The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
We Need an Update to On Liberty
So I offer one in The Battle for Your Brain.
To anyone paying attention, it's pretty clear that freedom of thought is under assault in society. What people don't realize, however, is that freedom of thought may be even more endangered in the era of neurotechnology. It's technology that can empower or oppress us. The choice is still ours to make.
I've been following developments in neuroscience and neurotechnology for more than a decade. I'm excited about the promise the developments for humanity. But it wasn't until I started to see major investments by mainstream technology companies into wearable brain-computer interface that I believed neural interface will become part of our everyday lives. But there are powerful headwinds against change, including challenges to our right to access and alter our own brains.
There has been major progress in the past few years by neurotech companies focusing on implanted devices. From Synchron, to Blackrock Neurotech and Neuralink. But it's the mainstream wearable devices and applications that interest me the most -- and make me believe that we need an update to Mill's On Liberty. By recognizing a right to cognitive liberty.
That's what I set out to do in my forthcoming book, The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology. And it's the global dialogue I hope to spark in the coming months. I hope you'll join that conversation by pre-ordering the book now. And follow along as I start to share insights here about the coming future, of neural interface becoming part of our everyday lives.
Interested in learning more about the book? Check out the review posted yesterday by Publisher's Weekly. They think you'll be enthralled.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Imagine mandatory brain scans for all citizens to discover their hidden opinions and thoughts.
To catch child molesters and terrorists of course.
I have not thunk as well since I began pushing 80. What other nefarious force is at work effing with my short-term memory? I may sue. There was something else I was gonna say but it slips my mind.
"I hope you'll join that conversation by pre-ordering the book now."
Couldn't I just download the book directly into my brain?
it's pretty clear that freedom of thought is under assault in society.
Is it though? I don't see anyone getting persecuted for their thoughts. (I see a lot of people being told that they're getting persecuted, by opportunistic pols and grifters, but no actual persecution.)
What am I missing?
Everything, apparently, starting with how language works.
When they let those thoughts slip into words.
No, that's just "accountability" according to these assholes:
https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/06/callout-culture-black-lives-matter-adidas-bon-appetit-lea-michele/613054/
You need to be "called out" and "cancelled" for the (racist / sexist / homophobic / etc.) things you say. We get to say and do whatever we want (up to and including rioting, arson, assault, etc.).
Feel free to "call out" whatever you want. That's not a problem. You think freedom of thought means you're not allowed to be "called out"? That's retarded. Why are you such a crybaby.
I think she may just be trying to fit in among this blog’s disaffected, grievance-consumed, right-wing misfits.
Theres literally tons of stories on this site alone, just recently for example the woman in BigLaw who was canned after having her opinion about abortion dragged out of her and the professor who got canned after showing the painting of Muhammad and you’re baldly gaslighting that ‘nobody’s being persecuted’ as if everybody here was a blind infant. At least try to be more subtle when lying your butt off.
Your opinions matter if you're at BigLaw. That one doesn't count. Join an antiabortion firm if that's what you think.
So that leaves the Muhammad case, which isn't really about freedom of thought but that's ok, I'll count it. It has gotten *tons* of attention, even many Muslims feel like that was overreach on the part of Hamline. I suspect they'll be forced to apologize and reinstate, we'll see. Anyway, one example with a superton of backlash doesn't amount to it being "pretty clear" that "freedom of thought is under assault in society."
Now you've moved the goalposts from 'no persecution' to 'its okay cuz reasons'
No, I admitted that one person has been persecuted.
One.
That's a vague assertion wrapped in "pretty clear."
I read the blurbs on Amazon. It sounds interesting. But I'm puzzled as to what qualifies "NITA FARAHANY is a Professor of Law & Philosophy at Duke University" to be an expert on that topic.
To what extent can machines read our thoughts? You need a neuro research scientist to talk about that, not a law professor. Personally, I'm skeptical. Google and FB may figure out what we're thinking from our online behavior, but not Dr. Who with a tinfoil hat.
You forgot something.
Lawyers know everything.
And their secret superpower is turning everything into procedure.
We are at a point now where a scanner can create images of what we see when we dream. The images at this point are crude, but they are improving. It's literally a form of mind reading.
It's not here yet, but the time of Johnny Mnemonic is approaching. Now, before that technology is upon us, is the time to talk about the implications and ethics of tinkering with the human brain.
Just so everyone understands the reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Mnemonic