The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Biden Administration Plans to Extend Residency and Work Permits for Afghans Who Came to US Under Parole Status
The policy will protect thousands of Afghan refugees against imminent prospect of deportation. Same should be done for Ukrainians and others admitted to US using the parole power. But a permanent solution to this problem requires Congress to pass an adjustment act.

When Afghanistan fell to the Taliban in 2021, the Biden Administration let some 77,000 Afghans enter the United States by using the president's "parole" power to grant temporary refuge to foreign citizens "for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit." Unfortunately, Afghans who entered the US on this basis were only given two years of residency and work rights. For most, that time limit will expire within the next few months. In a recent Boston Globe article, (non-paywalled version here) I warned that this looming deadline will cause a terrible injustice unless action is taken to extend it. Otherwise, Afghan parolees will soon lose residency and work rights, and be subject to deportation. I also noted that the same point applies to many thousands of Ukrainians and others fleeing war and oppression, who have also been granted entry under the parole power. Other immigration experts have given similar warnings.
The Biden Administration obviously studied my article, and decided to take action, at least when it comes to the Afghans. OK, they most likely did not read it. But, fortunately, they decided to take action anyway:
The Biden administration is planning to allow tens of thousands of Afghans brought to the U.S. after the Taliban takeover of their homeland to apply to stay and work in the country legally for at least another two years, as efforts in Congress to legalize them have stalled, four people familiar with the plan told CBS News.
The decision by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will give Afghan evacuees an opportunity to renew their temporary work permits and protections from deportation under a humanitarian immigration policy known as parole, which was used on a massive scale in 2021 and 2022 to resettle them.
Eligible Afghans will be allowed to submit an online application with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to request a renewal of their parole classification, the sources said, requesting anonymity to discuss the policy decision before its public announcement. The agency, one of the sources said, is planning to start accepting renewal requests in June.
This is a step in the right direction, and I applaud it. But much more needs to be done. At the very least, the administration should grant similar extensions to Ukrainians and others admitted under the parole system. For Ukrainian parolees, their two-year periods will start to expire in April or May of 2024, in the case of the earliest-admitted migrants under the Uniting for Ukraine program (in which I am a sponsor).
Ultimately, executive action alone cannot provide a permanent solution to this challenge. That is likely to require a congressional adjustment act, similar to those enacted for past parolees, such as Cubans and Hungarians fleeing communism. I summarized the reasons why in the Boston Globe article:
Biden could potentially extend the Uniting for Ukraine and TPS deadlines through unilateral executive action. But such an executive fix would still leave refugees vulnerable to the whims of whomever sits in the White House. If Biden or a future president found it politically convenient to do so, they could easily terminate their rights or just let them expire again.
The best solution for this problem is for Congress to pass a Ukrainian Adjustment Act, giving Ukrainian migrants who have entered the United States during the war the right of permanent residency and work status. That would give them a secure status no longer subject to the vagaries of politically driven executive discretion.
Such adjustment acts have been repeatedly enacted for migrants fleeing war and tyranny admitted under previous exercises of the presidential parole power used to create Uniting for Ukraine, beginning with Hungarian refugees fleeing the 1956 Soviet invasion. Congress could easily do the same in this case. But it may need to act swiftly. Significant legislation of any kind will be hard to enact during the 2024 presidential election year.
In the article, I also go over the moral, economic, and strategic justifications for enacting adjustment acts for Ukrainians, Afghans, and other migrants facing similar situations.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is getting old
Don't fret . . . Prof. Volokh will be along with the latest important report from his lesbian-transgender-white grievance-drag queen-Muslim-transgender-racial slur-transgender beat shortly.
OK, "Coach" I watched the "Game Film" (OK, just read your comment) are you ready for your grades?
"Don't fret" good, original, a little slow with the ". . . " EXPLODE out of your block, (Oh yes, umm, "Reverend" please disregard any advice to "Explode") OK, you used "Trangender" twice in a sentence, that's a "Tell" that you're on the fence about transitioning, might want to work on that in practice.
But (for you) short, to the point, no gratuitous insulting of demographic groups who deliver your KY, Namenda, Biktarvy, Printer Ink Cartridges (I know you use them) Food (I was going to go item by item, but.....)
and no "Bitters" "Klingers" "Bettors", I think that extra work in the "Avoiding Boilerplate" Gym did some good,
Gotta work on that rectal tone though, Kegel! Kegel!
Frank
The problem is that we don't know who these people are, and we don't know how many of them are actual TERRORISTS!
Brandon did such a terrible job of pulling out that they just let ANYONE onto the planes, and while I know this meets with Ilya's concept of "Deluging America", most of the deserving refugees got left behind to die. Thanks, Brandon....
I do not think this is a good idea.
You know how these people are - just one work permit from terrorism!
Don't think Moe-hammad Atta had a "Work Permit"
In September 2020 Trump allowed an Iraqi intent on assassinating George W Bush into the country…wtf??
If the government deliberately imports you, could you possibly be committing a crime? You would certainly have a defense. The president could presumably also decline to prosecute or remove, whatever that means in this situation, leaving how well he’s doing his job executing the laws as a political decision for voters. That assumes nobody sues to force the President to execute the laws, the way some environmentalists do.
It’s a roundabout, sketchy thing. Which is crystal clear compared to some of the tortuous BS lied to us when the power hungry try to justify stuff.
Oh, then there's the cohort of president can only pardon (potential) crimes that happened, not prospective crimes. I guess that depends what the issue is before we decide we like that principle or not. Get too shuf-ful-ling!
Every day!
This is why conservatives oppose "temporary" refugee status. Because it's never actually temporary.
See Haitian earthquake "refugees".
Except Republicans wanted Elian Gonzalez to remain with his American kidnappers instead of his father.
Maybe the small subset of Cuban Republicans did, but most didn't care one way or the other.
How's You-crane gonna win the wah if they all move to the US(of A)???
Congress must speak to this; in fairness, Congress has had nearly two years to craft passable legislation to address the Afghan refugees and did nothing. Legally, isn't that the case?
A sign of the toxic climate in DC.
"Same should be done for Ukrainians and others admitted to US using the parole power. "
---
Yes, we know, we know. This site's position is that anyone and everyone should be allowed to travel to the United States border, cross illegally, and then promptly be granted amnesty to live here for the remainder of their life. All on the tax-payers dime. We read at least one article here telling us such daily.
Reason should just change its name to "Reasons for unfettered illegal immigrants" and be done with it.
Professor Somin should host all of these fine folks in his home. I do hope he has no 14 year old children, though. We are pushing what, $30 TRILLION in debt and inviting more guests to our all inclusive welfare resort. National suicide, right before our eyes.
US benefits suuuuck compared to other countries; hardly an all inclusive resort. And Immigrants don’t get a lot of even those benefits.
And our current sovereign debt is not national suicide; other countries have more debt/GDP and are not about to shuffle off.
Put down the melodrama – you post angry all the time. Things could be better; but they are not existential at all. Certainly not from immigration. Maybe domestically, from folks like you who fear immigration and immigrants more than you like democracy.
So they should go to those "other Countries"
I expect another bullshit illegal caravan any day now since Trump is back in the mix.
Post hoc ergo prompter hoc error,
try "I expect another bullshit illegal caravan any day now since Sleepy Joe is about to let Title 42 expire"
In more cheerful news, they caught the Ill-egal wetback who murdered the other ill-egal wetbacks in Te-jas last week, maybe they won't "Deport" him this time,
Frank