The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"Book on Machine Learning Is Full of Made-Up Citations"
So alleges Retraction Watch (Rita Aksenfeld):
Based on a tip from a reader, we checked 18 of the 46 citations in the book {Mastering Machine Learning: From Basics to Advanced}. Two-thirds of them either did not exist or had substantial errors….
The book's author, Govindakumar Madhavan, asked for an additional "week or two" to fully respond to our request for comment. He did not answer our questions asking if he used an LLM to generate text for the book. However, he told us, "reliably determining whether content (or an issue) is AI generated remains a challenge, as even human-written text can appear 'AI-like.' This challenge is only expected to grow, as LLMs … continue to advance in fluency and sophistication." …
When asked about the potential use of AI in the work, [Springer Nature senior communications manager Felicitas] Behrendt told us: "We are aware of the text and are currently looking into it." She did not comment on efforts taken during Springer Nature's editorial process to ensure its AI policies are followed….
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Some day YOU should talk one of the AIs into writing a (hallucinated) report on hallucinations in AI, post it here, and see how many people catch on.
Or maybe you already have ....
What does AI have to say about being hoisted on one's own petard?
'Tis the sport.
As a teacher , I take this article to be a subset of those things that warn us that any article can be a fraud, either in the usual way or because the author hides his First Principles. So you read a 300 page book only to discover that the author is an atheist and believes (yes, believes ???? humans don't have free will at all.
That vitiates the entire book.
No, LLM's were always around, some were actually human ????
I mean, the guy has published 17 textbooks in six months. You would think someone at Springer would have taken note of that and started asking a few questions. The only explanation I can think of is that they've shifted their business model into being a vanity publishing mill but haven't yet admitted this to the public.
Use artificial intelligence, get artificial results.