The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Review of The Heritage Guide to the Constitution in the Washington Free Beacon
"It is, quite simply, the most thorough, useful, and readable guide to our fundamental law available today.
Ilya Shapiro, my friend and frequent co-author, reviewed The Heritage Guide to the Constitution in the Washington Free Beacon.
Here is the introduction:
There's a familiar lament among constitutionalists—one heard at law schools, in courtrooms, and across think tank hallways—that most Americans know next to nothing about the nation's founding document. Ask a random college graduate about the Emoluments Clause or the Compact Clause and you'll get a blank stare. Yet even among lawyers and judges, constitutional knowledge is often shallow, piecemeal, or warped by ideology.
What's been missing is a single, reliable, readable, and comprehensive reference work that explains what the Constitution actually says, what its words meant to those who wrote and ratified them, and how those meanings have been interpreted over time
Enter The Heritage Guide to the Constitution, now in its third edition and more indispensable than ever. Originally published in 2005, with an updated edition in 2014, this volume has long been a mainstay for those of us who care about constitutional text, structure, and history. But the new edition isn't just an update. It's a major expansion and refinement, reflecting nearly a decade of scholarship, jurisprudence, and debate.
If the Constitution is our civic scripture, this is the annotated commentary you want by your side—with a foreword by former attorney general Edwin Meese and an introduction by Justice Samuel Alito! Kudos to lead editors Josh Blackman and John Malcolm (both friends and professional collaborators of mine).
And from the conclusion:
The Heritage Foundation has always seen itself as a steward of America's Founding principles, and this book is one of its finest contributions to that mission. In an era when too many view the Constitution as a "living" document to be bent toward whatever policy end is fashionable, the Heritage Guide offers a refreshing alternative: rigorous, sober, historically grounded analysis of the document as it is.
No single volume can settle every constitutional debate, but if you want a reference that will make you smarter every time you open it, this is it. It is, quite simply, the most thorough, useful, and readable guide to our fundamental law available today. And at a time when constitutional literacy has never been more needed, that makes it a civic treasure.
The Heritage Guide to the Constitution is what every serious student of American government—and every citizen who wants to remain free—should own. It doesn't tell you what to think; it gives you the tools to think constitutionally.
If you've purchased the book on Amazon, please leave a review!
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
The Heritage Foundation, author of this tome, has spent decades stacking the judiciary with its disciples, in an attempt to enshrine in practice the highly dubious Unitary Executive Theory, which amounts to installing a king in this country. To do so, they've endorsed dubious practices, from Mitch McConnell's gamesmanship with Merick Garland, to outright bribing sitting Justices. Their project is now close to complete, as our Supreme Court ignores the text and intent of the Constitution to hand ever greater power to one Donald Trump.
I cannot think of a worse source of information on the Constitution than the Heritage Foundation.
There is no 4th Branch of government, there are no "Independent" Agencies or Departments. It's Executive, Legislative,or Judicial. If you work in the Executive Branch, you ultimately work for the President, at his pleasure.
I would sooner trust a book on monogamy by Bill Clinton before a book on the Constitution by the Heritage Foundation.
I disagree with the heritage foundation therefore the book must be terrible. Have I read it? Jeez what a stupid question…
Whatta get!
Will Breitbart pen the next approving review?
Whenever I hear about Ilya Shapiro I gotta check his tweets. Because the man tweets like an old VC shitposter:
------
Since everyone’s posting their East Wing memories… can’t believe they tore down Jimmy Carter’s tennis court.
-------
This has to be the first World Series contested by two non-American teams.
------
School choice is the civil rights issue of our time.
------
Did California secede w/o me knowing it?
" . . . explains what the Constitution actually says, what its words meant to those who wrote and ratified them, and how those meanings have been interpreted over time . . . . "
Um . . . why do we need a third edition if we're supposed to use the original meaning of the Constitution?
There's a Republican in office. That means it's time to use the Heritage Foundation's special "unlimited executive power" interpretation.
What's wrong here is Shapiro's implicit statement that this is some sort of objective, authoritative, commentary.
If you know anything about Heritage you know that the book is going to present a strongly ideological right-wing view. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but pretending it's something else is deceptive.
Thank you Josh. I just ordered the book. It will be here in a few days.