The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
When Did The Supreme Court Come Out "The Other Way Than Every Court of Appeals"?
Not in INS v. Chadha. Yes in Brown v. Board of Education.
Co-Blogger Jon Adler flagged an exchange in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger. Chief Justice Roberts asked Ashley Keller if there were any cases where the Supreme Court "came out the other way than every court of appeals had come out." Keller was not able to think of an example on the spot. After a few moments, Roberts thought of a case:
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Was that -was that the case in Chadha?
MR. KELLER: INS versus Chadha?
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Yes. MR. KELLER: I --I don't know. I apologize.
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Somebody will check. I just -
JUSTICE KAGAN: Gosh, I'm not sure which way that cuts.
(Laughter.)
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I'm not sure that's true. I just have it in the back of my mind, but --okay.
Yes, someone would "check" that. His name is Seth Barrett Tillman. Seth reminded me that in Chadha, the Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit. And do you know who wrote the circuit court opinion in Chadha? Judge Anthony M. Kennedy. AMK ruled that the one-house veto violated the separation of powers. So Chief Justice Roberts is wrong on this front. Even better, Antonin Scalia filed an amicus brief on behalf of the American Bar Association supporting affirmance!
But there is one fairly prominent case in which the Supreme Court came out the opposite way of all lower federal courts: Brown v. Board of Education. The Court reversed three federal courts in Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia. Of course, the Court affirmed the Delaware Supreme Court, which found that the separate schools were not equal.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This doesn’t really seem analogous. Brown overturned a prior Supreme Court case saying that racial segregation was permissible, so it’s not exactly surprising that lower federal courts followed precedent, and even less is that fact somehow an argument in favor of the precedent.
Yes
Came here to say that. Precisely.
An example is Chief Justice Roberts' own opinion in Carpenter v. United States (2018), expanding Fourth Amendment protection to cell-site location records. All the court of appeals to have ruled on the issue had gone the other way.
Did it at least carve a huge exception to prior SCOTUS precedent?
Has the Supreme Court ever overruled all 12 Circuit Courts of general jurisdiction without also overruling its own precedent? Or all 11 prior to the creation of the 11th Circuit in 1980.
Rehaif v. U.S. had 11 (if you count the decision under review), but it doesn’t appear the Second Circuit had weighed in.
I think that's why it's called the Surpreme Court
Seems like yet another attempt by Blackman to crap on the chief. It's really not the mic drop he wants it to be.