The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Advice to Entering Law Students - 2025
Some suggestions that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.

Law students around the country will be starting classes over the next few weeks. Back in 2018, I wrote a post offering advice to entering students, which I updated in 2019, 2022, 2023, and last year. I tried to focus on points that I rarely, if ever, see made in other pieces of this type. I think my original suggestions remain relevant today. So I reprint my advice from earlier posts largely unaltered, with the addition of incremental edits and updates:
1. Think carefully about what kind of law you want to practice.
Law is a profession with relatively high income and social status. Yet studies repeatedly show that many lawyers are deeply unhappy, a higher percentage than in most other professions. One reason for this is that many of them hate the work they do. It doesn't necessarily have to be that way. There are lots of different types of legal careers out there, and it's likely that one of them will be a good fit for you. A person who would be miserable working for a large "Biglaw" firm might be happy as a public interest lawyer or a family law practitioner, and so on. But to take advantage of this diversity, you need to start considering what type of legal career best fits your needs and interests.
There are many ways to find out about potential options. But one place to start is to talk to the career services office at your school, which should have information about a range of possibilities. Many also often have databases of alumni working in various types of legal careers. Talking to these people can give you a sense of what life as a practitioner in Field X is really like.
This advice applies not just to what you do in school, narrowly defined, but what you do in the summer, as well. Law students typically get summer jobs at firms or other potential future employers. Apply widely, and look for organizations that might be good employers, or at least introduce you to areas of law that might be crucial for your future career.
The summer clerk job I took at the Institute for Justice after my first year in law school, was a key step towards becoming a property scholar, and helped lead me to write two books and numerous articles about takings. Spending a summer at a public interest firm might change your life, too!
Regardless, don't just "go with the flow" in terms of choosing what kind of legal career you want to pursue. The jobs that many of your classmates want may be terrible for you (and vice versa). Keep in mind, also, that you likely have a wider range of options now than you will in five or ten years, when it may be much harder to switch to a very different field from the one you have been working in since graduation.
2. Get to know as many of your classmates and professors as you reasonably can.
Law is a "people" business. Connections are extremely important. No matter how brilliant a legal thinker you may be, it's hard to get ahead as a lawyer purely by working alone at your desk - even with the help of AI and other modern tech. Many of your law school classmates could turn out to be useful connections down the road. This is obviously true at big-name national schools whose alumni routinely become judges, powerful government officials, and partners at major firms. But it's also true at schools whose reputation is more regional or local in nature. If you plan to make a career in that area yourself, many of your classmates could turn out to be useful contacts.
The same holds true for professors, many of whom have extensive connections in their respective fields. They are sometimes harder to get to know than students. But the effort is often worth it, anyway. And many of them are actually more than eager to talk about their work.
This is one front on which I didn't do very well when I was in law school, myself. Nonetheless, I still suggest you do as I say, not as I actually did. You will be better off if you learn from my mistakes than if you repeat them.
3. Think about whether what you plan to do is right and just.
Law presents more serious moral dilemmas than many other professions. What lawyers do can often cost innocent people their liberty, their property, or even their lives. It can also save all three. Lawyers have played key roles in almost every major advance for liberty and justice in American history, including the establishment of the Constitution, the antislavery movement, the civil rights movement and many others. But they have also been among the major perpetrators of most of the great injustices in our history, as well.
Robert Cover's classic book Justice Accused - a work that made a big impression on me when I was a law student - describes how some of the greatest judges and legal minds of antebellum America became complicit in the perpetuation of slavery. While we have made great progress since that time, the legal system is not as far removed from the days of the Fugitive Slave Acts as we might like to think. There are still grave injustices in the system, and lawyers whose work has the effect of perpetuating and exacerbating them. We even still have lawyers who do such things as come up with dubious rationales for deporting literal escaped slaves back to places where they are likely to face further oppression. The present administration is coming up with even more dubious rationales for doing things like using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (previously used only in wartime) to deport people who have not broken any laws to imprisonment, without any due process. The latter is just one of several dramatic examples of how we are now engaged in a struggle over the future of justice and the rule of law in this country.
Law school is the right time to start working to ensure that the career you pursue is at least morally defensible. You don't necessarily have a moral obligation to devote your career to doing good. But you should at least avoid exacerbating evil. And it's easier to do that if you think carefully about the issues involved now (when you still have a wide range of options), than if you wait until you are already enmeshed in a job that involves perpetrating injustice. At that point, it may be too late - both for you and (even more importantly) for the people who may be harmed.
4. Legal knowledge isn't as different from other kinds of knowledge as you might think.
Students often ask me how best to study for law school classes. My answer is that there isn't one way that's best for everyone. You probably know what works for you far better than I do.
In law school, you are likely to be bombarded with all sorts of complex methods of studying and outlining cases. Advocates of each will often tell you theirs is the One True Path to law school success. Some students really do find these methods useful.
But I would urge you to consider the possibility that you can study for law school classes by using…. much the same methods as you used to study other subjects in the past. If you were successful in social science and humanities classes as an undergraduate, the methods that worked there are likely to carry over.
I know because that's largely what I did as a law student myself. I did the reading, identified key points, and didn't bother with complicated outlines or spend money on study guides. If I did badly in a class, it wasn't for lack of more complex study methods (usually, I either got lazy or just had a bad day on the final exam). And I've seen plenty of other people succeed with similar approaches. You can save a lot of time and aggravation (and some money) that way. And that time, energy, and money can be better devoted to other purposes - including advancing your studies and your career in other ways!
Ultimately, when reading a legal decision (or any assignment), you need to 1) identify the key issues, and 2) understand why they are important. With rare exceptions, the case in question was likely included in the reading because it highlights some rule, standard, or issue that has a broader significance. If you know what that is and why it matters, much of your work is done. The same goes for most other kinds of assigned reading: they are probably there because the professor thinks they elucidate some broadly important point. Figure out what it is, and you will be in good shape.
These days, there is much discussion about the extent to which students should rely on AI to help them study. I don't have any definitive answer to that question. But, ideally, AI can augment your reading, writing, and analytical skills, but doesn't fully replace them. You should also be wary of its tendencies to hallucinate information. Use its output, but verify for accuracy. And, as with other study aids, the use of AI to study law need not be much different than its proper use for other subjects.
The experience of remote learning during the Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of Point 2 above. The loss of much in-person contact was a serious problem, one we would do well to avoid repeating.
I don't think I need to dwell on how recent events have reinforced the significance of Point 3. Suffice to say there are many recent examples of lawyers facilitating both good and evil. Even if you don't maximize the former, you should at least avoid contributing to the latter.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Advice to Entering Law Students - 2025"
Learn to weld.
I’d like to see more advice on dealing with new technologies like AI. I graduated about 10 years ago and work as a public defender. I feel fairly confident that I have job security, but I worry that AI might rob the job of the things I most enjoy about it, research, writing, arguing. Other legal sectors might be decimated. I also worry that AI in particular might impact the learning experience, something Ilya addresses.
5. Decide Whether you intend to Use Your Law Bonafides to Advance Thinly-Buttressed Political Opinions.
As a law student, you will be taught that a good lawyer learns how to skillfully argue both sides of an issue. You will also be taught how to back up each opposing argument with a thorough and sometimes nuanced interpretation of case law, statutory interpretation, and, sometimes, legislative intent.
For some of you, though, you may become law professors. If you choose this path, you can cast aside any pretense of the professionalism or candor to the court you are taught to engage in as a soon-to-be-lawyer.
Instead, you can openly shill for political opinions under the rubric of learned academic research. If you’re pro-choice, you can write articles, case notes, and symposium briefs culling every paper, case, and tortured interpretation of statute that supports an inviolate right to abortion, and discarding any authority, no matter how persuasive, that undermines your desired position. You can cite half-baked studies whose methodologies you don’t even understand about the benefits of free and open access to abortifacents. You can weave social justice narratives into your work that have nothing to do with the law, public policy, or accepted legal interpretive doctrines which as state decisis.
Conversely, if you’re pro-life, your academic research can cite to obscure studies purporting to express the views of some Founding Father or the other that supposedly shows their antipathy to bodily autonomy. As a tenured professor, you can go far afield into sociological and psychological studies about the societal and individual harms abortions have, even though none of it has to do with doctrines of judicial interpretation you are purporting to drill into your students. You can find every square peg to jam into a round hole using nothing more than a cryptic footnote citation or trite dismissive phrases like “countervailing arguments are not as persuasive,” or “research has not yet borne out a sufficiently robust case in opposition,” and other nonsensical bullshit.
Most importantly, you can let your wife get a real legal job to support your navel-gazing excuse for a career.
"Yet studies repeatedly show that many lawyers are deeply unhappy."
I retired early, from an intellectually and monetarily rewarding international law practice.
I loved what I did, but I didn't love what I had to do to do what I did. Substantially every lawyer I know would say the same.
The constant necessity to pitch potential clients who have no conception of what they need -- that's why they're looking for an expert, after all -- and have no criteria other than that they want it cheap.
I quit, moved to Idaho and took up skiing, hiking and fishing. I haven't thought about law in 10 years. I've never been happier.
One of the most rhythmically fun and burningly accurate turns of phrase I've encountered in quite a while. Bravo.
"I haven't thought about law in 10 years. I've never been happier."
And yet you have an account on a legal blog.
Somin writes to aristocratic top 10 school students whiling away at their summer home before taking that plum federal clerkship on the inevitable path to a secure lifelong job in the high six to seven figures in the roaring pre 2008 era. True to form he seems almost completely oblivious of the actual challenges faced by typical modern students and job seekers, like losing your mind numbing document review job that pays in circus peanuts to llms. Or making your resume stand out to a llm hiring manager among thousands of llm generated resumes. Save for some tacked on generic musings about AI.