The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Supreme Court's Mysterious 1920s Due Process Education Trilogy
My new article is available on SSRN
You can download it at this link.
Abstract:
The Supreme Court's 1920s Education Trilogy cases–Meyer v. Nebraska, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, and Farrington v. Tokushige–were important milestones in American constitutional history.
These decisions protected private schools, religious and otherwise, from the threat of closure in many states. This preserved educational freedom for parents who preferred private education for their children.
As a constitutional matter, the Trilogy became the foundation of a due process jurisprudence that moved beyond liberty of contract, property rights, and police power considerations to a broader protection of fundamental rights.
This Article describes external forces that may have motivated this shift—revulsion at the Ku Klux Klan, backlash against Progressive statism of the sort that demanded the closure of private schools, and the Justices' need to cultivate political allies among ethnic and religious minority populations.
This Article also reviews the idiosyncratic biographical factors that may have led Justice Brandeis to join the majority in Meyer. Brandeis' vote with the majority helped preserve the Education Trilogy cases as precedents that later generations of liberal Justices felt comfortable relying upon.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A Jewish Justice Brandeis understanding how a ruling prohibiting the teaching of Hebrew might be problematic?
If you are referring to Meyer v. Nebraska, Hebrew was not proscribed. The SC of Nebraska decided it only applied to living languages.
I definitely misread the title as “Due Process Education Thingy” at first. If it’s not too late, you might want to see if they can change it.
The top of page 49 refers to Chief Justice Robert Taft.