Uncommon Culture

He was a Berber from Algeria. And, like many a Washington cab driver, he had a story to tell about politics. The Algerian government had done his people wrong, had done him wrong when he was a student demonstrator standing up for Berber rights. But Americans didn't understand his struggle "Americans won't fight for principles," he said.

Thinking of my country as the would-be world policeman and idealistic guardian of human rights, I demurred. But then he started talking about soccer riots, about how Americans didn't understand the principle behind them, the notion of standing up for your team no matter what. The notion of blind, dehumanizing, clan loyalties.

To the cab driver, "principles" weren't abstract ideals like liberty or equality. They were group allegiances. "Principles" were what set Serbs against Bosnians, Hindus against Muslims, neo-Nazis against Turks. And Americans won't fight for principles. It is one of our defining characteristics.

The cab driver was, I believe, correct. But not everyone is so sure. A lot of very smart people see the Balkans in America's future. They point to the L.A. riots and say race relations are worse than ever. They look at immigrants pouring in from Third World nations and say (on the left) that we must accommodate diverse cultures and (on the right) that we must shut the doors. They worry about a fragmenting nation–too many ethnicities, too many religions, even too many cable TV channels. They're afraid America will disappear. "Unless a common purpose binds [Americans] together, tribal hostilities will drive them apart," says liberal historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., neatly encapsulating the centrist position.

"There is no American heritage," proclaims Rubén Martinez, one of L.A.'s angry young pundits, voicing the multiculturalism of the left.

Writing in National Review, Peter Brimelow declares that Americans, to remain a nation, must have genetic ties. " 'Nation'–as suggested by its Latin root nacere, to be born–intrinsically implies a link by blood. A nation is like an extended family," he writes, and later, "Americans are now being urged to abandon the bonds of a common ethnicity and instead to trust entirely to ideology to hold together their state (polity). This is an extraordinary experiment, like suddenly replacing all the blood in a patient's body."

Martinez and Brimelow are both right, in part. America has more than one heritage, and America is an extraordinary experiment. But it is an experiment that works.

And it will continue to work as long as the multiculturalists of the left and the monoculturalists of the right aren't allowed to impose their visions on America. The United States is neither the Balkans nor Little England, West. And the forces of assimilation–the forces of American culture–are as powerful as they are utterly misunderstood.

Sometimes a picture is worth only a few words. The picture of Thurgood Marshall's funeral said, "We won." On the front page of the Los Angeles Times was Marshall's widow, flanked by their two sons. And they were all, unmistakably Asian. Mrs. Marshall is ethnically Filipina, born in Hawaii. Her half-Asian sons are married to white women.

Thurgood Marshall was, above all else, the lawyer who beat Jim Crow in court. That he became a Supreme Court justice was incidental. And Jim Crow was, above all else, designed to prevent families like Marshall's. Until 1967, it was illegal for an interracial couple to live together in the state of Virginia. The Marshalls bought their home there in 1968.

The old segregationists understood the American character. They knew that if the law didn't keep people apart, common humanity would bring them together. Americans have no principles. Restaurants and hotels and railroads and department store dressing rooms would let the races mingle–all in pursuit of the almighty dollar. Jim Crow was a bulwark against the integrating forces of commerce, education, and, above all, love. Allow the races to mingle, the segregationists said, and you'd soon have mixed-race children.

They were right. In 1970, there were 310,000 interracial marriages in the United States. In 1988, there were almost a million. "But would you want your daughter to marry one?" is now an irrelevant question. Your daughter will do as she pleases. America melts tribal ties. Jewish leaders write and preach incessantly on the evils of intermarriage. And the Jewish intermarriage rate has gone from 10 percent before 1965 to more than 50 percent since 1985–not counting ethnic non-Jews who convert. "We have lost more Jews to intermarriage than to the Holocaust," thundered a direct-mail appeal I once received. (Ah, that Commentary list.)

But most American Jews–most Americans–don't think of assimilation as death. Most Americans, lacking the cab driver's principles, do not disown their children for marrying outside their kind. We teach our ninth-graders Romeo and Juliet. It tells them adolescent love is more important than family loyalty. It says we are all the same kind.

For the last quarter century, the children of the New Deal have been fighting with the children of the '60s over what it means to be an American. Shall we melt everyone down in an Eisenhower-era cultural pot and call it America? Or shall we divide up on principle and get together only to insult each other's ancestors? Shall we protect "the common culture" or champion "cultural pluralism"? On and on the battle has raged–in the schools, in the newspapers, over the airwaves.

The debate over the American character has it all wrong. Assimilation is not an evil (or a good) foisted upon unwilling, unmeltable ethnics. It does not represent a betrayal of the self, a denial of identity. And it does not require public schools.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • William of Purple||

    45 Years, 45 Days: Why the American Experiment Works

    What day are we on?

  • Scruffy Nerfherder||

    Are these biblical days or solar days?

  • CE||

    Day 4,545 I think.

  • Almanian!||

    You know, this just reminds me how much better it was when Virginia Postrel was running Reason

  • William of Purple||

    drinking this early is bad for the liver

  • Almanian!||

    Just a glass of red wine with lunch...

  • Brett L||

    Goddammit. I was trying to get may BAC all the way to zero on a bet!

  • Almanian!||

    Wow - for someone who comes to website called "REASON", you sure make silly bets!

  • Brett L||

    I subscribe to the Cool Hand Luke school of betting.

  • UnCivilServant||

    I read the article, and so little of what was said rang true. My high school (in the 'multicultural' New York) had a rabidly self-segregated student body, enforced mostly by the 'minority' students (who were a majority of the student body) and their enabling teachers. College was the opposite, the only barrier within the student body was between deaf and hearing students - mostly due to communication difficulties. The faculty wanted to contanerize and subdivide, but we were more interested in picking up technical skills than their politicking.

    Also, the balkinization seems to be emanating from the government, which wants to reinforce these divisions with preferential treatment of groups based on irrelevent categorizations. I see neither mixing nor optimism, only demagogues agitating strife.

  • Almanian!||

    Interesting - I'm guessing you were in HS more recently than I (1980 grad)? We saw NO self-segregation, basically - but 30 years later, tons for my kids attending schools similar to mine. And it was "minorities" driving the segregation, as you note - not the "majority" kids (apparently - who knows with all the microaggression etc. that hadn't been made up discovered in my youth)

    And college? YEah - it was like a mini-UN that wasn't dysfunctional. I hung out with kids literally from across the globe - it was awesome! And works like that, so college was good preparation...

  • UnCivilServant||

    I graduated in 2000. In that twenty year span, things went to shit.

  • Almanian!||

    Also, EXCELLENT stuff! Ms. P is much more sanguine than I about the future (which may be the past now? at least partly, based on the date this was first published)

    Speaking of the US, "Left alone, it will long endure." It's emphatically NOT being "left alone". People are attempting to fuck with it and change it and shift it to their purposes every day, and I don't believe in a "good" way - it's for selfish and self-serving reasons. Will they succeed? We'll see...

    Ms. P points out plenty of reasons to remain optimistic. We shall see how it all unfolds.

  • CE||

    You know who else assimilated lots of cultures into a government that started out following republican ideals but slowly disintegrated due to an overabundance of the pursuit of happiness?

  • Almanian!||

    Not gonna lie - no. Complete blank. WOW!

  • Dead or In Jail||

    With all their billions, the Kochs can't bribe Virginia to come back to reason?


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties