The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Secretary Noem Takes it On The Chin
It's been a difficult few weeks for DHS Secretary Noem
From Judge Ana Reyes' opinion in Miot et al. v. Trump et al. (D.D.C.), a case challenging DHS' suspension of the TPS (Temporary Protected Status) program for Haitians in the U.S., on the grounds that DHS Secretary Noem "preordained her termination decision and did so because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants." [The court agreed with the challengers that they were likely to succeed on their claim, and granted their motion to stay the DHS' action].
It's pretty powerful stuff.
On December 2, 1783, then-Commander-in-Chief George Washington penned: "America is open to receive not only the Opulent & respected Stranger, but the oppressed & persecuted of all Nations & Religions." More than two centuries later, Congress reaffirmed President Washington's vision by establishing the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (TPS statute). It provides humanitarian relief to foreign nationals in the United States who come from disaster-stricken countries. It also brings in substantial revenue, with TPS holders generating $5.2 billion in taxes annually.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem has a different take. [From her posting on X:
"I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies. . . . WE DON'T WANT THEM. NOT ONE."
After a fairly exhaustive review of the facts and the relevant law - 83 pages worth - Judge Reyes writes:
"There is an old adage among lawyers. If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither, pound the table. Secretary Noem, the record to-date shows, does not have the facts on her side—or at least has ignored them. Does not have the law on her side—or at least has ignored it. Having neither and bringing the adage into the 21st century, she pounds X (f/k/a Twitter).
Kristi Noem has a First Amendment right to call immigrants killers, leeches, entitlement junkies, and any other inapt name she wants. Secretary Noem, however, is constrained by both our Constitution and the APA to apply faithfully the facts to the law in implementing the TPS program. The record to-date shows she has yet to do that.
By accompanying Order, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for a Stay under 5 U.S.C. § 705.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Temporary Protected Status should mean exactly that. Temporary. Haiti's original TPS was due to the earthquake in 2010. More than 15 years ago. That has passed.
TPS status provides no road to citizenship for those here. Because it was meant to be temporary. A temporary relief. Not a program that lets people stay for decades.
TPS status just provides a method of cheap labor with individuals who can never become citizens. The "economic benefit" calculation is meaningless in terms of the law. It simply isn't in the law, not at all. Moreover, slavery could provide an "economic benefit". This judge's decision uses the same logic that rationalized keeping slavery.
I don't know why MAGA think "temporary" and "short term" are synonyms.
Because he's read a book?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/temporary
Step 1.) Click link
Step 2.) CTRL+F "short-term"
Step 3.) LOL
Maybe because they are.
temporary
adjective
Definition of temporary
1
as in interim
intended to last, continue, or serve for a limited time
Synonyms & Similar Words
interim
provisional
short-term
https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/temporary
Can't spell "denial" without "David Nieporent", everyone always says.
She violated the plain language of the TPS law.
The Temporary Protected Status statute clearly states that status is not reviewable by judges.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1254a
LexAquillia: The Temporary Protected Status statute clearly states that status is not reviewable by judges.: "There is no judicial review of any determination of the Attorney General with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection."
Her opinion deals with this (at length). Bottom line is she says that the plaintiff are not challenging the "determination" about TPS, but the process by which the determination was made.
That's what they call "sophistry".
Here's the way I read it as a layman.
1. The administration violates the process requirements of the TPS.
2. They then claim their violation is a "determination....under this subsection."
3. No. To be covered, the determination must be under which means following all the requirements of a legal process.
Surely you agree Noem could not rob a bank while yelling "TPS determination! TPS determination" and avoid all judicial review of her action.
That logic reads all the procedures out of the statute.
One must wonder why Congress bothered to put them in then, eh?
Exactly.
There's a whole course in law school called Administrative Law. Much of mine long ago was devoted to Chevron... Whoops. But overturning Chevron does not somehow invalidate the APA.
This is America. We have rules.
Exactly. It is impossible to say that a determination not to extend a designation is not a determination “with respect to” such extension.
Oh, I forgot the "Gold Heart, Black Heart" Animus clause in the Constitution.
Amendment 38:
Section A
Lawful actions by Republicans or citizens (e.g. CA Prop 8) are only lawful if a Democrat judge believes it was done with a "Gold Heart". If a Democrat judge believes the Republican or citizens have a "Black Heart", then the otherwise lawful act is unlawful.
This is what Rule of Man looks like, David.
It's utter nonsense. The court takes it upon itself to decide what it decides are "appropriate agencies" of the government that the AG must consult with. "Oh, you didn't consult with the 4th subbranch of the state department, so...you didn't get the appropriate agency!"
For all the kvetching of decisions that were made before actually looking at the facts, the court is most guilty here. The court wanted to rule against ending TPS, so it found reasons to do so. It is gross judicial overreach.
All the more reason to whack more DC bureaucrats; fewer people to consult. 😉
What I would love to see is this.
The same "consultation with agencies" is required for each renewal of TPS status. I would love to see if for each and every renewal of TPS status, the same agencies are carefully considered and documented by the government.
If the government didn't consider each of the agencies the court so seemingly requires for the renewal, that would be the renewal itself was not done according to the proper procedures and is null and void, and the program is terminated.
I suspect the administration might take that position, search the records of previous extension decisions, and declare them void and the program terminated as if the date the first one not fully compliant with the terms of the judge’s order was made.
It would be one thing if the judge had granted relief by enjoining the process, e.g. prohibiting use of the same process in future determinations. But the judge’s injunction seems to have gone well beyond simply enjoining the process. It seems to have reach its result, the determination itself, which is not subject to challenge.
That would be a more reasonable objection.
Noem is not the AG. Also no judicial review offends the due process clause in 14A0
We’re not dealing with state government.
What makes it different from a presidential pardon? Or is it your position that completely discretionary pardons violate the 5th Amendment Due Process Clause?
The pardon power is in the Constitution; Congress can't bestow it.
Congress can strip jurisdiction. I don't know much about how that looks; this could be that, but I don't think so.
Here come the MAGAts...
It's okay, you can use the slur "Goy" now. The cat is out of the bag.
"Goy" is not a slur. It is a term right out of the Torah.
>"Goy" is not a slur. It is a term right out of the Torah.
lmao, of course it's a slur. goyishe kopf? Goyishe naches?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goy
Quick! Activate the IDF to scrub Wikipedia!
Lex!
I think I DID do your Circumcision.
You know, we were required to send the "Specimen" to the Lab for Anal-lysis, to make sure you didn't have Foreskin Cancer or something.
Yours came back "Quantity Not Sufficient for Testing"
Did you see what I said? Your Foreskin was "Not Sufficient" that means it was too small, too insignificant, NOT SUFFICIENT.
And like the Blind with hearing, when you lose one ability you gain another, like your ability to suck a Golf Ball through a Garden Hose (so I've heard)
Seriously, I've been to Israel, I know Israel, Israel is a friend of Mine,
You, Sir, are no Israel!!
Any random Israeli Girl wearing Yoga Pants and an M4 would Bitch Slap you like Cagney did with Mae Clark in "The Pubic Enemy"
Don't regularly do Movie Reviews here, but it'd be to your advantage to watch the first segment of "Twilight Zone: The Movie" (Warner Bros 1983)
Seriously, Testosterone, it's available, get some.
Frank
Frank
Echoes of the so-called "travel ban" of Trump's first term, as decided in lower courts. Evidence that Trump wanted something is evidence that the decision to do it is illegal.
A pretty good heuristic!
Wanting something in this context is notable but in both cases that was not the only thing relied upon. The opinion here provides extended discussions of actions, not merely words and desires.
The rhetorical touches will get attention as did quoting the Bible and a photo of a little child did in another opinion (order).
But the 83 pages is not filled with such rhetoric. Like so many lower court opinions, regularly incorrectly disdained by SCOTUS, lots of pages are provided to spell out the facts and law.
When you're right, like Supreme Clarence "Frog Man" Thomas most of the time, you don't need 83 pages to explain your Opinion.
"When an adult male is chasing a female, with intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard. That's my policy."
Oh wait, that was Inspector Hairy Callahan. (Warner Bros 1971)
Frank
Love how David Post has not idea "Take it on the Chin" can be SO misunderstood
Make that "Missundaztood" (HT Pink Arista Records 2001)
While not quite up to the Beatles "White" Album, it's close. Used to play "Get the Party Started" as "Walk Up Music" right before my Daughter's Tennis matches.
Frank
There being no actual *evidence* of this animus is something we'll leave out of the analysis.
Oh, and that the review by the judiciary isn't authorized by Congress.
Your first line implies you didn't read the OP.
Your second indicates you didn't read the comments.
Thanks for stopping by, I guess!
Progressive Biden appointee finds Trump admin done wrong; Anti Trump people everywhere cheer. Appellate reversal at 11!
Temporary protected status means temporary.
The reason half the country cheers for ICE is because the left has literally no limits on immigration, twisting words into pretzels to justify people overstaying.
Temporary means Temporary.
the left has literally no limits on immigration
I mean, you can read the deportation numbers under Biden and Obama.
But I guess someone who mistakes reading a title for reading a statute can't be held to too high a standard.