The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
President Carter's Peanut Business and the "Blind" Trust
After the 2016 election, many commentators urged President-Elect Trump to follow the lead of President Carter, and create a blind trust. The Associated Press, for example, observed "The tradition stretching back to Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s is for presidents to put personal holdings such as stocks into a 'blind trust' run by an independent trustee with no ties to the occupant of the Oval Office." That tradition, however, was not so clear.
Governor Jimmy Carter of Georgia operated successful farms and a peanut warehouse business in the Peach State. The 3,000 acres of farmland had been in his family for six generations. In 1977, President Carter's shares in the family enterprise were valued at approximately $350,000, or about $1.8 million in present-day value. The business was valued at about the same amount. On January 4, shortly before the inauguration, President Carter announced a plan to transfer his holdings from his family businesses into a trust. This trust agreement would let Carter retain ownership of the land, but "insure that he will not benefit financially from agricultural policy decisions that he may make as President." Specifically, the farm and business would be leased for a fixed amount that would not be affected by the administration's policies. But Carter would continue to receive income from the businesses while he was in office. In the trust document, Carter explained that he "wants the trustee to arrange the assets of the trust so that no one should reasonably assert that [his] actions as President were motivated by a desire to foster his own personal monetary gain or profit." (p. 140).
Carter's arrangement has often been described as a blind trust. Indeed, the Carter Presidential Library calls the arrangement a "blind trust." Carter's trust, however, was not blind in every sense. Pursuant to Section 102(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act, which Carter signed in 1978, a strict wall of separation was needed between the grantor and trustee. The trust, however, was managed by Carter's close personal friend and longtime confidant, Charles Kirbo. And Kirbo served as an adviser to the President, frequently visiting Carter in the White House. Kirbo was not an independent, disinterested trustee. The New York Times reported that the Lincoln bedroom was Kirbo's "home away from home." Moreover, the President was not really separated from his enterprises. In 1977, Carter had to "bail out" the family business.
Eventually, the President would acknowledge that the trust was not blind. In 1979, Carter's team characterized the trust as open, rather than blind. Even after that recharacterization of his role as trustee, Kirbo continued serving as trustee. The New York Times observed that had Carter chosen to claim his trust was blind, "he would have taken the risk that Mr. Kirbo, a close friend and confidant, might be ruled an invalid trustee." Under the rules, "[t]he trustee of that blind trust must be completely independent of the person whose business is being managed. But with "an open trust," the director of the Office for Government Ethics explained, "Mr. Kirbo's role [was] a moot point."
There would be more conflicts with Carter's businesses and his presidency. In 1976, the President's brother, Billy Carter, had taken a $6.5 million loan for the family business from the National Bank of Georgia—approximately $30 million in present-day value. (Billy Carter was perhaps most famous for marketing "Billy Beer," a beer that bore his name.) In January 1977, President Carter appointed Bert Lance, the President of the National Bank of Georgia, to serve as director of the Office of Management and Budget. Lance resigned as director in September 1977 after allegations arose concerning his mismanagement of the bank. Lance was tried and acquitted on nine counts of bank fraud.
In March 1979, Attorney General Griffin Bell appointed Paul J. Curran as special counsel to investigate whether loans from the National Bank of Georgia to Carter's business may have been illegally diverted to Carter's presidential campaign. (Curran was not appointed as an independent counsel under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.) Curran deposed President Carter, who testified under oath for nearly four hours. In October 1979, the special counsel concluded his investigation. Curran found "no evidence whatsoever . . . that any monies were diverted from the warehouse [business] into the campaign." I contacted the Carter Library in Atlanta to obtain a copy of the Curran report, but was told it was still sealed. I were not able to find any records suggesting that the Carter businesses transacted with state or foreign governments.
In short, Carter's trust was messy. The Washington Post described the complex arrangement this way: Carter had "two fairly large businesses (particularly for the time), a cozy relationship with the guy put in charge of his business, and, at one point, the appointment of a special counsel to dig into loans one of his businesses received—from a bank whose president ended up serving in Carter's administration." After Carter left office in 1981, the businesses were over $1 million in debt.
Billy Carter would create even more financial conflicts for his brother. In 1980, Billy became a registered agent of the Libyan government, and accepted a $200,000 loan from the Gaddafi regime. Billy defended himself from the scandal, which became known as Billygate. He said, "I considered myself to be a private individual who had not been elected to public office and resented the attention of different Government agencies that I began to hear from almost as soon as Jimmy was sworn in." A Senate investigation found that the President was negligent in not disassociating himself from his brother's foreign entanglements. Billy would only pay $1,000 of the loan.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I agree with Josh, President Trump should improve on President Carter's arrangement and entrust the operation of his business interests to an enemy instead of a friend.
That already happened in NY; Barbara S. Jones, a former U.S. District Court judge, was a court appointed independent monitor of the Trump Organization.
"entrust the operation of his business interests to an enemy instead of a friend"
Its not the choice of the trustee, its the deceit about it being a "blind" trust when it was not.
No Bob, the concern was that Kirbo wouldn't qualify according to 5 U.S.C. §13104(f)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the Ethics in Government Act which requires that the trustee
Josh is wrong to conclude that this would make the trust not a blind trust, rather it makes it not a qualified blind trust and so it isn't exempt from the reporting requirements under the Act.
Responding to these concerns, and faced with the choice of replacing his trustee or opening the books, Carter chose to open the books. And there's your "scandal".
In other words, Carter lied about the trust and got caught.
No Bob, wrong again.
When Carter announced the trust in Jan. 1977 he didn't claim it would comply with the Act, because there was no Act until 1978, but when the text was finalized and there was a possible conflict he changed his arrangements to align.
He showily put his asset into a trust that he controlled thru his friend to show how ethical he was. That was the deceit.
The statute is a red herring. The President is only subject to the disclosure part. He is not required to create a trust, blind, near sighted or otherwise.
Something that is overt is not "deceit."
Democrats are always honestly and overtly unethical. Just ask the Big Guy and his crackhead bagman son.
Identify the lie, please.
A direct quote from Carter, not a media report.
And how do you know he controlled it through his friend? Friends are often trustees.
This whole thing is just Blackman trying desperately to demonstrate some MAGA bona fides, and it has nothing to do with reaity.
One lesson to take from this: be extremely careful with those close to you when it comes to money and position. You will let your friends do things you would never dream of letting an enemy get away with.
I learned this myself more than once.
I can't think of a much sadder state of being than waiting for high-profile people to die so you can write a gossipy hit-piece about (checks notes) his trust for a small business. This is the sort of thing gossip magazines do in parodies.
I think that you have the correct. Josh could have written this piece a month ago.
He's probably sick of all the false things being written by people praising Carter.
Carter's PR about his virtue far exceeds the actual record. This post is an example.
Comment in response to Drewski
Drewski is talking about Prof. Blackman's timing.
Blackman could have (should have), written this back in 2016 - as he even noted.
But - as Drewski describes - Blackman just had to wait until Carter was dead.
Oh dear, he waited until someone was in the news. Horrible!
I mean if you're waiting for someone to die so you gloat about how much they sucked, that's kind of shitty, no?
Actually I think he's just a contrarian asshole who needs to have a contrarian take on literally everything. Even if Carter is being hyped up too much for his virtue (probably true) it still WAY exceeds Trump's, Blackman's and yours.
When Trump, Blackman, or you spend your life building housing for the poor or trying to eradicate diseases in Africa, let us know.
Yeah, yeah, he pounded some nails. Great guy.
He also pimped for Chavez and Arafat and other dictators.
"Yeah, yeah, he pounded some nails. Great guy."
Better than you.
"He also pimped for Chavez and Arafat and other dictators."
UMMMMMMMMMM
So do a lot of your heroes and yourself! You defend Pinochet, Salvadorian death squads, nun murder, and using animals to rape women!!!
LawTalkingGuy 6 minutes ago
Flag Comment "So do a lot of your heroes and yourself! You defend Pinochet, "
True but Pinochet basically reversed the negative trend and prevented Chile from becoming a Venezula under chavez. As a result Chile is one of the more prosperous of the South American countries.
So widespread torture, murder, and sexual abuse, including using animals, is A-okay!!!!
"using animals"
Which never happened, phony claims before truth commissions not withstanding. Its common for "dissidents" to claim this, the Palis have claimed it currently. It sucks in rubes like you, its intended target.
“Which never happened”
You know this how?
“phony claims before truth commissions not withstanding.”
Why are they phony? Did you interview the women? Were you part of the proceedings?
“Its common for "dissidents" to claim this”
Why is dissidents in scare quotes? Do you not think they were real during Pinochet’s dictatorship? Or other dictatorships? (I also notice you skipped over the nun murder and death squads part.)
“the Palis have claimed it currently”
Ethnic slur aside, the Israel’s are making the same claim about Hamas. Is that propaganda for a rube like you? (No it’s not)
“It sucks in rubes like you, its intended target.“
You are a bad person. Like genuinely. You have bad morals and a bad soul. You cry for justice for victims but call them liars as soon as your friends are implicated. You are a deeply disgusting person and I would relish the opportunity to tell you that to your face someday.
True, but Hitler did help the German economy get back on its feet?
Is that a question or a snark?
How are you so stupid?
"True but Pinochet basically reversed the negative trend and prevented Chile from becoming a Venezula under chavez. As a result Chile is one of the more prosperous of the South American countries."
Do you get the point of Sarcastr0's post now, or does someone need to get some crayons?
Joe_dallas going all "He made the trains run on time."
I am reminded of several years ago reading in a news story that then sitting veep Cheney had ordered his "blind" trust to sell a specific stock. It was mentioned just as a passing comment, the writer didn't seem to see any need for explanation as to how Cheney even knew he owned it, as though it were a common thing, which it probably is.
The press pretty much went to sleep on Cheney's conflicts of interest. His old companies (Blackwater, Halliburton) kept getting Iraq contracts. Compare that to the press hullabaloo over the Whitewater "scandal".
What press was that? I read about it all the time.
Not a serious response. I don't think you are old enough to remember (or did not read the news at the time).
1) Dick Cheney had no connection to Blackwater.
2) What is the "conflict of interest" if a former company — which unlike Carter and the peanut farm or Trump and the Trump Organization, Cheney did not own — gets contracts?
Would you want a house built by Jimmuh Cartuh?? Who did the plumbing, Larry, Moe, and Curley?
On your best day, Drackman, you're not 1% of the man Jimmy Carter was on his worst day. But, please, don't let that deter you from continuing to show up here regularly to prove to us just how stupid and malicious you are. Thanks for the laughs.
You're right, I haven't killed any Cats
Frankie 'Wounded Warrior' Drackman, America's neediest veteran, there are three Habitat houses on my street alone. They are well built. Interestingly, unlike most everyone else on the block, the families in these houses are all employed, not freeloaders. Maybe Jimmy has work requirements to get the free house
"Work Requirements to get the free house"???
I think there was a Civil Wah to make that Ill-legal
Go to Plains sometimes, it's 3 hours south of Atlanta and an hour away from Al-binny, love the idea of all the Media talking heads forced to spend a few hours in that shithole.
After Hurricane Andrew hit Homestead FL in 1992 a TV newsman noted that the Habitat for Humanity houses had all stood up well while houses around them were destroyed. He asked a local manager for HfH if it was a sign of God's will. The guy replied dryly, "We build to code."
... and the houses around them that were destroyed had been built before the building codes were modified to include construction more resistant to hurricane winds. Get over it. Even with the new codes in Florida, insurers are fleeing the state. Homes built of the wood currently available will weaken over time, and newer ones may be more vulnerable as the standards for lumber have fallen considerably over the last century.
When you spend your presidency hating Israel, cozying up to communist dictators in Latin America, helping depose the Shah, fecklessly watching America's enemies drive up fuel costs, and combatting inflation by wearing sweaters when not fleeing attack rabbits or consulting your underage daughter about "nukear" policy, you get a complete do over. So in your post presidency you certify fraudulent foreign elections and do photo-ops with Habitat for Humanity. But you're still a Democrat, so you get to skate.
That's one hell of a bee you got in that bonnet. Should have that looked at.
Now do Trump...andddd Go!
He's probably sick of all the false things being written by people praising Carter.
He probably regarded it as an opportunity to defend Trump by implication. Just wait for future Josh columns in response to allegations against Trump's managing of his financial interests, "but Jimmy did it too! See my article here!"
Is it even possible to create a true blind trust for someone with large holdings in a particular business, like Carter's peanut farm or Trump's casinos? Even if I've transferred my assets to the trust and am not involved in the day-to-day operations of the business, I'm still very well aware of what sorts of policies would make it more or less profitable.
It's true that, given an honest trustee, I can't do market-timing trickery—say, short-selling based on an SEC report that hasn't yet been released to the public. But I can certainly push policies that're likely to benefit the business: mandating peanuts in school lunches, or making gambling losses tax-deductible.
The only true blind trust would involve the sale of all the assets and their replacement by a package chosen by the trustee, but not revealed to the trustee (or, necessarily, to the public).
Conversely, if Carter believed in the peanut industry, he would inherently support policies that supported it because he believed them to be good, just, and right.
For example, while I haven't made a dollar from the Lobster industry in 40 years, I'd still decide to reign in the econazis who are trying to put it out of business. Because I think it is the right thing to do.
"large holdings in a particular business, like Carter's peanut farm"
Yes, large holdings in a peanut farm worth about as much as three grocery stores at the time. Practically an empire. Carter had about as much wealth as Nixon when elected, approximately one tenth of one percent of Trump's estimated net worth after adjusting for inflation. Definitely comparable, if you don't know that zeroes at the end of the numbers make them bigger.
HaHa!
For instance, though Carter was nominally a peanut farmer, he owed most of his income to owning peanut allotments, without which your peanuts could not be sold for North American consumption. Without the allotments his business would have been much less profitable.
It's not like he'd have been ignorant about the effects of such agricultural price supports on his own trust.
Ah, Big Ag. The biggest welfare hustle in America. But a reliable redneck voting bloc. Welfare for me but not for thee
concur - the whole issue about a real blind trust or a fake blind trust whether for real or just for appearences is a nothing burger.
While i agree Carter ranks in the bottom 4 presidents in the 20th and 21st century, the blind trust issue is a non issue.
I never realized Carter was the first to attempt to do this. It's a good idea even if the trust is myopic rather than truly blind.
In any case, if Carter intended to take back control after his presidency, he would still have a temptation to promote the peanut industry while President.
That's quite the scoop you got there, Blackman. I'm thinking Pulitzer
Oh yes, Burt Lance. The Carter Admin wasn't as pure as driven snow -- there were televised hearings about Bert Lance allthough I was too young to understand what it was all about.
I do remember Carter pressuring the French to let the Ayatollah Khomeini fly from France to Iran and wondering "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" -- why Carter wasn't instead telling them NOT to do this. Now declassified documents indicate that Carter was in bed with Khomeini for at least a couple years earlier.
Carter supported Arafat which is what inevitably led to the Gaza mess today, and why Gaza needs to be nuked with tactical neutron bombs. Carter gave away the Panama Canal.
And domestically, Carter so screwed up the country that I was glad to get a job as a janitor working for minimum wage. That's how bad things were back then -- most people don't know this.
Let's not forget about what the "Sunday School Teacher" said about Ronald Reagan -- it wasn't particularly Christian...
Gerald Ford was a better man than Carter, and a better President than Carter, and I don't remember anything along the lines of the Carter delusions being spewed when he died.
People forget that the Democrats swept Congress in the 1974 election -- Ford had a hostile Congress, Carter had a friendly one, and yet....
I forgot him telling us to wear sweaters -- fine in Georgia or even DC, but not in Maine when you came in half-frozen from being out in sub zero weather.
And his "National Malaise" speech -- it was all our fault and not his.
Right....
Oh yes, Burt Lance. The Carter Admin wasn't as pure as driven snow -- there were televised hearings about Bert Lance allthough I was too young to understand what it was all about. Nothing's changed. You still don't understand much. Lance was acquitted, by the way. Not saying he was a saint, but that's something.
And domestically, Carter so screwed up the country that I was glad to get a job as a janitor working for minimum wage. That's how bad things were back then -- most people don't know this.
When was this, Ed? The first three years of Carter's term showed pretty decent growth. It went negative in 1980, though that was maybe not so much Carter's fault. From Wiki:
In 1980, following the onset of the Iran–Iraq War, oil production in Iran fell drastically. Iraq's oil production also dropped significantly, triggering economic recessions worldwide. Oil prices did not return to pre-crisis levels until the mid-1980s.
Let's not forget about what the "Sunday School Teacher" said about Ronald Reagan -- it wasn't particularly Christian...
Whereas your cult leader has never said anything nasty about anyone.
I don't see where you got the economic claims bernard.
According to Google's AI
"The average annual inflation rate between 1976 and 1980 was approximately 9.7%." and "During the period from 1976 to 1980, the US economy experienced relatively sluggish growth, marked by high inflation, often referred to as "stagflation," with the latter half of the decade seeing a significant slowdown due to factors like the oil crisis, leading to a period of economic instability and rising unemployment."
When Carter was president, inflation outpaced wage growth every year (just like when Biden was president). Economic growth was fueled by borrowing with the expectation of paying back with cheaper money (sorta like when Biden was president - although economic "growth" under Biden comes mainly from additional government payroll). There was no presidency since Roosevelt's when public confidence in the economy was lower and none when more employed people suffered financial loss.
Economic growth was fueled by borrowing with the expectation of paying back with cheaper money
You must really have hated Reagan, as he blew up the deficit. Carter got pretty close to a balanced budger.
Don,
Try this. Better than Google AI, I think.
Note that these are real, not nominal, figures.
Yes, there was bad inflation - worse I think than the recent episode that had MAGAt's up in arms (and which Carter addressed by appointing Volcker), but Dr. Ed seemed to be talking about GDP.
And domestically, Carter so screwed up the country that I was glad to get a job as a janitor working for minimum wage. That's how bad things were back then -- most people don't know this.
Cool story, bro.
6 Generations? I always wondered where Jimmuh's big lips came from.
Peanuts were a Black crop, introduced by the Tuskegee Institute, because they would both grow on and enrich soil depleted by cotton farming -- the land that BLACK farmers had in the latter 19th Century.
Just sayin....
I don't see in the OP where Carter claimed it was a blind trust. Most of the references are to the media calling it that, but the term does not appear in the NYT article Blackman links to.
And WTF is that business about Bert Lance (acquitted, let's note) doing here, other than as some sort of irrelevant indirect cheap shot at Carter.
As, by the way, is the Billy Carter business.
A Senate investigation found that the President was negligent in not disassociating himself from his brother's foreign entanglements. Billy would only pay $1,000 of the loan.
What was he supposed to do? And how does a $200K loan compare with a $2 billion investment in Jared Kushner's real estate fund?
Blackman is such a MAGA ass-kisser.
Amanda Tyler, executive director of BJC (Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty), has a nice essay on Carter's belief in the separation of church of state & religious liberty overall.
https://time.com/7204048/jimmy-carter-religious-liberty-essay/
Such a petty post.
Gotta be a helluva guy to have on your faculty.
Seems good with the kids though.
-------
But I want to talk the hipster of it all.
There's some interesting things to debate about Carter's Presidency.
Blackman fails to locate any of them, and goes with this lame implication-heavy shot that doesn't land (though look at all the work Bob is trying to do to get it to the finish line!)
Want to talk about how few of his policies went forth? His failure to meet the challenge of President-as-cheerleader? His mixed success on foreign policy?
There was some open thread discussion on his economic policies viewed over the long term.
Only a very few have attempted to argue against his post-Presidency works. Bob's into it, but he gets off on people calling him an asshole.
Nah, Blackman's gotta try for some hipster deep cut like how while Carter was a lot lot better than Trump when it came to conflicts of interest, we can quibble over the use of the word blind...by the media.
Sometimes...there's a reason stuff is obscure.
"Bob's into it"
You, and the rest of your comrades here, just don't like your shibboleths challenged.
St Jimmy the Good is a myth.
I hear Trump salvaged his ear lobe and is gonna Ebay it as a holy relic for $1B
Close, it was Cums-a-lot's Clit
Not quite right, Hobie.
He's cutting it into segments and selling them individually as pieces of the True Ear.
“ just don't like your shibboleths challenged.”
Neither do you! Anytime one of your political allies (or actual straight up dictators) are exposed as criminals or abusers you call the victims liars or make excuses for why the crime is justified. Then when confronted with your depravity you lash out like a child, claim that no one is virtuous, or just run away and say you don’t have to engage (despite engaging to the point)
Again you are a bad person, and I would bet a lot of money most people in your life think that too.
I usually get crickets when I bring up the fake elector fraud scheme or showing off state secrets to club guests. That's how I know I've successfully applied the Vulcan neck pinch. You need to learn how to read these rubes, LTG. Their brains operate on different levels than previous rubes.
That's not the word you mean to use.
Add that to the long list, right under gaslighting.
I might mean sacred cow, but as I discussed a lot of ways he was a bad President in my post you're wrong about that as well.
You're just doing performative dickery like you're into for some reason.
It was a helluva show till Dr. Ed showed up.
"Gotta be a helluva guy to have on your faculty."
What do you want, S_0? It's Southern Texas U, a tier 5 school.
Good Lord, Blackman, the guy isn't even buried yet. Maybe we could wait until after the funeral to begin to trash him. Meanwhile, if you really need to talk about people who lie and, in addition, are convicted felons, adjudicated sexual assaulters, philanderers, cheats, and frauds, you need to look no further than Mar-a-Lago. (Just look for the guy whose ass is being kissed by Elon Musk.)
Only say good things about the dead. It's good he's dead.
+1
Old joke but it works.
But it only works with people with middle-school mentalities and senses of humor.
Tell it to Moms Mabley, you stupid shit.
Quote Investigator: The earliest match located by QI appeared in June 1971. The comedian Jackie ‘Moms’ Mabley received credit for a version of the joke in the “Philadelphia Daily News” of Pennsylvania. A columnist stated that Mabley was in town to tape a syndicated television talk show. She aimed the barb at her former husband:[1]
Miss Mabley thinks people should marry only for love. She says her father forced her to marry an older man when she was only a child. “It was a miserable marriage,” she said. “But he’s dead, thank goodness. I was always taught never to say anything about the dead unless it’s good. He’s dead. Good!”
Apparently you and Ms. Mabley never evolved beyond school-yard "humor."
Awful lot of planning for Jimmuh's Funeral, I mean, he's only going to be buried for 3 days.
Best comment today!
It drives you hayseeds crazy that you can't draw and sharpen your knives over a man like Carter. Just try and deal with idea that there are good people on both sides.
You should take your own advice.
Some sense of proportion is warranted here. Carter's affairs were "peanuts" compared to Trump's.
And as far as I know, Carter never put the country's national security in danger in order to line his pockets (as Trump has with Tik Tok).
Carter's affairs were "peanuts"??
so were his "accomplishments" the Atlanta Urinal & Constipation has a story about how Jimmuh says he cried when Barry O was erected in 2008 (so did millions of others, but for different reasons). You know how Jimmuh "Eradicated" the Guinea Worm? Getting illiterate Natives to start wearing shoes and stop shitting in their water, what a guy!
Frank
I wouldn't have thought it possible, "Dr." Drackman, but your comments just get dumber and dumber. If you can put aside your racist crap for a few minutes, maybe you can get someone to read to you the actual story of how Guinea Worm is close to being eradicated.
So far as you know. Perhaps you should be more widely read.
And exactly how might President Trump profit economically from TikTok?
Using Tik Tok got him the Presidency, as he admits. And of course with Trump that meant 1) escaping criminal liability and 2) continuing the shameless merchandising that he conducted during his first term.
Billy Carter was perhaps most famous for marketing "Billy Beer," a beer that bore his name.
The explanatory phrase at the end really wasn't needed.
Many Presidents have an embarrassing family member. Nixon had his hippie nephew, George HW Bush had his corrupt son Neil, Bill Clinton had his cokehead brother Roger . . . With Trump, the President is the embarrassing family member.
...and your family has you.
He looked up his Fambily tree and found out he's the sap!
Rimshot!
Talk about how Government Programs never die, Jimmuh's ridiculous "Draft Registration" remains in effect, (for Men, but wait, Trannies have to register also, but only if they were "Assigned Male at Birth")
you know who else is required to register? Illegal Immigrants.
I'm guessing most haven't.
That's our Jimmuh though, the Millard Fillmore of the 20th Century (I know knowing about Millard Fillmore, he just sounds like an ineffectual boob)
Frank
I agree, Donald Trump should definitely be allowed to sell NFTs to the Saudis.
Slave trade was outlawed in 1808
If only JB had managed to make this post in some way about him, we would have achieved Peak Blackman.
Are you saying it hasn't been achieved yet? That is a scary thought.
Can't wait to see what brilliant legal commentary Blackman has in store for us in 2025. Of course whatever it is won't get him his coveted judgeship, but at least we can count on him for some good laughs.
Unfortunately, with a Republican Congress, Trump as President, and ever more Trump-appointed judges, we will see Josh celebrate victory after victory, and his predictions coming true again and again, though often for different reasons than he suggests.
The names of several Capital City Club members appear in this article. By a strange coincidence, they are the men who hired Gerald Rafshoon to locate a candidate to run for president following the McGovern fiasco. "If that man could get the nomination, anybody could. So why not our boy? Now, who is he?" Rafshoon returned with an obscure Naval veteran and former governor, who only needed a speech coach to be made understandable outside his home state. The rest, sadly, is history. The smartest of that group was a lawyer who knew how to keep his distance from Washington.
Except for the Veteran and former Governor part could be Bill Clinton, who except for his Surpreme Picks, did a good job.