The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Part II: Enumerated Powers
An Introduction To Constitutional Law Video Library: Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842), U.S. v. Dewitt (1869), Hepburn v. Griswold (1870), Knox v. Lee (1871), U.S. v. E.C. Knight (1895), Champion v. Ames (1901), Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), Schechter Poultry Corp. v. U.S. (1935), NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), U.S. v. Darby (1941), Wickard v. FIlburn (1942), Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S. (1964), Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), South Dakota v. Dole (1987), U.S. v. Lopez (1995), U.S. v. Morrison (2000), Gonzales v. Raich (2005), NFIB v. Sebelius (2012)
⚖️ Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)
Enumerated Powers on the Chase Court (1869-1871)
⚖️ U.S. v. Dewitt (1869)
⚖️ Hepburn v. Griswold (1870)
⚖️ Knox v. Lee (1871)
Enumerated Powers in the Progressive Era (1895-1918)
⚖️ U.S. v. E.C. Knight (1895)
⚖️ Champion v. Ames (1901)
⚖️ Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)
⚖️ Schechter Poultry Corp. v. U.S. (1935)
The Substantial Effects Doctrine (1937-1942)
⚖️ NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937)
⚖️ U.S. v. Darby (1941)
⚖️ Wickard v. FIlburn (1942)
Enumerated Powers on the Warren Court (1964)
⚖️ Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S. (1964)
⚖️ Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)
⚖️ South Dakota v. Dole (1987)
⚖️ U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
⚖️ U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
⚖️ Gonzales v. Raich (2005)
⚖️ NFIB v. Sebelius (2012)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
God, I love the conspiracy -
An article about a video about the US Constitution is filed under 'politics'.