The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: November 18, 1811
11/18/1811: Justice Gabriel Duvall takes judicial oath. Professor David P. Currie said that an "impartial examination of Duvall's performance reveals to even the uninitiated observer that he achieved an enviable standard of insignificance against which all other justices must be measured."

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
He's more significant than Professor David P. Currie.
Ok, not fair, lets see, the Professor was Hah-Vud Law Review, clerked for 2 years then taught Constitutional law for 45 years.
It's like if I taught Medicine my whole life after 2 years of Practice. (37 years and I'm still practicing, one day I'll get it right)
Frank
And as has become a customary ritual this time of year, Mima Queen and child make their annual rise from the grave to lodge their objection.
“Insignificant”is high praise for a judge, even when it is intended as an insult.
Way better than the significance earned by pulling stuff out of the judicial fundament.
Multiple justices historically were "insignificant," including multiple justices who served with John Marshall.
These justices have moments, as Duvall did when he provided some recognition of the interests of freedom of non-white people.
He had special experience in the case he dissented in. Not only was he involved in many freedom suits (which underline that blacks had rights whites respected in antebellum times), but he was involved in freedom suits for the specific family involved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_v._Hepburn
As with many early justices who are now mostly forgotten, Duvall had an impressive pre-SCOTUS resume.
"impartial examination of Duvall's performance reveals to even the uninitiated observer that he achieved an enviable standard of insignificance against which all other justices must be measured."
I wonder if there are any Law Professors who have achieved an enviable standard of insignificance against which all other Professors must be measured?
Any suggestions?