The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Climate Protestors Sentenced to Jail for Blocking Major Roadway in Britain
Organizers of the highway obstruction will spend years in jail for their anything-but-peaceful protest.
A group of protestors with a group called "Just Stop Oil" seeking to force greater action on climate change conspired to block the M25 -- basically the London beltway -- in November 2022. The protestors were prosecuted for their efforts, and have now been sentenced to several years in jail. The BBC reports:
Five environmental activists who organised protests that brought part of the M25 to a standstill over four days have been jailed. . . .
Judge Christopher Hehir said Roger Hallam, 58, Daniel Shaw, 38, Louise Lancaster, 58, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu, 35, and Cressida Gethin, 22, had "crossed the line from concerned campaigner to fanatic".
At Southwark Crown Court, Hallam was sentenced to five years' imprisonment while the other defendants each received four-year jail terms.
Obstructing a highway is not simple political expression, and it is far from "peaceful protest." It involves the physical obstruction of others' freedom of movement. It is also disruptive and potentially tortious conduct that can have severe consequences. In this case, those seeking to "just stop oil" have done little to advance their cause (traffic congestion results in worse fuel economy and increases emissions), but and managed to cause significant harm to others. From the BBC report:
The action resulted in chaos on the M25 over four successive days, causing nearly 51,000 hours of driver delays, the court heard. The protests closed parts of the motorway in Kent, Surrey, Essex and Hertfordshire.
People missed flights, medical appointments and exams. Two lorries collided, and a police motorcyclist came off his bike during one of the protests on 9 November 2022 while trying to bring traffic to a halt in a "rolling road block".
Prosecutors alleged the protests led to an economic cost of at least £765,000, while the cost to the Metropolitan Police was put at more than £1.1m.
The activists and their allies also sought to disrupt the trial, but to no avail.
If activists wish to engage in such conduct as civil disobedience, so be it. They must remember, however, that civil disobedience involves the knowing and deliberate violation of law and (as traditionally practiced) a willingness to suffer the consequences.
In this case, those seeking to "just stop oil" didn't, and will just go to jail instead.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good. How about a firing squad?
Tom Cotton— is that you?
Nope.
Guess they don't have snowplows in England.
They don't get enough snow in England to have snowplows.
5 years!
I think they goofed. They embarrassed the same politicians who normally rely on them to make a stink, authorizing the politicians to get in the way of business, waggle finger waggle look my family is richer now.
But this is a convention of the corrupt. How dare they make those pols look bad! Never forget your antics are only useful to us insofar as it helps us get power and get in the way using that power!
You seem to know a lot about it.
Hopefully this is sufficient to deter others from engaging in similar acts.
But the sentences seem a little bit light. How much time do we give people who "peacefully" steal a million dollars from banks?
I don't know what's typical in the UK, but a sentence of 4 or 5 years for that kind of financial crime wouldn't be especially remarkable. For instance, a theft of ~$1 million under the federal sentencing guidelines would call for a range of 27-33 months for someone with no criminal history. Getting aggressive with enhancements, you could probably get up a 7 or 8 year guideline range, but in my experience judges tend to go well below that in financial crimes cases: according to the sentencing commission's statistical tools, the median sentence at offense level 28 (which is pretty high for what you're describing) was 60 months, with a median sentence of 62 months.
How much of that depends on how much was recovered? Does someone who steals a million and blows it all get a longer sentence that someone who buys things which can be sold to recover some of the value?
They care deeply, and there commitment should be recognized. A mere 6 months or probation would be an insult to their deeply held beliefs, beleifs that they held so deeply that they wanted to share their pain with thousands of innocent commuters, and truck drivers.
I hope the courts are going to show similar respect to those that damaged Stonehenge, valuable paintings, blocked subways.
Their commitment too needs to be respected and cherished, deeply.
And they’re using less energy while in prison. I’m surprised they don’t ask for more time.
Exile to a small island without any fossil fuel derived energy or materials is appropriate, and honors their wishes.
I would like to see a follow up article in five years detailing how many survived in prison.
Oh really? Why is that?
I'd surmise it's because there's a difference between "law and order" and "the rule of law".
I'd wager most of them will have been quietly released by then.
These heroes!
They're to be celebrated!
Imagine the significant reduction in their carbon footprint now.
The U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week denied a stay regarding blocking a public area as part of a protest of a Confederate monument. The three defendants were sentenced to a week in jail. Possible VC topic.
Quoting BBC:
They're being charged and sentenced as if they were rioters.
Adler seems to take much delight in this post. I don't buy his claim that he's tempered his prior views about climate change.
" In this case, those seeking to "just stop oil" didn't, and will just go to jail instead. "
Did you have much to say about the fucking insurrectionists going to jail, Prof. Adler?
The clingerverse -- and the partisanship, bigotry, and superstition at this white, male, faux libertarian blog in particular -- may be pickling your brain.
Oooh, actual cussing! Something bit you in a tender spot.
That was my first thought as well. Although its still light enough on the spice that it could be as simple as an "I haven't yet had my coffee yet" moment.
Now if he kicked it up a notch and kept going, that would be something. 🙂
I might mention that this a shit-rate blog every week or so. Or that the Conspirators and their fans tend to be shitty people.
These were the fucking insurrectonists!
Honestly, you could cut down the sentences if they had an agreement with a local educational concern to volunteer and come to the prison to oversee two studies to assist them and anyone else interested in the effects of their actions.
Study #1: What were the environmental effects of the protests?
Study #2: What actually is each person's carbon footprint in prison?
You could include all kinds of variables that you would normally just adjust for as your researchers aren't going anywhere, and you can make these studies for pennies on the dollar compared to standard gov funded Uni research.
Double bonus: Let this count as class credits for completing college while incarcerated or after.
If they don't want to participate and just wish to do their time they can.
All lives splatter. And if they were so concerned about the use of oil, having thousands of cars idling is a pretty stupid strategy.
Leave them there, call a road roller
Tom Cotton— is that you??
I tend to call them "Just Stop Breathing", but I fear my meaning is susceptible to misunderstanding.
Well definitely a big improvement. 16 years ago, a group of Greenpeace activists shut down the entire Kingsnorth power station, and Britain effectively declared them not guilty because their political stance was so important.
That’s the precedent that Just Stop Oil is working with. Literal statements that active sabotage is not guilty if your politics is sufficiently popular.
See the article
“Not guilty: the Greenpeace activists who used climate change as a legal defence”
No comment in the case but the mix of these are very silly idiots and let’s throw the book at them is a sight to behold.
Well, they are silly idiots, but they cause a lot of damage and their sentences need to provide a strong deterrent to others.