The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Victims of Communism Day - 2025
May Day should be a day to honor victims of an ideology that took tens of millions of lives. But we should also be open to alternative dates if they can attract broad enough support.

NOTE: This post largely reprints last year's Victims of Communism Day post, with some modifications.
Today is May Day. Since 2007, I have advocated using this date as an international Victims of Communism Day. I outlined the rationale for this proposal (which was not my original idea) in my very first post on the subject:
May Day began as a holiday for socialists and labor union activists, not just communists. But over time, the date was taken over by the Soviet Union and other communist regimes and used as a propaganda tool to prop up their [authority]. I suggest that we instead use it as a day to commemorate those regimes' millions of victims. The authoritative Black Book of Communism estimates the total at 80 to 100 million dead, greater than that caused by all other twentieth century tyrannies combined. We appropriately have a Holocaust Memorial Day. It is equally appropriate to commemorate the victims of the twentieth century's other great totalitarian tyranny. And May Day is the most fitting day to do so….
Our comparative neglect of communist crimes has serious costs. Victims of Communism Day can serve the dual purpose of appropriately commemorating the millions of victims, and diminishing the likelihood that such atrocities will recur. Just as Holocaust Memorial Day and other similar events promote awareness of the dangers of racism, anti-Semitism, and radical nationalism, so Victims of Communism Day can increase awareness of the dangers of left-wing forms of totalitarianism, and government domination of the economy and civil society.
While communism is most closely associated with Russia, where the first communist regime was established, it had comparably horrendous effects in other nations around the world. The highest death toll for a communist regime was not in Russia, but in China. Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward was likely the biggest episode of mass murder in the entire history of the world.
November 7, 2017 was the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia, which led to the establishment of the first-ever communist regime. On that day, I put up a post outlining some of the lessons to be learned from a century of experience with communism. The post explains why the lion's share of the horrors perpetrated by communist regimes were inherent flaws of the system. For the most part, they cannot be ascribed to circumstantial factors, such as flawed individual leaders, peculiarities of Russian and Chinese culture, or the absence of democracy. Some of these other factors, especially the last, probably did make the situation worse than it might have been otherwise. But, for reasons I explained in the same post, some form of dictatorship or oligarchy is virtually inevitable in a socialist economic system where the government controls all or nearly all of the economy.
While the influence of communist ideology has declined since its mid-twentieth century peak, it is far from dead. Largely unreformed communist regimes remain in power in Cuba and North Korea. In Venezuela, the Marxist government's policies have resulted in political repression, the starvation of children, and a massive refugee crisis - the biggest in the history of the Western hemisphere.
In Russia, the authoritarian regime of former KGB Colonel Vladimir Putin has embarked on a wholesale whitewashing of communism's historical record. Putin's brutal and indefensible invasion of Ukraine owes more to Russian nationalist ideology than communism. But it is nonetheless fed in part by his desire to recapture the supposed power and glory of the Soviet Union, and his long-held belief that the collapse of the USSR was "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century." It is also telling that most communists in Russia and elsewhere have joined with many far-right nationalists in backing Putin's line on the war.
In China, the Communist Party remains in power (albeit after having abandoned many of its previous socialist economic policies), and has recently become less tolerant of criticism of the mass murders of the Mao era (part of a more general turn towards greater repression).
China's horrific repression of the Uighur minority is reminiscent of similar policies under Mao and Stalin, though it has not - so far - reached the level of actual mass murder. But imprisoning over 1 million people in horrific concentration camps is more than bad enough.
Far-left support for Hamas since the horrific October 7, 2023 terrorist attack is yet another reminder of the inherently evil nature of communist ideology. Backing terrorism is part of a long history of support for repression and mass murder. Not all extreme socialists of the type who support Hamas are communists. But the latter are a subset of the former.
Victims of Communism Day is also a good time to remember our duty to help those victims. Among other things, it is unjust to deport migrants fleeing oppressive Marxist dictatorships, like those Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, as the Trump Administration seeks to do to hundreds of thousands who entered the US legally under the CNVH program.
In a 2012 post, I explained why May 1 is a better date for Victims of Communism Day than the available alternatives, such as November 7 (the anniversary of the Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia) and August 23 (the anniversary of the Nazi-Soviet Pact). I also addressed various possible objections to using May Day, including claims that the date should be reserved for the celebration of labor unions.
But, as explained in my 2013 Victims of Communism Day post, I would be happy to support a different date if it turns out to be easier to build a consensus around it. If another date is chosen, I would prefer November 7; not out of any desire to diminish the significance of communist atrocities in other nations, but because it marks the establishment of the very first communist regime. November 7 has in fact been declared Victims of Communism Memorial Day by three state legislatures.
If this approach continues to spread, I would be happy to switch to November 7, even though May 1 might be still more appropriate. For that reason, I have adopted the practice of also commemorating the victims of communism on November 7.
I would also be happy to back almost any other date that could command broad support. Unless and until that happens, however, May 1 will continue to be Victims of Communism Day at the Volokh Conspiracy.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We are all victims of communism, and dictatorship and corruption in general. Beyond devoting teradollars to the big stick to buttress speaking softly, such nations produce far less innovation per capita, than free countries.
As such tech, especially medical tech, is shared worldwide, and certainly the knowledge, worldwide medical tech lags behind where it otherwise would be, were the whole world free, with vigorous, robust economies working on problems.
People who continue dying for ancient diseases and injuries rarely show up on anyone's ledger, with the note: these ten million this year alone would have lived butfor drag on progress.
Ironic. A post about the victims of Communism by a supporter of the Marxist Democrat Party. Commie goes against humanity nature. It can only be imposed by force. A small elite are enriched. 99% of the population is condemned to abject poverty. This toxic elite should be visied around the world. Seize their $trillions.
Are you that long-missing commentator, who used to say things like violence is justified by pure logic of things like you said above? Or the people who should be sued are those who decline to hire someone based on social ostracism postings, rather than the ostracizers themselves?
What was his name? I wanna say David something but I don't think that's right.
Yes. I was banned for excessive comment branching, not for content. The new edit feature makes it less necessary. Volokh is the lawyer with the high IQ. He is national expert in the First Amendment. Yet, he is a denier that courts look like churches, with altars, clerical robes, standing and sitting, solemnity despite the utter goofiness and stupidity of the proceedings. Volokh is a denier that the common law, including the criminal common law, plagiarized the 13th Century catechism,word for word. This is totally lawless in our secular nation.
Awesome!
I'm legit excited to block Behar now, as I wished I could do back in the day but couldn't.
Hi, Sar. Love you.
Supremacy Claus is a longstanding Internet pseudonym for David Behar.
There is no Marxist Democrat party in the US. There may be a vanishingly small Marxist party and there is a Democratic Party but the two are not connected except in the febrile minds of right-wing loons.
Those self-0same loons do like attempting to attach the Democrats to the evils of Communism, but as they're either loons, ignorant, or dishonest, a simple "fuck off" should suffice, just as those left-wing loons attempt to attach moderate conservatives to the evils of fascism, Nazism, etc. when all it does is discredit their position when real fascists or communists come along.
Ok, Neo-Marxists. Happy now?
That the commies don't want it to be May 1st is enough reason to keep it as May 1st.
The commies don't want it to be.
Who and where are the communists now? Did they ever really leave?
Woke is reworded Commie filth. Zero tolerance for woke.
The "commies" are anyone right-wingers don't like that day. Which means they're **everywhere!!!1!**
In the 60s and 70s, some Democrats loved communism, and wanted to work towards it. A much bigger faction, unionized labor, saw how their colleagues in communist nations lived, and didn't want any part of it.
Right... /s Not as-if it could be anyone who thinks Government should supply them with x, y and z which the right-wingers are against.
It must be just people who pride themselves on being Federal (i.e. [Na]tional) So[zi]alist[s] calling the right-wing [Na][zi] because they don't like them that day.
Oh wait; That's what the left does.
If the left couldn't self-project they'd have nothing left to say.
Hi, Sar. Love you. Commie has updated. They replaced the struggle of the working class with the struggles of miscellaneous minorities. Trotsky lived in the Bronx a few months. No Revolution in the USA. They are too comfortable.
"it is unjust to deport migrants fleeing oppressive Marxist dictatorships, like those Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, as the Trump Administration seeks to do"
BS. How is it unjust to let people suffer the consequences of their own ideology and makings? You seem to believe these regime's where created by some rainy-day accident instead of by the very people who elected, lobbied, wanted and allowed these regimes to be there.
Here's a fun-fact. 75%+ of these "fleeing oppressive Marxist dictatorships" will vote for 'Communism' again when given the chance. Running away (i.e. relocation) from the consequences of a mistake doesn't seem to do much in the line of fixing that mistake. Accepting the 25% that learned their lesson is the only immigration the USA should accept.
Which is exactly how Trump addressed it.
“Those who come to enjoy our country must love our country,” Trump said during a speech at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s conference in Washington, adding, “We’re going to keep foreign, Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists out of America.”
Both parties loved inhaling people from Cuba and so on. It was a proud thing, to accept those fleeing tyranny.
The current state of the US is an embarrassment on this policy, now the better part of a century.
If only the Republicans kept making inroads to immigrants and left isolationism a thing of the far left, of Bernie and Cesar Chavez, who don't like liberal integration undercutting union wages.
Has communism been voted in anywhere?
"Security for Socialists" for starts ... Never-mind the endless list of the rest.
And most of them are too low IQ to draw the connection between their bad policies and the consequences. Much like Jews from New Yawk or Kommiefornia who move to Texas and Colorado and destroy it too.
I suspect that the disdain for the American way of life that Trump et al. so often attribute to immigrants is not in fact held by the majority of such immigrants, or by any more than a small minority thereof.
It's home-grown "pro-immigrant" advocates, generally with comfortable American suburban backgrounds and with social-sciences degrees from American universities, who believe that American culture is fundamentally rotten, and should be replaced to the greatest extent possible by the beliefs and practices that they attribute to cool brown-skinned people.
Pro tip: your statement is neither fun, nor a fact.
What the 20th century proved is how different it is when socialism takes root in countries with no democratic tradition.
I'm not so upset about Communism per se. The opposition to it was motivated not so much by concern for democracy. When Communism took over a country, it removed it as a money maker for capitalist exploitation. Dictatorships were fine with us, with no limit as to human rights abuses, so long as they kept their markets open for American commercial interests.
The whole "100M" dead was just those eggs that were needed to make the omelette, right?
See, that's the issue, really. Not the actual communists, they're fairly rare, though disturbingly common in academia.
It's the people who grope around for some excuse to downplay just how horrific communism really was, try to claim the actual communist countries were all horrible for some reason other than being communist.
Which leads to the notion that maybe there could be something to it, if you just didn't make the same mistakes...
C'mon, man, it was just college kids being college kids...
Great article.
- At the very foundation of Communism/Socialism is Government economy.
Q: But what is 'government'? What makes it unique?
A: UN-challenged 'Gun' usage (i.e. legal) against others (Gov-Guns).
'Guns' don't inherently make anything.
They just shoot people dead if they resist being stolen from or enslaved.
When the supply struggles because people are tired of being stolen-from and/or enslaved they just shoot people to preserve what's left. 'Gun' fights over the last twinkie on the shelf.
Because ... again 'Guns' don't make anything.
There it is 1st-grader level obvious sense on why Communism/Socialism NEVER EVER EVER EVER WORK no matter how many times selfish, greedy, criminal minds try to make it work.
In its stages to absolutely genocide is the [WE] Identify-as gangs will be the CONSUMERS and those 'icky' people will be the 'slaves'. It is the Gov-Gun "Conquer-it then Consume-it till its gone" mentality. The USA is dangerously on this step right now!
The USA (defined by the US Constitution) LIMITED the use of Gov-Guns specifically for ONLY ensuring Individual Liberty and Justice for all. That is the ONLY human asset a 'Gun' can provide is in *defense* of a 'Gun' trying to STEAL and ENSLAVE.
Therefore; by the very definition of what a USA is suppose to be Communism/Socialism is turning the protector of Liberty and Justice into the CRIMINAL trying to STEAL and ENSLAVE.
I really liked David Friedman's explanation. (Milton's son.)
He said that there were basically only three ways to get people to cooperate: Love, trade, and force.
Love is a great way to get people to cooperate, but it really doesn't scale well.
Trade works very well, and DOES scale.
Force? Well, we know how that goes.
If you rule out using trade, and try to rely just on love, you find that "Love is not enough", and end up substituting force for trade.
So every social system that rejects trade becomes a murderous tyranny, because, again, love is not enough, and without trade, you have to resort to force.
As much as you want to turn may day into something else international, it's not going to happen. It's the workers rights day, or labor day all over the world, in remembrance of the Haymarket massacre. And a bank holiday in many countries.
That ship has sailed decades ago.
You could post the same argument year after year to the same libertarian american audience, to no results. Or you could advocating for another option, if you are really interested in promoting the remembrance of the victims of communism.
Since, obviously, you know all that, I'm a tad puzzled by your insistence.
Interesting that you bring up Haymarket, since it was not a result of police violence, but revolutionaries throwing bombs into the crowd.
When the Left learned the power of false narratives...
Libertarians and conservatives can't handle the existence of the labor movement. It's a history America is barely aware of thanks to them. If they can just get people to forget about it completely, they think they'll be able to make us all slaves again.
It's just particularly silly coming from libertarians, who will almost certainly be the first ones sent back to the mines. And as we recently saw from their group chats, none of them work a day of their lives.
So, anything less than communism and six figure UBIs is slavery?
Idiot.
Democrats were the party of slavery.
were?
Yes, were.
There's a simple principle. The party which wishes publicly to preserve the memorialising the traitors and insurrectionists who fought against the abolition of slavery and who laud the heritage of those who wished to preserve it are now the party of slavery, the party which wishes to remove those public memorials and who denounce the traitors and insurrectionists for what they were are the party opposed to slavery. Gottit?
Or as I put it before:
GOP: "The Democrats were the party who put up monuments to the Confederates!"
Democrats: "And now we want to take them down"
GOP: "No."
>>Gottit?
lol anyone who desires power over another is a slaver they're all guilty every day
As-if vandalizing and destroying property that everyone paid for was somehow excusive of 'hating' and lobbying to STEAL the fruits of people's labor...
Yes; Almost everything Democrats lobby the Gov-Guns to do is TAKE by Gov-Gun-Threat from the fruits of someone else's labors. Do you deny that?
The only thing more fitting than saying Democrats ARE STILL the party of slavery is to say Democrats use FORCE and VIOLENCE to get what they want instead of ***EARN*** it.
Yes, which makes it all the more interesting that the other party wants to keep naming bases and maintaining monuments to them…
As-if trying to hide true-motive and deleting history (knowledge) is some new thing. It's just a repeat of what Communist/Socialists have always done.
Hut hum; Biden's "Inflation Reduction Act" naming that did everything possible to increase inflation.
Hut hum; Pretending you can say the party of [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] is against Socialism.
Hut hum; ...and the list goes on and on and on....
Libertarians are not diametrically opposed to union labor. Even Ayn Rand said there was a place for it. It must be free interaction between freely-associating factions, though.
Resistance is in two areas:
1. Gov support, giving it a massive leg up in what would otherwise be interaction between free parties in a free society.
2. Unionized government employees. Even FDR was opposed to it as idiotic. There is no countervailing, limiting force. Politicians are happy to give up other peoples' money to buy labor peace, by people who also, coincidentally, vote for you. At least private business is motivated by profits and the bottom line.
(Some) libertarians believe in humans' freedom of association, and are therefore ok with collective bargaining. The case against the "labor movement" stems from 1) it's historic antipathy towards capitalism and 2) the NRLB and associated State acts that give labor decisions the power of law.
Additionally, given libertarians' belief in self-ownership, believing they want a return to slavery is particularly silly.
Unions are like a nuclear deterrent. You can get most of the benefit of unions just by threatening to form one, but if you DO form one, most people lose.
Yes, 7 November would make more sense (and be more likely to gain wider acceptance). Many people around the world view May Day in the same way Americans view Labor Day (unsurprisingly, considering their common theme).
May 1 might also be "Josh stops posting 'Today in Supreme Court History' Day".
Anyway here goes.
Knox v. Lee (Legal Tender Cases), 79 U.S. 457 (decided May 1, 1871): forcing creditors to accept new (paper) money for preexisting debts is not a Fifth Amendment “taking” which applies only to physical property (as pointed out in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 2021, “takings” are now more expansively defined)
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (decided May 1, 1989): Title VII plaintiff doesn’t have to prove but-for causation, just a motivating factor; defendant must show by preponderance a non-discriminatory reason for failure to promote (1991 amendment devised a different test, as noted in Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media, 2020, see March 23)
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne Int’l Drilling Co., 581 U.S. 170 (decided May 1, 2017): (I didn’t know until now that this is the official name of that country) plaintiff must show that property at issue (here, oil rigs) was actually taken in violation of international law so as to invoke jurisdiction of the court under the “expropriation” exception in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; whether the property belonged to plaintiff is what is decided in “the merits phase of the litigation” (but isn’t a showing of violation part of the “merits”?) (case was later dismissed based on later appellate court holding that FSIA requires the property to be present in the United States, 2023 WL 1401372 (D. D.C., Jan. 31, 2023))
Arkansas Dept. of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268 (decided May 1, 2006): I do a CLE presentation on this case, which means it’s a boring topic: Medicare and Medicaid liens on personal injury settlements. Here, the Court holds that an Arkansas statute requiring recovery of the full Medicaid lien violates the prohibition on liens recovering “property” (42 U.S.C. §1395p) because it invades the part of the settlement not reasonably ascribable to medical expenses.
United States v. Robertson, 514 U.S. 669 (decided May 1, 1995): gold mine into which defendant invested ill-gotten RICO gains (from sale of cocaine) was involved in “interstate commerce” so as to satisfy RICO statute
Mallard v. United States District Court for Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296 (decided May 1, 1989): court can per 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) request (but not force) an attorney to represent indigent criminal defendant
Oklahoma v. Texas, 258 U.S. 574 (decided May 1, 1922): border of the ever-shifting Red River depends on the part of it that is navigable, a difficult question because at that point the “main channel” was a dry bed with streams around it; important because it involved oil and gas rights (both sides concede that all of the river bed belongs to Oklahoma; the map today shows the river and the border swing-dancing the whole way)
Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143 (decided May 1, 1944): white man allegedly hired black man to kill his wife; simply being held by police for 36 hours with little sleep means white man’s confession was not voluntary (even though police denied any coercive tactics); conviction vacated, and black man’s conviction therefore also vacated; Jackson dissents because no torture involved and can’t disturb state court’s finding that confession was voluntary
In re Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U.S. 747 (decided May 1, 1968): long decision (with 96 headnotes!!) affirming the Federal Power Commission’s power to set rates and other requirements for gas drilled from the Permian Basin (areas of Texas and New Mexico)
Latta & Terry Constr. Co. v. British Steamship “Raithmoor”, 241 U.S. 166 (decided May 1, 1916): admiralty jurisdiction extends to suit for damage to pier hit by vessel
>> it’s a boring topic: Medicare and Medicaid liens on personal injury settlements
boring yes but is known to create anarchists lol.
Hilarious to see Trump defenders claim Democrats are communists while they celebrate economic economic protectionism, wars around the world, kowtowing to Russia, industrial central planning, warrantless arrest, disappearing people off the streets, no due process, punishing free speech, ignoring elections, flouting the law, ignoring courts, and all the other things their Gameshow Host in Chief is doing.
Yeah; Not as-if they don't SELF-ADMIT "Identify-as" Communists or anything. /s
"members of the Communist Party" ... "on Democratic tickets."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Communist_Party_USA_members_who_have_held_office_in_the_United_States
Course you are the champion of Self-Projection......
So what-ever 'Democrats' self-claim to be or do is all those 'icky' people's fault.
I'm not a Democrat, dipshit. However you are a protectionist, warmongering, Putin-loving, speech-hating, election denying, central planning commie who likes to see people disappeared off the street, arrested without warrants, and deprived of due process by a strongman who ignores the law, ignores the Constitution, and tells the courts to pound sand. Face it, you're a totalitarian shit bag who longs for Trump to declare himself dictator for life.
"I'm not a Democrat"
That's funny. You're like a kiddie blindly caught with his hand in the cookie jar and proclaiming "It wasn't me!" before anyone could even make the accusation.
Course you are the champion of Self-Projection......
So what-ever 'Democrats' self-claim to be or do is all those 'icky' people's fault.
By definition, if you're not a cultist, you're a leftist/ Marxist/ Communist/ Democrat/ Hamasnik/ Illuminatus/ Nazi/ cyclist*
* old Jewish joke
The LGBT 'cult', The Feminist 'cult', The Green-Energy 'cult', The Antifa 'cult', The BLM 'cult'....
Apparently. If you're a 'cultist' there's a 99% chance you're a Democrat.
Communist and dictator are as communist and dictator do.
Does "disappearing people off the street" not bother you?
Yes, I attack both sides equally. My posts pointing out Democrats are also a massive threat to democracy, pulling out all the stops to arrest, jail, kick off the ballot, and expropriate the estate of a political opponent are legion. Like Turkey last month. Though that was a much smaller scale. And Turkey's despot didn't expropriate the estate.
Too many of you are trained echo chamber defenders. Part of your echo chamber's positive stroke memes involve "teaching" you are a good person for following all of it, and the other side are hellbound dupes lead by actively evil demons.
My point is both sides are hellbound dupes lead by actively evil demons!
Do disappearing invaders in your house bother you?
Are you aware that it's possible to oppose people invading your house while requiring that before the regime kidnaps people for invading your house they actually make a legal showing that these people did invade your house? It would appear not.
You, like so many cultists, in effect hold to a presumption of guilt, that once the regime has declared that someone is an "invader", they lose all rights, including the right to challenge the regime's characterisation of them as an invader.
"Actually make a legal showing that these people did invade your house"?
How does being caught in your house have any other "legal showing"? They're there. That's where they were caught. What kind of BS imagination does it take to say there were caught anywhere else?
The only 'due process' needed is whether they had an 'invite' to be in your house. Which on a single-owner home is entirely up to that one owner and on a multiple-owner (like the USA) entirely up the immigration written-law and the executive.
Happy Omelette Day!
>>May 1 will continue to be Victims of Communism Day at the Volokh Conspiracy.
I like it. In Iowa in the 70s May Day was give your neighborhood friends a small basket of candy day like oppo-Halloween ... I'm sure historically it stemmed from all the communist farmers settling Iowa but I liked the candy
Paraphrasing, Far-left support for open borders is yet another reminder of the inherently evil nature of communist ideology.
Far-left support for Hamas since the horrific October 7, 2023 terrorist attack is yet another reminder of the inherently evil nature of communist ideology.
This suggests how far "anti-communism" is being stretched.
Dan's comment above about this country's selective concern about authoritarianism is on point. As compared to a range of ideologies, the "inherent evil nature" of communism is unclear to me, especially as to its unique qualities.
May Day is a traditional day that celebrates labor, which became a communist and socialist theme. Taking it over as an anti-communist day seems ill advised. Honor workers, if in the way you think is best, today.
"Dan's comment above about this country's selective concern about authoritarianism is on point."
Not really. It ignores the serious distinction between "authoritarianism" and "totalitarianism". Both are bad, but it's like comparing the flu to cancer.
Your typical authoritarian government wants to be obeyed on a relatively limited number of topics, and to stay in power, but aside from that, it's generally going to leave you alone.
Totalitarian governments want to control EVERYTHING. They don't want your obedience, they want YOU. All of you.
It's possible to live a normal life under an authoritarian regime. Not so much under a totalitarian one.
The Nazis and Communists were totalitarian movements, and expansionary ones.
So, authoritarian governments elsewhere? Not great, not really a threat either.
Totalitarian governments elsewhere? Yeah, pretty much always a threat.
"RECOMMENDED
Victims of Communism Day - 2024
Victims of Communism Day - 2023
Victims of Communism Day - 2022
Victims of Communism Day 2018
Victims of Communism Day 2020"
My 'tism is triggered.
Oh, is it May 1 again? Seems to happen every year around this time.
One would think a man so broken up about the victims of communism - and I don't doubt his sincerity - would not wish to be a stooge for the Chinese Communist Party, who would, by far, be the largest beneficiaries of the courts' striking down Trump's tariffs. (One would be naive not to think Chinese money was involved in funding some of those lawsuits).
The Soviet Union tried slave labor in the gulags but could never make it profitable because there weren't willing Western leaders clamoring to let those goods into their markets (duty-free!) But the West took a different approach with China, allowing it to flood their markets with cheap goods while erecting a giant tariff wall for itself. As a result, China went from backwater to superpower in 20 years. (The theory behind this approach was that integrating China into world markets would hasten its democratization. Needless to say, it hasn't worked.)
The West has become addicted to cheap Chinese goods the last 25 years. Trump is trying to change this state of affairs in the face of massive resistance, much from American politicians of both parties who are in China's pocket.
Okay, so any American who dares to object to the economic chaos Trump's Tariffs will imminently inflict upon America, is a communist stooge. Got it.
...because a USA that makes stuff (avoiding tariffs) is economic chaos!!! /s
No, you moron. Americans would be.
And even if one were dumb enough to think tariffs primarily fell on a foreign country rather than on one's own people, the U.S. starting a trade war with hundreds of countries/penguin-inhabited islands dramatically weakens our own economy and our alliances, while allowing China to strengthen trade and diplomatic ties with all those other countries.
And yet you want to flood America with people who will implement those policies here. You're a fucking fool, Somin.
I live in Japan, perhaps one of the most "Communist"-friendly democracy in the world. The numbers speak for themselves: Japanese Communist Party currently has 8 seats in the lower house, 11 in the upper house, and actually holds more seats in municipal assemblies than the LDP. (source: https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/001001874.pdf - 68.7% independent, followed by 9.1% Komei, 7.5% JCP, then 7.2% LDP)
They are not ordinary communists, however - they have long abandoned violence (or, is very good at hiding it); they prioritize their own policies over having good relations with Communists worldwide; and they consistently vote against laws they deem will violate our civil liberties.
People have grouped too many things into "communism" (or even "capitalism"), in order to provoke irrational fear. So long as this continues, the history will forever repeat.
Sounds to me like they just like they're just a Democratic Socialist party that, for historical reasons, doesn't want to abandon calling themselves "communist".
Sounds like Somin. He also downplays his Marxist sympathies.
But he didn't fool you!
Can you link to an article where Somin says he's in favour of a centralised, non-market, economy? Where he advocates for the People owning the means of production? These two positions are at the very core of Marxism and anyone who does not adhere to them cannot, by definition, be a Marxist.
I call him Marxist because of his style of thinking. He subscribes to grand ideology-driven narratives that are supposedly for the public good, but require revolutionary changes that no one wants. He is disconnected from reality in a way that is found in academic Marxist theorizers.
You call him Marxist because you're an antisemite and labeling everything someone doesn't like as "Marxist" and then blaming the Jews for it was a Nazi trope.
Sure, it is antisemitic in the same way that celebrating Victims of Communism Day is antisemitic. Yes, the Nazis were anti-communist.
Paraphrased, "It's not Communism if you don't call it that!" /s
It's the 'act' that is the curse not the 'name'. You've got that right.
But when the 'act' is described by the 'name' then yelling fire on the 'name' is just an act of hide-n-seek the language to deny the act is even happening.
Happy Law Day!
"Law Day, U.S.A., is a special day of celebration by the people of the United States—
(1)in appreciation of their liberties and the reaffirmation of their loyalty to the United States and of their rededication to the ideals of equality and justice under law in their relations with each other and with other countries; and
(2)for the cultivation of the respect for law that is so vital to the democratic way of life."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/113
Leave Victims of Communism day to the anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution.
Celebrate Law Day by dancing around the Law Pole. The Law Pole has a great and storied history, and has received guests like John André, Henry Wirz (Andersonville commandant), and others.
Leave anonymous baskets of pocket constitutions and Miranda cards.
Elect a "Law Queen" and dress her up as the Goddess of Justice (bondage gear optional).