The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Advice to Entering Law Students - 2023
Some ideas that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
Law students around the country will be starting classes over the next few weeks. Back in 2018, I wrote a post offering advice to entering students, which I updated in 2019 and last year. I tried to focus on points that I rarely, if ever, see made in other pieces of this type. I think all three of my original suggestions remain just as relevant today. So I reprint my advice from earlier posts largely unaltered, but with the addition of some modest editing and updating, and a new point:
1. Think carefully about what kind of law you want to practice.
Law is a profession with relatively high income and social status. Yet studies repeatedly show that many lawyers are deeply unhappy, a higher percentage than in most other professions. One reason for this is that many of them hate the work they do. It doesn't necessarily have to be that way. There are lots of different types of legal careers out there, and it's likely that one of them will be a good fit for you. A person who would be miserable working for a large "Biglaw" firm might be happy as a public interest lawyer or a family law practitioner, and so on. But to take advantage of this diversity, you need to start considering what type of legal career best fits your needs and interests.
There are many ways to find out about potential options. But one place to start is to talk to the career services office at your school, which should have information about a range of possibilities. Many also often have databases of alumni working in various types of legal careers. Talking to these people can give you a sense of what life as a practitioner in Field X is really like.
Regardless, don't just "go with the flow" in terms of choosing what kind of legal career you want to pursue. The jobs that many of your classmates want may be terrible for you (and vice versa). Keep in mind, also, that you likely have a wider range of options now than you will in five or ten years, when it may be much harder to switch to a very different field from the one you have been working in since graduation.
2. Get to know as many of your classmates and professors as you reasonably can.
Law is a "people" business. Connections are extremely important. No matter how brilliant a legal thinker you may be, it's hard to get ahead as a lawyer purely by working alone at your desk. Many of your law school classmates could turn out to be useful connections down the road. This is obviously true at big-name national schools whose alumni routinely become judges, powerful government officials, and partners at major firms. But it's also true at schools whose reputation is more regional or local in nature. If you plan to make a career in that area yourself, many of your classmates could turn out to be useful contacts. The same holds true for professors, many of whom have extensive connections in their respective fields. They are sometimes harder to get to know than students. But the effort is often worth it, anyway. And many of them are actually more than eager to talk about their work.
This is one front on which I didn't do very well when I was in law school, myself. Nonetheless, I still suggest you do as I say, not as I actually did. You will be better off if you learn from my mistakes than if you repeat them.
3. Think about whether what you plan to do is right and just.
Law presents more serious moral dilemmas than many other professions. What lawyers do can often cost innocent people their liberty, their property, or even their lives. It can also save all three. Lawyers have played key roles in almost every major advance for liberty and justice in American history, including the establishment of the Constitution, the antislavery movement, the civil rights movement and many others. But they have also been among the major perpetrators of most of the great injustices in our history, as well.
Robert Cover's classic book Justice Accused - a work that made a big impression on me when I was a law student - describes how some of the greatest judges and legal minds of antebellum America became complicit in the perpetuation of slavery. While we have made great progress since that time, the legal system is not as far removed from the days of the Fugitive Slave Acts as we might like to think. There are still grave injustices in the system, and lawyers whose work has the effect of perpetuating and exacerbating them. We even still have lawyers who do such things as come up with dubious rationales for deporting literal escaped slaves back to places where they are likely to face further oppression.
Law school is the right time to start working to ensure that the career you pursue is at least morally defensible. You don't necessarily have a moral obligation to devote your career to doing good. But you should at least avoid exacerbating evil. And it's easier to do that if you think carefully about the issues involved now (when you still have a wide range of options), than if you wait until you are already enmeshed in a job that involves perpetrating injustice. At that point, it may be too late - both for you and (more importantly) for the people harmed.
4. Legal knowledge isn't as different from other kinds of knowledge as you might think.
This is the new point for 2023. Students often ask me how best to study for law school classes. My answer is that there isn't one way that's best for everyone. You probably know what works for you far better than I do.
In law school, you are likely to be bombarded with all sorts of complex methods of studying and outlining cases. Advocates of each will often tell you theirs is the One True Path to law school success. Some students really do find these methods useful.
But I would urge you to consider the possibility that you can study for law school classes by using…. much the same methods as you used to study other subjects in the past. If you were successful in social science and humanities classes as an undergraduate, the methods that worked there are likely to carry over.
I know because that's largely what I did as a law student myself. I did the reading, identified key points, and didn't bother with complicated outlines or spend money on study guides. If I did badly in a class, it wasn't for lack of more complex study methods (usually, I either got lazy or just had a bad day on the final exam). And I've seen plenty of other people succeed with similar approaches. You can save a lot of time and aggravation (and some money) that way. And that time, energy, and money can be better devoted to other purposes - including advancing your studies and your career in other ways!
Ultimately, when reading a legal decision (or any assignment), you need to 1) identify the key issues, and 2) understand why they are important. With rare exceptions, the case was likely included in the reading because it highlights some rule, standard, or issue that has a broader significance. If you know what that is and why it matters, much of your work is done.
The experience of the Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of Point 2. The loss of much in-person contact was a serious problem, one we would do well to avoid repeating.
I don't think I need to dwell on how the events of the last few years have reinforced the significance of Point 3. Suffice to say there are many recent examples of lawyers facilitating both good and evil. Even if you don't maximize the former, you should at least avoid contributing to the latter.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>Law is a profession with relatively high income and social status
Are you sure about that anymore? Compared to what? Okay I guess if you go to a high ranked school, its still like the 50s where law school is a ticket to being a pillar of society but what about all those people who have to settle for those schools beneath the elite tiers? I'm no expert in law school stats but even I've heard stories. Did Ilya just inadvertently reveal how insulated and out of touch he is in the Ivory Tower again?
I think you need a nap, young man. You're getting cranky.
May I add - - - - -
Don't borrow money.
Learn to code.
Consider that being a lawyer is almost as low as being a politician, which you may become.
Treat that 1-credit pass-fail legal writing and analysis class as seriously as civ pro and con law, even if nobody else is.
Even for transactional lawyers, a quality LRA course greatly helps young lawyers--even Ivy grads--to succeed after law school.
Do law schools actually do a 1 credit pass/fail writing class? I had to take 11 graded credit hours of legal writing/practical skills.
Back in 1992, ours was (I think) 2 hrs and graded. It was hugely flawed, though, because the instructor didn't provide (or even tell us about) models.
No, no, no on number 4. There are effective study methods, and there are study methods that are mainly a waste of time. Students develop bad approaches to studying in college and high school. Bad study methods include just re-reading, cramming, keyword mnemonics, and underlining.
Education research has determined that self-testing is the best learning method because it causes the neurons in the brain to fire the strongest and it strengthens synapses. It also helps students organize knowledge and process distinct features of things.
Repetition is another key to learning. Learning experts recommend at least four repetitions of material at least once within a day for retention.
While cramming is not effective for long-term retention, spaced learning--spreading learning of a particular item over time--is.
Other effective techniques include
1. Interleaving, which involves covering different material or doing different types of learning in the same session.
2. Elaborative interrogation--“[g]enerating an explanation for why an explicitly stated fact or concept is true.”
3. Self-explanation--“[e]xplaining how new information is related to known information, or explaining steps taken during problem solving.”
4. Synthesis of multiple sources.
5. Graphic organizers.
See chapter 2 of my book, How to Succeed in Law School. https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/108018922X/reasonmagazinea-20/.+Scott+Fruehwald&s=books&sr=1-2
Graduated in the 70s top 10%, Law Review Editor, Order of the Coif, disagree with all three suggestions, not that I knew enough back then to think about them. What I learned in law school,
how to analyze, how to write (barely), fellow students could assume personas, cheat on exams, lie on resumes, make great impressions on certain faculty, in essence show what they would become political persons. A valuable lesson.
Faculty and Administration adored these political persons who sucked up to egos, ignored misrepresenting oneself as Law Review Editor in Chief or top of class.
Law School is too soon to contemplate ethics. Wait until you are given instructions by judges and firm partners or corporate CEOs. Then wait some more years when your ethical reflections will not cost you your job.
Law School may or may not be too soon to understand any practice field, if someone had suggested that insurance law would put me in court every day for years, argue appeals, then offer opportunities to work with law firms and corporate counsel all over the world, give me inside views of government agencies, US and foreign, learn about public corporation theft and asset hiding, corporate and judicial bribery, meet so many talented lawyers.
Law School is an opportunity to study the evolution of civilized disagreement, balancing societal needs and individual rights, how words and language can assume a religious importance, how professors and fellow students think and act,
No regrets.
I'd suggest thinking about how much of a business you want to run, personally. A lot of lawyers are surprised how much of private practice is really about running a successful business--and how little of it is "the practice of law".