The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Brandon Garrett Guest-Blogging About "Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World"
I'm delighted to report that Prof. Brandon Garrett (Duke Law School) will be guest-blogging this week about his new book. The publisher's summary:
We all feel unfairness deeply when treated in rash ways. We expect, and the law requires, government officials to take fairness seriously, giving us notice and an opportunity to be heard before taking our rights away. That is why the U.S. Constitution commands, twice, that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Yet, in overheated debates, people argue that others do not deserve any presumption of innocence. In courtrooms and colleges, police stations and jails, restaurants and libraries, print and online, the democratic value of due process is up for grabs.
Why is due process under so much pressure? Brandon Garrett exposes widening fault lines. One division lies within our own attitudes, and he explores why we are tempted to put desired outcomes before fair process. Another lies in government, as judges adopt toothless due process rules. People are trapped in debt for unpaid traffic fines; sheriffs seize and forfeit belongings; algorithms suspend teachers' employment; officials use flawed data to cancel healthcare; and magistrates order arrestees to be jailed because they cannot pay cash bail. Meanwhile, the rise of AI threatens what remains of due process with black-box technology.
To fight against such unfairness, lawyers try to challenge unjust systems, researchers demonstrate why such processes are so counterproductive, and lawmakers try to enact new protections. Common ground matters now more than ever to mend political polarization, cool simmering distrust of government, prevent injudicious errors, and safeguard constitutional rights. A revival of due process is long overdue.
And the blurbs:
"Defending Due Process is stunning in its originality; it is, in every way, a superb book that deserves a wide readership. I know of no other work like it."
Erwin Chemerinsky, University of California, Berkeley"Defending Due Process does just what the title promises ― it makes a persuasive case for the importance of procedural values. Brandon Garrett has done a wonderful job of making the topic accessible by illustrating his argument with compelling and often heart-wrenching stories of people harmed by government actions they can barely comprehend. This is an important book for anyone who wants to understand the virtues and vices of our legal system."
Stuart Banner, University of California, Los Angeles"What counts as a fair process when the government is taking away your liberty or your property? No question is more fundamental to our legal system, and no question is harder to answer with precision. Defending Due Process offers a comprehensive rethinking of the problem, drawing on narrative, original empirical research, and a cautious assessment of emerging technologies. Scholarly rigor is combined with readability, making this a valuable read for anyone who cares about getting fairness right in a complex and changing world."
Noah Feldman, Harvard University"Whenever we are wronged or feel wronged, we rightfully want to understand what happened, and why, and to have a chance to object. Governments and companies increasingly make crucial decisions about us that shape our lives, but we have little chance to say anything. With his characteristic care and wisdom, Brandon Garrett helps us understand the importance of due process in all aspects of our lives. Clearly and compellingly, he shows us how, in ways personal and societal, due process has the potential to repair and reinvigorate our democracy. Bravo."
Danielle Keats Citron, University of Virginia School of Law
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
On behalf of MAGA, I say f*** due process.
I haven't enjoyed it, so why should I care if my enemies do?!?
You're only guaranteed that you'll have it, not that you'll enjoy the experience.
The guarantee is worthless as long as government controls all aspects of it -- police, prosecutors, judges. The due process we do get is only because they can't abuse everybody at once; they leave that to the politicians and bureaucrats.
Magister -- it may be Old English, but "enjoyed" in that context means "had" or "received."
No, it's from Middle English and Old French.
And most likely you had and received due process, even if you didn't recognize it.
I don’t think you have any idea what due process even is.
Can we start with the government following its own rules?
For example, "within 10 days" not meaning "sometime five months later"...
Life isn't fair,
so I googled to see who was booked for the Superbowl Halftime Show, Cher? Madonna? Lady Gaga (don't agree with her Politically but she rappelled from the top of NRG Stadium like a friggin Navy SEAL)
Some (Redacted) named "Lamar" who's only claim to fame is he did a "Dis-Rap" on some Canadian Rapper named (who-da-fuck-gives-a-shit)
Seriously? they couldn't get Lady Gaga back? Cher? how about Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam (you know you love "Lost in Emotion")
I'll be rooting for Mahomes, I always cheer for the White(er) guy
Frank
They should just invite the best high school marching band from the hosting state.
Or a drag show...
I'm all in favor of due process, so long as the process that is due is specified in detail in statute.
Judicial discretion is extremely unfair, so we certainly don't want any kind of "due process" that rests on judges deciding what is and is not "fair."
The whole point of the "due" in "due process" is that you are getting what has been promised to you. Not the arbitrary mercy, or lack of it, doled out by some pocket Napoleon on the bench.
Let's start with your pre-judging.
Who is the team that knows the law
Alito and Thomas
OR
Sotomayor, Kagan, Brown
I at least 90% of the jawboining on here you see right through the answer to who they take as their heroes.
You can't get due process from a Kagan or Sotomayor. As for Brwon, worst Justice of my lifetime.
Lol if you did criminal defense you would never come up with the idea that Thomas or Alito 1) know the law 2) give more due process than the others.
Surprised to see a blurb from Citron, given her fair weather support for due process (and the rest of the bill of rights).