The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: December 27, 1771
12/27/1771: Justice William Johnson's birthday.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
The Flushing Remonstrance was a [27 December] 1657 petition to Director-General of New Netherland Peter Stuyvesant, in which some thirty residents of the small settlement at Flushing requested an exemption to his ban on Quaker worship. It is considered a precursor to the United States Constitution's provision on freedom of religion in the Bill of Rights.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flushing_Remonstrance
Richard Brookhiser in Give Me Liberty has a chapter on the Flushing Remonstrance.
https://tif.ssrc.org/2014/01/15/the-forgotten-story-of-the-flushing-remonstrance/
OTD in 2022:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s ruling that had ordered the government to end a Trump-era border policy that allows immigration officials to quickly turn away migrants seeking asylum. The justices agreed to hear argument in late February or early March on whether 19 states with Republican attorneys general can step in to defend the policy against a challenge by migrant families.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/12/trump-era-border-policy-will-remain-in-place-while-justices-hear-argument-on-procedural-question/
"The application for stay pending certiorari presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted. " Justice Gorsuch and the liberals dissented.
The policy later expired in May, and the Court declared the matter moot. Gorsuch added a jeremiad on COVID polices as a threat to liberty. His concern about federal power is somewhat selective, as seen by his dissent earlier this week.