The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Officials, Protest Rallies, and Pride Parades
From a N.Y. Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics decision released Mar. 27, 2025 but just posted on Westlaw:
The inquiring court attorney-referee asks if he/she may attend either an unspecified "protest rally" in support of LGBTQIA rights or an annual community Pride Parade together with his/her minor child. The inquirer proposes to do so solely in his/her capacity as a parent, and expects to remain anonymous.
As quasi-judicial officials, court attorney-referees must comply with the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct in performing their official duties and otherwise must "so far as practical and appropriate" use the Rules to guide their conduct (22 NYCRR 100.6[A]). Like judges, they must avoid even the appearance of impropriety (see 22 NYCRR 100.2) and always act to promote public confidence in the judiciary's integrity and impartiality (see 22 NYCRR 100.2[A]). They also must not "directly or indirectly engage in any political activity" unless an exception applies (see 22 NYCRR 100.5[A][1]). For example, a judge or quasi-judicial official who is not in his/her window period must not attend political gatherings (22 NYCRR 100.5[A][1][g]; Opinion 22-126).
We note, initially, that a judge or quasi-judicial official "may not engage anonymously in otherwise prohibited political activity" (Opinion 16-85). Nor is there any exception permitting a judge or quasi-judicial official to attend an otherwise impermissible event "as a volunteer chaperone for students" (Opinion 24-60).
Community Pride Parade
We have advised that "judges may march in parades sponsored by municipalities or by civic, charitable, ethnic, cultural, or other not-for-profit organizations unless the parades are inseparable from the sponsoring organizations' fund-raising initiatives" (Opinion 06-147). Thus, for example, judges may march in a "community parade" celebrating both "a county bi-centennial and the end of the war in the Persian Gulf" (Opinion 91-55). Likewise, a judge may serve as a Grand Marshal or Deputy Grand Marshal in a St. Patrick's Day parade, which is organized as "a community event" rather than a fund-raiser (see Opinions 04-144; 96-148).
We see no reason for a different result with respect to a community parade that celebrates the culture and history of the LGBTQIA community. Accordingly, the inquirer may accompany his/her minor child to an annual Pride Parade.
Unspecified Protest Rally
Whether a judge or quasi-judicial official may participate in a protest, rally, march, or demonstration involves a fact-specific determination. As explained in Opinion 22-160 (internal quotations and citations omitted):
[W]e have declined to state categorically whether judges may participate, without speaking, in a local rally, march or demonstration sponsored by grassroots organizations. However, we opined that such events would generally be prohibited political activity, subject to specific facts fitting within a narrow exception to the blanket prohibition.
We likewise declined to provide blanket guidance about attending public events that invite participants to "stand with Israel," as we must consider "factors such as the identity of the sponsor(s), the actual focus and purpose of the event, the location of the event, and other matters" (Opinion 23-133).
Here, too, we cannot provide blanket guidance about attending an unspecified "protest rally" in support of LGBTQIA rights but must instead await a particularized inquiry about a specific known event.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why are lefties so singularly obsessed with exposing children to LGDFLFJDKLJFFFFFFFFKDKKDFKDFDKJL56454 and drag which are concepts that ultimately come down to genitalia and sex? Like its all they think about and the most important thing in the universe to them. Even if it wasn't sexual its still a pretty random thing to base your existence off of. Why not an obsession with puffy 60s pants or root beer floats?
Or why do they insist on reading to little children? Do they ever read to hospital patents or in rest homes?
I have never gotten any answer to that. I conclude
* Little children are impressionable and easily led astray.
* Hospital patients and old folks are disgusting.
* Drag queen readers are perverted.
Twist ending: The judge is really planning to attend a Straight Pride march and now ethics officials will have to engage in overt viewpoint discrimination to sanction him.
This opinion proves the old adage that the answer to every legal question is "It Depends."
Totally reasonable, assuming judges are willing to recuse themselves if ANYONE raises a conflict of interest concern. One might say "Sure, I advocated we must hang the bastard" in my personal position, but I can be impartial when the bastard - ahem...defendant - comes to trial in my court.
It is high time courts, legislatures, all of us, recognize that Pride and other LGBT-whatever groups are inherently political. No one marches for abstract notions of support - they march like any other activist group; ie, to garner political power. Accordingly, they must be treated as political entities, with all the restrictions that apply to any political group. The subterfuge has gone on long enough.