing with new admissions. There are also reviews available for many of these places online http://fortroubledteens.com
Pingback| 11.1.09 @ 10:26AM
Latest troubled teen programs news – The Trouble with Troubled Teen Programs – Reason links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 2.9.10 @ 9:15PM
Behind Liz Cheney’s group, a weird legacy of torture | Nunya links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 2.10.10 @ 1:46PM
Torture becoming more mainstream in US « Later On links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 2.22.10 @ 4:59PM
More on Cheney Terrorism connections « Jibarosoy's Weblog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.10.10 @ 9:57PM
Mel Sembler: Behind Liz Cheney’s Group, a Weird Legacy of Torture | The Alex Constant links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
|9.5.10 @ 11:37PM|#
They made me LITTERLY INSANE! One of the guys there (SCOTT) held me down in cross position with penis on my ass ... near a picture of God, Oh nd they think that its all a joke! You shouldn't ever send your child here unless you plan on making them go mentally insane. They hold your wrists on both sides everyday all day.. It was just a living nightmare I litterly wanted to kill myself & them!! & Im Christian!!! I just hope this place goes down , they arent helping they are hurting kids mentally & physically I would just like the parents who are having a hard time LOOK into what you plan on spending ALOT of money on BEFORE you do it! You could get ripped off like my mom did, because in the end THEY DIDNT HELP ME , BUT ONLY MADE IT WORSE!! I just thank GOD & my Mom for saving me by sending me somewhere else because when i left that place I DID GET BETTER! Because they ARENT CIVIL TO THE CHILDREN! The main old guy there freaked out on me and was yelling as loud as he could in my ear to make a point to the other children just to be afraid of him. Turns out I happened to have a mental disabilty i got treated at a CIVIL place where they treated people like humans & NOT like another kid that they are going to have to watch all day! Turnabout Stillwater Academy I want one thing for you guys & its NOT to be running anymore!
|9.10.10 @ 4:27PM|#
I think that if parents consider going to enroll their child in a teen program, should consider researching into the program. They should visit the area, and see if it would be a perfect suit for their child. I had enrolled my child in to west ridge academy in utah, I had my child come with me, so I can see how he interacts with the others. It was a great decision for him, he's a lot happier now and days.
nfl jerseys|11.6.10 @ 3:52AM|#
ntfh
Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.25.10 @ 8:58AM|#
FSDFGG
UggBoots On Sale|11.25.10 @ 8:59AM|#
CSDF
Ugg boots outlet|11.25.10 @ 9:00AM|#
DGG
Ugg Boots On Sale|11.25.10 @ 9:01AM|#
SAD
SheepskinUGG boots|11.25.10 @ 9:03AM|#
TERE
WOMENUGGS|11.25.10 @ 9:05AM|#
DSFF
CHEAPWOMEN UGG BOOTS|11.25.10 @ 9:06AM|#
CVCV
CHEAPWOMEN UGG BOOTS|11.25.10 @ 9:06AM|#
CVCV