The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My Move to the Hoover Institution
Next year, I'll become a Professor of Law Emeritus at UCLA School of Law, after 30 years of teaching, and move (effective July 1, 2024) to the Hoover Institution at Stanford, where I'll be a Senior Fellow—essentially like a permanent, tenured research faculty position, but with no teaching obligations.
Technically, I'll be "retiring" from UCLA. But at the ripe old age of 56, I will not be at all retiring from scholarship—I'll just be doing the same sort of research, public commentary (of course, including blogging), and occasional litigation as I have been doing at UCLA, but with more institutional support. Until June 30, 2024, I will be a Visiting Fellow at Hoover, while I finish my full-time obligations to UCLA.
Hoover is a think tank on the Stanford campus; it is a unit of Stanford University, but has a great deal of independence, as well as its own Board of Overseers (and its own endowment). Its current director is Condoleezza Rice, who is a Stanford professor and former Stanford provost, National Security Advisor, and Secretary of State. Past Senior Fellows have included the Nobel-winning economists Milton Friedman and Gary Becker, as well as George Shultz, who had been a professor at MIT and Chicago before serving as Secretary of Labor, of the Treasury, and of State. Hoover Senior Fellows today include, among others, many leading economists, historians, political scientists, national security scholars, and other academics, including law professors Richard Epstein, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Kessler, and Michael McConnell.
I will continue to have complete academic freedom and security of employment (provided for expressly by the Hoover faculty contract, the same way as it is by Stanford for its tenured faculty members). As to this blog, this of course also means continued editorial independence, which I care about very much.
I expect I'll probably feel pretty much at home ideologically at Hoover, which is on balance an institution of the center-right. Naturally, I'm sure that there will be much my colleagues and I will disagree on, as there of course has been at UCLA—but that is the nature of a healthy academic institution. (For whatever it's worth, my sense is that the median ideological views at Hoover are much closer to the median American voter than are the median ideological views at the median top 20 U.S. law school.)
The important point is that I'll be able to write and say what I think is right, regardless of whether I'm mostly, partly, or not at all in step with my colleagues or the administration. I much look forward to this next chapter of my academic life.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You will be great! I know that already, Professor Volokh. Mazel Tov!
I have long followed Professor Volokh. I am not surprised and am pleased at this next move in his professional life. Hoover, though not the only enclave of classical liberal/libertarians, is a proper home for one of America's greatest legal authorities on freedom of speech and defenders thereof.
Hoover? Libertarians?
Disingenuous right-wingers walking around in garish, unconvincing libertarian drag are among my favorite culture war casualties.
Mazel tov!
BTW please don't fall into Richard Epstein's trap of believing that legal expertise translates to scientific expertise.
Yup. Has echoes of of Dr. Scott Atlas, a former Stanford Medicine professor and a fine radiologist who, with no particular communicative disease or immunology knowledge or experience, dove into Covid conspiracy theory and became Trump's second-most trusted Covid advisor (second to whack economist, Peter Navarro).
How about George Schultz and Theranos?
Example please. I follow Epstein and don't recall him claiming expertise in science. He does ask very good questions though.
The original article: https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-pandemic
His updated article: https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-perspective-revised
The funny thing is that in the former article he says "My original erroneous estimate of 5,000 dead in the US is a number ten times smaller than I intended to state, " when initially he'd come up with 500 (!!) and then revised it to 5,000, pleading arithmetical error.
He is no expert at model-building, still less at model validation.
Yes, he made a mistake. He admitted as such.
Don't see a lot of that.
Was he claiming expert status at the time?
Is he claiming expert status in other pieces?
Is having an opinion or asking skeptical question equal claiming expert status?
Congratulations. You'll be a perfect fit.
Wow, that's a big life change. Congrats! Will this require a physical move up to No Cal? Or, is this new gig something you will do remotely, from your existing VC headquarters (lair??) here in the Los Angeles area?
(If you do move up to Silicon Valley; maybe ask the tech gurus up there to fix the horrible new pop-up ads here inside Reason.) 🙂
I'll indeed be moving up to Palo Alto in mid-2024, after nearly 50 years in L.A.
Probably unavoidable if you’re to cultivate the requisite animosity for Orin’s tribe and locale, leading up to the annual Big Game watching party, which I assume was the whole point of this exercise.
Welcome to Palo Alto! I'm sure you will "feel pretty much at home ideologically at Hoover" but maybe not so much on the rest of the campus, or around town...
CONGRATS!
If I need to describe you now, I say "a law school professor". What phrase works next year? "A fellow says there is too much pseudonymous litigation in federal court"?
The best phrase to describe Eugene (IMHO) would be "a math wunderkind who should have stuck with math for his career".
Why? Did he, in your opinion, make such a poor lawyer / law-professor?
I suspect your comment has something to do with Prof. Volokh's politics (which you don't like).
I wonder if him being "a math wunderkind" had something to do with his politics. Compare John Derbyshire. I wonder if there's a predictable tendency here, something like: it's hard to combine having a passion for (or even just a solid grasp of?) math with having your head in the clouds.
No, it has nothing to do with Eugene's politics. It's just that the worst mathematician is still better for the world (IMHO) than the best lawyer, and Eugene could probably have been one of the best mathematicians (or applied-math-guys, or transitioned into computational genomics or computational chemistry as many great mathematicians did, if math had turned out too monastic for Eugene's taste).
Congratulations! It should be a good experience!
Congratulations on the appointment at Hoover!
Congrats, this seems like an excellent move for you.
Congratulations.
Great news!!! You'll be a solid and valuable addition to the Hoover Institute. I hope the VC continues with your leadership and commentary. I've particularly enjoyed your comments on all the 2nd Amendment cases as they came up, from Heller to McDonald to Bruen. I'll look forward to it on what ever comes next on the subject.
Congratulations, Eugene.
Congratulations.
Congratulations!
Geez, you can be such an a hole at times. Don't you have a dyke to plug?
It's not named after Margaret Hoover?
The Vacuum guy
I didn't think it needed explaining that that's a quote from The West Wing. If your sense of humour is defective, that's hardly my fault.
It is your fault, however, to assume that others' entertainment interests -- and memories of them -- remotely resemble yours. I've watched large swaths of the West Wing over the years, and I didn't even know that line. Google returns exactly 4 hits.
That still doesn't explain why people suddenly felt the need to defend the guy who plunged the US into the Great Depression.
You should live as a successful and productive life as Hoover, and no, he didn't plunge the US into the world wide Great Depression.
If you think Hoover was a mistake, then tell it to the millions of Europeans he helped save from starvation:
"American Relief Administration (ARA) was an American relief mission to Europe and later post-revolutionary Russia after World War I. Herbert Hoover, future president of the United States, was the program director.
The ARA's immediate predecessor was the important United States Food Administration, also headed by Hoover. He and some of his collaborators had already gained useful experience by running the Commission for Relief in Belgium which fed seven million Belgians and two million northern French during World War I."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Relief_Administration
I'm aware. It was basically that track record of competence that got him elected president.
But, for the record, it wasn't me criticising Hoover. According to Wikipedia, episode 18 of season 7 of The West Wing was written by Eli Attie, Debora Cahn and John Wells. So take it up with them. I just thought it was an amusing quote regardless of whether the criticism is justified.
There are quite a few institutions whose names honor Andrew Jackson and Woodrow Wilson, two rather embarrassing Democratic presidents. To be fair, those institutions are gradually being renamed. But those Democratic men were evil, whereas Hoover was merely ineffectual.
"You won’t catch us naming something after pretty much anybody."
They named an area in Virginia after JFK:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bumpass,_Virginia
Congratulations and happy (semi)retirement!
Good luck on your new endeavor, Professor.
Congratulations. I didn’t realize until just now how recently you had started teaching law when I first conversed with you - almost 30 years ago now.
You have done great work while teaching at UCLA. No doubt, Hoover will be a great fit for you. Keep up the great work!
Congratulations! UCLA's loss. I may frequently disagree with you politically, but I know you to be an excellent law professor. I hope Hoover treats you well.
Were you his student?
Congrats! Enjoy the next chapter.
Congratulations both on retiring and transitioning.
Be careful with your choice of words. He'll still be Eugene and not Eugenia.
Congratulations and I look forward to subscribing to your twitch AI-live-gaming stream since you will have so much free time to research AI gaming now 😉
So instead of going to the Big Ten, you will be moving to the ACC. Got it.
Its UCLA's loss, but your gain.
Speaking of editorial and academic independence, UCLA doesn't seem the friendliest place.
https://dailybruin.com/2020/10/05/without-edi-office-guidelines-professors-question-use-of-racial-slur-in-classes
I doubt UCLA agrees with the first assertion.
Years of defending an administration that slaughtered innocent Muslims has finally paid off…congratulations!!
Congratulations!
Bravo!
This is about UCLA joining the Big 10 isn't?
Well good luck with Stanford, if you can't actually move to the East Coast, you can be in the Atlantic Coast Conference.
Mazel Tov!
Nice. I hope you find the new position enjoyable and rewarding.
Congratulations!
Congrats!! 😀
The Hoover institution - that's where the vacuum cleaner was invented, right?
Dam straight.
Congratulations Gene-o! 🙂
I am glad to hear that you will be still doing research and blogging.
Will UCLA be keeping an office open for your use as a prof Emeritus? If so, will yours be the first I've ever heard of that isn't piles upon piles upon piles of books and papers? 🙂 🙂 🙂
you forgot to mention Thomas Sowell and Victor Davis Hanson, two distinguished members of the Hoover Institution
I doubt he forgot it at all. Just imagine what a flame war the thread might have devolved into had he thrown out names like that in the middle of something personal and really cool for him.
Congratulations! This would give you the opportunity to drop by and see the people at JPL, who's work always fascinates me.
Are you suggesting he become a rocket scientist?
No, I just figure he might have enough clout to get a really good tour.
Congratulations! You seem excited by this move, and I am happy for you. While I do not always agree with you, I do appreciate your scholarship, and I have cited your work in submissions to court before.
I hope that this is everything you want it to be! 🙂
https://vdare.com/articles/law-schools-and-the-american-bar-association-a-communist-partnership-for-dismantling-america
The Hoover Institution has more in common with the worst 20 American law schools than it does with the top 20 American law schools? Sounds right.
The Hoover Institution has more in common with poorly educated America that it does with properly educated (let alone well-educated) America? Also sounds right.
"Center right" sounds a lot like "often libertarian" or "libertarianish."
This sounds like a move that should be welcomed by everyone involved. I hope Prof. Volokh enjoys his time at the Hoover Institution, which is "academicish."
Thanks for this, Artie. It's useful and enlightening for you to so straightforwardly remind us of the level of courtesy and respect for fellow humans afforded by those that deems themselves their betters.
Too much more of this sort of thing rather than the constant droning reminder of your membership in the elite winners of society, the average reader here might just end up thinking you're a classless dickhead.
Did Prof. Volokh's unprovoked whining about what he considers to be the inadequate embrace of conservatives' bigotry and backwardness at our nation's strongest educational institutions bother you, too?
UCLA has put up with Prof. Volokh's shit for a long time, likely far longer than it wished to. His method of repaying UCLA's courtesy is as shabby as this blog.
And the fact this kind of pointless, classless, mean-spirited vitriol remains here untouched is why nobody believes -- or should believe -- a word of your endless crybaby rants about censorship. Shame on you.
Prof. Volokh is entitled to criticize UCLA. I am entitled to criticize that criticism. On of those —and only one— seems to bother you. I ascribe this to the stale, ugly thinking you share with Prof. Volokh.
Actually, Artie, it has squat to do with ideology and everything to do with tone and approach. Eugene is a gentleman who routinely displays his capacity to disagree without being disagreeable. You're just a bitter asshole.
Many congratulations!
As for UCLA after you leave - the conservative caucus will be able to fit into a flea's bellybutton and still have room left over for a Congressman's conscience.
(Adapted from a joke attributed to Fred Allen)
In other words, "Congratulations, UCLA!"
And room for your civility and graciousness, too.
The Hoover Institution doesn't mind vile racial slurs?
I'll buy it.
Vile racial slurs like this:
For reasons of clarity, I choose not to bowdlerize the racial slurs when I quote Kirkland's comments.
Well, he *did* say "Jehovah."
You are just the type of defender Prof. Volokh deserves and seeks.
Perhaps you can comfort each other as you continue to watch your political aspirations get stomped by the American mainstream and you await replacement.
Congrats and best wishes!
"I expect I'll probably feel pretty much at home ideologically at Hoover, which is on balance an institution of the center-right."
Conducting research and making public comments on areas you're biased towards is really tough work.
Very much like how you making acerbic public comments disparaging those to whom you're ideologically opposed is like falling off a log, I suppose.
It appears apedad just doesn't like bigots and bigotry as much as you and Prof. Volokh do.
It appears apedad understands the art of quitting while he's behind. Just imagine the boundless possibilities were you too willing to engage in a bit of quiet introspection from time to time instead of constantly lashing out like a rabid animal.
Prof. Volokh bashed UCLA to flatter guys like you. You deserve each other. And replacement.
Yeah, quiet introspection fell off your menu a long time ago, assuming it was ever there to start with.
Congratulations, Professor! Best wishes at The Farm!
Congratulations!
Congratulations!
Fantastic, congratulations!
Congratulations and continued success.
How the hell is Eugene old enough to retire? I've only been reading this blog for... (checks notes)... around 20 years? Crap. That must mean I'm getting old too.
Good luck at Hoover! ULCA's loss is their gain.
Congratulations and thanks for making me feel like a failure since we’re the same age.
Congratulations and good luck.
Congratulations and good luck as you move forward with this new position and sympathies about your having to move to the Bay Area.
He could have chosen to move to a Republican backwater. He chose not to.
Congratulations on the step up! UCLA has suffered an immense loss that they are too woke to realize right now.