The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
A Fourth Antitrust Shoe Drops, on Apple This Time
Episode 498 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The Biden administration has been aggressively pursuing antitrust cases against Silicon Valley giants like Amazon, Google, and Facebook. This week it was Apple's turn. The Justice Department (joined by several state AGs) filed a gracefully written complaint accusing Apple of improperly monopolizing the market for "performance smartphones." This questionable market definition will be a weakness for the government throughout the case, but the complaint does a good job of identifying ways in which Apple has built a moat around its business without an obvious benefit for its customers. The complaint focuses on Apple's discouraging of multipurpose apps and cloud streaming games, its lack of message interoperability, the tying of Apple watches to the iPhone to make switching to Android expensive, and its insistence on restricting digital wallets on its platform. This lawsuit will continue well into the next presidential administration, so much depends on the outcome of the election this fall.
Volt Typhoon is still in the news, Andrew Adams tells us, as the government continues to sound the alarm about Chinese intent to ravage American critical infrastructure in the event of a conflict. Water systems are getting most of the attention this week. I can't help wondering how we expect the understaffed and under-resourced water and sewage companies in this country to defeat sophisticated state-sponsored attackers. This leads Cristin and me to a discussion of how the SEC's pursuit of CISO Tim Brown and its demands for more security disclosures will improve the country's cybersecurity. Short answer: It won't.
Cristin covers the legislative effort to force a divestiture of Tiktok. The bill has gone to the Senate, where it is moving slowly, if at all. Speaking as a parent of teenagers and voters, Cristin is not surprised. Meanwhile, the House has sent a second bill to the Senate by a unanimous vote. This one would block data brokers from selling American's data to foreign adversaries. Andrew notes that the House bill covers data brokers. Other data moguls, like Google and Apple, would face a similar restriction under a new executive order, so the government will have multiple opportunities over the next few months to deal with Chinese access to American personal data.
In the wake of the Murthy argument looking at the first amendment and administration efforts to increase social media censorship of mostly right-wing posts, Andrew reports that the FBI has resumed its outreach to social media companies, at least where it identifies foreign influence campaigns. Meanwhile, the FDA, which piled on to criticize ivermectin advocates, has withdrawn its dubious and condescending tweets.
Finally, Cristin reports on the spyware agreement sponsored by the United States. It has collected several new supporters. Whether this will reduce spyware installations or simply change the countries that supply the spyware remains to be seen.
You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@gmail.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug! The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
At Securium Solutions, we understand that in today’s digital landscape, network security is paramount. Our company is dedicated to providing comprehensive, cutting-edge solutions to protect your network infrastructure from ever-evolving cyber threats.
https://securiumsolutions.com/risk-assessment-services/vapt-service/network-security/
This lawsuit will continue well into the next presidential administration, so much depends on the outcome of the election this fall.
This seems like a statement that's worth unpacking. In what way is the antitrust case against Apple a partisan issue? In other areas of antitrust, the interesting thing is that the fault lines run within both major parties, not between them. But if this Apple case is as strong as you say, why would any President shut it down?
Trump generally cut back antitrust enforcement severely and curtailed several DoJ antitrust efforts. He's pro-monopoly, which should come as no surprise.
As opposed to turning loose thousands of regulators to take expensive pot shots at everything, until donations start to flow into the pockets of the politicians holding the leashes, I suppose, as this is the evolved version of corruption plaguing humanity worldwide and through all history.
Or the contributions flow to the pols who will protect monopolies. Pick a fucking side.
With regards to messaging interoperability Apple is in a corner here as their famous white text on green background violates their own rules regarding allowed contrast by a considerable margin. This impacts the user experience simply by making the text hard to read and is done to discourage use of a non Apple phone to message an Apple phone
Even if your claim were true — and I assure you that it is not hard to read SMS messages on iPhones — your conclusion makes no sense. How does making it harder for an iPhone reader to read an SMS message discourage the non-iPhone reader from sending it?
(The DOJ's claim is so weak that it had to argue that there's a social stigma attached to the green messages, and that's the basis for the antitrust violation.)
Hard to find the link.
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/steptoecyber/The_Cyberlaw_Podcast_498.mp3?dest-id=187494