The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
UCLA Chancellor's Statement
Just circulated:
Our community is in deep pain. We are reeling from days of violence and division. And we hope with all our hearts that we can return to a place where our students, faculty and staff feel safe and, one day, connected again.
Our approach to the encampment that was established on Royce Quad last week has been guided by several equally important principles: the need to support the safety and wellbeing of Bruins, the need to support the free expression rights of our community, and the need to minimize disruption to our teaching and learning mission.
The events of the past several days, and especially the terrifying attack on our students, faculty and staff on Tuesday night, have challenged our efforts to live up to these principles and taken an immense toll on our community.
We approached the encampment with the goal of maximizing our community members' ability to make their voices heard on an urgent global issue. We had allowed it to remain in place so long as it did not jeopardize Bruins' safety or harm our ability to carry out our mission.
But while many of the protesters at the encampment remained peaceful, ultimately, the site became a focal point for serious violence as well as a huge disruption to our campus.
Several days of violent clashes between demonstrators and counter-demonstrators put too many Bruins in harm's way and created an environment that was completely unsafe for learning. Demonstrators directly interfered with instruction by blocking students' pathways to classrooms. Indirectly, violence related to the encampment led to the closure of academic buildings and the cancellation of classes. And frankly, hostilities were only continuing to escalate.
In the end, the encampment on Royce Quad was both unlawful and a breach of policy. It led to unsafe conditions on our campus and it damaged our ability to carry out our mission. It needed to come to an end.
Over the past several days, we communicated with and made a formal request to meet with demonstration leaders to discuss options for a peaceful and voluntary disbanding of the encampment. Unfortunately, that meeting did not lead to an agreement.
To preserve campus safety and the continuity of our mission, early this morning, we made the decision to direct UCPD and outside law enforcement officers to enter and clear the encampment. Officers followed a plan that had been carefully developed to protect the safety of protesters at the site. Those who remained encamped last night were given several warnings and were offered the opportunity to leave peacefully with their belongings before officers entered the area. Ultimately, about 300 protesters voluntarily left, while more than 200 resisted orders to disperse and were arrested.
UCLA facilities teams are now in the process of taking down structures and cleaning up the quad, and we ask that students, staff and faculty continue to avoid the area.
I want to be clear that we fully support the right of our community members to protest peacefully, and there are longstanding and robust processes in place that allow students, faculty and staff to gather and demonstrate in ways that do not violate the law or our policies. I urge Bruins to take advantage of these many opportunities, which were designed to support advocacy that does not jeopardize community safety or disrupt the functioning of the university.
I also want to recognize the significance of the issues behind the demonstrators' advocacy. The loss of life in Gaza has been truly devastating, and my administration has and will continue to connect with student and faculty leaders advocating for Palestinian rights to engage in discussions that are grounded in listening, learning and mutual respect. Similarly, we will continue to support our Jewish students and employees who are reeling from the trauma of the brutal Oct. 7 attacks and a painful spike in antisemitism worldwide.
We will also continue to investigate the violent incidents of the past several days, especially Tuesday night's horrific attack by a mob of instigators. When physical violence broke out that night, leadership immediately directed our UCPD police chief to call for the support of outside law enforcement, medical teams and the fire department to help us quell the violence. We are carefully examining our security processes that night and I am grateful to President Drake for also calling for an investigation.
The past week has been among the most painful periods our UCLA community has ever experienced. It has fractured our sense of togetherness and frayed our bonds of trust, and will surely leave a scar on the campus. While Counseling & Psychological Services and Staff & Faculty Counseling Center are available to lend support to those in need, I also hope we can support one another through this difficult moment and reaffirm the ties that unite us as a community of learning.
I've been off campus since two weeks ago (the law school, unlike undergrad, is on the semester system, so the last day of my Business Torts class was on the 18th); I've also been out of town the last few days. My knowledge of what's happening at UCLA is thus sketchy and second-hand. It appears clear that some of the pro-Israel demonstrators tried to (unlawfully) tear down the (unlawfully placed) barricades surrounding the encampment, and people then started physically fighting each other. Some accounts I've seen suggest that the fights were mostly directly initiated by the pro-Israel demonstrators (and not just in the sense that the taking down of the barricades led to foreseeable reactions); others describe basically mutual melees. I'm happy to wait further to see if the picture is made any clearer.
Many sources also report that it took the police hours to intercede to break up the fights, and some suggest that the problem was that the university authorities did not properly instruct the police to intercede more promptly. If that's right, then that strikes me as hard to defend.
Law enforcement, in both sense of the word (the people and the activity), should be present in such situations, proactively and not just in a slow reaction—especially as to violence, but also as to vandalism, illegal taking over of public space (space where all UCLA students should be free to go), and the like. Students should be free to express themselves, on both sides of the conflict, but only consistently with the law and with university rules. To close with a quote from Jesse Singal's Singal-Minded newsletter (and I recommend people read the whole item):
What if widespread disorder is … bad? And should be prevented?
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The administration appears to be surprised that the 'protestors' have behaved in just the way that they have been trained.
In what way have the 'protestors' been 'trained?'
Sounds like you might benefit from a little extra curricular reading on what’s going on out there.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nypd-release-video-showing-professional-protest-consultant-at-columbia-university/ar-AA1nXic0
That's... 'training?'
The protesters have been trained to ignore rules and laws as neither will be applied to them, and they know that.
It is always amazing how much nuance progressive protests get. Conservative ones are really, really binary things it seems.
The OP is a conspiracy theory.
The admin and the cops seem to have behaved *exactly* how they were trained - look the other way while masked vigilantes do their work for them.
Been using that trick for centuries now.
it's almost poetic really
to protest the response to Hamas invading Israel and taking hostages, the protesters... invaded universities and took hostages
---
Columbia University janitor says he was held hostage by pro-Palestine protesters who took over campus building...as college suspends encampment negotiator 'for ignoring warnings to leave'
Protestors have occupied Hamilton Hall on the campus of Columbia university
One facilities worker told a crowd that he had been held hostage by the group
The University has said any students inside the building now face expulsion
--
imagine it was something like this:
"Look at me."
"Sure."
"Look at me."
"Sure."
"I'm the janitor now."
(dramatic music)
Y'know, the major training these kids got in building barricades and acting together in groups was school shooter drills.
So, Gaza suffered "loss of life", but Israel just suffered "trauma"? Good thing Hamas wasn't able to actually kill anybody October 7th.
"It appears clear that some of the pro-Israel demonstrators tried to (unlawfully) tear down the (unlawfully placed) barricades surrounding the encampment,"
This seems somewhat paradoxical.
Do you dispute that vigilantes are engaging in criminality?
Also, as to your first point, trauma covers loss of life. When I 'googled' it this came up:
trau·ma
/ˈtrômə/
noun
1.a deeply distressing or disturbing experience.
"a personal trauma like the death of a child"
Your inability to comprehend basic English is noted.
Where is my mistake in basic English comprehension?
Because you didn't understand how the definition did not include "death", and cited a death as an example of things that can cause a trauma. It is not the death itself that is the trauma.
The statement referred to the “trauma” of "the brutal attacks of Oct. 7th". Brett Bellmore’s complaint seemed to be that this was < the reference to "loss of life" in Gaza. But plainly "trauma" can refer to "loss of life."
In fact, couldn't you argue "trauma" is more powerful since it, as the definition demonstrates, includes that the "loss of life" be "deeply distressing or disturbing." Hitler's suicide involved "loss of life" but few would refer to the "trauma" of it.
Were one ideologically inclined they could complain that the Gazan losses are referred to as "devastating" but the attacks on Israel as "brutal" and thus are biased in favor or Israel.
The distinction between brutal and devastating is noted, but accurate. Write back when the Israeli rape-fest starts.
Boom. These rape apologists are either delusional or evil. I guess both is a possibility.
"Vigilantes" are, by definition, doing something criminal. But I will dispute that removing illegally placed barriers would be illegal.
Brett -- see 269 MGL 1: "...shall command the assistance of all persons there present in suppressing such riot or unlawful assembly and arresting such persons." See also 269 MGL 2
These are ~300 year old laws -- yes, British law -- but it establishes the duty of the general public to disperse illegal assemblies.
FFS your own example shows the assistance is at the COMMAND of authorities.
They can't just unilaterally decide to enforce the law.
Until 20 years ago, police weren’t mentioned in that statute.
FFS yourself…
Here, let me add the part you conveniently left off:
269 MGL 1: " . . . each of said magistrates and officers shall command the assistance . . . ."
But I will dispute that removing illegally placed barriers would be illegal.
Allow me to help your brain to function. The barriers were only illegally placed to the extent that the property owner, i.e. UCLA, didn't want them there. From the perspective of everyone else, the barriers merely violated school policy.
Enforcing school policy is the sole perogative of the school. Students and outsiders have no power to enforce school policy... and it obviously doesn't justify illegal acts.
It is worrisome how quick the right is to excuse illegal behavior these days, as long as they like the perps and hate the victims. You're a pathetic old man, Brett. You've given up on the rule of law in your old age basically out of a disdain for Those Meddling Kids.
So, you're saying that, if Bob throws out his old mattress from his dorm room, and leaves it cluttering up the commons, I'm acting illegally if I pick it up and take it to the dump? Because policing the campus is the exclusive prerogative of the University, I'm a criminal if I pick up trash?
Yeah, I don't think so. This is the sort of claim that collapses the moment you actually examine it. Nobody has ever maintained prior to this that students would be criminals if they picked up litter. It was actually lauded!
See? Always end up apologising for law-breaking and violence after the wailing and gnashing of teeth over 'rules.'
Litter? What the fuck are you talking about about?
Let's say I accidentally dropped my wallet in the quad. You think you're entitled to steal it because it's there illegally? You're an idiot flailing around for reasons to enable lawbreaking by vigilantes you happen to like. It's sickening.
The barriers (and disorder) were denying other students the benefit of their tuition dollars, and your theory implies that the university (and not the schmucks) should be liable to these students for the damages.
It's an interesting theory, but self help is recognized in the law.
self help is recognized in the law.
Hahaha you just made that up! Is that like how it's legal for me to shoot you if you have a Trump bumper sticker and you cut me off illegally? I'm just helping myself by removing the illegal barriers to my lawful commute!
What law do you think the students who dismantled the barricades were breaking?
Bear in mind that police officers are a relatively new thing.
Before that, average citizens enforced the law. Kinda like what happened Tuesday night at UCLA.
Oh, great! Antifa is very much looking forward to enforcing some laws.
That's a pretty stupid comment, even from you.
Thanks. It’s intended to reflect the stupidity of Ed’s post.
"Oh, great! Antifa is very much looking forward to enforcing some laws."
They tend to not get punished for the mass law breaking that they do.
Yeah, the cops are well-known antifa sympathisers.
It wasn't my point, but yes -- they are.
The same technologies that were used to prosecute (persecute) the Jan 6th folk could be used against Antifa -- and haven't been.
Legally speaking, attacking a US District Court is every bit as much a Federal offense as attacking the US Capitol -- both are Federal buildings.
You really are on another planet.
All those leftists got charged and treated even more harshly than the Jan 6 people. You just want to pretend otherwise because it’s convenient to your grievance narrative.
A Reddit meme. In reality, police go back to times before written codes of law. The US has never been without police.
The Boston Police -- the first municipal police department in the nation -- were established in 1838. Boston was established in 1630....
To this day, a police officer in Massachusetts brings charges as an individual (i.e. in his own name) and not in the name of the state.
Item 7 of the Peel policing principles that most modern police forces outside dictatorships purport to be following:
"To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence."
"So, Gaza suffered “loss of life”, but Israel just suffered “trauma”? Good thing Hamas wasn’t able to actually kill anybody October 7th."
Mealy-mouthed "both side-ism" in general but you can tell he is supportive [or afraid] of the Hamas "protestors". Its "mob of instigators" but nothing harsh about the Hamas-nicks, just neutral terms.
You're tilting at mites.
'the trauma of the brutal Oct. 7 attacks and a painful spike in antisemitism worldwide' isn't good enough for you, because you just want to complain.
The king of mealy-mouthed “both side-ism” speaks!
You call for mob justice on behalf of 'The Jews' so dunno how much credence I give to your judgement of what's the moral position to take.
True mob justice would have made wearing a keffiyeh dangerous and displaying the Palestinian flag suicidal.
Ed, you wouldn't know justice if it machine gunned your family.
For someone who claims he is not a racist -- Sarc really hates Jews!
A racist and a douche.
For people who claim to oppose anti-semitism, you sure use the accusation arbitrarily against anyone who disagrees with you, as if the meaning if the term is actually unimportant to you, as opposedt o its effect.
Well, you have to admit that “the trauma of the brutal Oct 7 attacks” doesn’t carry quite the same weight as “the mass, indiscriminate rape, torture, burning, murder, and kidnapping of Jews on Oct 7” does. You know. If the Chancellor had decided to honestly describe what happened.
But the Chancellor sides with Hamas....
'Say it exactly as I want you to or I'ma gonna call you a Hamas supporter.'
Raping hippies and beheading babies is a particularly vile form of savagery.
You have advocated for both in the past, assuming the hippy was wearing a short skirt, and the baby was part of a group trying to cross the border.
Gonna be real hard to service your moral outrage with the shit you've said.
You lie an awful lot for somebody who claims moral high ground.
Nah, you just wish I lied.
You tried calling me on it recently regarding education spending and it turned out you were the one full of shit.
Well you're the lying sack of shit here.
You repeat, often in all caps, posts on machine gunning border crossers, nuking Gaza, and how women who dress slutty deserve to be raped and killed.
Dunno why you'd try and deny it here.
Exactly my thought -- not sure how one illegally takes down something illegally put up.
Wow, is this the right's latest version of the tourist grandmas? Who do you think you're fooling?
Assault, dear asshole, is what you're conventiently ignoring this time.
Legitimate use of force is not assault.
Ok well when antifa beats up the Trump supporters who are blocking the sidewalk, sending them to the hospital, I'll keep that in mind.
So, beating people is, to you, THE EXACT SAME THING as taking down an illegal impediment to property you have the identical right to have access to?
Read the OP you nimrod.
It's pretty obviously not assault to disassemble a barricade. I encourage others to look at the elements of assault in New York because this is exceedingly obvious with a casual glance. It's likely fourth-degree criminal mischief though.
It's mind-boggling that seizing buildings is "peaceful" but taking down illegal barricades is "assault".
Occupying a building without violence is peaceful; taking down barricades with violence is not.
If only the Hamas brigade had been peaceful, instead of attacking a female Jewish student.
Given the assault on the encampment, it seems like the counter-protesters are on the belligerent side.
if only Hamas had been peaceful instead of killing and raping thousands of innocent Israelis
If only you hadn't looked at that atrocity and said: 'More, please!'
It’s mind-boggling that seizing buildings is “peaceful” but taking down illegal barricades is “assault”
Have a look. “Taking down barricades” or assault? You decide!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1785583650916205023
If you were heading out to "dismantle barricades," would you reach for your baseball bat as the appropriate tool? Or might that be an indicator that these guys had something else in mind?
This HAS happened -- a bank robber is running down a sidewalk with a police officer chasing him and a random bystander tackles the guy and detains him until the officer can take custody of him. Is that assault?
Did the bystander slit the guy's throat? Bash his head in with a brick? Whether it's assault depends on something like the reasonable force standard.
Beating alleged trespassers with baseball bats and sending them to the hospital is not reasonable.
It’s pretty obviously not assault to disassemble a barricade.
Uh... the Israel sympathizers sent a bunch of protesters to the hospital in the course of "dismantling the barricades."
Nobody's upset about Tuesday night because of the attempted dismantling, so why do you guys keep talking about it? As a distraction to the
assault
is the obvious answer.This is perhaps the most plausibly accurate description I have seen: thinking back to the Charlottesville event of now-long-ago, reality and reports are two different creatures, with reality involving more tit-for-tat behavior than might be reported. Thinking back a more more to the end of the '60s and the start of the '70s, I recall that (a) we retreated from Vietnam, after (b) there was both campus protesting and police ineptitude/brutality... but only after (c) the publication of the Pentagon Papers which reminded us that (1) [as the cited Substack puts it] "In terms of the present war’s real-life impact on real-life people, the biggest thing happening is the brutal and repeated displacement and killing of civilians" and (2) government-actor motive -- and related propaganda -- is often political and unrelated to the human suffering.
Element (c)(2) should be obvious, yet it isn't and ultimately leads directly to (b). To get to (a), (c)(1) is necessary and (c)(1) typically originates not with protestors but instead with boots-on-the-ground forced to fight, ironically also due to (c)(2).
A long chain of reasoning for the west to wring its fingers and just let murderous kleptocrats take over. That’ll be better for ’em! “At least they’re alive!,” say people sitting safe and free in the west.
I don’t have a great solution. The Pax US on defeated countries has been in the hands of shitty politicians since the end of Korea, the last time it worked. Vietnam taught the dictator kleptocrats to hunker down until the US gets tired and takes its football home, then murder your way back into control and start building well-appointed palaces.
It's been tested successfully multiple times now.
The members of "Handbag Hamas" seem devastated that the rest of the world doesn't appreciate their efforts.
I personally like the name "Bottomless Mimosa Intifada".
I might just steal that!
:-0)
From the river to the sea
College tuition must be free
Oohh that's good, just needs slight alteration for regional variation:
From shining sea to shining sea
College tuition must be free
Ta!
There is no inherent constitutional right to camp on public property (at least not Park Service property, and the Park Service knows something about camping.)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/468/288/
If the rules against camping are neutral regulations of time, place and manner, then enforce them. If you don’t, just because you’re so full of empathy for the campers’ cause, then equal treatment would seem to require you to be similarly indulgent when someone representing a cause you dislike comes calling.
Clear out the impermissible campsites without waiting for it to escalate to further illicit behavior.
Camping! On public property! As part of a protest! The free speech absolutists are aghast and horrified!
Vandalism. Assault. Trespassing.
The Pro-Rape crowd are cheering them on!
You do realize bandying about 'pro rape' so often takes out any heat that accusation might have, and makes people wonder what's up with you?
Do you recall the statements, such as the Harvard Student Letter co-signed by 33 student groups, saying that the rapes and murders were entirely the fault of Israel?
Or the Cornell professor who said he found the violence, including the rapes, exhilarating?
You're massively generalizing, of course.
Nutpicking, one might say.
Wait'll you hear who gets blamed for tens of thousands of people killed directly by the IDF.
The pro-rape crowd are cheering on the counter-protesters who assaulted the encampent? Is that you? Are you pro-rape? As well as pro-war?
Just for the record, Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.
So? Why can't they have a ceasefire? (Like the one in effect on October 6th, some of us might point out.)
Because every time one is proposed, they reject it?
Nuke Gaza -- it worked with Japan.
Nuke Columbia
In previous threads, the suggestion to just use tear gas received a lot of pushback. And here's UCLA, using tear gas, you can see it live on twitter. Turns out the stuff is pretty effective.
Most of these goons aren't serious about this, they're just cosplaying as revolutionaries. The minute they face consequences for their actions, they'll decide there's other stuff they'd rather be doing.
That, or just give the Pumpkin Spice Intifada 6 months to find the newest "shiny" to chase after like a dog going after a bone.
Aw, they're harmless and silly! Also terrifying and threatening enough to demand tear gas! There's a familiar formulation.
Aw, Hamas hasn't raped and killed enough people to satisfy your bloodlust?
Nige made an argument based on your comment.
Rather than engaging you went with over -the-top insults and nothing more.
You're a small, shitty little man who seems pretty unable to actually debate things. You just want to call people you don't like names.
Pretty boring!
Hey, you're the one in favour of the conflict continuing, you're hungry for more and more murder and rape. At the same time, terrified of college kids in tents.
I predict UCLA will have problems with sick buildings over the next decade...
UCLA student blocked by pro-Palestine protesters from getting to class
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vek-84EL94o
The Chancellor was fine with this behavior, until some people took his inaction as an excuse to escalate. Sorry, you can't have "a place where our students, faculty and staff feel safe and, one day, connected again" where you allow people whose views you sympathize with to disrupt the school.
Oh and here is another incident that did not bother the Chancellor.
https://www.instagram.com/melissaschapman/reel/C6bDHWuutci/
Jewish girl at @ucla sent to the ER after being beaten unconscious by pro-Hamas protesters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forest
If a Jewish girl is beaten unconscious, but the media (and the university president!) refuse to report it, it's like it never happened.
And that is why the Jewish violence was necessary.
"Im ba l'hargekha, hashkem l'hargo"
-- Brachot 58a, 62b, citing Exodus 22.2
Hamas-Nazis, and their fevered/fervent supporters here, think that if they yell “Israel/Zionism/Jews are Nazis” loud enough, that people will believe them, and ignore that they are actually literally acting like Nazis.
Hopefully soon they’ll figure out that they’re on the wrong side of history. I won't hold my breath though. They seem to be impervious to reason.
Nazis were know for many things. Their encampments on local colleges was not one of them.
They were known for assaulting Jews, just like their followers at UCLA
Assaulting them was hardly the big thing they were known for. You just want to call people Nazis.
You also want to ignore the actual facts as laid out in the OP.
"Assaulting them was hardly the big thing they were known for."
???
Ever hear of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
In addition to burning & looting, there were lots & lots of assaults.
"Deportations" and "concentration camps" came much later.
So you think Kristallnacht was the big thing Nazis were known for re: the Jews?
Also what with your posting of VDARE all the time, you have any sense of what they think about Jews vs those race scientist Nazis?
"So you think Kristallnacht was the big thing Nazis were known for re: the Jews?"
It's a big thing the Nazis are known for. This "hey, they're not loading them into boxcars and gassing them by the millions, so what's the big deal?" isn't a good look, Sarcastro.
Not what he said, but a bit rich from people who claim that if the Israelis really wanted to commit genocide they'd be better at it.
Wow, TiP, remarkably shitty strawman.
lol it's literally one of the main pages in the Holocaust Encyclopedia and prominently mention in the Nazi wikipedia
KRISTALLNACHT
On November 9–10, 1938, Nazi leaders unleashed a series of pogroms against the Jewish population in Germany and recently incorporated territories. This event came to be called Kristallnacht (The Night of Broken Glass) because of the shattered glass that littered the streets after the vandalism and destruction of Jewish-owned businesses, synagogues, and homes.
KEY FACTS
1
Nazi officials disguised the organized nature of the pogroms. They described the actions as justifiable and spontaneous responses of the German population to the assassination of a German diplomatic official, Ernst vom Rath, in Paris. This unprecedented violence against the Reich’s Jews generated international outrage.
2
During the pogrom, View This Term in the Glossary some 30,000 Jewish males were rounded up and taken to concentration camps. This was the first time Nazi officials made massive arrests of Jews specifically because they were Jews, without any further cause for arrest.
3
In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, the Nazi regime ordered the Jewish community to pay a 1 billion Reichsmark “atonement tax” and rapidly enacted many anti-Jewish laws and edicts.
Persecution of Jews
Further information: Anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Nazi Germany
Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses, April 1933. The posters say "Germans! Defend yourselves! Don't buy from Jews!"
Discrimination against Jews began immediately after the seizure of power. Following a month-long series of attacks by members of the SA on Jewish businesses and synagogues, on 1 April 1933 Hitler declared a national boycott of Jewish businesses.[283] The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service passed on 7 April forced all non-Aryan civil servants to retire from the legal profession and civil service.[284] Similar legislation soon deprived other Jewish professionals of their right to practise, and on 11 April a decree was promulgated that stated anyone who had even one Jewish parent or grandparent was considered non-Aryan.[285] As part of the drive to remove Jewish influence from cultural life, members of the National Socialist German Students' League removed from libraries any books considered un-German, and a nationwide book burning was held on 10 May.[286]
The regime used violence and economic pressure to encourage Jews to leave the country voluntarily.[287] Jewish businesses were denied access to markets, forbidden to advertise, and deprived of access to government contracts. Citizens were harassed and subjected to violent attacks.[288] Many towns posted signs forbidding entry to Jews.[289]
On 7 November 1938 a young Jewish man, Herschel Grynszpan, shot and killed Ernst vom Rath, a legation secretary at the German embassy in Paris, to protest his family's treatment in Germany. This incident provided the pretext for a pogrom the Nazis incited against the Jews two days later. Members of the SA damaged or destroyed synagogues and Jewish property throughout Germany. At least 91 German Jews were murdered during this pogrom, later called Kristallnacht, the Night of Broken Glass.[290][291] Further restrictions were imposed on Jews in the coming months – they were forbidden to own businesses or work in retail shops, drive cars, go to the cinema, visit the library, or own weapons, and Jewish pupils were removed from schools. The Jewish community was fined one billion marks to pay for the damage caused by Kristallnacht and told that any insurance settlements would be confiscated.[292] By 1939, around 250,000 of Germany's 437,000 Jews had emigrated to the United States, Argentina, Great Britain, Palestine, and other countries.[293][294] Many chose to stay in continental Europe. Emigrants to Palestine were allowed to transfer property there under the terms of the Haavara Agreement, but those moving to other countries had to leave virtually all their property behind, and it was seized by the government.[294]
---
so yes, in preventing Jews from attending classes the protesters are literally re-enacting actual prominent Nazi policies
Y'all pretend 'the big thing' is 'a big thing' so you can call me a Nazi.
How pathetic.
Has anyone checked how anti-war dissent is being treated in Israel?
Since there are Jews among the protesters, the counter-protesters must be Nazis, since they launched the biggest and most violent assault.
We saw this during the BLM/antifa riots. The reason we have police is that without them doing their job, people will feel compelled to settle disputes on their own in arbitrary, often violent and deadly ways. And the predictable result of Mayors declaring entire swaths of their cities as "No Law Enforcement" areas was that they became areas of No Law.
And as a result many people were shot.
Perhaps the only thing more perfidious than these officials shedding their tears when their self-created lawless zones turned violent was the often cynical followup attempts to punish people for breaking laws they had signaled wouldn't be enforced.
The university haters offended by disruption to the universities they hate! Free speech absolutists who demand protests be supressed! Brave believers in the second amendment, implict supporters of violent revolution, calling for the full force of the state to be brought to bear for tents and a building occupation!
So it took this esteemed Chancellor seven paragraphs to acknowledge this little factoid, which - I don’t know, seems like it could be been the lead paragraph:
“In the end, the encampment on Royce Quad was both unlawful and a breach of policy. It led to unsafe conditions on our campus and it damaged our ability to carry out our mission. It needed to come to an end.”
No, dude. Not “in the end,” In the beginning. Follow the law and follow your own policies and this whole mess could have been avoided.
Reminds me of Kenosha where the City and County of Kenosha and the State of Wisconsin refused to maintain order. Had they executed their primary duty, young Rittenhouse likely wouldn't have been patrolling the streets with that rifle.
Yes. Exactly.
You beat me to it. The same thing happened in Austin:
https://reason.com/2020/07/27/the-libertarian-party-mourns-garrett-foster-activist-killed-at-a-black-lives-matter-protest/
So many people picking sides there when the simple fact was that Foster and his killer were the natural, predictable consequence of officially sanctioned lawlessness.
I remember that article.
At the time, I believed it was printed too soon.
Trump supporters have thoughts about the sanctity of rules and the law.
Hamas supporters have thoughts about more Jewish students being assaulted.
The Jewish students among the protesters? So now you’re claiming the counter-protesters support Hamas?
it's been independently confirmed Trump asked for the National Guard, despite media lies
and hey, what happened to that pipe bomb with the kitchen timer that was coincidentally found by an FBI contractor that just got a big contract award? weird how FBI suddenly lost the cell phone tracking data they were able to use to have BOA illegally provide info on every other protester
almost like it was a false flag op being run by the same guy who brought us the Whitmer fednapping
SOROS? Is this 'same guy' SOROS?
I'll bet it's SOROS.
The fuck are you on about? You voted for a sleazy crook. Puts the kibosh on your appeals to being tough on violations of rules in order to suppress a protest.
oh no there are muted comments
sadly I’ll never get to see them
but here's something to upset them further
The number of anomalies surrounding this still unsolved case continues to grow. These include:
The failure of the Secret Service detail assigned to Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris, who was inside DNC headquarters when the bomb was discovered, to find the device before her visit.
The fact that the bomb at RNC headquarters was discovered by a government contractor with ties to the FBI.
That law enforcement officials repeatedly described the bombs as “highly dangerous” but also said they couldn’t have detonated on their own because of their cheap kitchen timers.
That cell phone data that might help locate the perpetrator has been deemed corrupted.
That the FBI’s geofence warrant to obtain cell phone data from Google gives no indication the warrant included the Capitol Hill neighborhood on the night of Jan. 5 – the time and location the pipe bombs were apparently planted.
That the FBI assistant director leading the stalled investigation had previously been in charge of the investigation into a kidnap plot against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in which the bureau tried to get alleged conspirators to build bombs.
That an FBI whistleblower has testified he was told the bombs were inoperable – a claim that seems supported by video showing authorities allowing children to cross the street toward the DNC bomb after it was discovered.
I think the slow response by law enforcement is due to the UCPD has primary responsibility for campus security, and the LAPD provides support under a UCPD incident commander. That interagency response where the primary law enforcement doesn’t had the resources to handle the situation on its own and needs support before it moves in necessarily takes time that a response to a traffic accident doesn’t doesn’t require, and expecting immediate succor isn’t possible.
Of course basically telling the LAPD “stay off campus until we need you”, didn’t help either.
But I really like the first sentence:
"Our community is in deep pain."
That may be legal — unlike private universities, most state school police departments are legally considered MUNICIPAL police departments with primary jurisdiction over campus.
Or as one police officer explained it to me, a town police officer going onto campus is the same thing as the town police officer going into another town — he doesn’t have jurisdiction UNLESS that town requests mutual aid, and then it is under the orders of that town’s chief.
The state police have jurisdiction statewide, hence CHIPs could go arrest someone on campus, the LAPD likely *can’t* unless the campus police ask them to. Now they can show up, like any citizen can, and stand ready to be asked, but LIKELY NOTHING MORE.
It’s like Jan 6th and the USCP having jurisdiction on capitol hill, with the DC Metro police having to be ASKED to help.
NB: This depends on what California law says, I presume it is similar to Massachusetts law in this regard.
Its absolutely legal, nobody is questioning the authority of University of California police, on the University of California Los Angeles campus.
I'm merely pointing out the difficulty when the first responder with primary responsibility has to request aid but retains command and control.
For once I'm not just talking out my ass, I was contracted to analyze and gather requirements for a future emergency management command and control system at Homeland Security's Topoff2(Top Officials) dirty bomb exercise for staged in the city of Seattle in 2003.
I know everything there is to know about emergency management that you can learn in a 3 month contract assignment.
It's why you have a shared command.
Shared command is the same as saying no command.
But if I were you I'd just worry about the tent stakes.
Shared command seems to be working in Baltimore....
somehow Texas and Florida have none of these problems
Seems like the perfect time for EV to move on.
"We will also continue to investigate the violent incidents of the past several days, especially Tuesday night's horrific attack by a mob of instigators."
This is unmitigated (but typical) bullshyte. The left can be as violent as it wants to be (e.g. knocking Jews unconscious) but when the victims fight back -- that won't be tolerated.
The concept of equality before the law has become a joke.
No, your unconsciousness incident happened after the pro-Israel counterprotesters sent a bunch of pro-Palestinian kids to the hospital.
So I guess by your logic, it was the Jewish girl who deserved what she got. Right?
His unconsciousness incident, (She just spontaneously passed out, yeah, that's the ticket!) happened on the 30th of May. The counter-protest you're complaining about was a day or two later.
Probably the 30th of April? Or did it happen last year?
Yeah, Tuesday, April 30th:
https://www.news9live.com/videos/world-videos/ucla-protests-jewish-student-beaten-unconscious-by-pro-palestine-protesters-video-2519144
There was sporadic fighting over the weekend, as was to be expected since the protesters were not remotely as peaceful as some would like to pretend. Duh, that's why she got beaten! But the real counter-protest violence began on Wednesday:
Fighting breaks out at UCLA as counter-protesters confront pro-Palestinian encampment
A bunch of (some billionaire-funded incidentally, outside agitators!) counter-protesters turn up to pick fights and aha! Not as peaceful as they pretend!
So, even then, not exactly a spontaneous response, but retroactively adding an inciting incident to justify their violence.
Why do you lie, all the time?
He wants to write SOMETHING and knowing what he's writing about is marginally important to him.
Lynching logic.
(I doubt Ed will even disagree.)
just wait until a protester in an Approved Victim Group dies of a adrenal paraganglioma while being restrained
"However, arson, vandalism, and looting that occurred between May 26 and June 8 caused approximately $1–2 billion in insured damages nationally, the highest recorded damage from civil disorder in U.S. history, and surpassing the record set during the 1992 Los Angeles riots."
records are made to be broken
You're right. They should probably de-escalate rather than risk sparking off a summer of protest.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/05/02/university-of-minnesota-protests-divestment-agreement
"Organizers of pro-Palestinian protests at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus and university leadership announced Thursday morning that they’ve reached an agreement to end the dayslong encampment on Northrop Mall."
See also University of Rochester, Rutgers, Brown.
Probably others.
"And we received an amazing email, basically stating that five out of six of our demands would be met,” said Fae Hodges, a member of Students for a Democratic Society. "
1. SDS! 1960s LARPing! Bill Ayers spoke to the Chicago Hamasniks too. When does the bombing campaign begin?
2. Problem with paying the Danegeld is you cannot then get rid of the Danes.
"In return, the agreement states, protest organizers won’t disrupt final exams that start Thursday, or commencement activities over the next couple of weeks."
Nice commencement you have planned, pity anything happens to it.
Yes, Bob we are all aware you just want blood.
Yes, Sarcasto we are all aware you just want surrender.
There has not been any "blood" from the [belated] police arrests. Minor injuries because the Hamasniks [ineffectively] fight back You are just a chicken little.
'Surrender!' Students might be in a building for a few more days! The Republic crumbles!
2. The universities should remember that when they try to appease right-wing extremists demands to crack down on student protests.
Such a bunch of quivering cowards. Oh no! The students are in a building! Crush them!
they don't mind, they're paying the Danegeld with your money
"In 2021, about 174.9 billion U.S. dollars were funded by the government for postsecondary education programs in the United States.Jun 2, 2023"
just wait for the lawsuits, they'll be throwing settlements at the Hamas protesters faster than the Lafayette Square protesters who tried to burn down a church
---
Today, the Department of Justice announced that it has reached an agreement to settle claims in four civil cases arising from the June 1, 2020, law enforcement response to racial justice demonstrations in Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C.
As part of the settlement, the United States Park Police (USPP) and the United States Secret Service (USSS) agreed to update and clarify their policies governing demonstrations, and to implement the policy changes within 30 days of today’s settlement. The plaintiffs, Black Lives Matter D.C. and individuals who attended the protests, agreed to dismiss their claims for equitable relief against the United States.
Changes to the agency’s policies include more specific requirements for visible identification of officers, limits on the use of non-lethal force and procedures to facilitate safe crowd dispersal.
“The federal government is committed to the highest standards for protecting civil rights and civil liberties in any federal law enforcement response to public demonstrations,” said Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta. “These changes to agency policies for protest responses will strengthen our commitment to protecting and respecting constitutionally protected rights.”
“From the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to the White House sidewalk, the National Park Service takes immense pride in caring for some of our nation’s most storied civic spaces,” said Director Chuck Sams of the National Park Service. “We hope this updated policy can serve as a model for others to uphold civil rights and facilitate safe demonstrations. It is good for the public and good for our officers. The United States Park Police is committed to ensuring people can gather safely to express our most fundamental and cherished right to free speech. This updated policy is designed to be accessible and understandable to both our officers and the public, further strengthening that commitment.”
So anyone who wants an audience with the board of regents should set up an illegal encampment? Or are these protesters getting special treatment?
Oh, my god. With the exception of religion, you're totally allowed to get favorable treatment based on your viewpoint. Otherwise, the government wouldn't even be able to do a job interview legally. This isn't communism. We capitalists realize that the world isn't zero-sum.
I’m not sure what this means. Per Sarcastro’s link above, the protesters are getting an audience with the board or regents, plus leniency, in exchange for removing their illegal encampments.
Is this deal available to any students who set up an illegal encampment? If not, why are these students special?
No, and, presumably because the administration found the demands reasonable in this case.
You're reduced to complaining that handling things on a case by case basis and sometimes not bringing in the cops to knock heads came out OK.
Because of some hypothetical future double standards.
As I said, you demonstrate again and again how much you don't want an end to this campus chaos. Or at least no end without bloodshed.
Do you expect there will be an epidemic of encampments for other issues at these campuses soon or are you just said at the lack of blood and pain for the bad guys and this is the best way you could find to look less like you were pouting for a crackdown?
No I don't expect an epidemic because they are 99% theatre, less than 1% results.
Most of them don't even know what they demonstrating for, I'll bet most of their college education funds aren't divested from Israel either.
This is by all accounts actually a cause these student believe in, don’t pretend otherwise without some information.
Are there some non students? Certainly; with the arrests we shall see how many. But the idea this is some ‘I just love a good protest encampment’ requires more support than nothing.
So much the worse for them, then. I'd rather have students stupidly cosplaying terrorist allies for giggles, than actually BEING terrorist allies.
Yeah, like all those anti-war demonstrators who were objectively pro-Saddam, didn't they know the grown-ups were in charge?
You mean the "Anti-War Demonstrators" that mysteriously disappeared once Obama was in office and started droning American citizens?
LOL
Yeah where were the protesters like 6 years after the wars started?
You're dumb as a box of rocks.
The anti-war demonstrators. The ones who were proved to be absolutely and completely correct about everything. Like these guys will. While the pro-war crowd caused needless death and suffering and spending on a vast scale, and all for nothing. Like the people calling these kids 'pro Hamas' will.
Or maybe your definition of terrorist allies is way overbroad and not operable outside bubbles like here.
I disagree with these students and that’s where it ends. Disagree with Brett and it ends in telepathic findings of bad faith end evil.
For many in here this is just another wedge issue for outrage farming at this point. It’s sad really.
Your definition is artificially narrow and obtuse. They don't have to have Hamas ID cards to be allied with Hamas, they just need to be supporting them, and that they are.
Saying protesting Israeli policies means you're with Hamas, eh?
You're really quite the authoritarian every single time it's tested.
How about the protestors chanting "We are Hamas" or "Remember the 7th of October!"?
Why are you such a liar?
""We are Hamas!" one aggressive protester
Another person could be heard calling, "Long live Hamas!"
A woman in a Keffiyeh shouted at a pro-Israel activist "We are Hamas,"
"Remember the 7th of October!" shouted a man with a red keffiyeh
"Never forget the 7th of October," said another masked man
Don't use the plural when you are nutpicking like that, you liar.
"Don’t use the plural when you are nutpicking like that, you liar."
5 different people. Is not that "plural"?
Is your point that unless every single person yells something one cannot say "protestors"?
5 individuals accross 2 different schools.
TiP said: "How about the protestors chanting “We are Hamas” or “Remember the 7th of October!”?
No chanting, and each of those were single protesters.
Bob, know you think lying for political gain is a clever virtue, but you didn't do a very good job of defending it here.
You can say what you like, you were going to say it anyway.
They just have to oppose your war. That's it. That's enough. We've seen this all before.
VIDEO: Jewish UCLA Student Says Pro-Hamas Encampment Was Never Peaceful, Calls Out School's Antisemitism
"Al-Qassam you make us proud! Kill another soldier now!
Yeah, they're not allies of Hamas. Tell another one.
One person talks to redstate, and a badly framed video with like 13 people in it?
All you're doing is showing what a low bar it takes for you to call people terrorist sympathizers.
That is the inability to deal with disagreement and censoriousness I've come to expect from you.
Evidence, what point does it have? None in conversations with you.
If the best evidence you have is remarkably non-probative, that may be a sign your position is not evidence-based.
I've got better evidence than you. Where are your videos of the protesters chanting, "Love and Peace, that's all we want!"?
No, they actually are supporting Hamas. That's inconvenient for you, so you have to dismiss any evidence confirming it.
Your thesis is that these protesters - all of them - may be generally referred to as 'terrorist allies.'
Your evidence is one student who ran to redstate and an out of context video of like 13 people.
That is nowhere near the kind of evidence you need to support your thesis.
Presumably this is the best you have. Which shows you do not actually need support for your thesis.
You just want to call these people terrorists supporters.
My thesis is that damned few people took part in that protest not knowing that it was a pro-Hamas protest, and those few likely got out early once they looked around and saw what was going on. It's not like a one day protest where you're going to have a large percentage of people in the dark about what's going on, by the time an event like this has been going several days, everybody knows what's up.
You are really desperate to deny what the protesters were actually saying, to the point of absurdity. No matter how many times it gets documented, you just blow it off.
Your definition of a 'pro-Hamas protest' grows from almost nothing, and you've made it into a nationwide blanket.
All part and parcel of you (and authoritarians in general) being unable to deal with people being wrong without accusing them of bad faith and-or evil.
'My thesis is that damned few people took part in that protest not knowing that it was a pro-Hamas protest'
They probably weren't at all worried about how you would predictably equate an anti-war protest with terrorism - in fact, nobody expected anything else of the right.
So here we have the usual right-wing overdetermined wankfest.
The protesters aren't real
The protesters are mostly nonstudents so they don't count.
The protesters are real but don't know what they're protesting.
The protesters are real and know what they're protesting, which makes them all Hamas supporters.
No evidence for any of it. It's like a choose your own adventure for shallow right-wing outrage.
For those at all interested:
More than a quarter of protesters arrested Tuesday at Columbia University and 60 percent of those arrested at the City College of New York had no connections to the institutions, according to data from the New York Police Department.
So mostly students at Columbia, but certainly plenty of interested parties circling for opportunity.
"Do you expect there will be an epidemic of encampments for other issues at these campuses soon or are you just said at the lack of blood and pain..."
Doesn't it suck when a typo ruins your shitpost?
So what's the policy for students who break rules and disturb the operation of the universities above? Will they be uniformly and equally punished, uniformly and equally rewarded, or rewarded or punished based on arbitrary criteria?
I would think we prefer the first; that the school articulates clear rules with clear consequences for violating them.
But your article above seems to foreclose that option, so I'm wondering what the rules are going forward.
If Jewish students, or BLM students, set up illegal encampments, should they expect leniency and an audience with the board of regents or suspension?
If Jewish students set up an encampment and are suspended, that would rightly raise questions about whether or not they were suspended because they were Jewish, no?
Arbitrary state action is never good, and I'm not sure why you're in such a hurry to endorse it, Sarcastro.
Given examples of encampments that were deescalated and ended without any need for force, you complain.
And what a weak-ass complaint. There are insufficient national standards for encampments? That stupid on a number of levesl to the point it looks like bad faith.
Your unhappiness with the problem being solved peaceably shows what you want out of this, and it's not a peaceful solution. Which leaves bloodshed or eternal chaos.
How shitty of you!
“Will they be uniformly and equally punished, uniformly and equally rewarded, or rewarded or punished based on arbitrary criteria?”
of course not, the criteria will be carefully filtered through Marxist dialectic and intersectional victim theories
with the natural result that primarily Republicans will be prosecuted
just like with all our other laws, such as for classified information or bribery or trespassing
for all we know many of these protesters could be elderly people with poor memories, who might appear sympathetic to juries
Marxist dialectic
When you truly know what you're talking about.
How DARE they think they're worthy of the attention those hallowed institutions! Presumption!
Those “fights” made a baseball fight look like Verdun. Should have called some soccer hooligans to spice them up. IOW where was Crocodile Dundee when you needed him. The ISIS bride wannabees wouldn't have last 15 minutes with Dick Daley's '68 Chicago squad.
Soros DAs are already signaling none of the left-wing protesters will be prosecuted
meanwhile the FBI is still sending SWAT teams after people who spent 15 seconds peacefully protesting election fraud in the Capitol on Jan 6
weirdly none of the students have been shot or beaten to death like Ashli Babbitt and Roseanne Boyland, despite lots of broken windows and trespassing
this country is at its lowest point since Reconstruction-era Democrats openly lynched Republicans because they knew no Democrat would prosecute them
just watch, right-wing counter-protesters will soon be subjected to the same unconstitutional campaign of lawfare as the current Republican nominee
at some point we effectively lost the Civil War and are now being governed by a party bent on the utter destruction of its enemies at any cost -- to save democracy!
Fuck yeah SOROS! has arrived!
It's not our fault Soros looked at the worst "Jewish banker" stereotype, and decided to be that guy in real life. It's not like you have to ignore evil financiers if they inconveniently happen to be Jewish.
He actually DID finance a whole bunch of radical DA candidates flying under the radar, who are now refusing to prosecute cases based on ideological criteria. Doesn't really matter how inconvenient that reality is, he actually, really did it.
Naw, it is your fault you lot are deep into rewarmed antisemetic puppetmaster conspiracy theories focused on this one Jew.
I'll have to remember this principle: If I ever decide to head up an international criminal conspiracy, if I get a fat white cat and pet it regularly, I'll be untouchable on account of being a movie stereotype.
I mean, that's the reasoning here: You've got a guy who really does fund evil shit, but we're not allowed to notice because of his religion.
He's a Jewish financier so he must be funding evil? I mean, come on. You gravitate towards this automatically.
lol the whole point was that HE IS FUNDING EVIL
"In total, Soros has spent more than $40 million in direct campaign spending to get prosecutors elected. His spending campaigns were so aggressive that from 2018 to 2021, he spent $13 million in just ten races. In each race, he was by far the largest single booster and, in some"
Soros prosecutors are now refusing to prosecute crimes against anti-Jewish rioters, which is almost as ironic as Gays For Palestine
I'm sorry, you haven't identified anything evil, even in your barer assertions.
"He’s a Jewish financier so he must be funding evil?"
No, he's funding evil, and the fact that he's a Jewish financier doesn't obligate us to ignore it.
You haven't identified anything that's evil - other than his Jewishness? - and of course *you single him out* of many billionaires spending their money to shape society and politics however they please.
Brett, people in this thread are just invoking Soros without any actual evidence.
You act like they're not just making things up. They are.
A conspiracy theory falling into antisemetic tropes aimed at a Jew. That's what you are defending.
Sarcastr0, your being in denial about something that’s so well documented people don’t feel the need to document it yet again doesn’t make it untrue.
George Soros’ quiet overhaul of the U.S. justice system
After that he really opened up the spigot.
Follow the Money: Mapping Soros Prosecutor Funding
Washington Post Fact-Checker Should Try Checking Facts About Soros Prosecutors
"After a successful Soros-funded (or “backed,” if you prefer Mr. Kessler’s “technically true” term) test run in 2015 to unseat incumbent district attorneys who supported the death penalty, Mr. Soros and other far-left donors poured money into a nationwide effort.
Pouring money into dozens of PACs and other organizations, their goal was to elect prosecutors who would not only oppose the death penalty but also would oppose bail, water down felony charges, target police, refuse to prosecute most misdemeanors and embrace other radical reforms. These funding practices have been anything but transparent.
Mr. Soros has directly contributed over $40 million to campaigns and candidates over the past decade. But he has also contributed hundreds of millions of dollars more to organizations that directly and indirectly support the progressive prosecutor movement.
Local district attorney races had tended to be relatively low-visibility and low-dollar affairs. That changed in 2015 when Mr. Soros began pouring seven-plus-figure sums into those contests.
According to New York Times writer Emily Bazelon, the goal was to “change who occupies the prosecutor’s office [in order to] make the system operate differently.” Or, as liberal law professor Rachel Barkow put it, “to reverse engineer and dismantle the criminal justice infrastructure.”
In many of these races, the Soros donations—including those funneled through “independent” PACs—constitute most of the money “raised” by the candidates. In some cases, it has accounted for 70%-80% of their campaign funds."
And, yes, he's funding the encampments, too.
“At three colleges, the protests are being encouraged by paid radicals who are “fellows” of a Soros-funded group called the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR).”
“USCPR provides up to $7,800 for its community-based fellows.”
“It has three “fellows” who have been major figures in the nationwide protest movement.”
It increasingly looks like you only read headlines now, Brett.
The conspiracies in this thread are not true. You link to something that doesn't say what it promises (standard for NY Post) .
And a spittle-flecked screed from Heritage that just says "moneymoneymonemoneyevilmoney"
What's the problem with any of that? Billionaires are allowed, nay, obliged to influence the democratic processes in ways non-billionaires cannot, that's just capitalism. You and your ilk just single out the Jewish guy.
I mean, Soros funded 3 people. Brett: "he’s funding the encampments, too."
Okay or not, he's not doing what they say he's doing.
Soros is a tin-foil hat cliche at this point.
'It’s not our fault Soros looked at the worst “Jewish banker” stereotype, and decided to be that guy in real life.'
He's to blame for all the anti-semitism directed at him! Wow.
A lot of people finance a lot of things. There's a reason you all just always say SorosSorosSoros. A billionaire guy literally helped fund the counterprotests, others were organised by extremist Christians who think it's all biblical prophecy. But SorosSorosSoros. And 'outside agitators, but not those guys.'
TallDave, your post is unfortunately too stupid to rebut.
Do you actually think that garbage or are you just trollishly copy-pasting from your favorite 8chan channel?
Is the community really in deep pain, or only those whose job is PR?
1% of the student body was affected. At a nearby high school there was a minor incident that caused agonized spewing of hatred from adults. I asked a student if she had heard about it. No. (Somebody drew a swastika on a bathroom wall and levelled up his troll skill.)
It’s amazing how these coddled students are simultaneously getting away with (figuratively) murder without consequences while at the same time getting arrested in their hundreds by tooled-up cops. The impotent rage of the right will always be an impotent rage even when it gets what it wants, because it's locked in this state of endless self-contradiction, primarily used to bully their way through aguments, but imprinting in their brains as reality.
The chancellor recklessly allowed a nationally-coordinated, pro-Hamas, anti-Semitic, anti-American, leftist political faction to encamp at UCLA and foment tensions until a foreseeable hours-long riot broke out with an attack by an opposing faction. He is directly at fault for it, and his statement is worthless.