The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"Bottom Line Up Front"
I just came across this section heading in a federal filing; an excerpt:
The principle that one should include at the very beginning a quick summary of what the filer is asking for and why is familiar; usually the Introduction or Summary of Argument does that. But this is the first time I've seen it expressly labeled that way, and it turns out to be fairly common at least in federal courts in the Western District of North Carolina, likely because of this Standing Order:
A memorandum of law shall always state the "Bottom Line Up Front" – that is, the introductory paragraph(s) shall: (i) identify with particularity each issue in dispute; (ii) concisely (i.e., in one or two sentences) state why the party should prevail on the issue, directing the Court's attention to what the party believes to be the controlling legal authority or critical fact in contention; and (iii) if applicable, state the remedy or relief sought.
Always interesting to see the slightly different rules and practices (even if just as to labeling) that emerge in different courts.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
BLUF is used in the military a lot too.
And sometimes incorrectly.
A person will write a long email then write in the LAST paragraph: BLUF (summary)
I used the abbreviation with a former boss who I thought was ex-military, and had to explain it to him. Maybe I should have gone with "executive summary" instead.
Yeah, that's obviously a misuse; it should say "TL;DR" instead.
Wouldn't the Reader write TL;DR and not the Writer?
tl;dr in the body is a marker for those who won't read the deets. It's not added by such readers after the fact except in separate comments.
TL;DR: Not necessarily.
Uhhh ... a reader can't add tl;dr to the body, only the author can. And adding it afterwards has to be in some form of commentary.
Just finished a round of moot court judging. Every year I urge the youngsters to do this, though without the catchy name. I'd love to see if they followed my advice when they got out and practiced.
Feels like there's a bit of malicious compliance by titling it "bottom line up front."
I don't know, the order did have quotation marks. IANAL but when a federal agency says a proposal should have a section on "Outcomes and Deliverables" we make very sure the title is exactly that, right down to capitalization. The idea is some clerical person could reject it for missing a required section before the real decision maker even sees it.
BLUF is ubiquitous in some corners of the govt, especially the military.
And that's the bottom line, CUZ STONE COLD SAID SO!!!
My old boss would say, "Executive Summary". It made the recipient feel important.