The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Fareed Zakaria, "The Crisis of Democracy Is Really a Crisis for the Left" / "Why Is the Left Flailing? Look at New York vs. Florida"
An interesting column yesterday in the Washington Post. An excerpt:
The crisis of democratic government then, is actually a crisis of progressive government. People seem to feel that they have been taxed, regulated, bossed around and intimidated by left-of-center politicians for decades — but the results are bad and have been getting worse.
New York, where I live, and Florida, where I often visit, provide an interesting contrast.
They have comparable populations — New York with about 20 million people, Florida with 23 million. But New York state's budget is more than double that of Florida ($239 billion vs. roughly $116 billion). New York City, which is a little more than three times the size of Miami-Dade County, has a budget of more than $100 billion, which is nearly 10 times that of Miami-Dade. New York City's spending grew from 2012 to 2019 by 40 percent, four times the rate of inflation. Does any New Yorker feel that they got 40 percent better services during that time? …
It's easy to comfort oneself by thinking that these sky-high tax rates and growing government revenues are providing some crucial ingredients of progressive government. But they are often simply the toll of waste and mismanagement. The first phase of the Second Avenue subway line construction, at $2.5 billion per mile, was eight to 12 times more expensive than a sampling of similar projects in places such as Italy, Sweden, Paris and Berlin….
I think there are crises for both the Left and Right in America. I'm glad that institutions that are generally on the Left (such as the Post) are starting to taking seriously the Left's problems, and I hope that something similar is happening on the Right.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Last Execution in New York was 1963, Last Execution in Florida was in August. Florida's executed 106 murderers since 1979 (plus an Abortionist or 2). New York only executes the unborn.
New York City is such a unique case, I don't think comparing it to other cities reveals much, least of all Miami.
Uniquely mismanaged, uniquely corrupt, uniquely filthy. An exemplary Democrat city, in an even more uniquely awful Democrat state.
Long Goy-land isn't too bad, of course it isn't New York City
Maybe, but the people who live there love it and wouldn't want it any other way, least of all, again, like Miami.
"an even more uniquely awful Democrat state."
Lol, not. Thanks to the Independent Democratic Conference NY got Democratic trifecta control later and has had it less than other states like Oregon, Delaware, Hawaii, California...
Really? New York City and New York State are hardly the worst of the blue states and Blue cities.
Chicago and Baltimore and Oakland are worse, Philadelphia and LA are just as bad. Seattle and Portland aren't that bad yet but have been in a stark decline in quality of life in the last 10 years.
I can't think of any large Red State cities (even though almost all are Blue cities) in noticible decline.
West Virginia’s Population Decline Hits Cities Hard
data also show that the majority of our cities suffered population declines.
—Charleston remains the state’s largest city, but the number of residents continues to drop. The Capital City’s population fell five percent from 2010, down to 48,864. By comparison, Charleston’s population in 1960 was just under 86,000.
—Huntington has also seen a steady decline, from nearly 84,000 residents in 1960 to 49,000 in 2010, to 46,842 today.
—The population of Parkersburg is 29,738. That is a decline of six percent over the last decade. Sixty years ago, more than 44,000 people lived in Parkersburg.
—Wheeling had a population of around 60,000 in the 30s, 40s and 50s. However, its numbers began to decline by 1960. Its population today is just over 27,000.
https://wvmetronews.com/2021/08/27/west-virginias-population-decline-hits-cities-hard/
It's not a unique case. It's what you get when you let the public unions get whatever they want, for many decades. Most blue cities are like that, especially if they're big enough to control the state.
You mean a city that has been run by unions and democrats forever.
Hate to break it to you NYer, but while it has a claim to fame for shows, and history it's no different than any other big city.
I've been to a lot of big cities - hell I grew up in Philly, and live in Houston now. Crime, regulations, lack of services, taxes -guess what? No difference.
People stay there for all reasons of course so you are right there. Question for you, if they are happy with their taxes why are they complaining about SALT limit?
Yes, lots of people believe the media in the city (like Russia) so they vote D.
New York is unique in size, geography, and history, and that results in a unique infrastructure and somewhat unique culture.
New York City is such a unique case, I don't think comparing it to other cities reveals much, least of all Miami.
Especially if you're going to compare a city with an area of 300.6 sq mi with a county of 1946 sq mi. NYC has a population (2023 estimate) of 8.3 million vs. 2.7 million for Miami-Dade County (2020 census). Even in making it closer to apples-apples, comparing the metro areas, you see important differences. The NY metro statistical area is 6720 sq mi, and has a population of ~20 million vs. the Miami metro area's 6.2 million (Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, and Broward Counties) in a similar land area (6137 sq mi).
NY metro statistical area GDP = $2.3 trillion
Miami metro statistical area GDP = $533 billion
Both are from 2023
The so-called "congestion" charge, simply a toll to drive into part of Manhattan, exists because the MTA wants to spend billions more than it has. That spending might not be counted as state or city. The MTA is an independent agency that can't be killed because it has a federal charter and union jobs.
That charge will move jobs to New Jersey...
The MTA is an independent agency that can't be killed because it has a federal charter
We love democracy! Until we don't.
The loudest screetchers of "democracy", so loud there's a little semi-intelligent muchroom growing out of the virtue signal band on their arm, itself squeaking "democracy!", love to put things beyond easy reach of democracy.
Not a balanced budget amendment, though. Nope. Overruns should be as easy as an omlet in butter.
Most conservatives don't claim to love democracy, on its own. I know I don't, nor do any of my conservative friends and family.
I don't know where you got the idea that conservatives are the biggest cheerleaders for democracy. We recognize its failings.
But that's Krayt's point. Most conservatives are unhappy that we have random organizations and bureaucracies cut off from the accoutability that is supposed to be built into our local, State, and Federal system's checks and balances, while those who screech "Muh democracy" the loudest are the ones pushing for these unaccountable institutions the hardest.
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/nyregion/25spit.html
If you want to know why the MTA "needs" so much money, look below.
"No weapon was involved in these episodes. “Strictly spitting,” said Charles Seaton, a New York City Transit spokesman.
And the encounters, while distressing, appeared to take a surprisingly severe toll: the 51 drivers who went on paid leave after a spitting incident took, on average, 64 days off work — the equivalent of three months with pay. One driver, who was not identified by the authority, spent 191 days on paid leave."
The MTA is not an independent agency, can be killed, does not have a federal charter, and union jobs have nothing to do with it.
(Caveats: it of course can't be killed because it performs a vital service without which the local economy would collapse, but it can legally be killed. And I don't know what you mean to imply by calling it an "independent agency" — independent of what?)
Florida also manages to get by without a State Income Tax (they make up for it with Sales/Property) you can carry concealed without a permit, and Luigi Mangione would be the Late Luigi Mangione if he pulled that (redacted, New Years Resolution, reduce the fucking profanity) in Tallahassee or Jacksonville. Yankees spent $200,000,000 more than the Rays to win 14 more games, what is that $14 million per win? and still lost to the Dodgers. Talk about your "Changing Demographics" Clinton carried Florida twice, "W" won Florida by 538 votes in 2000, "45/47" wins by 1.4 million in 2024
You're clearly a fan of Florida's favorite hobby: smoking meth.
Mangione would have had as easy or an easier time assassinating the CEO in Florida.
You much rather get pushed on the train tracks or shot on the street right? Your last point is pretty funny - we all know that criminals can't get guns because they follow gun laws right? Wait, you are say there are no drugs like meth in NY.
Mangione probably still would have assassinated the CEO. The question is would he have been a live when the cops
Well you showed us with your well reasoned out point huh? No a little baby crying...oh wait
"People seem to feel that they have been taxed, regulated, bossed around and intimidated "
Has that been the problem all along, hayseeds? Have these mean gays, pregnant pre-teen hussies and trans children been terrorizing you? I get it now. Wipe them out
Wipe them out? you just described Key West
Yes, Fareed Zakaria, hayseed extrordinaire.
Definitely fits the hayseed profile: Yale (BA), Harvard (MA,Phd), Newsweek, WaPo.
Speaking as someone who fled a Blue State, Blue City for a Red State, Deep purple city, and a very Crimson suburb, I can tell you the things I've noticed that do make my life easier, lower taxes, fewer or non-existent lines at the DMV, no homeless panhandlers at intersections, no tent cities closer than an hours drive.
And best of all I haven't seen anyone squat and take a shit on the sidewalk right on the corner of a busy street downtown since I left.
"Yes, Fareed Zakaria, hayseed extrordinaire."
I don't think he's equating the messenger with the message.
I live in a blue city in a blue state and havent' seen anyone take a shit on the sidewalk.
Perhaps you should have trained your family better.
Entitlements are kinda like body fat for the government. Everybody knows we'd be better off without it but once it goes on its nearly impossible to get off and the bloat often tends spiral.
Bad Anal-ology, without any Body Fat you'd be totally dependent on your Liver and Muscle Glycogen stores to maintain your Blood Glucose, which can be depleted in days. Average Body Fat % of Amurican men is 28% (and don't even get me started with "BMI" which is merely body weight in Kilos divided by the square of your height in meters, and which coincidentally, is usually within a few % of one's Body Fat %) but then again, the average Amurican Male is a Fat Fuck. I'm right around 15%, which I achieve with Diet, Exercise, and Adderall (for my ADD, or is it ADHD?) You also need a small amount of Intraabdominal fat around the kidney's and liver, sort of like Shock Absorbers
Around the kidney's what?
What entitlements does New York give that Florida does not? How much of the budget are they?
The "entitlements" here really are more in respect to the entitlements the public unions and their workers get.
To put it in contexts, in NYC, they spend an average of $35,914 per pupil in NYC public schools. In Miami Dade, by contrast, they spend an average of $11,237 per pupil
Now, it's all good to say "more spending on education is good"...but are NYC schools really 3 times better than Miami Dade schools? Or are they just spending 3 times more money for about the same results. And if they are, where's all the money going?
Well check out the grade 4 relative scores at Nations Report Card, Grade 4 scores are probably the most relevant because its kids that have come into the system in the last 4-5 years.
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?sfj=NP&chort=1&sub=RED&sj=&st=MN&year=2013R3
Florida is well ahead of NY in math and reading.
They (NY) are less points above the average than FL is but FL is in turn less points above the average than Massachusetts. Lots of relatively low spending states with scores below the average.
As Zakaria said NY and FL have similar populations, where Massachusetts is 70% white, 10% Asian, and 20% Black and Hispanic, FL and NY, are both about 50% White, Florida's Black and Hispanic Population is 40%, NY 37, but Florida's Asian population is just 3%.
Now I'm sure you will spin that into I'm being racist, but its well documented demographics do have a big effect on test scores.
So MA is 1/3 the size of both FL and NY and has a much smaller minority population. Not near as good a comparison as FL and NY are.
And to get back to the main point, MA isn't as bad as NY in spending but still out spends Miami Dade 19k to 11k, and I'm sure the state average for FL is even lower.
Medicaid is much more generous. You're talking 40%
https://www.empirecenter.org/publications/new-york-extends-its-lead-on-medicaid-spending/
Those higher taxes in NYC pay for a much larger police force per capita than Miami. https://www.governing.com/archive/police-officers-per-capita-rates-employment-for-city-departments.html. And so NYC's murder rate is a fraction of Miami's https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate while the NYPD is simultaneously an outlier in having relatively few police shootings. https://copinthehood.com/variations-in-police-involved-shootings-by-city-and-county/
So, maybe the taxpayers are getting something for their money?
NYC murder rates were extremely high, I think even higher than miami at the time, until they dropped precipitously in 1997. Did NY have gigantic tax hikes that took them from a comparatively low tax to an extremely high tax state during that year?
They peaked in 1990 and then went into a slow and then precipitous decline. Matching what was happening in other big cities. However it is true that per capita, New York is one of the nation's safest cities.
I'm no expert on Florida, but isn't that state (and the city of Miami) more strategically placed than New York on certain major drug-trafficking routes?
So far, this speculation of mine is simply at the level of a hypothesis. Or "*an* hypothesis," whatever floats your Coast Guard boat.
The homicide rate was huge with the Dems for decades, drop precipitously under Giuliani, had a leveled off and much slower decline under Bloomberg, and started upticking again under deBlahBlah. Kinda funny how sensitive it seems to be under the totally unrelated factor of who is mayor.
It was 5 per 100,000 people in 2001, 4.2 in 20 (under "dhttps://247wallst.com/special-report/2024/01/12/the-number-of-murders-in-new-york-every-year-since-1995/eBlahBlah."
NYC Murder rates in 1995 were 8.5 per 100,00; for Miami that year it was 14.9.
You just made a Classic Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc logical error.
NYC pays more for police and has fewer murders than Miami. Well Salt Lake City pays less for police and has way fewer murders than either.
There are certain conditions that affect crime rates, we call it "Local Coloreds"
in any City it's mostly the "Local Coloreds" committing the murders (OK, except for the occasional Luigi Mangione)
Frank
So the presence of magic underwear is inversely correlated to murder rate.
Percentage of NYC population white alone: 31%
Percentage of Miami population white alone: 14%
Percentage of NYC population Black: 15%
Percentage of Miami population Black: 11.9%
The Miami number assumes that none of the Hispanic population is white. A high percentage of the Cuban population is white.
I don't like left versus liberals being a tacit thing. It's mushy.
I also note that the right's got one big crisis - a cult of personality insisting they must distrust everything that Trump says to distrust. Including past Trump.
The left's is less clear, since despite that the right insists, the Democratic Party is not the left in the same way the GOP has been captured by the populist arm of the right.
You'd think it would take a hit after the visa fiasco.
America first unless it affects the bottom line.
Cults of personality bounce back fast.
Till they lose their personality.
Exactly! The people on the Right didn't draw any conclusions or form any opinions on their own! They just repeat what Trump says!!
That's so true!
GLOBAL WARMING!!!
WHITE SUPREMACY!!!
BLACK LIVES MATTER!!!!
COVID IS GOING TO KILL EVERYONE!!!
THE HOLOCAUST!!!!
I can't believe I forgot:
INSURRECTION!!!!
THREAT TO SACRED DEMODRACY!!!!
BOYS CAN BE REAL AUTHENTIC PRINCESSES!!!!
Sorted?
Then maybe you can address how much the cult of personality is going on with the GOP.
Not much. Today there seems to be much more diversity of opinion within the Republicans, than the Democrats. The Democrats blindly followed Kamala Harris.
"Today" vs. "followed" says a lot!
Technically, I'd say at this point the left has at least as much of a cult of personality as the right, maybe more, revolving around Trump; You've made him into your Emmanuel Goldstein, complete with regular Two Minutes Hates.
And, "the Democratic Party is not the left in the same way the GOP has been captured by the populist arm of the right." is just sheer denial. Which party can't even say what the difference between a man and a woman is, if the left says there's none? Part of the reason your party didn't do great in the recent election is that your party has made multiple insanities into articles of faith you can't safely dissent from.
Which party can't even say what the difference between a man and a woman is, if the left says there's none?
Sorry Brett, but the fascination with trans people is part of the GOP's cult of personality. It's not something that the left talks about at all, except to protect trans people from your guys' newfound hatred of them.
Also, "the left" doesn't say that there's no difference between men and women. That's the stupidest thing ever -- if that were true, there wouldn't even be a concept of trans.
If Fareed has any grand ideas for fixing what ails New York, I'm all ears. But Republicans certainly don't. Our last mayoral election was between a corrupt cop and a washed-out, slightly-crazed vigilante with too many cats. Our last governor election was between a corrupt upstater left standing when Cuomo resigned and a Trumper.
None of Zakaria's criticisms of NYC budget bloat are wrong, exactly. But we need to find a way to fix a leaking ship while at sea. We have the crooked cops hosing us with OT abuse, civil settlements, and pensions. We have the MTA's full-employment budgetary bloat. And every mayor/governor is inheriting a "pay it forward" approach to budget balancing that means making any fixes to how we fund/budget things entails a massive hit today. Like, that's the MTA budget - all of the money we raise from fares, tolls, state funding, etc., is bonded against to provide more cash upfront. It's just a cascading, deeply indebted organization, so you can either cut the shit and shut half the system down, or keep the grift going for the person warming the seat after you.
And don't tell me that it's our fault because we keep electing Democrats. We've elected Republicans, too, and they didn't fix it either. And the current, idea-averse version of the GOP won't do any better. We don't need someone who will distract half the city/state with stupid fights over trans students, while doing jack shit about the budget.
Whether the Florida/Texas model will prove successful in the longer term remains to be seen. You think the Second Avenue subway expansion was expensive? Look at what TxDOT spends on a highway interchange. Those states are going to have to figure out how to manage their own recent growth. I haven't seen a single reason yet to believe that they have a better plan for it.
And don't tell me that it's our fault because we keep electing Democrats. We've elected Republicans, too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The last arguably nonleftist mayor of NYC was Giuliani more than 20 years ago. GTFO with your 'we tried all options'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and they didn't fix it either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Giuliani literally quartered the murder rate. What have you done for NY Mr. 'Thats not very impressive'?
1) The murder rate also fell in other large cities. 2) Most of what Giuliani got credit for (community policing, more police on the streets, bringing Disney into Times Square, getting rid of the squeegee men) was actually done by Dinkins.
It wasn't 'slow' at all. It dropped like a rock during Giuliani's term. This wasn't just some abstract nationwide cultural/demographic shift although it was part of and did help influence a general nationwide rejection of previous failed Dem criminal justice and policing policies. Something that has crept back in places with the BLM nonsense and has unsurprisingly led to higher crime in those cases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
was actually done by Dinkins.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wow so I guess the best magic Dems work takes place after they leave office. Maybe we should fire more of them to see the fruits of their labor blossom. Also even if he was so great after his term you can't ignore the beginning and all of the crime wave before him was dominated almost completely by Dems.
The NYC homicide rate fell under Guliani, it was 8.5 in 95 and 5 by 2001. Some claim similar drops across the country show changes in demographics or federal policy made a difference, but the NYC data alone show a Guiliani success story. However, the same data shows that the homicide rate reached even lower lower levels under future Democratic or "leftist" mayors.
Crime had already started dropping noticeably in the last two years of the Dinkins administration. It continued to drop under Giuliani, at the same time that it was dropping in places where Giuliani wasn't mayor. It continued to drop under Giuliani's successors until it reached levels of safety not seen in decades. Since then, it was bounced around in a narrow range around crime rates almost unimaginable in the 1980's and early 1990's, making NYC one of the safest major cities in the country.
Being one of the safest cities in the country is like being one of the tallest midgets in the country. It's not nothing, but it's not impressive, either. Even the safest city is pretty dangerous.
Crime in NYC vs NY state
You can see that New York inside NYC is a lot more dangerous that New York outside NYC.
Brett, discovering that crime is higher in more densely populated areas.
Apples, meet oranges. If your point is that relatively big cities have higher crime rates than places nobody lives, in short, that they're relatively big cities, noted. And the cities don't have to be so big, either. Relatively bucolic Colorado Springs, pop. 489,000, for example, has a higher violent crime rate than NYC.
I don't see how this has anything to do with my comment, which was focused on taxes and the budget. Giuliani didn't fix it when he had the chance, Pataki didn't fix it, Bloomberg didn't fix it. Zeldin's off to run the EPA, Silwa's still off his rocker, so who's the GOP going to put up next?
as a frequent Visitor to the Big Apple since the early 90's it was noticeably better in the Guiliani/Bloomberg Error than before or after, of course my experience is limited to the LaGuardia to Greenlawn drive.
No one cares what you think, Frank.
"No one"? Picking a new screen name?
*jacking off motion*
Typical statist, assuming he speaks for everybody.
Lol, pathetic.
Just wondering: Do you care what Frank thinks? If so, why? Is it his racism? His vulgarity? His middle-school sense of humor? In your answer, please point to actual comments Frank has made that were insightful and intelligent.
"If Fareed has any grand ideas for fixing what ails New York, I'm all ears. But Republicans certainly don't."
Here's my suggestion: Pull the plug.
Cities were an adaptation to deficient communications and transport technology. They've always exhibited massive pathologies, but they were necessary. They aren't necessary anymore.
To be sure, NYC represents a lot of sunk costs, a lot of investment, but having lost it's reason to exist as it currently is, it WILL naturally decline. Manage that decline instead of fighting it.
In other words, leave it in place for cultural things like museums and theaters, and eliminate it for offices.
Offices and most of the housing, too, since if people aren't going to be working there, why would they want to live there?
There is a segment of people who love living in dense, urban areas with close restaurants, shows, and so forth within walking distance. But you are correct that many people who live in cities do so because its convenient for their jobs. If those people moved out, the populations and housing costs in cities would plummet.
You're an idiot, Goober.
The MTA's budget bloat is largely because the state legislature, dominated by Democrats, protected the unions through the state Constitution, making their fraudulent pensions sacrosanct.
What they should do is abrogate the pension agreements. I don't care if these thugs claim they "earned" those pensions, nobody should be getting a $250,000 pension at the taxpayer expense. They earned them through fraud and graft.
Ah yes, the wonderfully lefty Washington Post where [checks notes] you're not allowed to criticise the owner of the paper for kissing Trumps ass.
I believe most private businesses operate that way.
The owner sees the writing on the wall.
Academia doesn't...
Academia won't bow down before Trump. Is that your point?
Institutions dependent on public support probably do need to refrain from open hostility to large factions in the general public. The public won't forever support institutions that it figures out are opposed to it. And academia has become RADICALLY unrepresentative of the general population.
So, you're dependent on the government? Align yourself with one party clearly enough, you should not be shocked when the other party on taking power moves against you.
Neutrality is wisdom here, not cowardice. Academia is going to have to relearn that lesson the hard way, I think.
Academic freedom FTW!
Say / write / teach whatever you like. Just not on my dime.
It's not Right versus Left as much as it is Populist versus Establishment.
It's not fair to compare New York and Florida because most of Florida was impenetrable virgin wilderness a century ago -- it didn't even have a railroad until about 1900 whereas New York had one in 1832.
Florida as it exists today is a product of air conditioning and mosketo control, while New York was a product of steam.
Steam tugs which enabled it to become a bigger port than Boston (it was very difficult to sail a ship upriver), steam heat, and steam-generated electricity which enabled tall buildings. Hence Florida is a product of the 20th Century, while New York is a product of the 19th Century -- and don't forget that places like Buffalo once were major manufacturing hubs. Corning NY was known for glass, Rochester for Kodak and Xerox.
Fareek says voters worldwide have elected far-right governments because these voters were just fed up with big government policies embraced by left/progressive governments. I think Fareek misses the mark. To the extent that voters were concerned about economics (rather than cultural/woke/immigration issues), it was probably mostly about nominal price changes. These voters probably aren't itching for upper-bracket tax cuts, dismantling the welfare state, or reducing the federal debt.
Fareek is highly enamored with the Muskaswamy doge initiative. But any austerity that Muskaswamy actually achieves will, by Musk's own admission, bring about at least short term pain. That's not what the bulk of voters were after. They just wanted nominal prices to come down.
A few years ago, Fareek mentioned (on a podcast with Sam Harris) that his immigration to the US was inspired by Ronald Reagan's policies. This recent opinion piece is just Fareek's dormant Reagan love reemerging. The voters didn't vote for less government or for the pain of Muskaswamy austerity. They want lower nominal prices. Which is something that hardly ever happens, and there is even less chance of it happening if the policy agenda is tariffs, labor cost increases (via deportation), and unfunded upper-bracket tax cuts.
This is what the Religion of Government preaches on their day of worship.
I've also read that the results recently have shown more that incumbent parties are suffering (in some key areas leftist parties won vs. right wing incumbents [England, Japan]. Woe to those in charge might be a better lesson, but though progressives take "being in charge" more seriously in a traditional sense the still might particularly be concerned.
Funny that though Seinfeld was set in NYC no New York politician seems to be aware of the Costaneza (rule, method, principle) or whatever you choose to call it.
Latest example, congestion pricing.
NYC has 4 times the population of Miami/Dade
NYC has a lower murder rate than Miami/Dade
A quick look it appears that the miami/dade budget increased from 6 billion to 9 billion in that same time period
yawn
more lies that bobbleheads never check
One thing population density is good for, is getting people to good emergency rooms quickly. This converts a lot of murders into attempted murder/assault.
And… you think NYC didn't have a high population density before 1990?
No, of course not. They had their prior ultra-high murder rate despite that factor. I'm just saying that if you want to compare areas with considerably different access to good emergency rooms, you probably want to compare aggravated assault, not murder, because it's less influenced by how fast people can reach emergency rooms.
Not that Miami comes off good on that comparison, either.
So on one side we have leftists realizing they're demanding more spending but getting nothing in return and in response we have EV flaccidly declaring "both sides" without identifying anything on the right of a similar scale of societal impediment if not destruction.
What Fareed Zakaria doesn’t say in his NY Times opinion piece, and what has always been at the core of my thoughts, is that the dilemma of the left is really a conundrum. At the core of liberalism is the left’s advocacy for one side of the declaration that governments exist to secure the rights of the people. Does that mean what libertarians say it means- leave me the hell alone? “Don’t Tread On Me”? Give me slightly modified anarchism? Is it merely about ever so gently mediating the interactions of people finding their own way? Liberalism has always said no- it is about creating ground that is fertile for the translation of our potentials into actions. It isn’t just about preventing people from hurting each other. It is about helping people realize their dreams.
But that sets up the conundrum repeated throughout history, wherein the descendants of people who started a society dedicated to that society ask instead what their country can do for them. It starts innocently - a Great Depression, for example. Government intervention is required to prevent the society’s collapse. But it leaves a mark on people and the generation that follows - my generation - take the wrong lessons from that intervention. It was not an exceptional intervention for extraordinary circumstances. It is THE WAY IT SHOULD BE. Government should solve all problems, from dog poop on the street to the smells of hamburgers coming from Burger King that reach a vegan’s nostrils. And solving everybody’s problems gets messy and confusing and controversial and… expensive.
And that is the real conundrum of liberalism.
I agree the left are problem solvers. But since the '90s, a segment of the left has come to realize that sometimes, the best solution to a problem isn't a government solution. "Defund the police" is a stark example -- misguided for other reasons, but clearly an attempt by the left at limiting government. More reasonably, there's a good chunk of the left who are pro-charter-schools and/or anti-public-sector-unions.
Similarly, I think portions of the left are looking increasingly to federalism as a solution. Dobbs forced our hand in the abortion space, but it's worked out surprisingly well, and I think Democrats will take those learnings to other problems and make more state-level efforts, even -- and especially -- in red states. Pushing back against local anti-trans activists is one place this is already happening.