The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Ratio for the Importance of Legal Questions
An aphorism attributed to Edward Jacob QC:
The importance of questions was in this ratio: first, costs; second, pleading; and third, very far behind, the merits of the case.
That's quoted in Ben Kremer, The Origin of the Usual Undertaking as to Damages When Obtaining Interlocutory Injunctive Relief, 17 J. Equity 211, 225 (2024). Kremer's paper is outstanding and shows the history and normative basis for injunction bonds. And if you aren't reading the Journal of Equity, you should be!
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"And if you aren't reading the Journal of Equity, you should be!"
These are some weird motherfuckers. Off the grid.
You are only allowed to read the Journal of Equity if your hands are clean.
LOL
Sadly, a group of angry parents got the Journal of Equity banned from my local library.
Why do you think they were sad? I would have expected them to be happy. In a weird, antisocial, deranged way.
I have no idea what that is trying to say. Also, that's not a ratio, it's a ranking.
If you sat in the front row in every class, read the Journal of Equity. If you had fun in school, read the Journal of Inequity.