The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
A Family Affair for President Biden's Nominees To First and Sixth Circuits
CA6 nominee Karla M. Campbell was Judge Stranch's first law clerk, and CA1 nominee Justice Julia M. Lipez is filling the seat her father formerly held.
President Biden has now made his fiftieth round of judicial nominees. The two circuit nominees stand out.
First, in January 2024, Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch of the Sixth Circuit announced that she would take senior status on the confirmation of her successor. Now, Biden has nominated Karla M. Campbell to fill Stranch's seat. Campbell spent her entire career at the Nashville firm formerly known as Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC. If those names look familiar, it should. Jane Branstetter also started her career at that firm, where her father, Cecil D. Branstetter, was a founding partner. And Jane's husband, James Stranch, also worked at that firm. And wouldn't you know it, Campbell was Judge Stranch's first law clerk on the Court of Appeals. It is very much a family affair! Did Judge Stranch have any say in picking her replacement? We know that the President nominated Judge Gibbons's former law clerk to replace her. As a general rule, I would offer a rebuttable presumption: whenever a Judge is replaced by a former law clerk, there were some backroom dealings.
Second, in November 2023, Judge William Kayatta of the First Circuit announced his intention to take senior status on October 31, 2024 (just before the election!), or upon the confirmation of his successor, whichever happens sooner. Kayatta, who was confirmed in 2012, has only been in the seat for about twelve years--a fairly short tenure on the court of appeals. He was nominated at the not-so-young age of 58, so quickly hit the Rule of 80. Twelve years ago, Kayatta filled the Maine seat of Judge Kermit Lipez. Who did President Biden nominate to fill Kayatta's seat? Julia M. Lipez on the Maine Superior Court. And if that name sounds familiar, it should. Julia Lipez is the daughter of Kermit Lipez.
I imagine that any father would be very proud that his daughter was nominated as a federal judge. But did the father have any role to play in the selection of his child for the court? I've seen what parents do to get their kids into elite kindergardens. I imagine a similar treatment would apply to the federal judiciary. Obviously, it was Judge Kayatta's decision to take senior status. But I the longtime judge in the circuit probably had some sway, and could have suggested to Kayatta, and the powers that be in Maine, that his daughter would be a good fit. I would offer another similar rebuttable presumption: when a federal judge is appointed to a court on which a close relative sits, there were some backroom dealings. Another family affair.
It should be easy enough for the First Circuit to avoid putting the Lipezs on the same panel. And the senior-status Kermit would generally not sit on the en banc court, but if Kermit is on a panel for a case that goes en banc, he would be entitled to sit on the same court as his daughter. Then again, the First Circuit, which has zero active status Republican appointees, will probably never go en banc because it is about ideologically diverse as Senator Whitehouse's private beach club in Newport.
What about the federal nepotism statute, you might ask? Doesn't federal law prohibit appointing a father-and-daughter to the same federal court? The Office of Legal Counsel construed the statute to not apply to judicial nominations, to avoid any constitutional doubts of whether the statute was unconstitutional. Thus William A. Fletcher could serve on the Ninth Circuit along with his mother, Betty Fletcher. There have been other relatives on the same federal court. Learned Hand and his cousin Augustus Hand both served on the Second Circuit. Morris Arnold and Richard Arnold both served on the Eighth Circuit. Diana Motz serves on the Fourth Circuit, while her husband serves on the District of Maryland.
I am working on an article now to deal with judges who time their senior status to hand-pick their successors. It is unseemly, and I think it happens more often than we know.
Update: Judge Kermit Lipez will fully retire if his daughter is confirmed. He cited the statute, a concern that did not bother Judge Betty Fletcher:
Update: Judge Kermit Lipez plans to fully retire if the Senate confirms his daughter to the court, the 1st Circuit's circuit executive tells me, as a federal statute would bar Julia Lipez as a close relative from joining it otherwise. https://t.co/kbAlqJrpMq
— Nate Raymond (@nateraymond) May 23, 2024
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Blackman complaining about this is hilarious because it’s benefitting non-originalists. If Jerry Smith pulls the same thing under a Trump 2, he would pay it no mind.
We all should be thankful to Blackman for his unwavering concern for the unseemly.
I can't even. This ... this is what gets Blackman worked up about impropriety?
Judges getting all sorts of freebies from rich people that want to bend their ears? Nothing to see.
Judges coming up with the most lame excuses (muh wife!) for their behavior ... and still waiting for the next excuse for the next revelation? JB has your back!
Someone getting an appointment to an appellate court where there father is a senior judge, and took senior status more than a decade ago? HOW DARE THEY!
I actually am concerned about what seems like an eroding issue of judicial integrity, and a lack of concern for impropriety. Self-policing only works when the people involved have both integrity and shame.
But seeing this from Blackman is just too much.
It is honestly baffling.
Unless you're very new here, the one thing it's not is baffling.
I would offer a rebuttable presumption: whenever a Judge is replaced by a former law clerk, there were some backroom dealings.
I would offer another similar rebuttable presumption: when a federal judge is appointed to a court on which a close relative sits, there were some backroom dealings.
I would offer a different rebuttable presumption: whenever a judge is appointed there were some backroom dealings. And, generally speaking, who the f**k cares?
This is an example of the quality of Biden's nominees
https://nypost.com/2024/05/23/us-news/senators-grill-biden-judicial-nominee-sarah-netburn-for-transgender-inmate-transfer/
It's actually more of a commentary on the quality of Biden's critics.
A convicted male rapist –
Great idea to put him in a female prison.
Lets increase the probability of female prisoners getting raped by a male in prison to 100%
I agree that putting him in a female prison isn't a great idea, but it may be that the law compels that result, or that there was a valid policy reason for doing it anyway. There are lots of positions that lawyers advocate for, and that judges rule on, that they personally disagree with. Please do not confuse a lawyer's advocacy with her actual views.
He is a male - He will always be a male.
there is no law that provides that a male should serve his sentence in a female prison - at least no law/statute that has been duly enacted in any jurisdiction in the United States. As judge she is supposed to rule on the law that exists, not what she wants the law to be.
He will always be a male.
You will always be a no-count, bigoted, worthless right-wing write-off.
Until replacement. By your betters.
Unless of course the judge thought she was more at risk of assault in a male prison than in a female prison.
So you put a serial male rapist in a female prison!
That is incredibly stupid, even by your standards.
It's so weird to see such concern about this, over the amount of actual sexual violence that occurs in US prisons. Are they all trans?
Krychek_2 46 mins ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
It’s actually more of a commentary on the quality of Biden’s critics.
It shows more about the delusions running throughout the Biden administration.
The most important qualification is not being a White male.
How do you manage to walk around with such a heavy chip on your shoulder?
“Here’s an example of commentary that confirms by bias”
Ok bro
Only Josh Blackman thinks it is reasonable to infer unseemly backroom dealings whenever generally well-connected lawyers get judicial nominations, but absolutely horrifically unreasonable to infer that a Supreme Court justice who has flown two flags associated with extreme rightwing movements outside his home might be sympathetic toward those movements.
OLC is correct:
What about the federal nepotism statute, you might ask? Doesn't federal law prohibit appointing a father-and-daughter to the same federal court? The Office of Legal Counsel construed the statute to not apply to judicial nominations, to avoid any constitutional doubts of whether the statute was unconstitutional. Thus William A. Fletcher could serve on the Ninth Circuit along with his mother, Betty Fletcher. There have been other relatives on the same federal court. Learned Hand and his cousin Augustus Hand both served on the Second Circuit. Morris Arnold and Richard Arnold both served on the Eighth Circuit. Diana Motz serves on the Fourth Circuit, while her husband serves on the District of Maryland.
Diana Motz serves on the Fourth Circuit, while her husband serves on the District of Maryland.
Some tension in the Motz household when the 4th Circuit reverses District Judge Motz?
the 4th CA has become very progressive. I doubt he will be reversed anytime soon.
It has gotten moderate, not progressive.
If you think the guy that wrote the principal en banc dissent in American Legion contributes to this progressive circuit I don’t know what to tell you.
"Kindergartens," not "kindergardens."
Yeah.
You'd think Trump cultists would at least get their German right.
"I imagine that any father would be very proud that his daughter was nominated as a federal judge.."
Do you think Crystal Clanton's Federalist Society godfathers are proud of her?
Maybe Volokh will get her a job at the Hoover Institution, where they can exchange racial slurs whenever they wish!
Let's see now. Professor Blackman finds it "unseemly" for Judge Stranch and Judge Gibbons to time their taking senior status to influence the selection of their successors who had served them as clerks. Does anyone recall whether he expressed similar concern about Anthony Kennedy timing his retirement to enable the nomination of his former clerk Brett Kavanaugh?
Relax. Blackman is a clown mired at one of America's worst law schools. UCLA is rid of Volokh. I doubt Northwestern, Georgetown, UCLA, and similar schools are much interested in hiring more movement conservatives for faculty positions.
These right-wingers have lost the American culture war and have lost at the modern American marketplace of ideas. They are on the wrong side of history. America becomes less religious, less rural, less bigoted, less backward, and more diverse (less white) every day. Disaffected conservatives are being painted into smaller, more desolate corners of America every day. The arc of American progress strongly favors reason, inclusiveness, science, modernity, progress, education, strong and educated communities and our strongest schools at the expense of bigotry, ignorance, backwardness, dogma, insularity, religion, desolate backwaters, and nonsense-teaching religious schools.
Let these guys whine and whimper, gloat and boast, cite each other, and try to hold back progress and modernity as much as they like. They're roadkill along the path to more American progress.
Blackman is a clown mired at one of America’s worst law schools.
The problem is that he is trying hard to unmire himself, not by working hard and producing quality legal scholarship, but by setting new records for kissing the ass of Trump and prominent conservatives in general, and spreading any slime the RW is interested in at the moment.
> As a general rule, I would offer a rebuttable presumption: whenever a Judge is replaced by a former law clerk, there were some backroom dealings.
Are backroom dealings a bad thing? Or is it just the particular end you oppose?
Professor Blackman can be relied on for dubious attempts to find scandal in political opponents just as much as he can be relied on for dubious attempts to whitewash political cronies. Very reliable man.