The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: May 21, 2007
5/21/2007: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly decided.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Important Justice Souter opinion with Stevens and Ginsburg dissenting. It involved antitrust law and civil procedure.
One critique:
https://verdict.justia.com/2025/05/14/the-justice-who-may-have-been-too-smart-for-the-job
https://yt.gold/ is a streamlined and user-friendly platform designed for downloading and managing YouTube content efficiently. With fast access, clean navigation, and support for various formats, yt.gold is ideal for users seeking a reliable tool for personal or professional media use. Featuring no intrusive ads and a focus on performance, it's a solid resource worth exploring.
On May 21, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, a landmark case that reshaped federal pleading standards by requiring plaintiffs to present enough factual matter to suggest a plausible claim, not just a conceivable one. This decision had a major impact on how antitrust and other civil cases are filed, raising the bar for what constitutes sufficient initial evidence. Just like how gamers rely on tools like XITFF https://xitff.com/ to enhance their Free Fire experience with customized settings, legal practitioners had to adapt their strategies post-Twombly to meet the Court’s heightened plausibility standard.