The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Justice Department is Failing American Jews
Hamasnik protestors are violating various federal laws, and the Justice Department is doing nothing about it
[Cross-posted with my Times of Israel blog]
As Times of Israel readers are well-aware, since October 7, anti-Israel groups have launched widespread assaults on the rights of Jewish Americans, especially but not exclusively on college campuses.
I regularly tweet (@ProfDBernstein) about these incidents and comment, "Where is the Justice Department? Where is the FBI?"
I often get responses like, "isn't the Department of Education investigating some of these colleges? What can the feds really do?"
The answer is that "the feds," and the Department of Justice in particular, could do a lot to protect American Jews, and they are doing little to none of it.
Here are some examples.
(1) The Ku Klux Klan Act prohibits conspiracies to deprive Americans of their civil rights. This Act could be invoked against student groups that are blocking Jewish students from traversing their campuses, as at UCLA, and against groups that blockade public roads, depriving people of their right to travel. The Act has been invoked in private lawsuits, but the Justice Department has not brought a single case.
(2) The FACE Act prohibits "the use of physical force, threat of physical force, or physical obstruction to intentionally injure, intimidate, interfere with or attempt to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person who is exercising or trying to exercise their First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship." Hillel buildings serve as houses of worship, and various campuses have seen acts of intimidation of and interference with those students trying to enter or exit Hillel buildings. No one involved in these incidents has been charged under the act.
(3) Various complaints and lawsuits against universities have documented threats and assaults against Jewish students in violation of their civil rights. The Justice Department has not brought any criminal or civil charges against the perpetrators, with the exception of a Cornell student who threatened to kill Jewish students. Lower-level and less well-publicized threats, harassment, and assaults have not attracted Justice Department intervention.
(4) American intelligence officials have revealed that anti-Israel protesters are getting money from Iran, in violation of US sanctions laws. Despite this public revelation, no one has been indicted for receiving or serving as a conduit for this money. [Indeed, I wonder whether this information was released precisely because the intelligence folks are frustrated that Justice hasn't done anything about it.]
(5) For political reasons, police departments in cities including DC, Philadelphia, and Baltimore have refused requests by university officials to clear illegal, antisemitic campus encampments. This inaction violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the law. More narrowly, this abuse of police discretion violates the conditions on which cities receive billions of dollars in federal funds. The Justice Department seems entirely quiescent in the face of this malfeasance. Similarly, local prosecutors across Virginia and elsewhere have told police that they will not prosecute Hamasnik protesters who violate state laws by wearing masks to intimidate the public. Again, no intervention against discriminatory law enforcement from the Justice Department.
(6) There are strong indications that antisemitic groups like American Muslims for Palestine and National Students for Justice in Palestine have illegal ties to Hamas. Several state attorney generals, most prominently Virginia's Jason Miyares, are investigating these ties. There are also civil lawsuits pending against these organizations for material support for terrorism that has killed Americans. There is no indication that the Justice Department is seriously investigating.
(7) Jewish-owned businesses have been vandalized in New York and other cities. No federal civil rights charges have been filed against the vandals.
(8) Universities such as Yale have illegally failed to disclose massive donations from Qatar, Hamas's ally. The legal consequences of this failure have been minimal.
(9) Finally, while the Department of Education has been investigating allegations of universities discriminating against Jewish students via a hostile environment, double standards, or otherwise, every one of these complaints has been filed by a private party, giving the Department of Education a legal obligation to investigate. The department does not appear to have opened a single investigation of its own, nor has it referred even the most egregious cases to the Justice Department for potential civil litigation. Every lawsuit that has been filed has been the product of private rather than government efforts.
One can speculate as to why the Justice Department has been so quiescent in the face of the largest outbreak of antisemitism in the United States in decades, failing to use existing legal tools when the antisemitism turns illegal. But what we can say for sure is that despite Attorney General Merrick Garland's stated commitment to protecting the American Jewish community from hate crimes, his Justice Department has been an almost complete failure in combating such crimes inspired or committed by anti-Israel activists.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
DOJ is too busy chasing down micro aggressions to worry about trivial anti-semites attacking Jews and Jewish communities
The DOJ would care a bit more if Jews just committed more terrorist acts. The government sees little need to appease Jews, it's not like they're going to fly planes into buildings or something crazy like that if they're pissed off.
Do we have to summon the JDL? Maybe that would change behavior.
We (Finally) have Constitutional Carry in Jaw-Jaw, so many of my Tribe want to do everything by the book and would never carry, even though the Concealed Carry Permit was easy to get. Only place I don't carry is at the Airport, and (the Late) John Lewis's Shithole District? you'd be safer in Terror-Ann (to be fair, it's dangerous for the Goyim also)
Frank
The feds will try to protect Jews as soon as they have arrested everyone saying mean things at a city council meeting, or a school board meeting. Until then, there are just not enough staff to deal with the minor inconvenience of losing your civil rights to terrorists.
Gee, David, do you think the democrats might be anti-semitic just a little bit?
More like pandering to antisemites. They need Muslim and progressive votes. Ergo, they go soft on certain ideological crimes.
That and they know most American Jews are so reflexively liberal that 80% will vote for Democrats no matter what happens, so they don't care.
Speaking of hypocrisy, you blatantly ignore racist dog-whistles and instead pretend they are just culinary commentary.
To whom are you pandering, Grand Wizard?
All of this is happening in areas controlled by the Liberal Socialists that have co-opted the Democratic Party.
IF it's happening, and
IF they have the power to stop it, and
IF it is continuing to happen
THEN they want it to happen.
Don't overthink it. This administration wants Jews to be attacked. If they didn't, they would have stopped it.
I think you're ignoring the difference between "Wants" and "just doesn't care". I'm sure that at some level they'd prefer the attacks weren't happening, they just don't find them objectionable enough to actually DO anything about them.
If only the hamas-sympathizing protestors went to a school-board meeting and voiced displeasure. THEN Merrick Garland's DOJ would shut them down completely.
"[A]ttorney generals?" "Attorneys general," more like. There’s a grammatical reason for the difference.
Well, the Norman “soldiers general,” “soldiers major,” and “soldiers private” have long been shortened and Anglicized to “generals,” “majors,” and “privates.”
Why should Jewish students expect to be able to sit around and rely on the Justice Department? Not whether it’s right or not as a matter of absolute morality, but in terms of what’s most appropriate to do right now as a practical srrategy, Why don’t they use the private means available to them and, for example, sue themselves?
The Civil Rights statutes have fee shifting rules. Sympathetic shouldn’t be hard to find. And some of Hamasnik students, especially in private schools, come from wealthy families who can afford to pay judgments and/or settle to avoid further damage to their children’s futures.
Because the foot soldiers engaging in antisemitic behavior are effectively judgement proof. On campus they are mostly either students, or paid activists, and if the latter, aren’t being paid enough to make suing them realistic.
So what? It’s not all about the Benjamins.
Some of them (or their families) can pay judgments. And even if they can’t, you can garnish their student benefits. You could get protective orders against them, potentially barring them from campus. You can get court opinions that can be sent to their future employers. For paid activists, you can sue their employers, draining money from funds to pay future activists.
There are a lot of things that could be done. The national Ku Klux Klan was brought down as an organized organization able to pay activists largely by being bankrupted by numerous private organization. Why should we these organizations be allowed to continue to raise funds and pay activists with impunity? Claiborne Hardware addressed isolated violence by people not connected to the protest organizers. Violence by paid activists is a totally different story.
If you do nothing, you won’t be doing anything to deter others from joining.
I think the community needs to raise money to pay lawyers to ensure that this doesn’t go unpunished.
I think some of these statutes which Prof. Bernstein mentions are constitutionally dubious. But of course that's not the reason the DoJ is being selective on when to enforce these statutes.
Police in Newton, Massachusetts decided to charge a pro-Israel demonstrator who shot the anti-pro-Israel guy who assaulted him. It sure looked to me from reading the coverage, but not being a witness myself, that they decided the politically incorrect person must be at fault. At least the hate crime charge was dropped. That's deprivation of civil rights by force, the crime they charge you with if you say a bad word to the person you hit.
The racial and religious identity of the two parties was not revealed.
(NBC News quoting Middlesex County DA Marian Ryan)
Really?
No, the justice dept isn't failing Jews. Jews overwhelmingly voting democrat is failing Jews. The current justice dept is just an outgrowth of that voting pattern. We have watched democrat lawmakers, such as those clowns in "the squad," make screechy antisemitic noises for years now. Yet Jews keep voting for those that hate them and want them exterminated.
There are some hopeful signs:
https://nypost.com/2024/07/16/opinion/bidens-loss-of-jewish-support-could-cost-dems-the-presidency-and-more/
https://nypost.com/2024/08/11/us-news/trump-gop-eye-record-share-of-jewish-vote-over-antisemitism-a-real-issue/
It’s true the Democratic Party has a few clowns. But dare I point out that the Republican party also has clowns? Remember “Jews will not replace us?”
Pointing to the clowns and suggesting they’re representative of the whole is a self-serving argument, but hardly an intellectually serious or a fair one. Unless the clowns are the leadership. Then it’s fair game.
All parties have their clowns. They're not representative unless you're speaking of the modern Libertarian party. (It WAS serious at one time, a long time ago at this point.)
Side note: Most of the time, (But not always!) when somebody claims a crowd were chanting "Jews will not replace us", if you go listen to a recording it was actually, "You will not replace us." Most of the time...
This Jew doesn't and hasn't (OK, I voted for Al Sharpton in the 2004 DemoKKKrat Primary 1: as a Goof, 2: at least he's honest about his Anti-Semitism) Neither do my 2 Fighter Pilot daughters (when I can get them to Vote, they live in CA and New May-he-co) Last "D" I voted for in Jaw Jaw was Zell Miller (not a Jew, although he had the Nose) who was such a stout "D" he endorsed "W" in 2004
Like with the Afro-Amuricans ("45" got the largest Afro-Amurican vote of any "R" since that Civil Rights Champion Milhouse Nixon in 1960) it's a process, 10-7 changed a few minds, as well as Representatives Mullah Omar, Priapism Slap-a-Jap, and Hakeem the Bad Dream Jefferson
Frank
This is the extreme partisanship of the crank; it will not help Jews or Republicans or really anyone.
You're mixing up cranky statements with sensible ones.
While I doubt Biden subjectively wants Jews to be attacked, the overwhelming Democratic support by Jewish voters doesn't seem to have worked in countering anti-semitism, even or especially from Democrats.
So what is going on here? Is the Biden-Harris administration worried that they will lose Arab and Moslem votes if they come to the defense of Jews?
Duh. That's why Cums-a-lot picked Sergeant Pepper-Waltz instead of someone who could have actually helped carry a Swing State like Shapiro or Mark Kelly
Frank
Just going to point out here that this is a post about a long list of grievances and discrimination against the Jews in America.
And Sarcastr0, Mr "I am not an antisemite just because I repeat Hamas Propaganda, I have friends who are Jews, really!"
..is dismissive of these issues, saying they are "extreme partisanship of the crank"
He quoted the way other commenters are talking about the issues, and the partisan accusations they are baselessly putting forth.
He didn't actually say anything about the issues themselves, which means that, once again, you're a fucking liar.
They put that Tru-Coat on at the factory, but seeing as how it's special circumstances, I'll knock $100 off.
One can speculate as to why the Justice Department has been so quiescent in the face of the largest outbreak of antisemitism in the United States in decades, failing to use existing legal tools when the antisemitism turns illegal.
Purposeful passivity in the face of repeated violence against Jews?
A double standard in the enforcement of the law (i.e. Hillel)?
These things are not new, this phenomenon happened a century ago in the halls of our government (Purposeful passivity, double standard). What do we do?
Read through the list again. Not a single instance of "violence against Jews," let alone "repeated."
When the grievances are all in your mind, that could be a reason why the DOJ isn't stepping in.
Paging Representatives Priapism Slap-a-Jap, Mullah Omar, and Hakeem Juffuhson, please answer your Pages!
Frank
Qatar, Hamas's ally.
Hahahaha oh David, the whole world really is against you isn't it!
"In the 21st century, Qatar emerged as both a major non-NATO ally of the United States and a middle power in the Arab world."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar
Oh good another tirade condemning civil rights on the libertarian blog. Claiming the Klan act should be used against protesters for blocking roads is disgraceful. I hope if you get your wish someone uses it against pro-Israel protesters as often as anti-Israel ones, see what you think then.
Same goes for the rest. Every one of those right wing political causes are violating at a much higher frequency than left wing political causes, yet I don't recall any posts of yours ever complaining about any of that. Maybe at least a hat tip to not being so hypocritical in your next 'any criticism of the Israeli government's policy is anti-Semitism' screed?